RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bedside insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) has higher rates of malposition than fluoroscopic-guided PICC placement. This study evaluated the success rate of bedside PICC placement, variations in tip location, and risk factors for malposition. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent bedside PICC placement from January 2013 to September 2014 in a single institution. The procedure was conducted under ultrasound guidance or by a blind method. After PICC placement, tip location was determined by chest X-ray. RESULTS: The overall venous access success rate with bedside PICC placement was 98.1% (1,302/ 1,327). There was no significant difference in the venous access success rate between ultrasound-guided placement (868/880, 98.6%) and a blind approach placement (434/447, 97.1%). Optimal tip position was achieved on the first attempt in 1,192 cases (91.6%). Repositioning was attempted in 65 patients; 60 PICCs were repositioned at the bedside, two PICCs were repositioned under fluoroscopic guidance, and three PICCs moved to the desired position without intervention. Final optimal tip position after repositioning was achieved in 1,229 (94.4%). In logistic regression analysis, five factors associated with tip malposition included female sex (Exp(B), 1.687; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.180 to 2.412; P=0.004), older age (Exp(B), 1.026; 95% CI, 1.012 to 1.039; P<0.001), cancer (Exp(B), 0.650; 95% CI, 0.455 to 0.929; P=0.018), lung disease (Exp(B), 2.416; 95% CI, 1.592 to 3.666; P<0.001), and previous catheter insertions (Exp(B), 1.262; 95% CI, 1.126 to 1.414; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bedside PICC placement without fluoroscopy is effective and safe in central venous catheters. Potential risk factors associated with catheter tip malposition include older age, female sex, cancer, pulmonary disease, and previous central vein catheterizations.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement is not indicated for thrombolytic interventional treatment for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We analyzed the efficacy and feasibility of retrievable IVC filter placement for the preventive management of embolic shedding during catheter-directed thrombectomy (CDT) for DVT of lower extremity. METHODS: Seventy patients (35 males and 35 females) who underwent retrievable IVC filter placement to prevent thrombus dislodgement during CDT in all symptomatic DVT with thrombus age suspected within 4 weeks of the lower extremity between March 2008 and January 2014 were included in this study. All patients underwent laboratory blood study, duplex ultrasound and/or computed tomography for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up in accordance with treatment policy of our Uijeongbu St. Mary's hospital. Two types of retrievable IVC filters (OptEase Filter, Cordis, Roden, The Netherlands; Gunther Tulip Filter, Cook, Bloomington, IN) were used to prevent thromboembolic events during CDT. After filter placement, subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin and overlapped to warfarin or new oral anticoagulant tried to achieve a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.0 in warfarin patients. RESULTS: The thrombus was dislodged through the IVC filter during catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy in 22 patients (31.4%). In 22 cases, the thromboses were trapped by the retrievable IVC filter, and follow-up images showed thrombus capture. Thirty-four patients (48.6%) received percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Additional stents were inserted in 23 patients (32.8%). Pulmonary embolism (PE) was not observed in patients implanted with retrievable IVC filters. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings suggest that retrieval IVC filter placement during interventional treatments of DVT of lower extremity such as thrombectomy of vein thrombus with or without stent insertion at compressed deep vein is favorable and effective for protecting against PE or lethal complications. We recommend carefully that before the management of DVT thrombus of lower extremity, retrieval IVC filter placement should be considered for preventing morbidity related with the PE.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Trombectomía/métodos , Terapia Trombolítica , Filtros de Vena Cava , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , República de Corea , Factores de Riesgo , Trombectomía/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/sangre , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This paper describes the direct deposition of hydrocarbon coatings with a static water contact angle higher than 150 using simple C6 hydrocarbons as a reactive gas in helium plasma generated in ambient air without any preroughening of the silicon (100) substrate. The film morphology and hydrophobicity are found to strongly depend on the structure of the reagent hydrocarbon. The films deposited with n-hexane and cyclohexane exhibited relatively smooth morphology and the water contact angle was only â¼95°, similar to polypropylene. When benzene was used as a main reactive gas, the deposited film surface showed nanoscale textured morphology and superhydrophobicity with a water contact angle as high as 167°. Because the plasma is generated in air, all films show some degree of oxygen incorporation. These results imply that the incorporation of a small amount of oxygenated species in hydrocarbon films due to excitation of ambient air is not detrimental for superhydrophobicity, which allows the atmospheric rf plasma with the benzene precursor to produce rough surface topography needed for superhydrophobicity.