Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Cancer ; 130(4): 526-541, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38182686

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Imatinib has become an exceptionally effective targeted drug for treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Despite its efficacy, the resistance to imatinib is common in GIST patients, posing a significant challenge to the effective treatment. METHODS: The expression profiling of TRIM21, USP15, and ACSL4 in GIST patients was evaluated using Western blot and immunohistochemistry. To silence gene expression, shRNA was utilized. Biological function of TRIM21, USP15, and ACSL4 was examined through various methods, including resistance index calculation, colony formation, shRNA interference, and xenograft mouse model. The molecular mechanism of TRIM21 and USP15 in GIST was determined by conducting Western blot, co-immunoprecipitation, and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analyses. RESULTS: Here we demonstrated that downregulation of ACSL4 is associated with imatinib (IM) resistance in GIST. Moreover, clinical data showed that higher levels of ACSL4 expression are positively correlated with favorable clinical outcomes. Mechanistic investigations further indicated that the reduced expression of ACSL4 in GIST is attributed to excessive protein degradation mediated by the E3 ligase TRIM21 and the deubiquitinase USP15. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that the TRIM21 and USP15 control ACSL4 stability to maintain the IM sensitive/resistant status of GIST.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Mesilato de Imatinib/farmacología , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/genética , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , ARN Interferente Pequeño/farmacología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-kit/metabolismo , Línea Celular Tumoral , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/genética , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/metabolismo , Proteasas Ubiquitina-Específicas/farmacología
2.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1193614, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37426646

RESUMEN

Background: Recently, the use of immunochemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) has been increasing and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy has become the first-line treatment for advanced GC. However, few studies with small sample sizes have examined this treatment regimen to assess its effectiveness and safety in the neoadjuvant treatment phase of resectable local advanced GC. Materials and methods: Herein, we systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science for clinical trials on neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) in advanced GC. The primary outcomes were effectiveness [evaluated by major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR)] and safety [assessed by grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and postoperative complications]. A meta-analysis of non-comparative binary results was performed to aggregate the primary outcomes. Direct comparative analysis was used to compare pooled results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) with nICT. The outcomes emerged as risk ratios (RR). Results: Five articles with 206 patients were included, and all of them were from the Chinese population. The pooled pCR and MPR rates were 26.5% (95% CI: 21.3%-33.3%) and 49.0% (95% CI: 42.3%-55.9%), while grade 3-4 TRAEs and post-operative complication rates were 20.0% (95% CI: 9.1%-39.8%) and 30.1% (95% CI: 23.1%-37.9%), respectively. Direct comparison showed that with the exception of grade 3-4 TRAEs and postoperative complications, all outcomes including pCR, MPR, and R0 resection rate favoured nICT to nCT. Conclusion: nICT is a promising strategy for use as an advisable neoadjuvant treatment for patients with advanced GC in Chinese population. However, more phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be required to further consolidate the efficacy and safety of this regimen.


Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia
3.
Front Chem ; 10: 844426, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35308794

RESUMEN

Application of drug combinations is a powerful strategy for the therapy of advanced gastric cancer. However, the clinical use of such combinations is greatly limited by the occurrence of severe systemic toxicity. Although polymeric-prodrug-based nanococktails can significantly reduce toxicity of drugs, they have been shown to have low intracellular drug release. To balance between efficacy and safety during application of polymeric-prodrug-based nanococktails, a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive nanococktail (PCM) with self-amplification drug release was developed in this study. In summary, PCM micelles were co-assembled from ROS-sensitive cucurbitacin B (CuB) and paclitaxel (PTX) polymeric prodrug, which were fabricated by covalently grafting PTX and CuB to dextran via an ROS-sensitive linkage. To minimize the side effects of the PCM micelles, a polymeric-prodrug strategy was employed to prevent premature leakage. Once it entered cancer cells, PCM released CuB and PTX in response to ROS. Moreover, the released CuB further promoted ROS generation, which in turn enhanced drug release for better therapeutic effects. In vivo antitumor experiments showed that the PCM-treated group had lower tumor burden (tumor weight was reduced by 92%), but bodyweight loss was not significant. These results indicate that the developed polymeric prodrug, with a self-amplification drug release nanococktail strategy, can be an effective and safe strategy for cancer management.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA