Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Hypertens ; 42(3): 515-520, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38088422

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: : This study aimed to evaluate the effect of time-updated ambulatory blood pressure on chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression in patients with hypertension. METHODS: : Among patients with hypertension and CKD stages 3 and 4, enrolled in a clinical trial in which hypertension was treated based on office or ambulatory blood pressure (BP), participants assigned to the ambulatory BP were included in this study. Ambulatory BP was measured at the start of the study and 3, 6, and 18 months. Renal events were defined as a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by at least 30%, dialysis, or transplantation. RESULTS: : A total of 21 cases of renal events were observed. For baseline BP, a multivariate Cox model revealed that neither office SBP nor any component of ambulatory SBP, including mean, day-time, night-time BPs was associated with the risk of renal events. For time-updated BP, a marginal structural model revealed that the office SBP was not associated with renal events [hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.07, P  = 0.117], but higher ambulatory SBPs, including day-time (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10, P  = 0.014), night-time (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, P  = 0.001), and mean (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10, P  = 0.002) ambulatory SBPs, were significantly associated with an increased risk of renal events. CONCLUSION: : A higher time-updated ambulatory BP was associated with an increased risk of renal events in patients with hypertension and CKD, whereas baseline office and ambulatory BP, and time-updated office BP were not.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Presión Sanguínea , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Diálisis Renal
2.
J Bone Metab ; 27(4): 237-246, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33317227

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bone loss after stroke escalates the risk of fractures, mainly in the hip, leading to further disability in individuals with stroke. We aimed to investigate the skeletal effect of bone mineral density (BMD) based on the duration of onset of stroke, compare the BMD of the paretic and non-paretic sides, and elucidate the relationship between BMD and disability variables. METHODS: The 31 male hemiplegic stroke patients between 20 and 70 years of age with cerebral infarction or hemorrhage were considered in this study. Subacute and chronic cases included 13 and 18 patients with lag time from the onset of 1 to 6 months and beyond 6 months, respectively. BMD in the lumbar, paretic, and non-paretic hip as well as the disability variables were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The subacute group showed a significant reduction in the femoral neck BMD on the paretic side compared to that on the non-paretic side based on T-scores (P=0.013). Bone loss was significantly correlated with lower limb muscle strength and overall physical impairment (P<0.05). The chronic group demonstrated significant reduction in femur neck and total femur BMD on the paretic side compared to that on the non-paretic side based on T-scores (P=0.002 and P<0.001, respectively). T-scores of BMD in the chronic phase were not significantly associated with the clinical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Early screening of bilateral hip BMD in the early stages after stroke, monitoring, and timely implementation of prevention strategies are important to minimize subsequent bone loss and prevent possible complications in patients who experience stroke.

3.
Clin Ther ; 38(10): 2171-2184, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27742464

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A fixed-dose combination of a stain and an antihypertensive drug may be useful for the treatment of patients with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. It may also improve patient drug compliance to help control risk factors of cardiovascular disease. This study was designed to evaluate the blood pressure-lowering and cholesterol-lowering effect of a fixed-dose combination of irbesartan-atorvastatin compared with monotherapy by either agent over an 8-week treatment period. METHODS: Patients with comorbid hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were screened for this randomized, double-blind, Phase III study. Eligible study patients were randomly assigned to test groups receiving a combination of irbesartan 300 mg and atorvastatin 40 mg or 80 mg (IRB300 + ATO40 and IRB300 + ATO80). Comparator groups comprised monotherapy groups with irbesartan 300 mg (IRB300) or atorvastatin 40 mg (ATO40) or atorvastatin 80 mg (ATO80), or placebo. Patients who were eligible at screening were subjected to a 4- to 6-week washout period before commencing 8 weeks of therapy per their assigned group. The primary efficacy end points were percent change in LDL-C and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels from baseline to end of therapy. Tolerability profiles of combination therapy were compared with other groups. FINDINGS: A total of 733 patients with comorbid hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were screened for this study; 230 eligible patients were randomized to treatment. The mean age of patients was 58.9 (8.5) years, and their mean body mass index was 25.8 (3.2) kg/m2. More than two thirds (70.9%) of the study patients were male. Mean LDL-C and sitting DBP levels at baseline were 149.54 (29.19) mg/dL and 92.32 (6.03) mm Hg, respectively. Percent reductions in LDL-C after 8 weeks were 46.74% (2.06%) in the IRB300 + ATO40 group and 48.98% (2.12%) in the IRB300 + ATO80 group; these values were 47.13% (3.21%) and 48.30% (2.98%) in the ATO40 and ATO80 comparator groups. Similarly, a reduction in sitting DBP after 8 weeks was -8.50 (1.06) mm Hg in the IRB300 + ATO40 group and 10.66 (1.08) mm Hg in the IRB300 + ATO80 group compared with 8.40 (1.65) mm Hg in the IRB300 group. The incidence rate for treatment-emergent adverse events was 22.27% and was similar between the monotherapy and combination groups. IMPLICATIONS: A once-daily combination product of irbesartan and atorvastatin provided an effective, safe, and more compliable treatment for patients with coexisting hypertension and hyperlipidemia. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01442987.


Asunto(s)
Atorvastatina/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Bifenilo/administración & dosificación , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Tetrazoles/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Colesterol/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Irbesartán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Korean Med Sci ; 28(8): 1187-93, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23960446

RESUMEN

The prevalence of antibiotic resistance is higher in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT) than in patients who did not undergo RRT. We investigated the presence of KP (Klebsiella pneumoniae) in patients who underwent RRT. All data were collected retrospectively by accessing patient medical records from 2004 to 2011 for the culture results of all patients who were positive for KP. We grouped the patients by the presence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) into a KP ESBL(-) group (KP[-]) and a KP ESBL(+) group (KP[+]). In total, 292 patients (23.1%) were in the KP(+) group, and 974 patients (76.9%) were in the KP(-) group. A greater percentage of KP(+) was found in patients who underwent RRT (7.5%) than in patients who did not undergo RRT (3.2%) (OR, 2.479; 95% CI,1.412-4.352). A Cox's hazard proportional model analysis was performed, and for patients with pneumonia, the risk of KP(+) was 0.663 times higher in patients who had lower albumin levels, 2.796 times higher in patients who had an inserted Levin tube, and 4.551 times higher in patients who underwent RRT. In conclusion, RRT can be a risk factor for KP(+) in patients with pneumonia.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimología , Neumonía/epidemiología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/mortalidad , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Neumonía/microbiología , Prevalencia , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Albúmina Sérica/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...