Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(6)2023 Mar 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36980679

RESUMEN

(1) Background: In recent years there have been advances in imaging techniques, in addition to progress in the surgery of renal tumors directed towards minimally invasive techniques. Thus, nephron-sparing surgery has become the gold standard for the treatment of T1 renal masses. The aim of this study is to investigate the benefits of robotic partial nephrectomy in comparison with laparoscopic nephrectomy. (2) Methods: We performed a systematic review according to the PRISMA criteria during September 2022. We included clinical trials, and cohort and case-control studies published between 2000 and 2022. This comprised studies performed in adult patients with T1 renal cancer and studies comparing robotic with open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. A risk of bias assessment was performed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. (3) Results: We observed lower hot ischemia times in the robotic surgery groups, although at the cost of an increase in total operative time, without appreciating the differences in terms of serious surgical complications (Clavien III-V). (4) Conclusions: Robotic partial nephrectomy is a safe procedure, with a shorter learning curve than laparoscopic surgery and with all the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

2.
Arch Esp Urol ; 75(9): 798-802, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36472063

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy is recommended as category 1 in first-line treatment in metastatic renal cancer (mRC), however the evidence on the management of toxicities in patients with chronic renal failure is limited. Description of the Cases: Case 1: Patient with mRC and renal failure on hemodialysis. After 25 months of treatment with Nivolumab, he presented a partial response, without toxicities. Case 2: Patient with mRC undergoing treatment with Nivolumab-Ipilimumab, who after 6 cycles was admitted for acute renal failure, compatible with grade 4 nephrotoxicity, requiring definitive suspension of treatment, corticosteroid therapy and hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab is a safe and effective therapy in hemodialysis patients, not increasing adverse events, nor requiring dose adjustment. Immunotherapy nephrotoxicity must be adequately managed in daily clinical practice in an interdisciplinary way with the nephrologist.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Insuficiencia Renal , Masculino , Humanos , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Ipilimumab/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal/inducido químicamente , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario
3.
Arch Esp Urol ; 74(10): 979-990, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34851313

RESUMEN

Living donor kidney transplantation is the best therapeutic option in a patient with end-stage renal failure, because it provides excellent functionality and graft survival. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomyis the gold-standard for obtaining the graft. In exper thands, different minimally invasive surgeries can be offered with the main advantage of improving the a esthetic results. Although there may be controversy regarding laparoscopic devices for vascular ligation during living donor nephrectomy, both endostaplers and locking clips have proven to be safe as long as the proper techniqueis performed. Living donor nephrectomy has minimal morbidity and mortality. Age and glomerular filtration rate of the donor candidate are prognostic factor of long-term renal failure. In relation to the implant surgery,robotic kidney transplantation is now probably at the beginning of its development. Published series still do not allow to clearly establish its role compared to conventional open surgery.


El trasplante renal de donante vivo suponela mejor opción terapéutica en un paciente con insuficiencia renal terminal, por su excelente funcionalidad y supervivencia del injerto. La nefrectomía laparoscópica de donante vivo es la técnica de elección para la obtención del injerto. En manos expertas, distintas variantes mínimamente invasivas pueden ofrecerse con la principal ventaja de mejorar los resultados estéticos del donante. Aunque pueda existir controversia en relación a los dispositivos laparoscópicos para la ligadura vascular durante la nefrectomía de donante vivo, tanto las endograpadoras como los clips con cierre tipo Hem-olokhan demostrado ser seguros siempre que se respete la técnica adecuada en su empleo. La nefrectomía de donante vivo no está exenta de una mínima morbi-mortalidad.La edad y el filtrado glomerular del candidato a donante son orientativas del riesgo de enfermedad renal a largo plazo. En relación a la cirugía del implante, el trasplante renal robótico se encuentra en los albores de su desarrollo. Las series publicadas no permiten aún establecer claramente su papel frente a la cirugía abierta convencional.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos
4.
Arch Esp Urol ; 70(4): 422-428, 2017 May.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28530621

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic ureteral reconstructive surgery is routinely performed , because it demonstrated efficacy and safety profiles similar to open surgery in expert hands. The most frequent surgical complications after transplant are urological, appearing in up to 12,5% of the cases; they can compromise graft function and mortality. The most frequent ones include ureterovesical anastomosis stenosis (2,5-7,5%) and vesicoureteral reflux (0,4-2,2), which present in up to 80% of the cases. METHODS: Technical description of the Lich-Gregoire ureteral reimplantation technique in renal transplant patients. RESULTS: From October 2012 we performed 14 Lich-Gregoire laparoscopic ureteral reimplantations in transplant patients, 9 due to distal ureteral stenosis and 5 for vesicoureteral reflux. There were not open conversions. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery has evolved much allowing the performance on techniques that we could not think of years ago. Renal transplant patients present frequent postoperative complications, so they benefit of minimally invasive surgery such as endoscopy or laparoscopy. The Lich-Gregoire laparoscopic reimplantation in transplant patients is reproducible in Centers with experience both in laparoscopic surgery and transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Uréter/cirugía , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , Reflujo Vesicoureteral/cirugía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...