Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Dig Dis ; 24(11): 630-637, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37823361

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Laser lithotripsy under fluoroscopic guidance is difficult to perform and risky due to its invisibility. In this study we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of a novel endoscopic auxiliary system (NEAS)-assisted lithotripsy under fluoroscopy for treating difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones. METHODS: Patients with difficult CBD stones who were treated with NEAS-assisted laser lithotripsy (NEAS group) or conventional mechanical lithotripsy (ML) under fluoroscopy (ML group) were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was the complete stone clearance rate and the secondary outcomes included operation time, complications, and medical cost. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were treated with NEAS-assisted laser lithotripsy and 144 patients underwent ML. Using the propensity score matching analysis, 17 pairs of cases treated with NEAS-assisted lithotripsy and ML were included. Patients in the NEAS group showed a higher stone clearance rate than the ML group (94.1% vs 58.8%, P = 0.039), as well as shorter operation time (41.9 min vs 49.4 min, P < 0.001) and lower medical cost (USD 4607 vs USD 5014, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups (5.9% vs 17.6%, P = 0.601). CONCLUSION: NEAS-assisted fluoroscopy-guided laser lithotripsy is feasible and safe, which may be a promising technique in fluoroscopy-guided laser lithotripsy for difficult CBD stones.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Biliares , Litotricia , Humanos , Cálculos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Cálculos Biliares/terapia , Cálculos Biliares/etiología , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Litotricia/efectos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Fluoroscopía
2.
J Dig Dis ; 21(4): 215-221, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32129564

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Some gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (SETs) have malignant potential and complete resection may be required. However, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be a tedious procedure and requires a long and extensive training to master. Devices for endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) are limited and are not widely available. We report here a simpler endoscopic method to resect small SETs using a commercially available endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) kit and enucleation technique. METHODS: All patients with SET who underwent device-assisted resection at our tertiary care hospital from April 2015 to November 2016 were enrolled in this retrospective study. All procedures were performed by a single expert endoscopist with an advanced endoscopy trainee. A mucosectomy and a limited dissection under mucosa were performed to preserve the mucosa before a device-assisted enucleation of the tumor to facilitate endoscopic closure of the defect closure in all cases. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients aged 38-70 y, of whom six were males, were included. Most of the tumors originated from the muscularis propria and were located at the proximal gastric body. The mean procedural duration was 53 minutes (range 23-91 min). The average size of the lesions was 13 mm (range 9-21 mm). The mean duration of hospitalization was 1.3 days. Bleeding and intentional perforation were all successfully managed during the procedure and did not result in any clinically significant adverse event. CONCLUSION: A device-assisted EFTR using a commercially available EMR kit is a safe and feasible method for the endoscopic resection of small gastric extrovert SETs.


Asunto(s)
Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/instrumentación , Mucosa Gástrica/cirugía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Gastroscopía/instrumentación , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Gastroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) ; 8(6): 425-430, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33442474

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fluoroscopy is often used during the endoscopic drainage of pancreatic-fluid collections (PFCs). An electrocautery-enhanced coaxial lumen-apposing, self-expanding metal stent (ELAMS) facilitates a single-step procedure and may avoid the need for fluoroscopy. This study compares the treatment outcomes using ELAMS with and without fluoroscopy. METHODS: Patients with PFCs who had cystogastrostomy from January 2014 to February 2017 were enrolled. Two groups were studied based on fluoroscopy use. Technical success was defined as uneventful insertion of ELAMS at time of procedure. Clinical success was defined as (i) clinical resolution of symptoms after the procedure and (ii) >75% reduction in cyst size on computed tomography 8 weeks after stent placement. Adverse events including bleeding, stent migration, and infection were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (13 males) had PFCs drainage with ELAMS in the study period. The mean age was 51.6 ± 14.2 years. Thirteen patients had walled-off necrosis while eight had a pancreatic pseudocyst. The mean size of the PFCs was 11.3 ± 3.3 cm. Fluoroscopy was used in seven cases (33%) and was associated with a longer procedure time compared to non-fluoroscopy (43.1 ± 10.4 vs 33.3 ± 10.5 min, P = 0.025). This association was independent of the size, location, or type of PFCs. Fluoroscopy had no effect on the technical success rates. In fluoroless procedures, the clinical resolution was 91% as compared to 71% in fluoroscopy procedures (P = 0.52) and the radiologic resolution was 57% as compared to 71% in fluoroscopy procedures (P = 0. 65). Three cases of stent migration/displacement occurred in the fluoroless procedures. CONCLUSIONS: ELAMS may avoid the need for fluoroscopy during cystogastrostomy. Procedures without fluoroscopy were significantly shorter and fluoroscopy use had no impact on the technical or clinical success rates.

