Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Across Three Lines of Therapy in Patients with ALK+ NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard first- and second-line treatment for advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated outcomes in patients with ALK+ NSCLC receiving third-line ALK TKI versus non-ALK-directed therapy. METHODS: Flatiron Health OncoEMR data were extracted for patients with ALK+ NSCLC initiating first-line ALK TKI between January 2015 and March 2022 followed by second-line ALK TKI and third-line ALK TKI (group A) or non-TKI therapy (group B). Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariate modelling. RESULTS: Among patients receiving third-line ALK TKI (A, n = 85) or non-TKI therapy (B, n = 43), most received first-line crizotinib (A/B: 64%/60%) and second-line alectinib (36%/30%), ceritinib (24%/19%), or lorlatinib (15%/30%). Common third-line treatments were lorlatinib/alectinib (41%/33%) in A and immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemotherapy + immunotherapy (30%/28%/21%) in B. Group A versus B had longer TTD of first-line treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.93; p = 0.020) and second-line treatment (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.75; p < 0.001) and longer OS from start of first-line treatment (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.54; p < 0.001) and second-line treatment (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.66; p < 0.001). For third-line treatment, median TTD (A/B) was 6.2/2.4 months (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.00; p = 0.049) and OS was 17.6/6.5 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.98; p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving third-line non-ALK-directed therapy had suboptimal outcomes on prior TKIs. Patients with longer duration of prior ALK TKI treatment appeared to benefit from third-line ALK TKIs.

Transforming the oncology data paradigm by creating, capturing, and retrieving structured cancer data at the point of care: A Mayo Clinic pilot.

INTRODUCTION: Structured data capture requires defined languages such as minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE). This pilot assessed the feasibility of capturing 5 mCODE categories (stage, disease status, performance status (PS), intent of therapy and intent to change therapy). METHODS: A tool (SmartPhrase) using existing and custom structured data elements was Built to capture 4 data categories (disease status, PS, intent of therapy and intent to change therapy) typically documented as free-text within notes. Existing functionality for stage was supported by the Build. Participant survey data, presence of data (per encounter), and time in chart were collected prior to go-live and repeat timepoints. The anticipated outcome was capture of >50% sustained over time without undue burden. RESULTS: Pre-intervention (5-weeks before go-live), participants had 1390 encounters (1207 patients). The median percent capture across all participants was 32% for stage; no structured data was available for other categories pre-intervention. During a 6-month pilot with 14 participants across three sites, 4995 encounters (3071 patients) occurred. The median percent capture across all participants and all post-intervention months increased to 64% for stage and 81%-82% for the other data categories post-intervention. No increase in participant time in chart was noted. Participants reported that data were meaningful to capture. CONCLUSIONS: Structured data can be captured (1) in real-time, (2) sustained over time without (3) undue provider burden using note-based tools. Our system is expanding the pilot, with integration of these data into clinical decision support, practice dashboards and potential for clinical trial matching.

Examining crossover and postprotocol therapies in first-line immunotherapy trials in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has led to significant improvement in outcomes for patients with nononcogene-driven advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The rate of crossover and receipt of postprotocol ICI in frontline trials for advanced NSCLC has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS: ClinicalTrials.gov was used to identify phase 3 studies evaluating the use of immunotherapy or combination chemoimmunotherapy against chemotherapy alone in the frontline management of advanced NSCLC. Data on outcomes, rate of crossover and/or subsequent post-protocol receipt of immunotherapy, and the start dates of these clinical trials were then extracted. RESULTS: Twenty-three frontline trials in nononcogene-driven advanced NSCLC were identified. Six trials with ICI monotherapy/dual ICI therapy and 17 trials evaluating chemotherapy/ICI in first-line advanced NSCLC were included in the analysis. The crossover rate ranged 0% to 54% in ICI monotherapy/dual ICI trials and 0% to 52% in chemotherapy/ICI trials. Nineteen of 23 trials provided information on subsequent postprotocol therapies. Among the trials not allowing crossover, postprotocol ICI was administered to 17% to 45.8% of patients. Information regarding the eventual receipt of ICI therapy was available for 22 of 23 trials. Of 6631 patients, 2507 (37.8%) randomized to the control arm eventually received ICI therapy. CONCLUSION: The rate of crossover and postprotocol ICI use was low in frontline trials for first-line NSCLC incorporating ICI. Given the proven survival overall survival of ICI in a broad population, there is a need to ensure availability of this life-prolonging therapy in future trials, either by crossover treatment or postprotocol administration.

