Infrared microspectroscopy to elucidate the underlying biomolecular mechanisms of FLASH radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: FLASH-radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) is an emerging modality that uses ultra-high dose rates of radiation to enable curative doses to the tumor while preserving normal tissue. The biological studies showed the potential of FLASH-RT to revolutionize radiotherapy cancer treatments. However, the complex biological basis of FLASH-RT is not fully known yet. AIM: Within this context, our aim is to get deeper insights into the biomolecular mechanisms underlying FLASH-RT through Fourier Transform Infrared Microspectroscopy (FTIRM). METHODS: C57Bl/6J female mice were whole brain irradiated at 10 Gy with the eRT6-Oriatron system. 10 Gy FLASH-RT was delivered in 1 pulse of 1.8µs and conventional irradiations at 0.1 Gy/s. Brains were sampled and prepared for analysis 24 h post-RT. FTIRM was performed at the MIRAS beamline of ALBA Synchrotron. Infrared raster scanning maps of the whole mice brain sections were collected for each sample condition. Hyperspectral imaging and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were performed in several regions of the brain. RESULTS: PCA results evidenced a clear separation between conventional and FLASH irradiations in the 1800-950 cm-1 region, with a significant overlap between FLASH and Control groups. An analysis of the loading plots revealed that most of the variance accounting for the separation between groups was associated to modifications in the protein backbone (Amide I). This protein degradation and/or conformational rearrangement was concomitant with nucleic acid fragmentation/condensation. Cluster separation between FLASH and conventional groups was also present in the 3000-2800 cm-1 region, being correlated with changes in the methylene and methyl group concentrations and in the lipid chain length. Specific vibrational features were detected as a function of the brain region. CONCLUSION: This work provided new insights into the biomolecular effects involved in FLASH-RT through FTIRM. Our results showed that beyond nucleic acid investigations, one should take into account other dose-rate responsive molecules such as proteins, as they might be key to understand FLASH effect.

Acute Hypoxia Does Not Alter Tumor Sensitivity to FLASH Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Tumor hypoxia is a major cause of treatment resistance, especially to radiation therapy at conventional dose rate (CONV), and we wanted to assess whether hypoxia does alter tumor sensitivity to FLASH. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We engrafted several tumor types (glioblastoma [GBM], head and neck cancer, and lung adenocarcinoma) subcutaneously in mice to provide a reliable and rigorous way to modulate oxygen supply via vascular clamping or carbogen breathing. We irradiated tumors using a single 20-Gy fraction at either CONV or FLASH, measured oxygen tension, monitored tumor growth, and sampled tumors for bulk RNAseq and pimonidazole analysis. Next, we inhibited glycolysis with trametinib in GBM tumors to enhance FLASH efficacy. RESULTS: Using various subcutaneous tumor models, and in contrast to CONV, FLASH retained antitumor efficacy under acute hypoxia. These findings show that in addition to normal tissue sparing, FLASH could overcome hypoxia-mediated tumor resistance. Follow-up molecular analysis using RNAseq profiling uncovered a FLASH-specific profile in human GBM that involved cell-cycle arrest, decreased ribosomal biogenesis, and a switch from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis. Glycolysis inhibition by trametinib enhanced FLASH efficacy in both normal and clamped conditions. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide new and specific insights showing the efficacy of FLASH in a radiation-resistant context, proving an additional benefit of FLASH over CONV.

Antitumor Effect by Either FLASH or Conventional Dose Rate Irradiation Involves Equivalent Immune Responses.

