Different Risk Factors between Bony and Ligamentous Proximal Junctional Failure in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Fusion to Pelvis for Adult Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the risk factors for bony proximal junctional failure (B-PJF) and ligamentous PJF (L-PJF) separately after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite numerous studies about the risk factors of PJF, it remains unclear whether same risk factors can be applied to both B-PJF and L-PJF. METHODS: Patients who underwent corrective surgery from low thoracic level (T9-T12) to pelvis with minimum follow-up duration of two years were included in this study. Patients with PJF were divided into two groups according to the involvement of bony structure: B-PJF and L-PJF. The control group was created using patients who did not develop PJF for ≥2 years postoperatively (no-PJF group). Risk factors were analyzed by comparing various clinical and radiographic parameters between no PJF versus B-PJF group and between no PJF versus L-PJF groups. RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 240 patients. The mean age was 68.7 years, and there were 205 women (85.4%). On average, 8.1 levels were fused. PJF developed in 103 patients, with 70 (68.0%) in the B-PJF group and 33 (32.0%) in the L-PJF group. Stepwise logistic regression analyses revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR]=1.088), higher body mass index (BMI) (OR=1.161), osteoporosis (OR=3.293), greater postoperative lumbar distribution index (OR=1.032), and overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis (OR=3.964) were significant risk factors for B-PJF. Meanwhile, no use of transverse process (TP) hook was the single risk factor for L-PJF (OR=4.724). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the difference in risk factors between B-PJF and L-PJF will facilitate the optimization of surgical outcome for patients with ASD. Appropriate correction of sagittal malalignment along with use of TP hook is advisable to mitigate both B-PJF and L-PJF development.

Validation of Sagittal age-adjusted Score in Predicting Proximal Junctional Kyphosis/Failure and Clinical Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To validate the sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) in predicting proximal junctional kyphosis/failure (PJK/F) and good clinical outcomes following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SAAS is a relatively new assessment system that incorporates age-adjusted sagittal parameters of pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) to predict the PJK/F. External validation is required to verify its clinical usefulness. METHODS: We included patients with ASD undergoing ≥5-level fusion including the sacrum or pelvis. SAAS was calculated based on the scores of the three components: PI-LL, PT, and TPA. PJK/F rates and clinical outcomes were compared among the correction categories (undercorrection, matched correction, and overcorrection) for the SAAS as well as for each of the three components. PJK/F rates were compared according to the correction groups of the sagittal components and total SAAS using the chi-square test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive ability of overcorrection to develop PJK/F for the three sagittal parameters and SAAS. PROMs at final follow-up were compared among correction groups using ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc corrections. RESULTS: A total 411 patients were included in the study (mean age: 69.3 y, mean body mass index: 25.9 kg/m2, total levels fused: 7.7 levels, and follow-up duration: 43.3 mo). Postoperative SAAS categories were as follow: undercorrection (13.4%), matched correction (30.2%), and overcorrection (56.4%). The PJK/F rates were significantly higher in the overcorrection group relative to PI-LL component (P=0.001) as well as SAAS (P=0.038) compared to undercorrection or matched correction groups. The clinical outcomes were best in patients who achieved matched correction relative to PI-LL component as well as SAAS compared to the other correction groups. However, the differentiating power of clinical outcomes across the correction categories was greater in the PI-LL component than in the SAAS. CONCLUSION: This study validated the efficacy of SAAS system to differentiate PJK/F development and good clinical outcomes. However, its differentiating power seems to be largely attributable to the function of the PI-LL component, as the PI-LL correction status better predicted PJK/F risk and clinical outcomes than SAAS.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Mechanical Failure after Anterior Column Realignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence and risk factors of mechanical failure (MF) following anterior column realignment (ACR) in patients with severe degenerative sagittal imbalance (DSI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Considering the biomechanical properties of the procedure, ACR may increase the risk of MF, including proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and rod fracture (RF). However, this issue has been poorly documented in the literature. METHODS: We included patients aged ≥60 years with severe DSI radiographically defined by pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) ≥20° undergoing ≥5-level fusion, including the sacrum. PJK was defined radiographically as a proximal junctional angle (PJA)>28° plus Δ PJA of>22°. RF was evaluated at ACR levels performed. Clinical and radiographic variables were compared to identify the risk factors for PJK and RF, then multivariate analysis was performed by combining PJK and RF into a single composite outcome of MF. RESULTS: We included a total of 147 patients in the final study cohort. The mean age was 70.3 years, and there were 126 women (90.6%). The median fusion length was 8 levels. After surgery, PI-LL was corrected from 48.1° to 4.3°. MF developed in 49 patients (33.3%); PJK in 41 (27.9%), RF in 11 (7.5%), and both PJK and RF in 3 (2.0%) patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that osteoporosis (odds ratio [OR]=2.361, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.270 - 5.590, P=0.048) and an increased number of ACR levels (OR=1.762, 95% CI=1.039 - 3.587, P=0.036) were significant risk factors for MF. CONCLUSION: A considerable number of patients (33.3%) developed MF after deformity correction using ACR procedures. Therefore, appropriate surgical strategies are necessary to prevent MF in patients undergoing deformity correction using ACR, with special attention to the risk factors we identified here.