The Faces of Financial Toxicity: A Qualitative Interview Study of Financial Toxicity in Advanced Cancer Patients in Phase I Oncology Trials.

Objective: To characterize the financial toxicity experienced by advanced cancer patients enrolled in phase I oncology trials. Patients and Methods: We conducted structured interviews with cancer patients participating in phase I clinical trials. Using a thematic analysis approach, we identified recurring themes in patients' experiences of financial toxicity resulting from trial participation. Results: Seven major themes emerged from the interviews: (1) the burden of travel, (2) a willingness to pursue treatment despite financial risk, (3) fear of destitution, (4) financial toxicity equaling physical toxicity, (5) changes in food spending, (6) reluctance to confide in the study investigator about financial toxicity, and (7) difficulty navigating financial aid. These themes highlight the multifaceted financial challenges faced by patients in early phase clinical trials and the need for targeted support services. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the relevance of financial toxicity in the context of phase I clinical trials and provide insights into the diverse challenges faced by advanced cancer patients. These challenges likely augment the disparities seen in trial enrollment for historically marginalized populations. Addressing financial toxicity in this population is crucial for improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Future research should focus on developing effective interventions and support services tailored to the needs of patients in early phase clinical trials.

Real-World Outcomes With Lurbinectedin in Second-Line Setting and Beyond for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lurbinectedin has emerged as a potential treatment option for relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). While clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy and safety, real-world data are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lurbinectedin in a real-world setting, focusing on its use as a second-line agent and beyond in SCLC patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 90 patients who received lurbinectedin between June 2020 and June 2022 within the Mayo Clinic Health System. Of these, 50 patients received lurbinectedin as a second-line agent, and 14 patients received it as a third-line or later agent. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: Lurbinectedin was generally well tolerated in this real-world cohort, with a median OS of 5.1 months in the second-line cohort and 5.6 months in the third-line or later cohort. Median PFS was 2.1 months in the second-line cohort and 3.4 months in the third-line or later cohort. Adverse events were manageable, with the most common being neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, and febrile neutropenia. No treatment-related deaths or grade 5 toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: This real-world study provides valuable insights into the safety and efficacy of lurbinectedin in relapsed SCLC. Lurbinectedin demonstrated modest efficacy and a comparable safety profile to that observed in clinical trials. However, outcomes for relapsed SCLC remain suboptimal, particularly for patients with a shorter chemotherapy-free interval and central nervous system metastases.

Subtype of SCLC Is an Intrinsic and Persistent Feature Through Systemic Treatment.

Introduction: SCLC is an aggressive malignancy with poor outcome. Most patients have disease recurrence despite treatments with multiple modalities. Subtyping of SCLC has been proposed recently, and novel agents targeting specific subtypes are actively being investigated. In this study, we evaluated the plasticity of subtypes in paired pre- and post-treatment samples. The aim was to understand possible subtype evolution after chemotherapy resistance that could lead to alternate targeted therapy strategies. Methods: A total of 68 samples from 32 patients with sufficient paired specimens were identified from 1998 to 2022. ASCL1, NEUROD1, and POU2F3 immunohistochemistry studies were performed on all cases, and subtyping by predominant expression was determined. Subtype comparison in each patient was performed, and expression analysis was performed on the basis of subtypes. Results: Of 32 cases, 28 (88%) had the same subtype in pre- and first post-treatment specimens. Protein expression level of subtype-specific transcription factor remained stable after chemotherapy. Two of five (40%) NEUROD1-predominant SCLC switched to ASCL1-predominant phenotype after treatment. One case had a pitfall of scoring ASCL1 on specimen with marked crushing artifacts. One case revealed the challenge of proper subtyping for samples with borderline POU2F3 expression. Conclusions: Subtype of SCLC generally remains the same after acquiring chemotherapy resistance. Plasticity was observed with rare cases switching from NEUROD1-predominant to ASC1-predominant SCLC. Resubtyping is unnecessary for the consideration of novel subtype-specific targeted agents, except cases with NEUROD1-predominant subtype.

Chemoimmunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer and a poor performance status.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with platinum-etoposide is the standard first-line therapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The phase 3 clinical trials that led to the approval of chemoimmunotherapy in ES-SCLC excluded patients who had an Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2-3. Therefore, data on the efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with an ECOG PS of 2-3 are limited. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy (atezolizumab or durvalumab) within the Mayo Clinic Health System between January 2016 and January 2021. The objective of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and best clinical response to therapy in patients with an ECOG PS of 0-1 vs. patients with an ECOG PS of 2-3 who received chemoimmunotherapy for newly diagnosed ES-SCLC. RESULTS: In total, 82 patients were included in the study. The mean ± standard deviation age was 68.1 ± 8.3 years. Of these, 56 patients were identified with an ECOG PS of 0-1, and 26 patients were identified with an ECOG PS of 2-3. The median PFS was similar regardless of ECOG PS (5.8 months [95% CI, 4.3-6.0 months] in the ECOG PS 0-1 group vs. 4.1 months [95% CI, 3.8-6.9 months] in the ECOG PS 2-3; p = .2994). The median OS was also similar regardless of ECOG PS (10.6 months [95% CI, 8.4-13.4 months] in the ECOG PS 0-1 group vs. 9.3 months [95% CI, 4.9-12.8 months]; p = .2718) in the ECOG PS 2-3 group. CONCLUSIONS: The study results demonstrated no significant difference in PFS or OS among the ECOG PS 2-3 and ECOG PS 0-1 groups. Therefore, chemoimmunotherapy should be considered for patients who have ES-SCLC with an ECOG PS of 2-3.

MRTX1719 Is an MTA-Cooperative PRMT5 Inhibitor That Exhibits Synthetic Lethality in Preclinical Models and Patients with MTAP-Deleted Cancer.

Previous studies implicated protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) as a synthetic lethal target for MTAP-deleted (MTAP del) cancers; however, the pharmacologic characterization of small-molecule inhibitors that recapitulate the synthetic lethal phenotype has not been described. MRTX1719 selectively inhibited PRMT5 in the presence of MTA, which is elevated in MTAP del cancers, and inhibited PRMT5-dependent activity and cell viability with >70-fold selecti-vity in HCT116 MTAP del compared with HCT116 MTAP wild-type (WT) cells. MRTX1719 demonstrated dose-dependent antitumor activity and inhibition of PRMT5-dependent SDMA modification in MTAP del tumors. In contrast, MRTX1719 demonstrated minimal effects on SDMA and viability in MTAP WT tumor xenografts or hematopoietic cells. MRTX1719 demonstrated marked antitumor activity across a panel of xenograft models at well-tolerated doses. Early signs of clinical activity were observed including objective responses in patients with MTAP del melanoma, gallbladder adenocarcinoma, mesothelioma, non-small cell lung cancer, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors from the phase I/II study. SIGNIFICANCE: PRMT5 was identified as a synthetic lethal target for MTAP del cancers; however, previous PRMT5 inhibitors do not selectively target this genotype. The differentiated binding mode of MRTX1719 leverages the elevated MTA in MTAP del cancers and represents a promising therapy for the ∼10% of patients with cancer with this biomarker. See related commentary by Mulvaney, p. 2310. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 2293.

