RESUMEN
Background: Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) are a group of delayed presumed T-cell mediated hypersensitivities associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite their shared global healthcare burden and impact, the clinical phenotypes, genomic predisposition, drug causality, and treatment outcomes may vary. We describe the establishment and results from the first Australasian registry for SCAR (AUS-SCAR), that via a collaborative network advances strategies for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of SCAR. Methods: Prospective multi-center registry of SCAR in Australian adult and adolescents, with planned regional expansion. The registry collects externally verified phenotypic data drug causality, therapeutics and long-term patient outcomes. In addition, biorepository specimens and DNA are collected at participating sites. Results: we report on the first 100 patients enrolled in the AUS-SCAR database. DRESS (50%) is the most predominant phenotype followed by SJS/TEN (39%) and AGEP (10%), with median age of 52 years old (IQR 37.5, 66) with 1:1 male-to-female ratio. The median latency for all implicated drugs is highly variable but similar for DRESS (median 15 days IQR 5,25) and SJS/TEN (median 21 days, IQR 7,27), while lowest for AGEP (median 2.5 days, IQR 1,8). Antibiotics (54.5%) are more commonly listed as primary implicated drug compare with non-antibiotics agent (45.5%). Mortality rate at 90 days was highest in SJS/TEN at 23.1%, followed by DRESS (4%) and AGEP (0%). Conclusion: In the first prospective national phenotypic and biorepository of SCAR in the southern hemisphere we demonstrate notable differences to other reported registries; including DRESS-predominant phenotype, varied antibiotic causality and low overall mortality rate. This study also highlights the lack of standardised preventative pharmacogenomic measures and in vitro/in vivo diagnostic strategies to ascertain drug causality. Trial registration: ANZCTR ACTRN12619000241134. Registered 19 February 2019.
RESUMEN
Accurate detection of acute kidney injury (AKI) in clinical trials is important. Using a 'baseline' creatinine from trial enrolment may not be ideal for understanding a participant's true baseline kidney function. We aimed to determine if a 'pre-trial baseline creatinine' resulted in comparable creatinine concentrations to a 'trial baseline creatinine', and how the timing of baseline creatinine affected the incidence of AKI in the Combination Antibiotic therapy for MEthicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CAMERA2) randomised trial. Study sites retrospectively collected a pre-trial baseline creatinine from up to 1 year before CAMERA2 trial enrolment ideally when the patient was medically stable. Baseline creatinine from CAMERA2 (the 'trial baseline creatinine'), was the highest creatinine measurement in the 24 h preceding trial randomisation. We used Wilcoxon sign rank test to compare pre-trial and trial baseline creatinine concentrations. We included 217 patients. The median pre-trial baseline creatinine was significantly lower than the median trial baseline creatinine (82 µmol/L [IQR 65-104 µmol/L] versus 86 µmol/L [IQR 66-152 µmol/L] p = <0.001). Using pre-trial baseline creatinine, 48 of 217 patients (22%) met criteria for an AKI at CAMERA2 enrolment and only 5 of these patients met criteria for an AKI using the CAMERA2 study protocol (using baseline creatinine from trial entry). Using a baseline creatinine from the time of trial enrolment failed to detect many patients with AKI. Trial protocols should consider the optimal timing of baseline creatinine and the limitations of using a baseline creatinine during an acute illness.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Creatinina , Antibacterianos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (bacteraemia) is traditionally treated with at least two weeks of IV antibiotics in adults, 3-7 days in children, and often longer for those with complicated disease. The current practice of treating S. aureus bacteraemia (SAB) with prolonged IV antibiotics (rather than oral antibiotics) is based on historical observational research and expert opinion. Prolonged IV antibiotic therapy has significant disadvantages for patients and healthcare systems, and there is growing interest in whether a switch to oral antibiotics following an initial period of IV therapy is a safe alternative for clinically stable patients. PROTOCOL: The early oral switch (EOS) domain of the S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial will assess early switch to oral antibiotics compared with continued IV treatment in clinically stable patients with SAB. The primary endpoint is 90-day all-cause mortality. Hospitalised SAB patients are assessed at platform day 7 +/- 2 (uncomplicated SAB) and day 14 +/-2 (complicated SAB) to determine their eligibility for randomisation to EOS (intervention) or continued IV treatment (current standard of care). DISCUSSION: Recruitment is occurring to the EOS domain of the SNAP trial. As of August 2023, 21% of all SNAP participants had been randomised to the EOS domain, a total of 264 participants across 77 centres, with an aim to recruit at least 1000 participants. We describe challenges and facilitators to enrolment in this domain to aid those planning similar trials.