Risk Factors for Recurrent Proximal Junctional Failure Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Analysis of 60 Patients Undergoing Fusion Extension Surgery for Proximal Junctional Failure.

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous studies identifying risk factors for proximal junctional failure (PJF), risk factors for recurrent PJF (R-PJF) are still not well established. Therefore, we aimed to identify the risk factors for R-PJF following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS: Among 479 patients who underwent ≥5-level fusion surgery for ASD, the focus was on those who experienced R-PJF at any time or did not experience R-PJF during a follow-up duration of ≥1 year. PJF was defined as a proximal junctional angle (PJA) ≥28° plus a difference in PJA ≥22° or performance of revision surgery regardless of PJA degree. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to R-PJF development: no R-PJF and R-PJF groups. Risk factors were evaluated focusing on patient, surgical, and radiographic factors at the index surgery as well as at the revision surgery. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients in the final study cohort, 24 (40%) experienced R-PJF. Significant risk factors included greater postoperative sagittal vertical axis (OR = 1.044), overcorrection relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL; OR = 7.794) at the index surgery, a greater total sum of the proximal junctional kyphosis severity scale (OR = 1.145), and no use of the upper instrumented vertebra cement (OR = 5.494) at the revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We revealed that the greater postoperative sagittal vertical axis and overcorrection relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis at the index surgery, a greater proximal junctional kyphosis severity scale score, and no use of upper instrumented vertebra cement at the revision surgery were significant risk factors for R-PJF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To reduce the risk of R-PJF after ASD surgery, avoiding under- and overcorrection during the initial surgery is recommended. Additionally, close assessment of the severity of PJF with timely intervention is crucial, and cement augmentation should be considered during revision surgery.

Different characteristics between acute and delayed proximal junctional failure in elderly patients undergoing corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity: comparative analysis of risk factor, failure mode, and clinical consequences.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: While numerous studies have been conducted on proximal junctional failure (PJF), the clinical significance of acute and delayed PJF remains poorly understood. PURPOSE: The primary object of this study is to investigate the risk factors separately for acute and delayed PJF. Secondly, we aim to assess the incidence of each failure mode and their clinical consequences in relation to acute and delayed PJF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective comparative study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients aged ≥60 years who underwent deformity correction with ≥5-level fusion to sacrum. OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk factor, failure modes, and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). METHODS: Acute PJF is defined as PJF occurring within 6 months, while delayed PJF occurring after 6 months. Risk factors were analyzed by comparing various clinical and radiographic parameters among 3 groups: no, acute, and delayed PJF groups. The failure modes, including soft tissue failure, vertebral fracture, fixation failure, and myelopathy, were compared among these groups. The clinical subsequences after PJF development were evaluated by assessing the change in proximal junctional angle (PJA), revision rate, and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). RESULTS: A study cohort of 363 patients was included in the analysis. Among them, 156 patients experienced PJF, with 87 patients (55.8%) in the acute PJF group and 69 patients (44.2%) in the delayed PJF group. Multivariate analyses showed that older age (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.057, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.002-1.118), osteoporosis (OR=2.149, 95% CI = 1.074-4.300), high American Society of Anesthesiology ASA score (OR=2.150, 95% CI = 1.089-4.245), and overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis target (OR=4.031, 95% CI = 1.962-8.280) were identified as risk factors for the development of acute PJF. On the other hand, a high body mass index (OR=1.150, 95% CI = 1.049-1.251) and an uppermost instrumented vertebra located at ≤T10 (OR=2.267, 95% CI = 1.205-4.268) were found to be associated with delayed occurrence of PJF. No radiographic parameters were found to be related to the development of delayed PJF. In terms of failure modes, vertebral fracture and fixation failure were more commonly observed in acute PJF, while soft tissue failure and myelopathy were more predominant in delayed PJF. The clinical course was more aggressive in the acute PJF group compared to the delayed PJF group, as evidenced by a greater increase in PJA, a higher revision rate, and worse PROM. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated different risk factors between the acute and delayed PJF. It was found that overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted PI-LL target increased the risk of acute PJF, but had no impact on the development of delayed PJF. Therefore, a different surgical strategy needs to be established to mitigate both acute and delayed PJF.

