RESUMEN
Objective: We aimed to compare transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) parameters for on-pump (ONCAB) and off-pump (OPCAB) coronary artery bypass procedures. Methods: The database of the Registry for Quality AssESsmenT with Ultrasound Imaging and TTFM in Cardiac Bypass Surgery (REQUEST) study was retrospectively reviewed. Only single grafts were included (ie, no sequential or Y/T grafts). Primary end points were mean graft flow (MGF), pulsatility index (PI), diastolic fraction (DF), and backflow (BF). Unadjusted and propensity score-matching comparisons were performed. Results: Of 1016 patients in the REQUEST registry, 846 had at least 1 graft for which TTFM was performed. Of these, 512 patients (60.6%) underwent ONCAB and 334 (39.4%) OPCAB procedures. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) during measurements was higher in the OPCAB group. After propensity score-matching, 312 well balanced pairs were left. In these matched patients, MGF was higher for the ONCAB versus the OPCAB group (32 vs 28 mL/min, respectively, for all grafts [P < .001]; 30 vs 27 mL/min for arterial grafts [P = .002]; and 35 vs 31 mL/min for venous grafts [P = .006], respectively). PI was lower in the ONCAB group (2.1 vs 2.3, for all grafts; P < .001). Diastolic fraction was slightly lower in the ONCAB group (65% vs 67.5%; P < .001). The backflow was also lower in the ONCAB group (0.6 vs 1.3; P < .001) with trends similar to MGF and PI for venous and arterial grafts. There were 21 (3.3%) revisions in the OPCAB group and 14 (2.1%) in the ONCAB group (P = .198). Conclusions: ONCAB surgery was associated with higher MGF and lower PI values, especially in venous grafts. Different TTFM cutoff values for ONCAB versus OPCAB surgery might be considered.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is considered a high-risk operation. The study aim was to analyze the authors' eight-year experience with TVR and to characterize the specific risk factors for this operation. METHODS: Between January 2005 and August 2012, a total of 67 patients (46 females, 21 males; mean age 58 +/- 14 years; range: 25-86 years) underwent TVR at the authors' center. Re-do operations were performed in 48 patients (72%), including 37 patients (55%) who had at least two previous surgeries. Isolated TVR was performed in 28 patients (42%). The follow up (mean 28 months) included echocardiography and survival analysis. RESULTS: The overall operative mortality was 17.9% (n = 12, all female). In the latter half of the study period, mortality declined to 11.4% (p = NS). Major postoperative morbidity included prolonged mechanical ventilation (28.4%), low cardiac output (29.8%), and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis (10.4%). Univariate analysis revealed that female gender (p = 0.007), NYHA class (p = 0.038), serum bilirubin level (p = 0.02) and number of previous cardiac surgeries (p = 0.05) were associated with increased operative mortality. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that reoperation (OR 6.06, p = 0.036) was an independent risk factor for operative mortality or complications. Echocardiography at follow up showed that 92.6% of all patients had tricuspid regurgitation grade < 2. The overall five-year survival rates for males and females were 82% and 53%, respectively (p = 0.03), but five-year survival for operative survivors was similar in males and females (82% versus 73%, p = 0.5). Cox regression analysis showed that age (OR 1.07, p = 0.028) and reoperation (OR 6.1, p = 0.038) were independent risk factors for late mortality. CONCLUSION: TVR remains a high-risk operation, particularly for advanced age and previously operated patients; however, the long-term survival is satisfactory. Typically, women undergo TVR at an older age with a higher mortality rate than men. However, the long-term mortality rate of patients who survived surgery was not associated with gender.
