Cough Response to High-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients with Chronic Cough and Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels ≥ 25 ppb: A Prospective Study.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on chronic cough patients with elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels. In a prospective study, adults with chronic cough and FeNO ≥ 25 ppb, without any other apparent etiology, received fluticasone furoate (200 mcg) for three weeks. Outcomes were evaluated using FeNO levels, cough severity, and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) before and after treatment. Of the fifty participants (average age: 58.4 years; 58% female), the treatment responder rate (≥ 1.3-point increase in LCQ) was 68%, with a significant improvement in cough and LCQ scores and FeNO levels post-treatment. However, improvements in cough did not significantly correlate with changes in FeNO levels. These findings support the guideline recommendations for a short-term ICS trial in adults with chronic cough and elevated FeNO levels, but the lack of correlations between FeNO levels and cough raises questions about their direct mechanistic link.

Ascertaining injury risk issues through big data analysis: text-mining based analysis of national emergency response data.

Objectives: Injury prevention can be achieved through various interventions, but it faces challenges due to its comprehensive nature and susceptibility to external environmental factors, making it difficult to detect risk signals. Moreover, the reliance on standardized systems leads to the construction and statistical analysis of numerous injury surveillance data, resulting in significant temporal delays before being utilized in policy formulation. This study was conducted to quickly identify substantive injury risk problems by employing text mining analysis on national emergency response data, which have been underutilized so far. Methods: With emerging issue and topic analyses, commonly used in science and technology, we detected problematic situations and signs by deriving injury keywords and analyzing time-series changes. Results: In total, 65 injury keywords were identified, categorized into hazardous, noteworthy, and diffusion accidents. Semantic network analysis on hazardous accident terms refined the injury risk issues. Conclusion: An increased risk of winter epidemic fractures due to extreme weather, self-harm due to depression (especially drug overdose and self-mutilation), and falls was observed in older adults. Thus, establishing effective injury prevention strategies through inter-ministerial and interagency cooperation is necessary.

Characterization of Codeine Treatment Responders Among Patients with Refractory or Unexplained Chronic Cough: A Prospective Real-World Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Codeine is a narcotic antitussive often considered for managing patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough. This study aimed to evaluate the proportion and characteristics of patients who responded to codeine treatment in real-world practice. METHODS: Data from the Korean Chronic Cough Registry, a multicenter prospective cohort study, were analyzed. Physicians assessed the response to codeine based on the timing and degree of improvement after treatment initiation. Follow-up assessments included the Leicester Cough Questionnaire and cough severity visual analog scale at six months. In a subset of subjects, objective cough frequency was evaluated following the initiation of codeine treatment. RESULTS: Of 305 patients, 124 (40.7%) responded to treatments based on anatomic diagnostic protocols, while 181 (59.3%) remained unexplained or refractory to etiological treatments. Fifty-one subjects (16.7%) were classified as codeine treatment responders (those showing a rapid and clear response), 57 (18.7%) as partial responders, and 62 (20.3%) as non-responders. Codeine responders showed rapid improvement in objective cough frequency and severity scores within a week of the treatment. At 6 months, responders showed significantly improved scores in cough scores, compared to non-responders. Several baseline parameters were associated with a more favorable treatment response, including older age, non-productive cough, and the absence of heartburn. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 60% of chronic cough patients in specialist clinics may require antitussive drugs. While codeine benefits some, only a limited proportion (about 20%) of patients may experience rapid and significant improvement. This underscores the urgent need for new antitussive drugs to address these unmet clinical needs.

Blood transcriptome differentiates clinical clusters for asthma.