Time from immune checkpoint inhibitor to sotorasib use correlates with risk of hepatotoxicity in non-small cell lung cancer: A brief report.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the risk factors and outcomes for patients who experienced hepatotoxicity after use of sotorasib in KRAS G12C mutated NSCLC. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of patients with KRAS G12C mutated NSCLC who received sotorasib between May 28th, 2021, and December 31st, 2021 across all Mayo Clinic sites, with follow up until December 31st, 2022. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients received sotorasib as standard of care treatment. Grade 3 or higher hepatoxicity was seen in 32% (10/31) patients presenting at a median of 51 days (range, 27-123) of sotorasib initiation. Baseline demographics were comparable between patients with and without ≥grade 3 hepatotoxicity, except for presence of CNS metastases and time from prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. Improvement in liver tests was observed in all patients after stopping sotorasib, and it was restarted at a lower dose in 8 patients. Despite dose reduction, hepatotoxicity requiring sotorasib discontinuation occurred in 2 patients. Twenty-eight of 31 patients had received prior ICI. Median time from prior ICI therapy was 69 days (range, 4-542). Rates of ≥grade 3 hepatoxicity were 75% (3/4), 64% (7/11) and 0% (0/13) for patients who received ICI within 30 days, 31-90 days and >90 days. None of the 3 patients without prior ICI exposure developed hepatoxicity. The median PFS and OS were 3.9 months and 9.9 months respectively. CONCLUSION: One-third of patients developed grade 3 or higher sotorasib induced hepatotoxicity. Risk of hepatotoxicity was higher in patients who received sotorasib within 90 days of ICI treatment.

Proton craniospinal irradiation with bevacizumab and pembrolizumab for leptomeningeal disease: a case report.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) remains a challenging condition with a dismal prognosis. In this case study, we report partial response of LMD in a patient with metastatic large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma following treatment with proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI), bevacizumab, and pembrolizumab. Two years after the initial diagnosis, he presented with LMD. He underwent proton CSI with bevacizumab followed by combination therapy with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab. He had a partial disease response with progression-free survival after LMD diagnosis of 4.6 months. He unfortunately developed pembrolizumab induced hypophysitis, after which he experienced rapid neurologic clinical progression. Overall, this novel combination led to a durable partial response which warrants prospective evaluation.

Patients with leptomeningeal disease have few therapeutic options and poor treatment outcomes. Single-agent therapies have not yet been as successful in improving patient survival. In this paper, we discuss how combination therapy with proton craniospinal irradiation, bevacizumab, and pembrolizumab led to neurological improvement and disease regression. These results show that this novel combination may lead to a significant benefit not seen previously with these individual drugs given alone. We hope to lay a foundation for a novel therapeutic approach in a critically high need disease which has previously been thought to be resistant to radiotherapy or immunotherapy.

Shared Decision Making in the Care of Patients With Cancer.

Shared decision making (SDM) is a method of care that is suitable for the care of patients with cancer. It involves a collaborative conversation seeking to respond sensibly to the problematic situation of the patient, cocreating a plan of care that makes sense intellectually, practically, and emotionally. Genetic testing to identify whether a patient has a hereditary cancer syndrome represents a prime example of the importance for SDM in oncology. SDM is important for genetic testing because not only results affect current cancer treatment, cancer surveillance, and care of relatives but also these tests generate both complex results and psychological concerns. SDM conversations should take place without interruptions, disruptions, or hurry and be supported, where available, by tools that assist in conveying the relevant evidence and in supporting plan development. Examples of these tools include treatment SDM encounter aids and the Genetics Adviser. Patients are expected to play a key role in making decisions and implementing plans of care, but several evolving challenges related to the unfettered access to information and expertise of varying trustworthiness and complexity in between interactions with clinicians can both support and complicate this role. SDM should result in a plan of care that is maximally responsive to the biology and biography of each patient, maximally supportive of each patient's goals and priorities, and minimally disruptive of their lives and loves.

Early Changes in Circulating Cell-Free KRAS G12C Predict Response to Adagrasib in KRAS Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: Non-invasive monitoring of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to be a readily available measure for early prediction of clinical response. Here, we report on early ctDNA changes of KRAS G12C in a Phase 2 trial of adagrasib in patients with advanced, KRAS G12C-mutant lung cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed serial droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and plasma NGS on 60 KRAS G12C-mutant patients with lung cancer that participated in cohort A of the KRYSTAL-1 clinical trial. We analyzed the change in ctDNA at 2 specific intervals: Between cycles 1 and 2 and at cycle 4. Changes in ctDNA were compared with clinical and radiographic response. RESULTS: We found that, in general, a maximal response in KRAS G12C ctDNA levels could be observed during the initial approximately 3-week treatment period, well before the first scan at approximately 6 weeks. 35 patients (89.7%) exhibited a decrease in KRAS G12C cfDNA >90% and 33 patients (84.6%) achieved complete clearance by cycle 2. Patients with complete ctDNA clearance at cycle 2 showed an improved objective response rate (ORR) compared with patients with incomplete ctDNA clearance (60.6% vs. 33.3%). Furthermore, complete ctDNA clearance at cycle 4 was associated with an improved overall survival (14.7 vs. 5.4 months) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: These results support using early plasma response of KRAS G12C assessed at approximately 3 weeks to anticipate the likelihood of a favorable objective clinical response.

