AI powered quantification of nuclear morphology in cancers enables prediction of genome instability and prognosis.

While alterations in nucleus size, shape, and color are ubiquitous in cancer, comprehensive quantification of nuclear morphology across a whole-slide histologic image remains a challenge. Here, we describe the development of a pan-tissue, deep learning-based digital pathology pipeline for exhaustive nucleus detection, segmentation, and classification and the utility of this pipeline for nuclear morphologic biomarker discovery. Manually-collected nucleus annotations were used to train an object detection and segmentation model for identifying nuclei, which was deployed to segment nuclei in H&E-stained slides from the BRCA, LUAD, and PRAD TCGA cohorts. Interpretable features describing the shape, size, color, and texture of each nucleus were extracted from segmented nuclei and compared to measurements of genomic instability, gene expression, and prognosis. The nuclear segmentation and classification model trained herein performed comparably to previously reported models. Features extracted from the model revealed differences sufficient to distinguish between BRCA, LUAD, and PRAD. Furthermore, cancer cell nuclear area was associated with increased aneuploidy score and homologous recombination deficiency. In BRCA, increased fibroblast nuclear area was indicative of poor progression-free and overall survival and was associated with gene expression signatures related to extracellular matrix remodeling and anti-tumor immunity. Thus, we developed a powerful pan-tissue approach for nucleus segmentation and featurization, enabling the construction of predictive models and the identification of features linking nuclear morphology with clinically-relevant prognostic biomarkers across multiple cancer types.

AI-based histologic scoring enables automated and reproducible assessment of enrollment criteria and endpoints in NASH clinical trials.

Clinical trials in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) require histologic scoring for assessment of inclusion criteria and endpoints. However, guidelines for scoring key features have led to variability in interpretation, impacting clinical trial outcomes. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based measurement (AIM) tool for scoring NASH histology (AIM-NASH). AIM-NASH predictions for NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) grades of necroinflammation and stages of fibrosis aligned with expert consensus scores and were reproducible. Continuous scores produced by AIM-NASH for key histological features of NASH correlated with mean pathologist scores and with noninvasive biomarkers and strongly predicted patient outcomes. In a retrospective analysis of the ATLAS trial, previously unmet pathological endpoints were met when scored by the AIM-NASH algorithm alone. Overall, these results suggest that AIM-NASH may assist pathologists in histologic review of NASH clinical trials, reducing inter-rater variability on trial outcomes and offering a more sensitive and reproducible measure of patient therapeutic response.