Background: In previous studies, several asthma phenotypes were identified using clinical and demographic parameters. Transcriptional phenotypes were mainly identified using sputum and bronchial cells. Objective: We aimed to investigate asthma phenotypes via clustering analysis using clinical variables and compare the transcription levels among clusters using gene expression profiling of the blood. Methods: Clustering analysis was performed using 6 parameters: age of asthma onset, body mass index, pack-years of smoking, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/forced vital capacity, and blood eosinophil counts. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from whole blood samples and RNA was extracted from selected PBMCs. Transcriptional profiles were generated (Illumina NovaSeq 6000) and analyzed using the reference genome and gene annotation files (hg19.refGene.gft). Pathway enrichment analysis was conducted using GO, KEGG, and REACTOME databases. Results: In total, 355 patients with asthma were included in the analysis, of whom 72 (20.3%) had severe asthma. Clustering of the 6 parameters revealed 4 distinct subtypes. Cluster 1 (n = 63) had lower predicted FEV1 % and higher pack-years of smoking and neutrophils in sputum. Cluster 2 (n = 43) had a higher proportion and number of eosinophils in sputum and blood, and severe airflow limitation. Cluster 3 (n = 110) consisted of younger subjects with atopic features. Cluster 4 (n = 139) included features of late-onset mild asthma. Differentially expressed genes between clusters 1 and 2 were related to inflammatory responses and cell activation. Th17 cell differentiation and interferon gamma-mediated signaling pathways were related to neutrophilic inflammation in asthma. Conclusion: Four clinical clusters were differentiated based on clinical parameters and blood eosinophils in adult patients with asthma form the Cohort for Reality and Evolution of Adult Asthma in Korea (COREA) cohort. Gene expression profiling and molecular pathways are novel means of classifying asthma phenotypes.

Predictors of Early and Late Lung Function Improvement in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma on Type2-Biologics in the PRISM Study.

BACKGROUND: The determinants linked to the short- and long-term improvement in lung function in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) on biological treatment (BioT) remain elusive. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the predictors of early and late lung function improvement in patients with SEA after BioT. METHODS: 140 adult patients with SEA who received mepolizumab, dupilumab, or reslizumab were followed up for 6 months to evaluate improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). Logistic regression was used to determine the association between potential prognostic factors and improved lung function at 1 and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: More than a third of patients with SEA using BioT showed early and sustained improvements in FEV1 after 1 month. A significant association was found between low baseline FEV1 and high blood eosinophil count and sustained FEV1 improvement after 1 month (0.54 [0.37-0.79] and 1.88 [1.28-2.97] odds ratios and 95% confidence interval, respectively). Meanwhile, among patients who did not experience FEV1 improvement after 1 month, 39% exhibited improvement at 6 months follow-up. A high ACT score measured at this visit was the most reliable predictor of late response after 6 months of treatment (OR and 95% CI 1.75 [1.09-2.98]). CONCLUSION: Factors predicting the efficacy of biological agents that improve lung function in SEA vary according to the stage of response.

Prospective direct comparison of biologic treatments for severe eosinophilic asthma: Findings from the PRISM study.

BACKGROUND: Although various monoclonal antibodies have been used as add-on therapy for severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA), to the best of our knowledge, no direct head-to-head comparative study has evaluated their efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of reslizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in patients with SEA. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective observational study in patients with SEA who had received 1 of these biologic agents for at least 6 months. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the risk of the first exacerbation event, adjusting for sputum or blood eosinophils and common asthma-related covariates. The annual exacerbation rate was analyzed using a negative binomial model, and a mixed-effect model was used to analyze changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and asthma control test score over time. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients with SEA were included in the analysis; 71 (50%) received dupilumab; 40 (28%) received reslizumab, and 30 (21%) received mepolizumab. During the 12-month follow-up, 27.5%, 43.3%, and 38.0% of patients in the reslizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab groups, respectively, experienced at least 1 exacerbation. However, after adjusting for confounding factors, the dupilumab and mepolizumab groups showed similar outcomes in time-to-first exacerbation, exacerbation rate, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and asthma control test score to those of the reslizumab group. CONCLUSION: In patients with SEA, treatment with reslizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab resulted in comparable clinical outcomes within a 12-month period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The cohort protocol was sanctioned by the Institutional Review Board of each study center (clinicaltrial.gov identifier NCT05164939).