Chemoimmunotherapy as the First-Line Treatment for Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer and an ECOG Performance Status 2 or 3.

BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrated that chemoimmunotherapy prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 or 1. However, there is little data regarding chemoimmunotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC and an ECOG PS 2 or 3. This study aims to evaluate the benefits of chemoimmunotherapy compared to chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with ES-SCLC and ECOG PS 2 or 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 46 adults treated at Mayo Clinic between 2017 and 2020 with de novo ES-SCLC and an ECOG PS 2 or 3. Twenty patients received platinum-etoposide and 26 patients received platinum-etoposide and atezolizumab. Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: PFS was longer in the chemoimmunotherapy group compared to the chemotherapy group, 4.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-6.9) vs. 3.2 months (95% CI: 0.6-4.8), respectively; P = 0.0491. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the OS between the chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy group, 9.3 months (95% CI: : 4.9-12.8) vs. 7.6 months (95% CI: 0.6-11.9), respectively; P = .21. CONCLUSION: Chemoimmunotherapy prolongs PFS compared to chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC and an ECOG PS 2 or 3.  No OS difference was observed among the chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy groups; nevertheless, this may be attributed due to the small sample size of the study.

Efficacy of first-line checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in high-grade extrapulmonary metastatic neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Poorly differentiated extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP NECs) are aggressive cancers characterized by a high Ki-67 index, rapid tumor growth and poor survival, and are subdivided into small and large cell carcinoma. For small cell carcinoma of the lung, a pulmonary NEC, the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy (CTX) and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) is considered standard therapy and superior to CTX alone. EP NECs are typically treated with platinum-based regimens, some clinicians have adopted the addition of a CPI to CTX based on data from trials in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung. In this retrospective study of EP NECs, we report 38 patients treated with standard first-line CTX and 19 patients treated with CTX plus CPI. We did not observe any additional benefit of adding CPI to CTX in this cohort.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only a minority of NSCLC patients benefit from ICIs, and whether the magnitude of benefit is specific factor-dependent remains unclear. We performed a systematic review to improve our understanding of clinicopathologic and biomolecular features associated with improved survival upon treatment with ICIs for NSCLC. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus from database inception to August 31, 2021, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing overall survival (OS) in NSCLC treated with ICIs vs control therapies. We calculated the pooled OS hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI in subgroups using a random-effects model, and assessed the heterogeneity between the paired estimates using an interaction test. Results: A total of 23 RCTs involving 15,829 patients were included. We found that wild-type EGFR, high PD-L1 expression, and high bTMB were associated with a significant OS benefit from ICIs, but not mutant EGFR, low PD-L1 expression, and low bTMB. The differences of OS benefit between wild-type and mutant EGFR (HR=1.53, 95%CI 1.13-2.08), high and low PD-L1 (HR=1.35; 95%CI 1.14-1.61), high and low bTMB (HR=1.71; 95%CI 1.17-2.52) were statistically significant. OS benefit was found in all subgroups regardless of sex, age, ECOG PS, histology, smoking history, baseline brain metastasis, race, and region, and the interaction test demonstrated no significant difference of the OS benefit between these opposed subgroups (e.g. male vs female). Conclusions: Wild-type EGFR, high PD-L1 expression, and high bTMB are associated with a greater magnitude of efficacy from ICIs vs control therapies in NSCLC. However, the administration of ICIs should not be restricted to other clinicopathological factors (sex, smoking history, race, etc.).