The Optimal Lowest Instrumented Vertebra to Prevent the Distal Adding-On Phenomenon in Patients Undergoing Selective Thoracic Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke Type 1A and 1B Curves: Comparison of Nine Selection Criteria.

Background/Objectives: There is no solid consensus regarding which lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection criterion is best to prevent distal adding-on (DA) after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery. This study aims to search out the LIV selection criteria in the literature and to compare the ability of each LIV selection criterion to prevent DA in patients with AIS. Methods: Patients who underwent thoracic fusion for AIS of Lenke type 1A or 1B were included in this study. Nine criteria for LIV selection were found in a literature review. For each patient, whether the postoperative actual location of LIV was met with the suggested locations of the LIV was assessed. The preventive ability of nine criteria against DA was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. The patients who met the LIV selection criteria but developed DA were investigated. Results: The study cohort consisted of 145 consecutive patients with a mean age of 14.8 years. The criteria of Suk (OR = 0.267), Parisini (OR = 0.230), Wang (OR = 0.289), and Qin (OR = 0.210) showed a significantly decreased risk of DA if the LIV selection criterion was chosen at each suggested landmark. As the additional levels were fused, there was no statistically significant benefit in further reducing the risk of DA. Among the patients who met each criterion, the incidence of DA was lower in criteria by Takahashi (5.9%), Qin (7.1%), and King (7.4%) than the others. Conclusions: Qin's criterion, using the substantially touching vertebra concept, has the highest preventive ability against DA development. Extending the instrumentation further distal to this suggested LIV criterion did not add further benefit.

Are Surgical Outcomes Different According to Baseline Balance Status in Elderly Patients with Degenerative Sagittal Imbalance?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare surgical outcomes according to baseline balance statuses in elderly patients with degenerative sagittal imbalance (DSI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Although optimal sagittal correction has been emphasized for good surgical outcomes, the effect of the state of preoperative balance on surgical outcome has been adequately described at present. METHODS: Patients aged ≥60 years with DSI who underwent ≥5-level fusion to the sacrum were included. Among them, only those who postoperatively achieved the optimal age-adjusted pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) target were included in this study. Study participants were divided into two groups according to their preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA): compensatory balance (SVA <5 cm, group CB) and decompensation (SVA ≥5 cm, group D). Comparisons between the two groups were performed using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the independent t- test or Wilcoxon rank- sum test for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients whose postoperative sagittal alignment matched the age-adjusted PI-LL target constituted the study cohort. There were 59 patients in group CB and 97 patients in group D. Mean follow-up duration was 50.0 months after surgery. Immediate postoperatively, sacral slope and SVA were significantly greater in group D than in group CB. At last follow-up, the SVA was significantly greater in group D than in group CB (43.6 vs. 22.7 mm), while no significant differences were found in other sagittal parameters. The Oswestry disability index and Scoliosis Research Society -22 scores at the last follow-up were significantly worse in group D than in group CB. CONCLUSION: The SVA tended to experience less correction postoperatively, with evidence of further deterioration during follow-up in group D than in group CB. This suboptimal correction of SVA may contribute to the inferior clinical outcomes encountered in group D relative to group CB. Therefore, we recommend correction of PI-LL as close as possible to the lower limit of the suggested PI-LL target range in patients with evidence of preoperative decompensation.

