RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is an increasingly popular alternative that may increase the accuracy of conventional TKA techniques. This study aims to evaluate RA-TKA accuracy and compare its radiographic and clinical outcomes to conventional TKA (cTKA). METHODS: A retrospective examination of patients with bi- or tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis who underwent RA-TKA (RObotic Surgical Assistant system) or cTKA and were prospectively documented in the TKA registry. Accuracy was assessed using standardized radiographic implant position evaluations, namely femoral and tibial coronal angles and femoral and tibial sagittal angles. Baseline demographics, surgery details and 6- and 12-month post-TKA patient-reported outcomes (PROMs; e.g., Oxford Knee Score [OKS] and Core Outcome Measures Index) were compared between RA-TKA and propensity score-matched cTKA patients. RESULTS: Overall correlation between preset and 6-week postoperative angle measurements for RA-TKA was low with significant differences noted only for mean tibial sagittal angles (84.6° [RA-TKA] vs. 82.3° [cTKA]) (p < 0.001). The study groups were demographically similar, although RA-TKA patients had slightly longer operative times and higher blood loss but shorter inpatient stays. There were sustainable improvements in all PROMs already at 6 months, yet RA-TKA patients had significantly higher OKS values over their conventional counterparts at this time point. CONCLUSION: Radiological and clinical outcomes were comparable between RA-TKA and cTKA. The robotic-assisted system demonstrated higher accuracy in the coronal than sagittal plane and RA-TKA patients achieved better short-term outcomes for pain and disability. While both methods are similar in the hands of a skilled surgeon, long-term studies are necessary to establish clear method superiority. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Compromised abduction ability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty is primarily linked to limited glenohumeral range of motion while scapulothoracic mobility can typically be maintained. Glenohumeral joint forces strongly depend on the resulting scapulohumeral rhythm, however, an association between the acting muscle and joint forces and the subject-specific scapulohumeral rhythm after reverse shoulder arthroplasty has not been established. METHODS: Eleven reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients were divided into groups of poor and excellent abduction ability. Subject-specific models were developed and scaled for each patient using existing motion capture data in AnyBody™. Shoulder muscle and joint forces were obtained using inverse dynamics calculations during shoulder abduction to 100° in the scapula plane. The scapulohumeral rhythm, the resting abduction angle and internal body forces between the outcome groups were compared using a Mann Whitney U test. FINDINGS: The mean glenohumeral and scapulothoracic contribution to overall shoulder abduction for the excellent group was on average 9.7% higher and 21.4% lower, respectively, compared to the mean of the poor group. For shoulder abduction angles between 30° and 60°, the excellent group demonstrated on average 25% higher muscle forces in the anterior deltoid which was significantly higher compared to the poor outcome patients. Scapulothoracic muscle activity did not differ significantly between the two functional groups. INTERPRETATION: Accordingly, rehabilitation strategies focusing on strengthening the anterior part of the deltoid in particular may improve clinical outcomes.