Is fractional exhaled nitric oxide a treatable trait in chronic cough: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Current management of chronic cough is largely based on sequential therapeutic trials. The concept of treatable traits was first introduced for individualized treatment of chronic airway diseases; however, it has emerged as a potentially useful strategy in revising the management of chronic cough. This narrative review aimed to analyze the literature to determine if fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a treatable trait in chronic cough, compared to other type 2 biomarkers, and to summarize current knowledge and gaps in the clinical application. Methods: An online electronic search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus of English-language literature with following keywords: cough, nitric oxide (NO), eosinophils, biomarker, and treatable trait. Relevance and eligibility of each article were assessed by one or more of the authors and a narrative review was composed. Key Content and Findings: Eosinophilic or type 2 airway inflammation is a major treatable trait in patients with chronic cough. Induced sputum tests are regarded as the gold standard for defining inflammatory phenotype, however, technically demanding and cannot be widely applied in clinical practice. FeNO, a practical biomarker, has emerged as an alternative to induced sputum analyses. Mechanistic and clinical evidence indicated that FeNO had a potential for diagnostic utility and treatment response predictability. Conclusions: FeNO measurement may help to identify patients with chronic cough that will benefit from corticosteroid treatment. Further studies are warranted to determine the diagnostic roles of FeNO in the management of patients with chronic cough.

Effects of bepotastine, a nonsedating H1-antihistamine, for the treatment of persistent cough and allergic rhinitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Background: Empirical therapy with oral histamine-1 receptor antagonists (H1RAs) is often used for patients with suspected upper airway cough syndrome. No placebo-controlled trials with nonsedating H1RAs (nsH1RAs) have evaluated validated cough outcomes. The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of an nsH1RA, bepotastine, on cough outcomes in patients with allergic rhinitis and persistent cough. Methods: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. Adult patients with persistent cough (>3 weeks in duration) and symptomatic allergic rhinitis were recruited and randomly assigned to receive either bepotastine or placebo at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was cough-specific quality of life assessed using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Secondary outcomes included cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS), throat VAS, Cough Hypersensitivity Questionnaire, Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 score and drug adverse events. Results: Between October 2021 and September 2022, 50 participants (43 females; mean age 46.28 years; median cough duration 3 months) were assigned to either the bepotastine 10 mg twice daily or placebo group in a 1:1 ratio. After 2 weeks of treatment, both bepotastine and placebo groups showed significant improvements in the LCQ scores, but there was no significant difference in the magnitude of change between the groups (3.45±2.10 versus 3.04±2.94, p=0.576). Secondary outcomes were also comparable. Conclusions: Despite the relatively small sample size, our study clearly demonstrated that a 2-week treatment with bepotastine did not provide therapeutic benefits for cough outcomes. These findings suggest against the use of nsH1RAs with the intention of improving cough outcomes, even in patients with persistent cough and allergic rhinitis.

Feasibility and Utility of a Smartphone Application-Based Longitudinal Cough Monitoring in Chronic Cough Patients in a Real-World Setting.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the feasibility and utility of longitudinal cough frequency monitoring with the Hyfe Cough Tracker, a mobile application equipped with cough-counting artificial intelligence algorithms, in real-world patients with chronic cough. METHODS: Patients with chronic cough (> 8-week duration) were monitored continuously for cough frequency with the Hyfe app for at least one week. Cough was also evaluated using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and daily cough severity scoring (0-10). The study analyzed adherence rate, the correlation between objective cough frequency and subjective scores, day-to-day variability, and patient experience. RESULTS: Of 65 subjects consecutively recruited, 43 completed the study. The median cough monitoring duration was 13.9 days, with a median adherence of 91%. Study completion was associated with baseline cough severity, and the adherence rate was higher in younger subjects. Cross-sectional correlation analyses showed modest correlations between objective and subjective cough measures at the group level. However, in time series correlation analyses, correlations between objective and subjective measures widely varied across individuals. Cough frequency had greater day-to-day variability than daily cough severity scores in most subjects. A patient experience survey found that 70% of participants found the cough monitoring helpful, 86% considered it acceptable, and 84% felt it was easy to use. CONCLUSION: Monitoring cough frequency longitudinally for at least one week may be feasible. The substantial day-to-day variability in objective cough frequency highlights the need for continuous monitoring. Grasping the implications of daily cough variability is crucial in both clinical practice and clinical trials.

Baseline Cohort Profile of the Korean Chronic Cough Registry: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.