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced cirrhosis experience an unpredictable disease trajectory but are infrequently referred to palliative care (PC) services and rarely undertake advance care planning (ACP). AIM: We assessed whether a novel model of care increased provision of meaningful PC in advanced cirrhosis compared with standard of care (SOC). METHODS: Thirty consecutive hepatology clinic outpatients with advanced cirrhosis, meeting one or more cirrhosis-related PC referral criteria, consented to treatment in the HepatoCare clinic (PC physician, specialist liver nurse, pharmacist) in parallel with usual specialist hepatology care. A control cohort of 30 consecutive outpatients with advanced cirrhosis undergoing SOC treatment was retrospectively identified for comparison. The primary outcome was provision of meaningful PC using HepatoCare versus SOC. Additional clinical outcomes were assessed over 12 months or until death and significant differences were identified. RESULTS: The intervention and control cohorts had similarly advanced cirrhosis (mean Child-Pugh scores 8.7 vs 8.2, P = 0.46; mean model for end-stage liver disease scores 14.4 vs 14.6, P = 0.88) but a lower 12-month mortality rate (33% HepatoCare vs 67% SOC; P = 0.02). The intervention cohort experienced higher uptake of formal ACP (100% vs 25% for the control cohort) and outpatient PC referral (100% vs 40%), and were more likely to die at home or in a PC bed/hospice (80% vs 30%). The majority of the HepatoCare cohort (81%) had medications safely deprescribed and experienced fewer unplanned admission days (470 vs 794). CONCLUSIONS: HepatoCare is a novel multidisciplinary model of care that integrates effective PC and specialist hepatology management to improve outcomes in advanced cirrhosis.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal , Cuidados Paliativos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Cirrosis Hepática/terapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Staphylococcus aureus is a significant human pathogen, causing a variety of infections, from skin and soft tissue infections to endocarditis, bone and joint infections and deep tissue abscesses. Mortality from S. aureus bacteraemia remains high, without major therapeutic advances in recent decades. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, optimized dosing of antibiotics is increasingly being recognized as a cornerstone of management for severe infections including S. aureus bacteraemia. This comprehensive review details the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) targets for commonly used antistaphylococcal antibiotics and the doses predicted to achieve them in clinical practice. Recent advances in dosing of teicoplanin and use of cefazolin in CNS infections and findings from combination therapy studies are discussed. Drug exposure relationships related to toxicity are also detailed. SUMMARY: This review details the different PK/PD targets for drugs used to treat S. aureus bacteraemia and how to apply them in various scenarios. The drug doses that achieve them, and the risks of toxicity are also provided.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus , Cefazolina , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Background: The Combination Antibiotic Therapy for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CAMERA2) trial ceased recruitment in July 2018, noting that a higher proportion of patients in the intervention arm (combination therapy) developed acute kidney injury (AKI) compared to the standard therapy (monotherapy) arm. We analyzed the long-term outcomes of participants in CAMERA2 to understand the impact of combination antibiotic therapy and AKI. Methods: Trial sites obtained additional follow-up data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, censored at death or the date of last known follow-up. Secondary outcomes included kidney failure or a reduction in kidney function (a 40% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate to <60â mL/minute/1.73 m2). To determine independent predictors of mortality in this cohort, adjusted hazard ratios were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: This post hoc analysis included extended follow-up data for 260 patients. Overall, 123 of 260 (47%) of participants died, with a median population survival estimate of 3.4 years (235 deaths per 1000 person-years). Fifty-five patients died within 90 days after CAMERA2 trial randomization; another 68 deaths occurred after day 90. Using univariable Cox proportional hazards regression, mortality was not associated with either the assigned treatment arm in CAMERA2 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84 [95% confidence interval [CI], .59-1.19]; P = .33) or experiencing an AKI (HR at 1 year, 1.04 [95% CI, .64-1.68]; P = .88). Conclusions: In this cohort of patients hospitalized with methicillin-resistant S aureus bacteremia, we found no association between either treatment arm of the CAMERA2 trial or AKI (using CAMERA2 trial definition) and longer-term mortality.