Adagrasib in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring a KRASG12C Mutation.

BACKGROUND: Adagrasib, a KRASG12C inhibitor, irreversibly and selectively binds KRASG12C, locking it in its inactive state. Adagrasib showed clinical activity and had an acceptable adverse-event profile in the phase 1-1b part of the KRYSTAL-1 phase 1-2 study. METHODS: In a registrational phase 2 cohort, we evaluated adagrasib (600 mg orally twice daily) in patients with KRASG12C -mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 therapy. The primary end point was objective response assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: As of October 15, 2021, a total of 116 patients with KRASG12C -mutated NSCLC had been treated (median follow-up, 12.9 months); 98.3% had previously received both chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Of 112 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 48 (42.9%) had a confirmed objective response. The median duration of response was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2 to 13.8), and the median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.7 to 8.4). As of January 15, 2022 (median follow-up, 15.6 months), the median overall survival was 12.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 19.2). Among 33 patients with previously treated, stable central nervous system metastases, the intracranial confirmed objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.0 to 51.8). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97.4% of the patients - grade 1 or 2 in 52.6% and grade 3 or higher in 44.8% (including two grade 5 events) - and resulted in drug discontinuation in 6.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with previously treated KRASG12C -mutated NSCLC, adagrasib showed clinical efficacy without new safety signals. (Funded by Mirati Therapeutics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03785249.).

Dosimetric predictors of pneumonitis in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiation followed by durvalumab.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence and predictors of pneumonitis for patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the era of consolidation durvalumab have yet to be fully elucidated. In this large single institution analysis, we report the incidence of and factors associated with grade 2 + pneumonitis in NSCLC patients treated with the PACIFIC regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients treated at our institution with definitive CRT followed by durvalumab from 2018 to 2021. Clinical documentation and imaging studies were reviewed to determine grade 2 + pneumonitis events, which required the following: 1) pulmonary symptoms warranting prolonged steroid taper, oxygen dependence, and/or hospital admission and 2) radiographic findings consistent with pneumonitis. RESULTS: One-hundred ninety patients were included. The majority received 60 Gray (Gy) in 30 fractions with concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel. Median number of durvalumab cycles received was 12 (IQR: 4-22). At a median follow-up of 14.8 months, 50 (26.3%) patients experienced grade 2 + pneumonitis with a 1-year cumulative incidence of 27.8% (95% CI: 21.9-35.4). Seventeen (8.9%) patients experienced grade 3 + pneumonitis and 4 grade 5 (2.1%). Dosimetric predictors of pneumonitis included ipsilateral and total lung volume receiving 5 Gy or greater (V5Gy), V10Gy, V20Gy, V40Gy, and mean dose and contralateral V40Gy. Heart V5Gy, V10Gy, and mean dose were also significant variables. Overall survival estimates at 1 and 3 years were 87.4% (95% CI: 82.4-92.8) and 60.3% (95% CI: 47.9-74.4), respectively. CONCLUSION: We report a risk of pneumonitis higher than that seen on RTOG 0617 and comparable to the PACIFIC study. Multiple lung and heart dosimetric factors were predictive of pneumonitis.

Trends in Prices of Drugs Used to Treat Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the US From 2015 to 2020.