Comparison of Surgical Burden, Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes According to the Severity of Baseline Sagittal Imbalance in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical impact of the baseline sagittal imbalance severity in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion including the pelvis, for ASD with a ≥ 2-year follow-up. Using the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification system, patients were classified into 3 groups according to the severity of the preoperative sagittal imbalance: mild, moderate, and severe. Postoperative clinical and radiographic results were compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients were finally included. There were 42, 62, and 155 patients in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The perioperative surgical burden was greatest in the severe group. Postoperatively, this group also showed the largest pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch, suggesting a tendency towards undercorrection. No statistically significant differences were observed in proximal junctional kyphosis, proximal junctional failure, or rod fractures among the groups. Visual analogue scale for back pain and Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores were similar across groups. However, severe group's last follow-up Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores significantly lower than those of the severe group. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe sagittal imbalance were treated with more invasive surgical methods along with increased the perioperative surgical burden. All patients exhibited significant radiological and clinical improvements after surgery. However, regarding ODI, the severe group demonstrated slightly worse clinical outcomes than the other groups, probably due to relatively higher proportion of undercorrection. Therefore, more rigorous correction is necessary to achieve optimal sagittal alignment specifically in patients with severe baseline sagittal imbalance.

Hook Fixation at Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra +1 Reduced Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Patients With Spinal Deformity Having Achieved Optimal Deformity Correction by Sagittal Age-Adjusted Score.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Appropriate correction relative to the age-adjusted sagittal alignment target reduces the proximal junctional failure (PJF) risk. Nonetheless, a considerable number of patients suffer from PJF despite optimal correction. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors of PJF that occurs despite optimal correction relative to the sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) in adult spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: Patients aged 60 years or older with adult spinal deformity who underwent ≥5-level fusion to the sacrum were initially screened. Among them, only patients who achieved optimal sagittal correction relative to the SAAS were included in the study. Optimal correction was defined as the SAAS point between -1 and +1. Various clinical and radiographic factors were compared between the PJF and no PJF groups and were further evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 127 patients. The mean age was 67 years, and there were 111 women (87.4%). A mean of total fusion length was 7.2. PJF occurred in 42 patients (33.1%), while 85 patients (66.9%) did not develop PJF. Multivariate analysis showed that a high body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.153, 95% CI = 1.027-1.295, P = .016), a higher lordosis distribution index (LDI) (OR = 1.024, 95% CI = 1.003-1.045, P = .022), and no use of hook fixation (OR = 9.708, 95% CI = 1.121-76.923, P = .032) were significant risk factors of PJF development. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff value for the LDI was calculated as 61.0% (area under the curve = 0.790, P < .001). CONCLUSION: PJF developed in a considerable portion of patients despite optimal correction relative to the age-adjusted alignment. The risk factors of PJF in this patient group were high body mass index, high LDI exceeding 61%, and no use of hook fixation. PJF could be further decreased by properly managing these risk factors along with optimal sagittal correction.

Ideal Lumbar Lordosis Correction in Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Without Adversely Impacting Pelvic Tilt and Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis: A Study of 426 Cases.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the ideal pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) range to prevent pelvic tilt (PT) undercorrection while avoiding PI-LL overcorrection following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: PI-LL and PT are the important sagittal parameters to be restored to an adequate range by surgery. Ideal PI-LL target without causing PI-LL overcorrection and PT undercorrection has not been documented. METHODS: We included patients with ASD undergoing ≥5-level fusion including the sacrum. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the lower limit of the ideal PI-LL without causing PI-LL overcorrection and the upper limit of ideal PI-LL without causing PT undercorrection. The calculated ideal PI-LL was validated in terms of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure (PJK and PJF) rates and clinical outcomes. Analyses were performed according to age subgroups (<70 and ≥70 y). RESULTS: In total, 426 patients were included in the study. Female patients were predominant (85.4%), with a mean age of 69.8 years. The lower limits of PI-LL were calculated as 4.9° for all patients, 2.3° for patients aged <70 years, and 7.9° for patients aged ≥70 years. Meanwhile, the upper limits of PI-LL were calculated as 12.7° for all patients, 12.5° for patients aged <70 years, and 13.3° for patients aged ≥70 years. There were no significant differences in the PJK and PJF rates among the new three PI-LL groups. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in patients with the ideal PI-LL group than those in patients with overcorrection or undercorrection groups for all age groups. CONCLUSION: The ideal PI-LL correction target without adversely impacting PT and PI-LL was calculated at 2.3°-12.5° for patients aged <70 years and 7.9°-13.3° for patients aged ≥70 years. These guideline parameters may help ensure optimal clinical outcomes without increasing the risk of PJK/F.