4.
J Dig Dis ; 20(11): 572-577, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31498966

RESUMEN

Dysfunction of gastrointestinal (GI) sphincters, including the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and the pyloric sphincter, plays a vital role in GI motility disorders, such as achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), gastroparesis, and fecal incontinence. Using multi-detector high-resolution impedance planimetry, the functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) system measures simultaneous data on tissue distensibility and luminal geometry changes in the sphincter in a real-time manner. In this review we focus on the emerging data on FLIP, which can be used as an innovative diagnostic method during endoscopic or surgical procedures in GI motility disorders. Subsequent large, prospective, standardizing studies are needed to validate these findings before it can be put to routine clinical use.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico por imagen , Motilidad Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Canal Anal/fisiología , Acalasia del Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Acalasia del Esófago/fisiopatología , Unión Esofagogástrica/diagnóstico por imagen , Unión Esofagogástrica/fisiología , Incontinencia Fecal/diagnóstico por imagen , Incontinencia Fecal/fisiopatología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico por imagen , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/fisiopatología , Gastroparesia/diagnóstico por imagen , Gastroparesia/fisiopatología , Humanos
5.
Endoscopy ; 50(8): 809-812, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29966143

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tissue sampling for biliary stricture is important for differential diagnosis and further treatment. The aim of this study was to assess a novel dilation catheter-guided mini-forceps biopsy (DCMB) method in the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. METHODS: 42 patients with malignant biliary stricture who underwent both brush cytology and DCMB during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between October 2014 and November 2015 were retrospectively included. During DCMB, the mini biopsy forceps was introduced into the biliary stricture through the dilation catheter, and then the position and direction of the forceps were adjusted to obtain tissue samples. RESULTS: The positive rate of DCMB was significantly higher than that of brush cytology (81.0 % [34/42] vs. 38.1 % [16/42]; P < 0.001). No severe complications occurred; three patients (7.1 %) experienced mild procedure-related acute pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: The novel DCMB technique was a practical, safe, efficient, and low-costing method for diagnosing malignant biliary stricture with a high accuracy rate.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/diagnóstico , Colestasis/etiología , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/diagnóstico , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Anciano , Carcinoma/complicaciones , Carcinoma/patología , Catéteres , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos
6.
Dig Liver Dis ; 49(1): 38-44, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27665262

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage has been established as a good treatment modality in the management of walled-off pancreatic necrosis, but the unmanageable infection of postoperation is still a thorny problem due to the poor drainage ability for solid necrotic debris only through transmural stent and nasocystic catheter. AIMS: Introduce a novel therapeutic method, namely endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage combined with cyclic irrigation technique in managing patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis. METHODS: 18 patients with severe acute pancreatitis complicated with walled-off pancreatic necrosis received treatment with endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage combined with cyclic irrigation were involved in this retrospective study. RESULTS: 17 of 18 patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis were treated by this new therapeutic method. Subsequent surgery was performed in 1 case due to uncontrolled infection, complications such as perforation, bleeding or multiple organ failure were not observed. Treatment success rate was high (16 in 17, 94.12%). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage combined with cyclic irrigation is an effective treatment option for symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis to facilitate drainage and obviate the need for subsequent surgery or endoscopic necrosectomy.


Asunto(s)
Drenaje/métodos , Duodenoscopía/métodos , Endosonografía/métodos , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/cirugía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Catéteres , China , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Endoscopy ; 47(5): 457-61, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25479561

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: We previously reported on a plastic stent that was coated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and sodium cholate, which dissolved common bile duct (CBD) stones ex vivo. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of such stents on biliary stones in a live porcine model. METHODS: Stents without coating or with degradable membranes containing 0 % or 50 % EDTA and sodium cholate were inserted together with human CBD stones into the porcine CBD. Serum laboratory variables, histological examinations of the bile duct, and the weight change in stones were compared during and after stent placement for 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 16 pigs were included (5 no coating, 5 0 % coating, 6 50 % coating). Biliary stones showed decreased weight in all groups; however, stones in the group with 50 % coated stents showed a greater reduction in weight compared with the no coating and the 0 % coating groups (269 ±â€Š66 mg vs. 179 ±â€Š51 mg [P = 0.09]; 269 ±â€Š66 mg vs. 156 ±â€Š26 mg [P = 0.01], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The plastic stent coated with 50 % agent enhanced CBD stone dissolution in vivo and may be a promising tool for patients with difficult biliary stones.


Asunto(s)
Quelantes del Calcio/administración & dosificación , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Ácido Edético/administración & dosificación , Cálculos Biliares/terapia , Colato de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Amilasas/sangre , Animales , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/sangre , Colangiografía , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Cálculos Biliares/sangre , Cálculos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Recuento de Leucocitos , Plásticos , Porcinos
8.
J Dig Dis ; 15(2): 78-84, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24131862

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for temporary biliary decompression in patients with acute obstructive cholangitis. METHODS: In total, 72 patients with acute obstructive cholangitis were prospectively randomized to undergo emergency ENBD with EST (EST group, n = 36) or without EST (non-EST group, n = 36). The clinical outcomes and complications between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Endoscopic nasobiliary decompression was successful in all 72 patients. Four patients underwent a second endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to replace the nasobiliary catheter due to blockage (one in the EST group and two in the non-EST group) or migration (one in the EST group). The mean serum γ-glutamyltransferase and total bilirubin levels after treatment were significantly higher in the non-EST group than in the EST group (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed for other parameters evaluated. The total complication rate was similar between the two groups (EST 25.0% vs non-EST 19.4%). Although hemorrhage occurred more frequently in the EST group and acute pancreatitis in the non-EST group, these differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: EST is helpful and safe for biliary drainage while ENBD without EST is the first choice for acute cholangitis. EST may increase the efficacy of ENBD in patients with papillary inflammatory stricture and thick bile.


Asunto(s)
Colangitis/cirugía , Colestasis/complicaciones , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Esfinterotomía Endoscópica/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Colangitis/etiología , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Drenaje/métodos , Urgencias Médicas , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/efectos adversos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Esfinterotomía Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA