Indications and outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt insertion in two regional Australian hepatology centres.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an important therapy for complications of portal hypertension but remains underutilised in regional settings. AIMS: The aim of this study is to explore the demographics, indications, outcomes and complications in patients undergoing TIPS in two regional hepatology centres. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was undertaken of all patients undergoing TIPS at two regional centres between January 2017 and March 2023. The primary outcome measures were efficacy and complications of TIPS. Patient demographics (such as age, baseline liver severity scores and aetiology of liver disease) and indications for TIPS are detailed. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients underwent TIPS. Median age was 56 years (interquartile range (IQR): 46-65). The most common indications for TIPS were refractory ascites (n = 17) and failure of secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding (n = 13). Cumulative survival at 3 months and 1 year was 93% and 77% respectively. There was no significant difference in outcomes based on TIPS indication. The median number of paracenteses in patients undergoing TIPS for refractory ascites 1 year pre- and post-TIPS were 10 (IQR: 4.5-16) and 2 (IQR: 0-4) respectively (P < 0.001). There were no procedure-related deaths. Inpatient management of liver disease complications had a mean cost of $32 874.67 (SEM: 7779) in 1 year pre-TIPS compared with $12 304.70 (SEM: 3531.1) in 1 year post-TIPS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TIPS is a safe and effective treatment to reduce complications of portal hypertension and can be performed successfully in the regional setting.

Thromboembolism in active ulcerative colitis.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has a range of both intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations. Thromboembolism involving the arterial and/or venous systems is rare. Early recognition and treatment of thrombosis in patients with IBD may prevent progression and minimise complications. However, clear guidelines on the duration of treatment and indications for primary prophylaxis need to be established. We report a case of a young patient with ulcerative colitis, who developed multiple site arterial and venous thrombosis, all occurring within short intervals of each other.

Pre-oncall key conditions training for first-year radiology registrars.

INTRODUCTION: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiology (RANZCR) recognised the importance of experience in on-call and emergency radiology for first-year registrars by introducing 'Key conditions in Year 1 training'. This list of common radiological pathologies can help to focus preparations for new registrars as they prepare for after-hours duties. METHODS: The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (RBWH) implemented a 12-week formal training programme, based on this curriculum, for new registrars prior to commencing after-hours work. Its impact was assessed by an image recognition and interpretation examination that was administered to registrars before and after training. RESULTS: Examination results revealed that the prescribed training programme significantly increased both the rate and accuracy of reporting, and that improvements in speed were not at the expense of accuracy. Furthermore, it showed that a 12-week training programme was able to improve novice radiology registrars' ability to detect radiological abnormalities above that of experienced emergency department clinicians. Performances of consultant radiologists were used as a 'gold standard' control. CONCLUSION: This research demonstrates the value of a formal training programme in preparing registrars for extended after-hours reporting duties and contributing to important departmental service provision.

Evaluating the true clinical utility of the red dot system in radiograph interpretation.

INTRODUCTION: The 'red dot', or 'asterisk', system is used in many hospitals as a method for radiographers to identify potential abnormalities on plain radiographs prior to reporting by radiologists. While published studies into the accuracy of the 'red dot' system exist, analysis of its reliability in identifying subtle pathology is lacking. This is relevant because the prevalence and apparent success of the 'red dot' system has been cited by some authors as justification for non-radiologist reporting of medical imaging. It is important that all systems within medical imaging add value, and this audit evaluates the accuracy and clinical value of the 'red dot' system, particularly in the critical area of detecting undisplaced fractures. METHODS: All appendicular musculoskeletal trauma radiographs performed in the Department of Emergency Medicine at a major Australian metropolitan hospital over a continuous four-month period were retrospectively assessed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the 'red dot' system. The presence or absence of an asterisk was correlated with validated radiologist reports. A sub-analysis of fractures displaced <1mm was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 3638 radiographs were assessed and 938 (25.8%) fractures identified; 338 (9.3%) contained undisplaced fractures. Overall sensitivity and specificity of the 'red dot' in detecting appendicular fractures are 80.4% and 98.0%, respectively. PPV is 93.6% and NPV is 93.5%. However, the accuracy of the 'red dot' in detecting undisplaced fractures is significantly reduced, with a sensitivity of 45.9% and a PPV of 74.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of subtle abnormalities is fundamental to the service provided by radiologists. The 'red dot's' inability to reliably detect undisplaced fractures following trauma limits its value within a tertiary radiology department and suggests that role extension of plain film reporting to non-radiologists has potential to yield less accurate assessments. To maintain the highest quality of medical imaging services and standards of patient care, it is optimal that clinical decisions are based upon radiograph reports issued by medical specialists who have completed appropriate radiology training. Strategies to maintain this are suggested.

Automated versus manual audit in the emergency department.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to compare data collected by automated form processing with manual data collection for clinical indicators (CIs) in paediatric emergency medicine. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Paediatric patients presenting with croup, asthma, bronchiolitis, head injury and gastroenteritis in August 2006 were identified by ICD 9 coding and a traditional manual audit was performed by two data collectors. Data were collected on a total of 16 CIs for these five illnesses. Manual audit data were then compared to information collected for this same patient population using TELEform, an automated forms processing (AFP) system that had been employed for over two years. FINDINGS: Teleform data were only available for 24 patients compared to information for 127 patients identified by ICD 9 coding and manual audit. Teleform data overestimated compliance with clinical guidelines by 17 percent giving an overall departmental agreement with CIs of 90.6 percent compared to 73.5 percent in the manual audit. Additionally, manual audit demonstrated that when the clinical guideline was incorporated into the clinical record, compliance was 92.5 percent compared to 51.3 percent when it was not. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This single center study demonstrates that data collected by AFP such as TELEform, overestimate emergency department performance regarding CIs compliance. Departments that use automated data collection tools need to establish relationships between such data and data collected via more traditional auditing methods.