RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite medical advancements in neonatal survival rates, many children have poor neurological outcomes. Because the law in Korea restricts the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment to only cases of imminent death, treatment discontinuation may not be an option, even in patients with poor neurological prognosis. This study investigated the opinions of the general population and clinicians regarding life-sustaining treatment withdrawal in such cases using hypothetical scenarios. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on the general population and clinicians using a web-based questionnaire. The sample of the general population from an online panel comprised 500 individuals aged 20-69 years selected by quota sampling. The clinician sample comprised 200 clinicians from a tertiary university hospital. We created hypothetical vignettes and questionnaire items to assess attitudes regarding mechanical ventilation withdrawal for an infant at risk of poor neurological prognosis due to birth asphyxia at 2 months and 3 years after the incidence. RESULTS: Overall, 73% of the general population and 74% of clinicians had positive attitudes toward mechanical ventilator withdrawal at 2 months after birth asphyxia. The proportion of positive attitudes toward mechanical ventilator withdrawal was increased in the general population (84%, P < 0.001) and clinicians (80.5%, P = 0.02) at 3 years after birth asphyxia. Religion, spirituality, the presence of a person with a disability in the household, and household income were associated with the attitudes of the general population. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis of the general population, respondents living with a person with a disability or having a disability were more likely to find the withdrawal of the ventilator at 2 months and 3 years after birth asphyxia not permissible. Regarding religion, respondents who identified as Christians were more likely to find the ventilator withdrawal at 2 months after birth asphyxia unacceptable. CONCLUSION: The general population and clinicians shared the perspective that the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment in infants with a poor neurological prognosis should be considered before the end of life. A societal discussion about making decisions centered around the best interest of pediatric patients is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Respiración Artificial , Privación de Tratamiento , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Pronóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Privación de Tratamiento/legislación & jurisprudencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Lactante , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Recién Nacido , Asfixia Neonatal/terapia , República de Corea , Actitud del Personal de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric palliative care supports children and young adults with life-limiting conditions and their families, seeking to minimize suffering and enhance quality of life. This study evaluates the impact of specialized palliative care (SPC) on advance care planning (ACP) and patterns of end-of-life care for patients who died in the hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of medical records extracted from a clinical data warehouse, covering patients who died aged 0-24 in an academic tertiary children's hospital in South Korea. Participants were categorized into before (2011-2013; pre-period) and after (2017-2019; post-period) the introduction of an SPC service. Within the post-period, patients were further categorized into SPC recipients and non-recipients. RESULTS: We identified 274 and 205 patients in the pre-period and post-period, respectively. ACP was conducted more and earlier in the post-period than in the pre-period, and in patients who received palliative care than in those who did not. Patients who received SPC were likely to receive less mechanical ventilation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation and more opioids. A multivariable regression model showed that earlier ACP was associated with not being an infant, receiving SPC, and having a neurological or neuromuscular disease. CONCLUSIONS: SPC involvement was associated with more and earlier ACP and less intense end-of-life care for children and young adults who died in the hospital. Integrating palliative care into routine care can improve the quality of end-of-life care by reflecting patients' and their families' values and preferences.
Asunto(s)
Planificación Anticipada de Atención , Cuidados Paliativos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Planificación Anticipada de Atención/estadística & datos numéricos , Planificación Anticipada de Atención/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Niño , Adolescente , Lactante , Preescolar , República de Corea , Adulto Joven , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Recién Nacido , Registros Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Pediatría/métodos , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Mortalidad HospitalariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the rising trend of tracheostomies in children, there is a lack of comprehensive resources for families to navigate the challenges of living with a tracheostomy, emphasising the need for evidence-based support in understanding postoperative care and long-term adjustments. This study aimed to examine the pattern of using healthcare services and nationwide medical outcomes in children who underwent a tracheotomy before the age of 2 years. METHODS: This retrospective study used the National Health Insurance System database from 2008 to 2016 and included all children codified with tracheotomy procedure codes before their second birthday. Healthcare utilisation, such as medical costs, number of hospital visits, home healthcare nursing and medical diagnoses on readmission, in the first 2 years after tracheotomy was evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors affecting mortality. RESULTS: In total, 813 patients were included in this study. Their use of healthcare services and the accompanying expenses were higher than the national medians for similar age groups; however, both metrics decreased in the second year. The major causes of admission within 2 years of surgery were respiratory and neurological diseases. The mortality rate within 2 years was 37.8%. Higher risks of mortality were associated with having two or more complex chronic conditions. Use of home healthcare nursing services was associated with a lower mortality risk. CONCLUSION: Paediatric patients with more complex chronic conditions tended to have higher mortality rates within 2 years after surgery. However, receiving home healthcare nursing was significantly associated with a reduced risk of death. Many causes of hospitalisation may be preventable with education and supportive care. Therefore, further research for establishing an integrated care system for these patients and their caregivers is required.