PURPOSE: The capability of ultrahigh dose rate FLASH radiation therapy to generate the FLASH effect has opened the possibility to enhance the therapeutic index of radiation therapy. The contribution of the immune response has frequently been hypothesized to account for a certain fraction of the antitumor efficacy and tumor kill of FLASH but has yet to be rigorously evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To investigate the immune response as a potentially important mechanism of the antitumor effect of FLASH, various murine tumor models were grafted either subcutaneously or orthotopically into immunocompetent mice or in moderately and severely immunocompromised mice. Mice were locally irradiated with single dose (20 Gy) or hypofractionated regimens (3 × 8 or 2 × 6 Gy) using FLASH (≥2000 Gy/s) and conventional (CONV) dose rates (0.1 Gy/s), with/without anti-CTLA-4. Tumor growth was monitored over time and immune profiling performed. RESULTS: FLASH and CONV 20 Gy were isoeffective in delaying tumor growth in immunocompetent and moderately immunodeficient hosts and increased tumor doubling time to >14 days versus >7 days in control animals. Similar observations were obtained with a hypofractionated scheme, regardless of the microenvironment (subcutaneous flank vs ortho lungs). Interestingly, in profoundly immunocompromised mice, 20 Gy FLASH retained antitumor activity and significantly increased tumor doubling time to >14 days versus >8 days in control animals, suggesting a possible antitumor mechanism independent of the immune response. Analysis of the tumor microenvironment showed similar immune profiles after both irradiation modalities with significant decrease of lymphoid cells by ∼40% and a corresponding increase of myeloid cells. In addition, FLASH and CONV did not increase transforming growth factor-ß1 levels in tumors compared with unirradiated control animals. Furthermore, when a complete and long-lasting antitumor response was obtained (>140 days), both modalities of irradiation were able to generate a long-term immunologic memory response. CONCLUSIONS: The present results clearly document that the tumor responses across multiple immunocompetent and immunodeficient mouse models are largely dose rate independent and simultaneously contradict a major role of the immune response in the antitumor efficacy of FLASH. Therefore, our study indicates that FLASH is as potent as CONV in modulating antitumor immune response and can be used as an immunomodulatory agent.

Extracellular Vesicle-Derived miR-124 Resolves Radiation-Induced Brain Injury.

Radiation-induced cognitive dysfunction (RICD) is a progressive and debilitating health issue facing patients following cranial radiotherapy to control central nervous system cancers. There has been some success treating RICD in rodents using human neural stem cell (hNSC) transplantation, but the procedure is invasive, requires immunosuppression, and could cause other complications such as teratoma formation. Extracellular vesicles (EV) are nanoscale membrane-bound structures that contain biological contents including mRNA, miRNA, proteins, and lipids that can be readily isolated from conditioned culture media. It has been previously shown that hNSC-derived EV resolves RICD following cranial irradiation using an immunocompromised rodent model. Here, we use immunocompetent wild-type mice to show that hNSC-derived EV treatment administered either intravenously via retro-orbital vein injection or via intracranial transplantation can ameliorate cognitive deficits following 9 Gy head-only irradiation. Cognitive function assessed on the novel place recognition, novel object recognition, and temporal order tasks was not only improved at early (5 weeks) but also at delayed (6 months) postirradiation times with just a single EV treatment. Improved behavioral outcomes were also associated with reduced neuroinflammation as measured by a reduction in activated microglia. To identify the mechanism of action, analysis of EV cargo implicated miRNA (miR-124) as a potential candidate in the mitigation of RICD. Furthermore, viral vector-mediated overexpression of miR-124 in the irradiated brain ameliorated RICD and reduced microglial activation. Our findings demonstrate for the first time that systemic administration of hNSC-derived EV abrogates RICD and neuroinflammation in cranially irradiated wild-type rodents through a mechanism involving miR-124. SIGNIFICANCE: Radiation-induced neurocognitive decrements in immunocompetent mice can be resolved by systemic delivery of hNSC-derived EVs involving a mechanism dependent on expression of miR-124.

miRNA-based therapeutic potential of stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: a safe cell-free treatment to ameliorate radiation-induced brain injury.

PURPOSE: This review compiles what is known about extracellular vesicles (EVs), their bioactive cargo, and how they might be used to treat radiation-induced brain injury. Radiotherapy (RT) is effective in cancer treatment, but can cause substantial damage to normal central nervous system tissue. Stem cell therapy has been shown to be effective in treating cognitive dysfunction arising from RT, but there remain safety concerns when grafting foreign stem cells into the brain (i.e. immunogenicity, teratoma). These limitations prompted the search for cell-free alternatives, and pointed to EVs that have been shown to have similar ameliorating effects in other tissues and injury models. CONCLUSIONS: EVs are nano-scale and lipid-bound vesicles that readily pass the blood-brain barrier. Arguably the most important bioactive cargo within EVs are RNAs, in particular microRNAs (miRNA). A single miRNA can modulate entire gene networks and signalling within the recipient cell. Determining functionally relevant miRNA could lead to therapeutic treatments where synthetically-derived EVs are used as delivery vectors for miRNA. Stem cell-derived EVs can be effective in treating brain injury including radiation-induced cognitive deficits. Of particular interest are systemic modes of administration which obviate the need for invasive procedures.