Safety assessment of subconjunctivally implanted devices containing latanoprost in Dutch-belted rabbits.

PURPOSE: Latanoprost is used for the treatment of an increased intraocular pressure (IOP) to prevent the progression of glaucoma. Since the lack of compliance with topical ocular dosing may compromise efficacy, alternate methods of delivery are being sought. A 9-month study was conducted to assess the safety and tolerability of latanoprost-containing subconjunctivally implanted devices. METHODS: Dutch-belted rabbits were implanted subconjunctivally with up to 5 placebo or drug-loaded devices containing from 50 to 180 µg of latanoprost per device. Study assessment consisted of irritation scoring, clinical signs, ophthalmic exams, IOP, electroretinography (ERG), ocular histology of cohorts at 3 and 9 months postimplantation, and systemic exposure to latanoprost acid. RESULTS: The implants were well tolerated, with minimal-to-mild clinical and microscopic ocular findings attributable to either the placebo or drug-loaded devices. Mild conjunctival congestion persisted through week 13 of the study and tended to correlate with the number of devices and presence of drug. Ophthalmic examinations revealed no effects beyond conjunctival surface hyperemia. No effects on the IOP, corneal thickness, or ERG parameters were observed. The lack of changes in the IOP was expected due to the known lack of the IOP-lowering effects in rabbits from latanoprost. Microscopically, implants at the 3-month necropsy were associated with subconjunctival tissue cavities (containing the implants), fibrous encapsulation, and an infiltrate of lymphocytes and macrophages, sometimes as multinucleate cells, into the subconjunctival implant cavity. The drug-containing implants were often associated with inflammatory cell infiltrates, including heterophils (neutrophils), within the implant subconjunctival cavities and adjacent to the implant sites. At the 9-month necropsy, heterophils were no longer common among the inflammatory cell infiltrates; macrophages and lymphocytes persisted; most of the biodegradable implants were fragmented and disintegrating; and fibrovascular proliferation was present within implant luminal remnants. None of the findings were considered adverse. Systemic exposures were above the limit of quantification (0.1 ng/mL) for up to 96 h in the higher-dose groups, consistent with the initial burst phase of compound release. CONCLUSION: Overall, the study supports the safety of the latanoprost-containing subconjunctival device as a means of extended delivery of the antiglaucoma medication. Latanoprost-containing subconjunctival implants were well tolerated by Dutch-belted rabbits for up to 9 months. Such devices may improve patient compliance and serve as a means of extended delivery of antiglaucoma medications.

AMG 386, a selective angiopoietin 1/2-neutralizing peptibody, inhibits angiogenesis in models of ocular neovascular diseases.

PURPOSE: To determine whether systemic treatment with AMG 386, a selective angiopoietin 1/2-neutralizing peptibody, inhibits neovascular processes in animal models of ocular disease. METHODS: AMG 386 was tested in a laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) model in monkeys using fluorescein angiography. The biodistribution of (125)I-AMG 386 was determined in cynomolgus monkeys by whole-body autoradiography and radioanalysis of ocular tissues. A murine retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) model was used to examine the effect of AMG 386 on established and newly formed retinal vessels, either as a single agent or when combined with VEGF inhibition.AMG 386 pharmacokinetics were evaluated in each model. RESULTS: In the CNV model, AMG 386 significantly decreased fluorescent angiographic leakage and reduced fibroplasia, indicating an impaired healing response consistent with angiogenesis blockade. Radiolabeled AMG 386 was widely distributed across ocular tissues, with highest concentrations in the choroid, cornea, retinal pigmented epithelium, iris/ciliary body, and sclera. In the ROP model, AMG 386 prevented pathologic retinal angiogenesis when administered from P8 to P16 but transiently impeded regression of these abnormal vessels when administered from P17 to P23. Combining AMG 386 with VEGF inhibition led to cooperative prevention of retinal angiogenesis in this model. No AMG 386-related ocular toxicities occurred, and no treatment-related clinical observations were made in any of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, AMG 386 inhibited angiogenesis in animal models of CNV and ROP, supporting investigation of AMG 386 for the treatment of ocular neovascular diseases in the clinical setting.