Characteristics and Dental Indices of Orthodontic Patients Using Aligners or Brackets.

Background. Clear aligners have become a treatment alternative to metal brackets in recent years due to the advantages of aesthetics, comfort, and oral health improvement. Nevertheless, few studies have analyzed the clinical characteristics and dental indices of orthodontic patients using aligners or brackets. Methods. A total of 170 patients received orthodontic treatment at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in 2021. Patients were stratified by types of treatment (Invisalign® clear aligner (n = 60) or metal bracket (n = 110). Results: Patients were aged 26.1 ± 7.2 years, and most were female (75.0%). The Invisalign® group was older than the bracket group (p = 0.003). The skeletal relationships were mainly Class I (49.4%), followed by Class II (30.0%) and Class III (20.6%). The molar relationships were primarily Class I (38.8%), followed by Class II (37.1%) and Class III (24.1%). The decayed, missing, and filled tooth (DMFT) index was 9.9 ± 6.0, including 2.1 ± 2.9 for decayed teeth, 0.5 ± 1.1 for missing teeth, and 7.3 ± 4.3 for filled teeth. There were no significant differences in the DMFT index or skeletal and molar relationships between the groups (p > 0.05). The index of complexity outcome and need (ICON) was 56.8 ± 13.5, and the score was lower in the Invisalign® group than in the bracket group (p = 0.002). Among the variables included in the ICON assessment, only the aesthetic variable was lower in the Invisalign® group than in the bracket group (p < 0.001). The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle was 27.9 ± 5.1 degrees. Finally, the E-line of the lower lip was lower in the Invisalign® group than in the bracket group (1.5 ± 2.4 versus 2.8 ± 3.1, p = 0.005). Conclusions. Older patients showed a greater intention to choose Invisalign® treatment for improving the appearance of their teeth than younger patients, who chose metal bracket treatment. The demand for Invisalign® aligner treatment for aesthetic reasons was substantial. A soft tissue profile with more protrusive lower lips and a greater need for orthodontic treatment was found in the bracket group.

Children with appendectomy have increased risk of future sepsis: Real-world data in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide. Sepsis is a major aetiology of morbidity and mortality in children. Our preliminary research revealed a positive correlation amongst appendectomy and future risk of sepsis in adults. However, to date, the relationship between appendectomy and future risk of sepsis in children remains unknown. The aim of this research was to investigate the relationship between appendectomy and the hazard of future sepsis in children. METHODS: We applied a nationwide population-based cohort to assess whether children who received appendectomy were at increased risk of subsequent sepsis. Overall, 57 261 subjects aged below 18 undergoing appendectomy as appendectomy group and 57 261 matched controls were identified as a non-appendectomy group from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We use propensity score analysis to match the age, sex, urbanisation level and parental occupation at the ratio to 1:1. Multiple Cox regression and stratified analyses were used to appraise the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for developing sepsis in children. RESULTS: Children who received appendectomy had a 2.38 times higher risk (aHR: 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.98, 2.87) of developing sepsis than those who did not, and the risk was higher in all age groups (aHR: 2.98, 95% CI = 1.84, 4.83; aHR: 2.45, 95% CI = 1.08, 2.05; aHR: 2.18, 95% CI = 1.70, 2.80 in children aged <6, 7-12 and 13-18 years, respectively). Patients with <1-year follow-up showed a 4.53-fold risk of sepsis in the appendectomy cohort (aHR: 4.53, 95% CI = 2.80, 7.35). Patients with 1-4 and ≥5 years' follow-up showed a 2.19- and 1.94-times risk of sepsis (aHR: 2.19, 95% CI = 1.61, 2.97; aHR: 1.94, 95% CI = 1.48, 2.56 in 1-4 and >5 years, respectively). CONCLUSION: Appendectomy was correlative to a 2.38-fold increased future sepsis risk in children, and the risk in all age groups was higher. More studies to interpret the possible biological mechanisms of the associations amongst sepsis and appendectomy are warranted.