Risk factors of adjacent-segment disease after short-segment fusion in patients with de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE: Short-segment fusion (SSF) is an effective surgical option for appropriately selected patients with de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DNDLS). Considering that DNDLS is frequently accompanied by multisegment degeneration and potential instability across the entire lumbar segments, it is inevitable that unhealthy segments remain after SSF, thereby increasing the potential risk of adjacent-segment disease (ASD) occurrence. Therefore, the authors aimed to identify the risk factors for ASD in patients with DNDLS who underwent SSF. METHODS: This retrospective study included 80 patients with DNDLS (Cobb angle > 10°) who underwent SSF (1 or 2 levels) between December 2010 and July 2018 with a minimum follow-up duration of 5 years. The participants were divided into two groups: ASD and non-ASD. ASD was defined as clinical ASD rather than radiographic ASD. Various patient and operative variables were compared between the groups. Global and regional radiographic parameters (preoperatively and postoperatively) were also compared between the two groups using plain radiography and MRI. Consequently, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors for ASD occurrence. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the cutoff values. RESULTS: The mean ± SD age was 67.7 ± 7.2 years at the time of SSF, and there were 62 women (77.5%) enrolled in the study. Thirty patients (37.5%) were in the ASD group and 50 patients (62.5%) were in the non-ASD group. The mean time from the surgery to ASD diagnosis was 34.9 ± 28.2 months in ASD group. Thirteen patients required revision surgery at a mean time of 8.8 ± 7.0 months after ASD occurrence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that preoperative disc wedging angle (OR 1.806, 95% CI 1.255-2.598, p = 0.001), presence of facet tropism (defined as ≥ 10° difference between the facet joint angles of the right and left sides) (OR 5.534, 95% CI 1.528-20.040, p = 0.009), and foraminal stenosis ≥ grade 2 (OR 5.935, 95% CI 1.253-28.117, p = 0.025) were significant risk factors for ASD development. The cutoff value of the preoperative disc wedging angle was calculated to be 2.5° using the ROC curve. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative disc wedging angle ≥ 2.5°, presence of facet tropism, and foraminal stenosis ≥ grade 2 were identified as significant risk factors for ASD development after SSF in patients with DNDLS.

Predictor of Postoperative Ambulatory Recovery in Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression with Delayed Surgical Timing and Progressive Paraplegia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze preoperative predictors of ambulatory recovery after surgical treatment in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients with delayed surgical timing and progressive paraplegia. METHODS: We reviewed patients with a preoperative lower-extremity motor grade of ≤3 and surgical timing ≥48 hours after the nonambulatory status. The recovery group (group R) and nonrecovery group (group NR) were classified according to ambulation assessment during follow-up. The data on patient demographics, origin of the primary tumor, pre and postoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy, surgical procedures, Tokuhashi score, Karnofsky score, preoperative lower-extremity motor grade, and surgical timing were collected for analyzing predictors of postoperative ambulatory recovery. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients, 24 (43.6%) were group R and 31 patients were group NR. The preoperative motor grade of the lower extremities was the only predictive factor (P < 0.05). The mean hip flexor and knee extensor motor grades in group R were 2.0 ± 1.0 and 2.4 ± 1.1 respectively, while in group NR, they were 1.2 ± 1.0 and 1.3 ± 1.0. The odds ratios for failing to regain ambulatory ability were 12.6 in the knee extensor and 4.8 in the hip flexor when the motor grades 0-2 and 3 groups were compared. The rescue ratio of the preoperative hip flexor and knee extensor motor grade 0-2 group were 34.1% and 21.2%, grades 3 group were 71.4% and 77.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The significant predictive factor for ambulatory recovery was the preoperative lower-extremity motor grade. The preoperative knee extensor motor grade was identified as a more important factor than hip flexor motor grade in predicting ambulatory recovery.

Clinical Significance of Lordosis Orientation on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Development in Long-Segment Fusion Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the clinical impact of lordosis orientation (LO) on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development in adult spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: This study included 152 patients who underwent low thoracic (T9-T12) to pelvis fusion and were followed up for ≥2 years. In the literature, 6 radiographic parameters representing LO were introduced, such as uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) slope, UIV inclination, UIV-femoral angle (UIVFA), thoracolumbar tilt, thoracolumbar slope, and lordosis tilt. Various clinical and radiographic factors including 6 LO parameters were investigated using logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for PJK. RESULTS: The mean age was 69.4 years, and 136 patients were females (89.5%). PJK developed in 65 patients (42.8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only small postoperative pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.962, 95% confidence interval: 0.929-0.996, P = 0.030) and large UIVFA (OR = 1.089, 95% confidence interval: 1.028-1.154, P = 0.004) were significant for PJK development. UIVFA showed significantly positive correlation with pelvic tilt (CC = 0.509), thoracic kyphosis (CC = 0.384), and lordosis distribution index (CC = 0.223). UIVFA was also negatively correlated with sagittal vertical axis (CC = -0.371). However, UIVFA did not correlate with LL, PI-LL, or T1 pelvic angle. CONCLUSIONS: LO significantly increases the risk of PJK development in ASD surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed that smaller postoperative PI-LL and greater UIVFA were significant risk factors for PJK. Surgeons should avoid undercorrection and overcorrection to prevent PJK development.

Proximal Junctional Failure after Corrective Surgery: Focusing on Elderly Patients with Severe Sagittal Imbalance.

Background: Previous reports with proximal junctional failure (PJF) included relatively young patients or deformity without sagittal imbalance. The present study focused on the two well-known risk factors for PJF, old age and severe sagittal imbalance. With these high-risk patients, the present study aimed to identify a strategy that could prevent PJF and to investigate whether the degree of correction would really affect the PJF occurrence. Methods: Patients who were ≥ 60 years of age and underwent long fusion (≥ 4) to the sacrum for severe sagittal imbalance (defined as pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] ≥ 30°) were included. PJF was defined as a vertebral fracture at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1, failure of UIV fixation, myelopathy, or any need for proximal extension of fusion. Presumed risk factors were compared between the patients with and without PJF. Results: Total 146 patients (mean age, 68.4 years) with preoperative mean PI-LL of 46.8° were included. PJF developed in 39 patients (26.7%) at a mean of 18.1 months after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that osteoporosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.812; p = 0.019) and UIV located below T10 (OR, 3.773; p = 0.010) were significant risk factors for developing PJF. However, the degree of correction did not affect PJF occurrence. Conclusions: The present study indicates that osteoporosis should be well corrected preoperatively and extending the fusion above T10 should be considered for severe imbalance in old patients. However, the amount of correction was not associated with PJF development.

Introduction of a New Radiographic Parameter to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity: UIVPTA (Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra-Pelvic Tilt Angle).

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new sagittal parameter, uppermost instrumented vertebra-pelvic tilt angle (UIVPTA), and to determine the effects on the proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS: Patients ≥ 60 years with ASD who underwent low thoracic spine to pelvis fusion with a minimum of 2-years of follow-up were included in this study. Two groups were created according to PJK development. Various clinical and radiographic factors were compared between PJK and non-PJK groups to identify the risk factors for PJK. Cutoff value of UIVPTA for PJK development was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve according to different pelvic incidence groups. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors to affect UIVPTA. RESULTS: One hundred fifity-one patients were included in this study. There were 135 female patients (89.4%). Mean age was 70.5 years. PJK developed in 65 patients (43.0%). Multivariate analysis showed that overcorrection relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence (PI) minus lumbar lordosis (LL) (PI-LL) target and lower UIVPTA were independent risk factors for PJK. The cutoff value of UIVPTA for PJK development was calculated as 4.0° in patients with PI less than 45°, 9.5° in patients with PI between 45° and 60°, and 13.0° in patients with PI greater than 60°. Linear regression analysis showed that UIVPTA was positively affected by postoperative values of LL (coefficient = 0.505), PI-LL (coefficient = 0.674), and pelvic tilt (coefficient = 0.286). CONCLUSION: Optimal correction within the age-adjusted PI-LL combined with keeping UIVPTA within optimal range is suggested for the prevention of PJK.

Risk factors for radiographic progression of proximal junctional fracture in patients undergoing surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity.

OBJECTIVE: Proximal junctional fracture (PJFx) at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1 is the most common mechanism of proximal junctional failure (PJF). Few studies have assessed radiographic progression after PJFx development. Therefore, this study sought to identify the risk factors for radiographic progression of PJFx in the surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity. METHODS: In this retrospective study, among 317 patients aged > 60 years who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion from the sacrum, 76 with PJFx development were included. On the basis of the change in the proximal junctional angle (PJA), 2 groups were created: progression group (group P) (change ≥ 10°) and nonprogression group (group NP) (change < 10°). Patient, surgical, and radiographic variables were compared between the groups with univariate and multivariate analyses to demonstrate the risk factors for PJFx progression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate cutoff values. Clinical outcomes, such as visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 score, and the revision rate were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean age at index surgery was 71.1 years, and 67 women were enrolled in the study (88.2%). There were 45 patients in group P and 31 in group NP. The mean increase in PJA was 15.6° (from 23.2° to 38.8°) in group P and 3.7° (from 17.2° to 20.9°) in group NP. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in group NP than group P, including VAS-back score, ODI score, and SRS-22 scores for all items. The revision rate was significantly greater in group P than in group NP (53.3% vs 25.8%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted ideal pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) target at index surgery (OR 4.484, p = 0.030), PJA at the time of PJFx identification (OR 1.097, p = 0.009), and fracture at UIV (vs UIV+1) (OR 3.410, p = 0.027) were significant risk factors for PJFx progression. The cutoff value of PJA for PJFx progression was calculated as 21° by using the ROC curve. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for further progression of PJFx were overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted PI-LL target at index surgery, PJA > 21° at initial presentation, and fracture at the UIV level. Close monitoring is warranted for such patients in order to not miss timely revision surgery.

In vivo Comparison of Positive Microbial Culture by Wound Irrigation Methods: Biportal Endoscopic versus Open Microscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and prevalence of intraoperative contamination (IoC) through the microbial culture of superficial and deep samples obtained during surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical site infection (SSI) in spinal surgery is a serious complication. The prevalence of IoC may differ based on surgical approach and technique, even in the setting of the same procedure. METHODS: In this in-vivo study, microbial cultivation was performed with superficial (ligamentum flavum, LF) and deep (nucleus pulposus, NP) surgical specimens to evaluate IoC in 132 patients undergoing single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Biportal endoscopic (BE) TLIF was performed under continuous wound irrigation (group A, n=66), whereas open microscopic (OM) TLIF was performed under intermittent wound irrigation (group B, n=66). LF and NP specimens were homogenized, gram-stained, and cultured in aerobic and anaerobic media for 14 days. Microbial culture results and occurrence of SSI in the two groups were assessed. The Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to determine significant differences among categorical variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influence of patient characteristics on the prevalence of positive microbial cultures. RESULTS: Of the 132 patients, 34 (25.8%) had positive microbial cultures, and positive culture required an incubation period of 72 h to 2 weeks in all these patients except for three. Overall positive culture was significantly higher in group B than in group A (P=0.029). The subgroups of LF- and NP-positive cultures were 18.18% (n=24) and 12.88% (n=17), respectively; the SSI was 0.76% (n=1). Group A had a significantly lower subgroup of NP-positive culture than group B (P=0.035). OM technique was an independent risk factor associatd with overall positive culture (P<0.05). The most common microorganism was Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes). CONCLUSION: BE-TLIF with continuous wound irrigation showed significantly lower overall, and NP-positive cultures, than OM-TLIF with intermittent irrigation. The most common strain of positive culture was C. acnes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Radiographic Factors of Proximal Junctional Failure According to Age Groups in Adult Spinal Deformity.