PURPOSE: The Korean Chronic Cough Registry study was initiated to characterize patients with chronic cough (CC) and investigate their outcomes in real-world clinical practice. This report aims to describe the baseline cohort profile and study protocols. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective observational cohort study included newly referred CC patients and those already being treated for refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RUCC). Cough status was assessed using a visual analog scale, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), and the Cough Hypersensitivity Questionnaire (CHQ). RESULTS: A total of 610 patients (66.9% women; median age 59.0 years) were recruited from 18 centers, with 176 being RUCC patients (28.9%). The median age at CC onset was 50.1 years, and 94.4% had adult-onset CC (≥ 19 years). The median cough duration was 4 years. Compared to newly referred CC patients, RUCC patients had a longer cough duration (6.0 years vs. 3.0 years) but had fewer symptoms and signs suggesting asthma, rhinosinusitis, or gastroesophageal acid reflux disease. Subjects with RUCC had lower LCQ scores (10.3 ± 3.3 vs. 11.6 ± 3.6; P < 0.001) and higher CHQ scores (9.1 ± 3.9 vs. 8.4 ± 4.1; P = 0.024). There were no marked differences in the characteristics of cough between refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic cough typically develops in adulthood, lasting for years. Cough severity and quality of life impairment indicate the presence of unmet clinical needs and insufficient cough control in real-world clinical practice. Longitudinal follow-up is warranted to investigate the natural history and treatment outcomes.

The Risk of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events With Use of Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists in Patients With Asthma: Analysis of Korea's National Health Insurance Sharing Service Database.

BACKGROUND: Montelukast, a selective leukotriene receptor antagonist, is a commonly prescribed allergy medication but its potential association with neuropsychiatric adverse events is concerning. OBJECTIVE: To analyze Korea's National Health Insurance System claims records to identify the risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events in patients with asthma treated with montelukast. METHODS: This retrospective population-based study analyzed the National Health Insurance claims records of the entire Korean population between 2008 and 2015. We compared the risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events among patients with asthma using inhaled corticosteroids and/or long-acting ß2-agonists with montelukast or pranlukast and those not using leukotriene receptor antagonists (control group). RESULTS: There was no increased risk of the composite outcome of all measured neuropsychiatric adverse events in patients with asthma who were prescribed montelukast or pranlukast compared with those who were not. However, montelukast use was associated with an increased risk of hallucinations (inverse probability treatment weighting hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07-1.96) and attention problems (inverse probability treatment weighting hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.52). Significant negative hazards for disorientation, anxiety, stress reactions, and somatic symptoms were observed in the montelukast group. When grouped by sex, the risk of hallucinations and attention problems was higher in men prescribed montelukast compared with the controls. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe an increase in all neuropsychiatric adverse events in the leukotriene receptor antagonist-treated group; however, an increased risk of hallucinations and attention problems was observed in those taking montelukast, regardless of the medication administration period.

Skin Test-Guided Strategy to Select Alternative Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients With Immediate Hypersensitivity Reaction: A Prospective Confirmative Study.

BACKGROUND: Iodinated contrast media (ICM) are a common cause of drug-induced immediate hypersensitivity reaction (IHR). Repeated use of ICM is often necessary; therefore, a standardized protocol to prevent recurrence of IHR is required. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to propose an intradermal skin test (IDT)-guided strategy for previous reactors to prevent recurrence of IHR. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter study from May 2018 to December 2020 and recruited patients who had experienced IHR to ICM. Once enrolled, the participants underwent IDT with a causative ICM. The alternatives for reexposure were selected using the following protocol: (1) if the IDT with the culprit ICM was positive, further skin tests with other available ICM were conducted to choose IDT-negative agents as alternatives, and (2) if the IDT with the culprit ICM was negative, a randomly changed ICM was used without additional skin tests. The recurrence and severity of hypersensitivity were assessed in subsequent computed tomography examinations. Premedication was administered according to the severity of the index event in all cases. RESULTS: A total of 496 participants were enrolled, and 299 were reexposed to ICM. Among 269 participants who followed the protocol, 228 (84.8%) completed computed tomography examinations without adverse reactions, and IHR recurred in 16 of 30 participants (53.3%) who did not follow the protocol (P < .001). In addition, application of the protocol reduced the severity of IHR in recurred cases (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our IDT-guided strategy not only reduced recurrence of IHR to ICM but also mitigated the severity in recurred cases. This provides evidence for recommending an IDT to diagnose ICM allergy and find safe alternatives.

Development and linguistic validation of the Korean version of the Severe Asthma Questionnaire.

