Chronic clinical performance of a novel subxiphoidal pacemaker system: Early feasibility study design.

BACKGROUND: Extravascular and leadless pacemakers are a new class of cardiac devices that may reduce the rate of complications common to traditional cardiac pacemakers with intracardiac leads. These devices also have the potential of expanding access to cardiac pacing therapy by simplifying the complexity and cost of implantation. The objective of this study is to evaluate the implantation, chronic safety, and performance of a novel subxiphoidal pacemaker. METHODS: This study is an open-label, non-randomized, early feasibility study. Ten patients indicated for implantation of a single-chamber ventricular pacemaker will be enrolled and implanted with the investigational device. The pacemaker will be inserted underneath the ribcage and clipped to the xiphoid process, with stimulation electrodes positioned on the cardiac pericardium. Patients will be programmed to chronic pacing; pacing capture threshold, sensing amplitude, and lead impedance will be measured at implant and regularly scheduled follow-up visits. 24-h Holter ECG and cardiac troponin will also be periodically measured. Adverse events will be recorded throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: This study is designed to assess the feasibility, safety, and chronic performance of a novel extravascular pacemaker, and will provide valuable data on whether this device has the potential to be a viable alternative to conventional pacemakers.

First-in-man clinical implantation and acute pacing performance of a novel subxiphoidal pacemaker system.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular cardiac pacemakers are an established therapy for bradycardic indications. Recently, a new class of leadless pacemakers have mitigated some of the complications related to pacemaker leads. In this study, we evaluate the implantation and performance of a novel extravascular technology that delivers epicardial pacing through a subxiphoidal approach. METHODS: Fifteen patients undergoing non-emergent open-heart surgery were enrolled. A midline incision was made just below the xiphoid process, and substernal tunneling was used to create a pocket for the device and to access the anterior pericardium over the right ventricle. The test device (Calyan Technologies, Oakdale, MN) was temporarily inserted underneath the ribcage and clipped to the xiphoid process. The sensing and pacing electrode (FlexArm) was positioned on the anterior pericardium. Ventricular sensing and pacing capture thresholds were measured. RESULTS: The test device was successfully implanted in all 15 patients. There were no device or procedure-related adverse events. The first five implanted patients had no pacing capture at maximum stimulation intensity. Design changes were made to the device, including different electrode size and shape, and successful ventricular capture was achieved in 9 of the subsequent 10 patients. In these patients, pacing threshold was 3.8 ± 1.6 mA with a pulse width of 0.5 ms. All devices were successfully explanted at the end of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In a first-in-human experience with a novel extravascular pacemaker, this study demonstrated the feasibility of pericardial ventricular pacing via a subxiphoidal approach. Further chronic studies are required to evaluate the safety and performance of this novel pacing technology.

Safety and performance of a novel subxiphoidal pacemaker system.

BACKGROUND: Traditional cardiac pacemakers commonly have a range of complications related to the presence of intracardiac leads. A new class of extravascular and leadless pacemakers has recently emerged with the potential to mitigate these complications and expand access to cardiac pacing. The objective of this study is to evaluate the implantation, short-term chronic safety, and performance of a novel subxiphoidal extracardiac pacemaker. METHODS: Normal Yorkshire Cross swine (n = 16) were implanted with the subxiphoidal pacemaker. The pacemaker was inserted through a midline chest incision and clipped to the underside of the sternum, with the stimulation electrode placed on the anterior pericardium. Animals were chronically paced and followed for 90 days post-implant, with periodic measurement of pacing capture threshold (PCT) and electrode impedance. RESULTS: All 16 animals were successfully implanted with the study device. At implant, a consistent average PCT of 2.2 ± 0.4 V at a pulse width of 1.0 ms was observed in all animals, with an average implant impedance of 648 ± 44 Ω. Chronic pacing was programmed at a rate of 60 bpm, an amplitude of 3.4 ± 0.7 V, and a pulse width of 1.0 ms. PCT rose to 4.6 ± 0.8 V at 14 days and stabilized; at 90 days, PCT was 3.8 ± 1.2 V and electrode impedance was 533 ± 105 Ω. All implanted animals completed the study with no clinically significant findings, no clinically significant abnormalities, and with no adverse events that affected animal welfare. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of a novel subxiphoidal extracardiac pacemaker to deliver short-term chronic extravascular therapy. Further studies are required to assess the safety, feasibility, and long-term chronic pacing performance in human subjects.

Autonomic regulation therapy in chronic heart failure with preserved/mildly reduced ejection fraction: ANTHEM-HFpEF study results.

