Evaluation of an implementation package to deliver the COPD CARE service.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide and is estimated to be the leading cause of death in the next 15 years. Patients with COPD suffer from persistent chronic cough, sputum production and exacerbations leading to deteriorating lung function, worsening quality of life and loss of independence. While evidence-based interventions exist to improve the well-being of patients with COPD, incorporation of these interventions into routine clinical care is challenging. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Coordinated Access to Reduce Exacerbations (COPD CARE) is a team-based, coordinated care transitions service integrating evidence-based interventions for COPD management within the patient care delivery model to reduce readmissions. This evaluation considers the process of scaling the COPD CARE service across medical facilities using an implementation package designed for service expansion. The implementation package was developed at the United States Veterans Health Administration and implemented at two medical centres. Core dissemination and implementation science methods were applied to guide design and delivery of the implementation package.The aims of this evaluation were to (1) evaluate the impact of the implementation package on use of evidence-based interventions for COPD management and (2) explore clinician perceptions of the implementation package. This prospective mixed-methods quality improvement project included two Plan Do Check Act (PDCA) cycles conducted over a 24-month period. Electronic health record data demonstrated significant improvements in the count of evidence-based interventions incorporated into routine clinical care after training completion (p<0.001), offering preliminary effectiveness of the package to improve uptake of best practices for COPD management. Clinician perceptions of the implementation package, measured by questionnaire at multiple time points, demonstrated significant improvements for all scales at the end of the final PDCA cycle. Clinicians described the implementation package as positively impacting clinician confidence, interprofessional collaboration and patient care delivery.

The Effects of Adding Semaglutide to High Daily Dose Insulin Regimens in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Escalating doses of insulin required with progression of type 2 diabetes may lead to weight gain. Weight loss associated with semaglutide may be beneficial. However, data on the use of semaglutide in patients requiring high daily doses of insulin are currently lacking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project was to evaluate the impact of semaglutide on total daily dose (TDD) of insulin when initiated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on high daily doses of insulin. Secondary objectives assessed included changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, heart rate, and diabetes and blood pressure medications. METHODS: This IRB exempt retrospective medical record review included patients with T2DM prescribed semaglutide and at least 100 units TDD of insulin between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019. RESULTS: Of the 72 patients included, the TDD of insulin decreased from baseline to 6 months (183 ± 98 units and 143 ± 99 units, P < 0.001). Average A1c and body weight also decreased from baseline to 6 months (8.9% ± 1.3% and 7.6% ± 1.5%, P < 0.001 and 123.9 ± 23.5 kg and 118.9 ± 22.9 kg, P < 0.001, respectively). Limitations included a homogenous patient population and inability to control confounding factors. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Improvement in glycemic control occurred despite reductions in TDD of insulin. Improvements in A1c and body weight were clinically significant. This analysis adds to existing literature supporting the use of GLP-1 RAs in patients on high daily doses of insulin.

Incorporation of Student Pharmacists into a Proton Pump Inhibitor Deprescribing Telehealth Program for Rural Veterans.

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely prescribed class of medications in the United States. Although effective in the treatment of acid related disease, inappropriate PPI use is prevalent, and long-term PPI use has been associated with adverse effects. Objectives: This evaluation explores the novelty of a student-pharmacist directed PPI deprescribing telehealth program with the goals of (1) determining whether PPIs are appropriately prescribed in Veterans via remote student-led chart reviews, (2) identifying if a gap exists between urban and rural Veterans prescribed a PPI, and (3) assessing the feasibility of integrating student pharmacists into the PPI deprescribing process utilizing telehealth visits through a pilot study. Methods: Student pharmacists evaluated PPI appropriateness in Veterans at the William S. Middleton Veterans Hospital. Students collected data via remote chart reviews, compared appropriateness of PPI therapy in rural versus urban Veterans, and conducted a deprescribing pilot call study in rural Veterans with inappropriate PPI indications. Clinical decision-making was agreed upon in collaboration with pharmacist preceptors, however all means of communication with Veterans was performed by student pharmacists. Results: 51% of Veterans were found to have an inappropriate indication for their PPI, though comparison of inappropriate PPI use in rural versus urban Veterans was not statistically significant (n=170, p-value 0.34). 83% of Veterans agreed to proceed with PPI deprescribing and 71% of Veterans ended the pilot study with at least some degree of PPI dose reduction (n=33). Conclusion: Inappropriate PPI use among rural and urban Veterans is prevalent, however a significant difference was not observed between the two cohorts. Student pharmacists are capable of successful telehealth deprescribing interventions in collaboration with pharmacists.

Impact of a novel project management course sequence on innovative thinking in pharmacy students.

BACKGROUND: As healthcare continues to become more complex, pharmacist innovators have worked to advance the profession and expand the role of the pharmacist on the healthcare team. Accreditation standards for schools of pharmacy recognize the importance of developing future pharmacist innovators capable of making positive change in the profession, but there are limited resources available on how to best instill innovative thinking in student pharmacists. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY: A two-semester elective course sequence was created for third-year doctor of pharmacy students requiring completion of a longitudinal quality improvement project at a partnering health system. Students collaborated with key stakeholders to design a project plan and charter, identify deliverables, and deliver project results. Innovative thinking was assessed using a mixed methods approach including questionnaires with forced choice and open response items, focus group data, and semi-structured interviews. Each questionnaire item mapped specifically to an element of a validated model for employee innovation. From the beginning to the end of the course sequence, there were significant improvements in student-perceived project management self-efficacy and innovative thinking. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY: Student learning outcomes and the course structure mapped closely with a validated model of innovative behavior, demonstrating the effectiveness of utilizing project management to instill innovative thinking in student pharmacists. These findings support the concept that innovative thinking can be taught in pharmacy didactic curricula by situating students in the environment of real-world pharmacy practice.

Application of the replicating effective programs framework to design a COPD training program.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death globally and a common cause of hospital readmissions in the United States. While best practices exist in COPD management, incorporation of such approaches into routine clinical care remains a challenge. OBJECTIVES: This evaluation applied principles from the field of dissemination and implementation (D&I) science to design a training package integrating best practice for COPD management. The D&I field promotes evidence-based implementation strategies, frameworks, and assessment approaches that can be considered by clinicians to promote adoption of best practices. METHODS: This prospective mixed-methods evaluation applied a D&I science model to develop, implement, and evaluate an interprofessional training program for COPD management originally piloted in 2016. The authors provide a contextual example of how a guiding D&I framework, replicating effective programs, was applied to design and implement a Web-based training program for clinicians preparing to implement the COPD service. A questionnaire and profession-specific focus group sessions were conducted to evaluate trainee confidence and enactment of critical service components. RESULTS: A total of 41 of the 50 interprofessional trainees responded to the pre- and postquestionnaire including primary care clinical pharmacists (n = 15), primary care registered nurses (n = 9), triage registered nurses (n = 12), and respiratory therapists (n = 5). Statistically significant improvements in trainee confidence and enactment were observed in 31 of the 40 total survey items (77%). Pooled focus group data provided attestation that the training enhanced practitioners' confidence in their role within the service. Opportunities for further improvement were also identified, such as incorporating a video modeling clinic example and accompanying written materials. CONCLUSION: This evaluation provides a case-study example of how D&I science can be used to design, implement, and evaluate a training package for trainees to spread a promising best practice. Clinicians can consider similar applications of D&I science to enhance training and spread novel services across health systems.