Background: Severe asthma, compared with mild to moderate asthma, has a larger impact on the quality of life (QOL) of the affected patients and their families. These findings underscore the need for patient-reported outcomes that are specific to severe asthma. The Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ) is a validated disease-specific questionnaire that addresses the impact of severe asthma on patients. The present study aimed to develop the Korean language version of the SAQ (SAQ-K), with the translation and linguistic validation. Methods: The development of SAQ-K was achieved through a process of forward translation, reconciliation, back translation, reconciliation, cognitive debriefing involving severe asthmatics, proofreading, and the final report. Results: Two medical personnel who were fluent in Korean and English independently translated the original English version of the SAQ into Korean. After incorporating these translations into a single reconciled version, two other bilingual personnel translated the Korean draft back into English. Discrepancies between the original form and the first Korean translation were then reviewed by the panel. The translated questionnaire was then tested in cognitive debriefing interviews with 15 severe asthma patients. Through this cognitive debriefing process, the second version was verified and finally proofread to check for spelling, grammar, layout, and formatting as the final version. Conclusions: We have generated the SAQ-K to enable clinicians and researchers to assess the health status of severe asthma patients in Korea.

WITHDRAWN: Prospective direct comparison of biological treatments on severe eosinophilic asthma: Findings from the PRISM study.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

Exacerbation of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Following Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination in Omalizumab-Treated Patients.

BACKGROUND: The rapid development and rollout of vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to more than half of the world's population being vaccinated to date. Real-world data have reported various adverse cutaneous reactions, including delayed-onset urticaria, which was highly ranked as a common manifestation across studies. However, the impact of these novel mRNA or viral vector COVID-19 vaccines on preexisting chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) remains largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the clinical status of patients with relatively stable CSU who are undergoing omalizumab treatment and to identify risk factors for exacerbation. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital. Adult patients with relatively stable CSU under regular omalizumab treatments who had received at least one COVID-19 vaccination were included. RESULTS: There were 105 study subjects who received 230 COVID-19 vaccinations between March and December 2021. Fifteen patients (14.3%) experienced aggravation of urticaria at least once after COVID-19 vaccination. The demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients were comparable regardless of the exacerbation of CSU. However, case-level analysis revealed that the presence of urticaria (vs none) before vaccination (odds ratio [OR] = 4.99; 95% CI, 1.57-15.82) and the development of systemic reactogenicity (OR = 4.57; 95% CI, 1.62-12.90) were associated with a higher risk for exacerbation. CONCLUSIONS: The novel COVID-19 vaccination induced exacerbation in more than one-tenth of patients with well-controlled CSU. The establishment of a proper management strategy during COVID-19 vaccination is necessary for patients with CSU.

Clinical Relevance of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization and Staphylococcal Enterotoxin-Specific IgE Sensitization in Late-Onset Asthma.

This prospective observational study examined whether Staphylococcus aureus (SA) nasal colonization and staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE)-specific IgE sensitization synergistically affect clinical outcomes of adults with late-onset asthma (onset age ≥ 40 years). Nasal swabs were taken to evaluate SA colonization. Serum SE-IgE level was measured. Subjects were classified into 4 groups according to SA colonization and SE-IgE sensitization positivity. Among 181 patients with late-onset asthma recruited, the proportions of SA/SE (‒/‒), SA/SE (+ /‒), SA/SE (‒/ +), and SA/SE (+ / +) were 33.7%, 15.5%, 28.2%, and 22.6%, respectively. Severe asthma was more frequent in the SA/SE (+ / +) group than in the SA/SE (‒/‒) group (41.5% vs. 13.1%). The relationship of SA/SE (+ / +) with severe asthma was significant in multivariate logistic regression (vs. SA/SE (‒/‒); adjusted odds ratio: 4.36; 95% confidence intervals: 1.50‒12.73; p = 0.007), whereas SA/SE (+ /‒) or SA/SE (‒/ +) was not. In conclusion, SA nasal colonization and SE-IgE sensitization may synergistically affect disease severity in late-onset asthmatics.

Codeine prescription pattern and treatment responses in patients with chronic cough: a routinely collected institutional database analysis.

