Comparison of the efficacy and safety of cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for infants in the intensive care setting: a pilot, unblinded RCT.

OBJECTIVE: To study effectiveness and safety of cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) in small infants in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Pilot RCT. SETTING: Neonatal and paediatric ICUs of children's hospital in Western Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-six infants ≥35 weeks gestation and infants <3 months of age, ≥3 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Patients randomly assigned to Microcuff cuffed or Portex uncuffed ETT. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Primary outcome was achievement of optimal ETT leak in target range (10%-20%). Secondary outcomes included: reintubations, ventilatory parameters, ventilatory complications, postextubation complications and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Success rate (achievement of mean leak in the range 10%-20%) was 13/42 (30.9%) in the cuffed ETT group and 6/34 (17.6%) in uncuffed ETT group (OR=2.09; 95% CI (0.71 to 6.08); p=0.28). Mean percentage time within target leak range in cuffed ETT group 28% (IQR: 9-42) versus 15% (IQR: 0-28) in uncuffed ETT group (p=0.01). There were less reintubations to optimise size in cuffed ETT group 0/40 versus 10/36 (p<0.001). No differences were found in gaseous exchange, ventilator parameters or postextubation complications. There were fewer episodes of atelectasis in cuffed ETT group 0/42 versus 4/34 (p=0.03). No patient had been diagnosed with subglottic stenosis at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the primary outcome, though percentage time spent in optimal leak range was significantly higher in cuffed ETT group. Cuffed ETTs reduced reintubations to optimise ETT size and episodes of atelectasis. Cuffed ETTs may be a feasible alternative to uncuffed ETTs in this group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615000081516.

Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring in scoliosis surgery in children.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (INM) is thought to reduce the risk of postoperative neurological deficits in children undergoing scoliosis and spine deformity surgery. INM is being used increasingly despite conflicting opinions, varied results, non-standard alarm criteria and concern regarding cost effectiveness. In this paper we present our experience with INM in scoliosis and spine deformation surgery in children, propose alert criteria and preferred anaesthetics in clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed our experience with INM in 56 children who had 61 scoliosis and spine deformity surgeries. RESULTS: INM was successfully undertaken with transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TcMEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials. There were no injuries due to INM. Four children had 5 alerts during 4 surgeries. A postoperative deficit was seen in one child only. No new postoperative deficits were seen in any child who did not have an alert during INM. Total intravenous anaesthesia was better for INM compared to inhalational anaesthetics. CONCLUSIONS: INM is useful in scoliosis surgery; it is likely to mitigate the risk of new deficits following surgery. We recommend alert criteria for TcMEPs that include multiple facets - amplitude, stimulus paradigm, morphology. We recommend propofol and remifentanil, in preference to sevoflurane and remifentanil for anaesthesia during INM. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study adds to the literature supporting the role of INM in scoliosis surgery in children. We provide guidelines for alarm criteria in clinical practice and recommend the use of total intravenous anaesthesia as the preferred anaesthetic option.