Assessing breast arterial calcification in mammograms and its implications for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk.

PURPOSE: Breast arterial calcifications (BAC) are incidentally observed on mammograms, yet their implications remain unclear. We investigated lifestyle, reproductive, and cardiovascular determinants of BAC in women undergoing mammography screening. Further, we investigated the relationship between BAC, coronary arterial calcifications (CAC) and estimated 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular (ASCVD) risk. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we obtained reproductive history and CVD risk factors from 215 women aged 18 or older who underwent mammography and cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) within a 2-year period between 2007 and 2017 at hospital. BAC was categorized as binary (present/absent) and semi-quantitatively (mild, moderate, severe). CAC was determined using the Agatston method and recorded as binary (present/absent). Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, accounting for age as a confounding factor. ASCVD risk over a 10-year period was calculated using the Pooled Cohort Risk Equations. RESULTS: Older age, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, higher parity, and younger age at first birth (≤28 years) were significantly associated with greater odds of BAC. Women with both BAC and CAC had the highest estimated 10-year risk of ASCVD (13.30 %). Those with only BAC (8.80 %), only CAC (5.80 %), and no BAC or CAC (4.40 %) had lower estimated 10-year risks of ASCVD. No association was detected between presence of BAC and CAC. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the hypothesis that BAC on a screening mammogram may help to identify women at potentially increased risk of future cardiovascular disease without additional cost and radiation exposure.

Unilateral axillary adenopathy in the setting of COVID-19 vaccine: Follow-up.

With the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and now Johnson and Johnson COVID-19 vaccines readily available to the general population, the appearance of vaccine-induced axillary adenopathy on imaging has become more prevalent. We are presenting follow up to the first reported four cases of vaccine induced unilateral axillary adenopathy on imaging to our knowledge, which demonstrate expected self-resolving adenopathy. Our hope is that by providing this follow-up and reviewing current management guidelines, clinicians as well as patients will appreciate that this is an expected, benign, and self-resolving finding. In addition, we hope to quell any vaccine hesitancy brought about by recent mainstream media attention to this topic and ultimately empower patients to receive both the COVID-19 vaccine and undergo routine screening mammography, as both are vital to their health.

Unilateral axillary Adenopathy in the setting of COVID-19 vaccine.

With the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approval and rollout of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, it is important for radiologists to consider recent COVID-19 vaccination history as a possible differential diagnosis for patients with unilateral axillary adenopathy. Hyperplastic axillary nodes can be seen on sonography after any vaccination but are more common after a vaccine that evokes a strong immune response, such as the COVID-19 vaccine. As the differential of unilateral axillary adenopathy includes breast malignancy, it is crucial to both thoroughly evaluate the breast for primary malignancy and to elicit history of recent vaccination. As COVID-19 vaccines will soon be available to a larger patient population, radiologists should be familiar with the imaging features of COVID-19 vaccine induced hyperplastic adenopathy and its inclusion in a differential for unilateral axillary adenopathy. Short-term follow-up for unilateral axillary adenopathy in the setting of recent COVID-19 vaccination is an appropriate recommendation, in lieu of immediately performing potentially unnecessary and costly axillary lymph node biopsies.

Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of 2D synthetic mammography (SM) to that of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in the detection of microcalcifications and to evaluate radiologists' preference between the two imaging modalities for assessing calcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A fully crossed, mode-balanced, paired-case (n = 160), retrospective, multireader (n = 3) performance study was implemented to compare screening mammograms acquired with digital breast tomosynthesis and both FFDM and SM between 2015 and 2017. The study cohort included 70 patients with mammograms recalled for microcalcifications (35 with malignant findings and 35 with benign findings) and was supplemented with 90 patients with mammograms with negative findings. In separate sessions, readers interpreted SM or FFDM images by recording a BI-RADS assessment and the probability of malignancy. In a final session that included 70 mammograms with microcalcifications, readers recorded their subjective assessment of microcalcification conspicuity and diagnostic confidence. RESULTS. There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy as assessed by comparing the likelihood of malignancy based on the AUC of plotted ROCs, with AUCs of 91% (95% CI, 83-97%) and 88% (95% CI, 79-95%) observed for SM and FFDM, respectively (p = 0.392), and with noninferiority of SM compared with FFDM (p = 0.011). No significant difference was observed between SM and FFDM in terms of sensitivity (77% vs 73%, respectively; p = 0.366) or negative predictive value (84% vs 82%, respectively; p = 0.598). The specificity and positive predictive value of SM were lower than those of FFDM (91% vs 98%, respectively [p = 0.034], and 87% vs 96%, respectively [p = 0.034]). All readers found calcifications to be more conspicuous on SM (p < 0.0001); however, no significant difference in subjective diagnostic confidence was seen. CONCLUSION. SM is noninferior to FFDM in the detection of microcalcifications. Despite the increased conspicuity of microcalcifications on SM, the subjective diagnostic confidence in the two modalities is comparable.