RESUMEN
Beta-lactams are an important family of antibiotics used to treat infections and are commonly used in critically ill patients. Optimal use of these drugs in the intensive care unit (ICU) is important because of the serious complications from sepsis. Target beta-lactam antibiotic exposures may be chosen using fundamental principles of beta-lactam activity derived from pre-clinical and clinical studies, although the debate regarding optimal beta-lactam exposure targets is ongoing. Attainment of target exposures in the ICU requires overcoming significant pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) challenges. For beta-lactam drugs, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to confirm if the desired exposure targets are achieved has shown promise, but further data are required to determine if improvement in infection-related outcomes can be achieved. Additionally, beta-lactam TDM may be useful where a relationship exists between supratherapeutic antibiotic exposure and drug adverse effects. An ideal beta-lactam TDM service should endeavor to efficiently sample and report results in identified at-risk patients in a timely manner. Consensus beta-lactam PK/PD targets associated with optimal patient outcomes are lacking and should be a focus for future research.
RESUMEN
This retrospective analysis describes the administration of sotrovimab in 32 children (22 aged 12-16 years old; 10 aged 1-11 years old) who were at high risk of deterioration to severe COVID-19 disease. We provide dosing suggestions and demonstrate the feasibility of sotrovimab use in the younger pediatric population (<12 years old and <40 kg).
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Lactante , Preescolar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos NeutralizantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical risk factors for nephrotoxicity in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia remain largely undetermined, despite its common occurrence and clinical significance. In an international, multicentre, prospective clinical trial (CAMERA2), which compared standard therapy (vancomycin monotherapy) to combination therapy (adding an anti-staphylococcal beta-lactam) for methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteraemia, significantly more people in the combination therapy arm experienced acute kidney injury compared with those in the monotherapy arm (23% vs 6%). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this post hoc analysis was to explore in greater depth the risk factors for acute kidney injury from the CAMERA2 trial. METHODS: Among participants of the CAMERA2 trial, demographic-related, infection-related and treatment-related risk factors were assessed for their relationship with acute kidney injury by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Acute kidney injury was defined by a modified-KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria (not including urinary output). RESULTS: Of the 266 participants included, age (p = 0.04), randomisation to combination therapy (p = 0.002), vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve (p = 0.03) and receipt of (flu)cloxacillin as the companion beta-lactam (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with acute kidney injury. On a multivariable analysis, concurrent use of (flu)cloxacillin increased the risk of acute kidney injury over four times compared with the use of cefazolin or no beta-lactam. The association of vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve with acute kidney injury also persisted in the multivariable model. CONCLUSIONS: For participants receiving vancomycin for S. aureus bacteraemia, use of (flu)cloxacillin and increased vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve were risk factors for acute kidney injury. These represent potentially modifiable risk factors for nephrotoxicity and highlight the importance of avoiding the use of concurrent nephrotoxins.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Bacteriemia , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/inducido químicamente , beta-Lactamas/efectos adversos , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Cloxacilina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/inducido químicamente , Staphylococcus aureus , Vancomicina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) are a group of T cell-mediated hypersensitivities associated with significant morbidity, mortality and hospital costs. Clinical phenotypes include Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). In this Australasian, multicentre, prospective registry, we plan to examine the clinical presentation, drug causality, genomic predictors, potential diagnostic approaches, treatments and long-term outcomes of SCAR in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adult and adolescent patients with SCAR including SJS, TEN, DRESS, AGEP and another T cell-mediated hypersensitivity, generalised bullous fixed drug eruption, will be prospectively recruited. A waiver of consent has been granted for some sites to retrospectively include cases which result in early mortality. DNA will be collected for all prospective cases. Blood, blister fluid and skin biopsy sampling is optional and subject to patient consent and site capacity. To develop culprit drug identification and prevention, genomic testing will be performed to confirm human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type and ex vivo testing will be performed via interferon-γ release enzyme linked immunospot assay using collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The long-term outcomes of SCAR will be investigated with a 12-month quality of life survey and examination of prescribing and mortality data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was reviewed and approved by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/50791/Austin-19). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000241134).