BACKGROUND: Autonomic regulation therapy (ART) utilizing cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) appeared to be safe and to improve autonomic tone, symptoms, and cardiac mechanical function in patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in the ANTHEM-HF Study. The ANTHEM-HFpEF Study is the first investigation to evaluate the safety and feasibility of ART in patients with symptomatic heart failure and preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF, HFmrEF). METHODS: This open-label interventional study enrolled 52 patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF, NYHA Class II-III, and LVEF ≥40%, who received stable guideline-directed medical therapy. All patients were successfully implanted with LivaNova VNS Therapy® system with an electrical lead surrounding the right cervical vagus nerve. RESULTS: Adverse event incidence was low. At 12 months, NYHA class (p <0.0001), 6-min walk distance (p <0.05), and quality of life (p <0.0001) were improved. Cardiac mechanical function measures were normal at baseline, except for left ventricular mass index in women and E/e' ratio in all patients, which were elevated at baseline, and were unchanged by ART. Autonomic tone and reflexes improved, indicated by 29% decrease in low-frequency/high-frequency heart rate variability to normal levels (p = 0.028) and by increased heart rate turbulence slope (p = 0.047). T-wave alternans (p = 0.001) and T-wave heterogeneity (p = 0.001) were reduced from abnormal to normal ranges. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia incidence decreased (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: ART appeared well-tolerated and safe in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF. Chronic ART did not alter mechanical function measures but was associated with improved heart failure symptoms, exercise tolerance, autonomic tone, and cardiac electrical stability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: Autonomic Neural Regulation Therapy to Enhance Myocardial Function in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction [ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03163030, registered 05/22/2017].

Advances in Our Clinical Understanding of Autonomic Regulation Therapy Using Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Patients Living With Heart Failure.

The ANTHEM-HF, INOVATE-HF, and NECTAR-HF clinical studies of autonomic regulation therapy (ART) using vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) systems have collectively provided dose-ranging information enabling the development of several working hypotheses on how stimulation frequency can be utilized during VNS for tolerability and improving cardiovascular outcomes in patients living with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Changes in heart rate dynamics, comprising reduced heart rate (HR) and increased HR variability, are a biomarker of autonomic nerve system engagement and cardiac control, and appear to be sensitive to VNS that is delivered using a stimulation frequency that is similar to the natural operating frequency of the vagus nerve. Among prior studies, the ANTHEM-HF Pilot Study has provided the clearest evidence of autonomic engagement with VNS that was delivered using a stimulation frequency that was within the operating range of the vagus nerve. Achieving autonomic engagement was accompanied by improvement from baseline in six-minute walk duration (6MWD), health-related quality of life, and left ventricular EF (LVEF), over and above those achieved by concomitant guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) administered to counteract harmful neurohormonal activation, with relative freedom from deleterious effects. Autonomic engagement and positive directional changes have persisted over time, and an exploratory analysis suggests that improvement in autonomic tone, symptoms, and physical capacity may be independent of baseline NT-proBNP values. Based upon these encouraging observations, prospective, randomized controlled trials examining the effects on symptoms and cardiac function as well as natural history have been warranted. A multi-national, large-scale, randomized, controlled trial is well underway to determine the outcomes associated with ART using autonomic nervous system engagement as a guide for VNS delivery.

Multifactorial Benefits of Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Autonomic Function and Cardiac Electrical Stability in Heart Failure Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction is a progressive disease that claims > 352,000 lives annually in the United States alone. Despite the development of an extensive array of pharmacologic and device therapies, prognosis remains poor. Disruption in autonomic balance in the form of heightened sympathetic nerve activity and reduced vagal tone have been established as major causes of heart failure progression. Interest in chronic neuromodulation mediated by vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has intensified in recent years. This review focuses on four main goals: (1) To review the preclinical evidence that supports the concept of a cardioprotective effect of VNS on autonomic function and cardiac electrical stability along with the underlying putative mechanisms. (2) To present the initial clinical experience with chronic VNS in patients with heart failure and highlight the controversial aspects of the findings. (3) To discuss the latest findings of the multifactorial effects of VNS on autonomic tone, baroreceptor sensitivity, and cardiac electrical stability and the state-of-the-art methods employed to monitor these relationships. (4) To discuss the implications of the current findings and the gaps in knowledge that require attention in future investigations.

Persistent Autonomic Engagement and Cardiac Control After Four or More Years of Autonomic Regulation Therapy Using Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Introduction: Although heart failure (HF) outcomes have improved dramatically with the use of guideline directed medical therapy and implantable devices, the overall prognosis of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains poor. Autonomic Regulation Therapy (ART) using chronic vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been evaluated in the ANTHEM-HF study, using changes in heart rate (HR) dynamics as a biomarker of autonomic nervous system engagement and cardiac control to guide VNS titration. ART was associated with sustained improvement in cardiac function and HF symptoms in patients with HFrEF and persistent HF symptoms despite guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). We sought to determine whether the responsiveness of the autonomic nervous system to ART, as reflected in HR response to vagus stimulation during the VNS duty cycle, is maintained after long-term chronic VNS administration. Methods: Fifteen patients with HFrEF and implanted with a VNS systems in the ANTHEM-HF study were evaluated after 4.7 ± 0.3 years (range: 4.0-5.0 years) of chronic ART. ECG electrodes were placed on each patient's wrists, and ECG rhythm strips were recorded. Instantaneous HR time series was computed at each patient's chronically programmed VNS intensity and during progressively increasing VNS intensity. HR during active stimulation (on-time) was compared to HR just prior to initiation of each stimulation cycle (off-time). Results: Persistent autonomic engagement was observed in a majority of patients (11 of 15, 73%) after chronic ART for four or more years. The average magnitude of HR reduction during ART on-time in all patients was 2.4 ± 3.2 bpm at the chronically programmed VNS pulse parameter settings. Conclusion: Autonomic responsiveness to VNS persists in patients with HFrEF who received chronic ART for up to 5 years as a supplement to GDMT. This suggests that the effects of ART on autonomic engagement and cardiac control remain durable over time. Clinical Trial Registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [#NCT01823887, CTRI registration #CTRI/2012/05/002681].