Background: Patient age has been associated with the development of proximal junctional failure (PJF). The characteristics of adult spinal deformity (ASD) are considered different between younger and older age groups. We hypothesized that the radiographic risk factors of PJF would be different according to age groups. This study aimed to evaluate different radiographic risk factors of PJF between two age groups undergoing thoracolumbar fusion for ASD. Methods: ASD patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent thoracolumbar fusion from the low thoracic level (T9-T12) to the sacrum were included. The minimum follow-up duration was 2 years. PJF was defined as proximal junctional angle (PJA) ≥ 20°, fixation failure, fracture, myelopathy, or necessity of revision surgery. Using various radiographic risk factors including age-adjusted ideal pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL), univariate and multivariate analyses were performed separately in two age groups: < 70 years and ≥ 70 years. Results: A total of 186 patients (90.3% women) with a mean age of 69 years were enrolled. The mean follow-up duration was 67.4 months. PJF developed in 97 patients (52.2%). There were fractures in 53 patients, PJA ≥ 20° in 26, fixation failure in 12, and myelopathy in 6. PJF developed more frequently in patients 70 years or older than in those younger than 70 years. In patients aged less than 70 years, preoperative LL, PI-LL, and a change in LL were significant risk factors in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed only a change in LL was significant for PJF development (odds ratio [OR], 1.025; p = 0.021). On the other hand, in patients 70 years or older, postoperative LL, postoperative PI-LL, and overcorrection relative to the conventional PI-LL target (within ± 10°) and age-adjusted ideal PI-LL target were significant risk factors. On multivariate analysis, only overcorrection of PI-LL relative to the age-adjusted ideal target was a single significant risk factor of PJF (OR, 5.250; p = 0.024). Conclusions: In patients younger than 70 years, a greater change in LL was associated with PJF development regardless of PI-related values. However, in older patients, overcorrection of PI-LL relative to the age-adjusted PI-LL target was a significant risk factor of PJF.

Long-term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes After Selective Thoracic Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With Lenke 1C Curve.

BACKGROUND: Despite the promising results with selective thoracic fusion (STF) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) of the Lenke 1C curve, postoperative coronal imbalance and progression of the unfused lumbar curve have been concerns in long-term follow-up. In this study, we aimed to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes after STF for AIS with Lenke 1C curve with long-term follow-up. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with AIS with Lenke 1C curves who underwent STF between 2005 and 2017 were included. Minimum follow-up duration was 5 years. Time-dependent changes in radiographic parameters were investigated preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. In addition, radiographic adverse events such as coronal decompensation (CD), lumbar decompensation (LD), distal adding-on (DA) phenomenon, and trunk shift were evaluated at the last follow-up. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 score was used for clinical outcome evaluation. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of surgery was 13.8 years. The mean follow-up duration was 6.7 ± 0.8 years. The main thoracic curve significantly improved from 57 degrees to 23 degrees (60% correction), and the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve significantly improved from 47 degrees to 28 degrees (41% correction). Coronal balance was 15 mm after surgery but significantly improved to 10 mm at the last follow-up ( P = 0.033). At the final follow-up, 11 patients (37%) sustained at least one of the radiographic adverse events: CD in 5 patients (17%), LD in 3 (10%), DA in 4 (13%), and trunk shift in 3 (10.%). However, there were no cases requiring revision surgery. In addition, there were no significant differences in any items or total Scoliosis Research Society-22 score between the patients with and without radiographic adverse events. CONCLUSION: STF in Lenke 1C curves showed an acceptable risk of adverse radiographic events such as CD, LD, DA, and trunk shift in long-term follow-up. We suggest that STF without fusion to the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve would be sufficient in treating AIS with Lenke 1C curve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Does the Amount of Correction of Sagittal Deformity Really Promote Proximal Junctional Kyphosis? Multivariate Analyses According to Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra Levels.

BACKGROUND: The present study assumed that the effects of deformity correction amounts on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development after long deformity surgery would vary according to uppermost instrumented vertebrae (UIV) levels. Our study was to reveal the association between the amount of correction and PJK according to UIV levels. METHODS: Adult spinal deformity patients aged >50 years who underwent thoracolumbar fusion (≥4 levels) were included. PJK was defined by proximal junctional angles ≥15°. Presumed demographic and radiographic risk factors for PJK were evaluated including parameters regarding the correction amount such as postoperative change in lumbar lordosis and postoperative offset grouping, the value associated with age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch. The patients were divided according to UIV levels of T10 or above (group A) and T11 or below (group B). Multivariate analyses were performed separately for both groups. RESULTS: The present study included 241 patients (74 for group A and 167 for group B). PJK developed in approximately half of all patients within an average of 5 years of follow-up. For group A, only body mass index (P = 0.002) was associated with PJK. No radiographic parameters were correlated. For group B, postoperative change in lumbar lordosis (P = 0.009) and offset value (P = 0.030) were significant risk factors for PJK development. CONCLUSIONS: The correction amount of sagittal deformity increased the risk of PJK only in patients with UIV at or below T11. However, it was not associated with PJK development in patients with UIV at or above T10.