Background: Codeine has been long used as an antitussive drug in several countries. However, a prescription pattern of codeine, such as dose or treatment duration, has not been reported in detail. Furthermore, there is few scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety. We aimed to examine codeine prescription pattern and explore treatment response in patients with chronic cough in real-world practice. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with chronic cough who were newly referred to tertiary allergy and asthma clinics between July 2017 and July 2018. Routinely collected electronic healthcare records (EHRs), including medical notes, prescriptions, and outpatient visits, were analyzed. Codeine prescription records were examined for duration, mean daily dose, and 1-year cumulative dose. Codeine responses were evaluated by manual EHR reviews. Results: Among a total of 1,233 newly referred patients with chronic cough, 666 were prescribed codeine for a median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 27.5 days (IQR 14-60 days); the median daily dose was 30 mg/year (IQR 21.6-30 mg/year), and the 1-year cumulative dose was 720 mg/year (IQR 420-1,800 mg/year). About 14.0% of patients were prescribed codeine for >8 weeks; they were older and had a longer cough duration, throat abnormal sensation and less dyspnea than patients prescribed codeine for ≤8 weeks or who did not receive codeine. Codeine prescription and duration was positively associated with the number of other cough-related medications, diagnostic tests, or outpatient visits. Cough status change was noted in 61.3% of codeine-prescribed patients (as 'improved' in 40.1% and 'not improved' in 21.2%), but not documented in 38.7%. Side effects were described in 7.8%. Conclusions: Codeine prescription may be frequent and chronic in real-world practice of patients with chronic cough, despite the lack of robust clinical evidence on the efficacy. High prescription rates suggest unmet clinical needs. Prospective studies are warranted to identify codeine treatment responses and safety, and to build up clinical evidence to guide appropriate use of narcotic antitussives.

Chest computed tomography scan utilization and diagnostic outcomes in chronic cough patients with normal chest X-rays: analysis of routinely collected data of a tertiary academic hospital.

Background: The role of chest computed tomography (CT) scan is controversial in the management of chronic cough patients with normal chest X-rays. We investigated the utilization pattern and diagnostic outcomes of chest CT scans using institutional routinely collected data (RCD) in South Korea. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of adults with chronic cough (>8 weeks in duration) identified from routinely collected electronic health records (EHRs). Structured data were retrieved, including demographics, medical history, symptoms, and diagnostic test results (including chest X-rays and CT scans). Chest CT scan outcomes were classified into major abnormal findings (malignancy, infectious diseases, or other critical conditions that warrant immediate treatment decisions), minor abnormal findings (other abnormal findings), or normal CT. Results: A total of 5,038 chronic cough patients with normal chest X-rays were analyzed. Chest CT scans were performed in 1,006 patients. Prescription of CT scans was significantly associated with older age, male sex, smoking history, and physician-diagnosed history of lung disease. Only 8 of 1,006 (0.8%) patients had major abnormal findings (4 pneumonia, 2 pulmonary tuberculosis, and 2 lung cancer), while 367 (36.5%) had minor findings, and 631 (62.7%) had normal CT scans. However, no baseline parameters were significantly associated with major CT findings. Conclusions: Chest CT scans were frequently prescribed for chronic cough patients with normal chest X-rays, and abnormal findings were frequently found (37.3%). However, the diagnostic yield for malignancy or infectious disease were low (<1%). Given the potential radiation harm, a routine chest CT scan may not be warranted in chronic cough patients with normal chest X-rays.

Roles of real-world evidence in severe asthma treatment: challenges and opportunities.

Recent advances in asthma research have led to the development of novel biologicals that hinder the pathological actions of key molecules in severe asthma. Traditional randomised controlled studies (RCTs), the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy and safety of medical interventions with excellent internal validity, have proven the clinical benefits and favourable safety profiles of type 2 biologicals in severe asthma. However, RCTs are not always ideal because of shortcomings such as limited external validity and practical issues in the management of severe asthma that cannot be solved through strictly designed clinical trials. Thus, the applicability of their findings may be questioned because treatment adherence is frequently poor in the real world. Real-world evidence includes a wide range of real-world data (RWD) collected from multiple sources in clinical practice, such as electronic medical records, healthcare insurance claims and retrospective or prospective patient registries. RWD may help clinicians decide how to manage patients with severe asthma. Real-world evidence is also gaining attention in addressing clinical questions not answered by traditional RCTs. Because there are various types of RWD with different possibilities and limitations, it is important to decide which type of RWD could be "fit for purpose" to address a specific question. This narrative review discusses the challenges and opportunities of RWD for evaluating the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of biological treatments for severe asthma.