Asunto(s)
Eosinofilia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Adolescente , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Eosinofilia/complicaciones , Humanos , Leucocitos Mononucleares , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etiología , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/terapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Traditionally meropenem has been considered too unstable in solution for continuous infusion. However, in the era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, use of meropenem is becoming more frequently required, and the ability to facilitate its administration via community-based programs would be beneficial. There are some reassuring data about meropenem stability in solution, but data about actual drug exposure in patients and subsequent clinical outcomes are lacking. SUMMARY: Here we present a case series of 4 patients at a single tertiary center who received meropenem via continuous infusion coordinated through an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment (OPAT) program. We provide plasma drug concentrations achieved and report on the patients' clinical progress. All patients achieved drug concentrations of at least 2 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) while receiving meropenem via continuous infusion and had resolution of their infectious complications. No adverse effects of meropenem continuous infusion were noted. CONCLUSION: Meropenem continuous infusion along with therapeutic drug monitoring was used successfully in a community-based program. Due to interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, we consider meropenem concentration monitoring compulsory during continuous-infusion meropenem therapy.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Meropenem/administración & dosificación , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Monitoreo de Drogas , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Meropenem/farmacocinética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The use of ampicillin in the outpatient setting has traditionally been avoided because of the short half-life and instability in solution of this drug. However, recent in vitro data and two case series support the safe and effective administration of ampicillin by continuous infusion in the community. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of beta-lactam antibiotics can be used to optimise antibiotic exposure and ensure adequate clinical responses. A case series is presented of patients receiving ampicillin via prolonged infusion in the outpatient setting, with TDM to ensure adequate plasma antibiotic levels were achieved. Three patients who received ampicillin by continuous infusion under the Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) program are described, including details of antibiotic dose and steady-state plasma drug concentration as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. All three patients had an infection with ampicillin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis; one patient had post-partum endometritis, one had urosepsis and one had a complex polymicrobial bone and joint infection. Adequate plasma drug levels were achieved in all patients. Management of the antibiotic temperature and infusion times, and appropriate timing of drug levels in the community were required. Two patients achieved clinical cure, while the third required further surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy. TDM in this setting enabled the contemporaneous management and dose alteration of ampicillin. Ampicillin may be a safe and effective drug when administered by continuous infusion with appropriate TDM in the community setting.
Asunto(s)
Ampicilina/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Monitoreo de Drogas , Endometritis/diagnóstico , Endometritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/cirugía , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales/métodos , Masculino , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), are recognised neglected tropical diseases and have been endemic in patients in tropical Northern Australia. We reviewed the temporal trends in detections of STHs and Hymenolepis nana in faecal samples from Northern Territory (NT) Government Health facilities, representing patients with acute illnesses and comorbidities between 2008 and 2018. Ascaris lumbricoides is not detected in patients in the NT. The number of faecal samples examined yearly was relatively constant with a median of 4458 (range 4246-4933). Faecal samples from patients under the age of 5 years declined by 45% over the 11 years of the study. Detections of Trichuris trichiura, Strongyloides spp., and hookworm ova fell significantly by 89% (p<0.001), 71% (p<0.001), and 43% (p<0.01), respectively, over the 11 years. Detections of H. nana declined by 33% absolutely, but not significantly, when assessed relative to the reduction in faecal samples from patients under the age of 5 years. The marked reduction in STH numbers coincided with a 10-fold increase in NT dispensing of ivermectin, predominantly used for scabies control, in widely geographically spaced locations throughout the NT, over the 11 years of the study. Our data support previous findings of the beneficial collateral effects of ivermectin therapy. Ivermectin is not recognised as having anti-cestode activity, hence the continued presence of H. nana endemically in the NT, suggests declines in STHs are not related to other changes in health hardware or existing mass drug administration programs. The reduction in T. trichiura detections may not be explained by this association, as unlike Strongyloides spp., the anti-helminthic effect of ivermectin has been less marked.