Importance: Oncology drug prices are a determinant of health disparities in the US and worldwide. Several new therapeutic agents for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have become available on the US market over the past decade. Although increased competition typically produces lower prices, competition among brand-name oncology drugs has not resulted in lower prices. Objective: To assess price changes in class-specific brand-name medications used to treat metastatic NSCLC in the US from 2015 to 2020. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study, conducted from August 13, 2015, to August 13, 2020, used data from the Micromedex Red Book and Medi-Span Price Rx databases. The study sample was limited to 17 brand-name medications used to treat metastatic NSCLC that were available for purchase before January 1, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were trends over time in average wholesale prices and wholesale acquisition cost unit prices and the correlation in price among the multiple brand-name medications within each therapeutic class (immune checkpoint inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors, ROS1 inhibitors, BRAF inhibitors, and MEK inhibitors), measured using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The compounded annual growth rates of different medication costs were compared with the annual inflation rate and the consumer price index for prescription drugs. Results: For all drug classes, the Pearson correlation coefficient approached 1.0, indicating an increase in drug list prices despite within-class drug competition. The median Pearson correlation coefficient values were 0.964 (range, 0.951-0.994) for immune checkpoint inhibitors, 0.898 (range, 0.665-0.950) for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, 0.999 (range, 0.982-0.999) for anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors, and 0.999 for BRAF and MEK inhibitors. The median compounded annual growth rates for most drug costs were higher than the annual inflation rate and consumer price index for prescription drugs: 1.81% (range, 1.29%-2.13%) for immune checkpoint inhibitors, 2.56% (range, 2.38%-5.26%) for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, 2.46% (range, 1.75%-4.66%) for anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ROS1 inhibitors, and 3.06% (range, 0%-3.06%) for BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, prices of brand-name medications for treatment of NSCLC increased in the US from 2015 to 2020 without evidence of price competition, raising concern about the affordability of promising oncology drugs. These findings suggest that drug pricing reform is needed.

Real-world efficacy of osimertinib in previously EGFR-TKI treated NSCLC patients without identification of T790M mutation.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of osimertinib in previously EGFR-TKI-treated NSCLC without identification of T790M mutational status remains unclear in real-world practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 417 patients had stage III-IV NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation and 154 out of 417 patients receiving osimertinib as ≥ second-line EGFR-TKI were identified. The time to treatment failure and risk of death were analyzed. RESULTS: Higher risk of death was found in EGFR-mutant patients with age ≥ 65 years, non-adenocarcinoma, no surgery or radiation, non-exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R, higher ECOG PS (2-4), PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, and bone/liver/adrenal metastasis (all p < 0.05). Osimertinib as ≥ second-line TKI in patients with/without identification of T790M revealed lower risk of death compared to first-line first/second generation TKI without subsequent osimertinib (p = 0.0002; 0.0232, respectively). However, osimertinib-treated patients with T790M did not have superior survival than those without (p = 0.2803). A higher risk of treatment failure for osimertinib was found in males, patients with first-line TKI duration ≤ 12 months, BMI drop > 10%, and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% (All p < 0.05). Nonetheless, osimertinib as ≥ second-line TKI in patients without identification of 790 M did not have higher risk of treatment failure than those with T790M (p = 0.1236). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that osimertinib as second line or subsequent TKI in EGFR-TKI-treated patients without identification of T790M revealed lower risk of death compared to first-line first/second generation TKI without subsequent osimertinib, in real-world practice. Additionally, EGFR-mutant patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% had a higher risk of treatment failure for osimertinib and worse overall survival than those with PD-L1 expression < 50%. These results suggest that osimertinib as second line or subsequent TKI may be a potential alternative option for the treatment of patients without identification of T790M and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% is associated with a significantly poor outcome in patients receiving osimertinib.

Association of a Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) Program With Reduced Hospitalizations in Cancer Patients With COVID-19.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess the impact of an interdisciplinary remote patient monitoring (RPM) program on clinical outcomes and acute care utilization in cancer patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis following a prospective observational study performed at Mayo Clinic Cancer Center. Adult patients receiving cancer-directed therapy or in recent remission on active surveillance with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 18 and July 31, 2020, were included. RPM was composed of in-home technology to assess symptoms and physiologic data with centralized nursing and physician oversight. RESULTS: During the study timeframe, 224 patients with cancer were diagnosed with COVID-19. Of the 187 patients (83%) initially managed in the outpatient setting, those who did not receive RPM were significantly more likely to experience hospitalization than those receiving RPM. Following balancing of patient characteristics by inverse propensity score weighting, rates of hospitalization for RPM and non-RPM patients were 2.8% and 13%, respectively, implying that the use of RPM was associated with a 78% relative risk reduction in hospital admission rate (95% CI, 54 to 102; P = .002). Furthermore, when hospitalized, these patients experienced a shorter length of stay and fewer prolonged hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, and deaths, although these trends did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The use of RPM and a centralized virtual care team was associated with a reduction in hospital admission rate and lower overall acute care resource utilization among cancer patients with COVID-19.