Implantable vagus nerve stimulation system performance is not affected by internal or external defibrillation shocks.

PURPOSE: Autonomic regulation therapy (ART) for heart failure (HF) is delivered using vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and has been associated with improvement in cardiac function and HF symptoms. VNS is delivered using an implantable pulse generator (IPG) and a lead placed around the cervical vagus nerve. Because HF patients may receive concomitant cardiac defibrillation therapy, testing was conducted to determine the effect of defibrillation (DF) on VNS system performance. METHODS: Normal swine (n = 4) with VNS system implants on the right cervical vagus nerve received sequential defibrillation shocks with three defibrillation systems: an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD), and an external cardioverter defibrillator (ECD). Each system delivered a series of bipolar high-energy shocks and reverse-polarity high-energy shocks. RESULTS: The specified cardiac defibrillation shocks were delivered successfully from each of the three defibrillation systems to all animals. After each shock series, interrogation of the IPG confirmed that software and data were unchanged from pre-programmed values. After all of the defibrillation shocks were delivered, the IPGs underwent and passed comprehensive electrical testing demonstrating proper system function. No shifts in IPG parameters or ART system failures were observed, and histologic evaluation of the vagus nerve revealed no anatomic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Implantable VNS systems were tested in vivo for immunity to defibrillation via ICD, S-ICD, and ECD, and were found to be unaffected by a series of high-energy defibrillation shocks. These results confirm that ART systems are capable of continuing to function after defibrillation and the cervical vagus nerve is anatomically unaffected.

Therapeutic responsiveness to vagus nerve stimulation in patients receiving beta-blockade for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: The effect of beta-blockade (BB) on response to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has not been reported in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In the ANTHEM-HF Study, 60 patients received chronic cervical VNS. Background pharmacological therapy remained unchanged during the study, and VNS intensity was stable once up-titrated. Significant improvement from baseline occurred in resting 24-hour heart rate (HR), 24-hour HR variability (SDNN), left ventricular EF (LVEF), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and quality of life (MLWHFS) at 6 months post-titration. We evaluated whether response to VNS was related to percentage of target BB dose (PTBBD) at baseline. METHODS: Patients were categorized by baseline PTBBD, then analyzed for changes from baseline in symptoms and function at 6 months after VNS titration. RESULTS: All patients received BB, either PTBBD ≥ 50 % (16 patients, 27 %; group 1) or PTBBD < 50 % (44 patients, 73 %; group 2). Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, LVEF, use of ACE/ARB, and use of MRA were similar between the two groups at baseline. Six months after up-titration, VNS reduced HR and significantly improved SDNN, LVEF, 6MWD, and MLWHFS equally in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the ANTHEM-HF study, VNS responsiveness appeared to be independent of the baseline BB dose administered.

Effect of defibrillation on the performance of an implantable vagus nerve stimulation system.

BACKGROUND: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) delivers Autonomic Regulation Therapy (ART) for heart failure (HF), and has been associated with improvement in cardiac function and heart failure symptoms. VNS is delivered using an implantable pulse generator (IPG) and lead with electrodes placed around the cervical vagus nerve. Because HF patients may receive concomitant cardiac defibrillation therapy, testing was conducted to determine the effect of defibrillation (DF) on the VNS system. METHODS: DF testing was conducted on three ART IPGs (LivaNova USA, Inc.) according to international standard ISO14708-1, which evaluated whether DF had any permanent effects on the system. Each IPG was connected to a defibrillation pulse generator and subjected to a series of high-energy pulses. RESULTS: The specified series of pulses were successfully delivered to each of the three devices. All three IPGs passed factory electrical tests, and interrogation confirmed that software and data were unchanged from the pre-programmed values. No shifts in parameters or failures were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Implantable VNS systems were tested for immunity to defibrillation, and were found to be unaffected by a series of high-energy defibrillation pulses. These results suggest that this VNS system can be used safely and continue to function after patients have been defibrillated.

Chronic vagus nerve stimulation is associated with multi-year improvement in intrinsic heart rate recovery and left ventricular ejection fraction in ANTHEM-HF.

PURPOSE: Disturbed autonomic function is implicated in high mortality rates in heart failure patients. High-intensity vagus nerve stimulation therapy was shown to improve intrinsic heart rate recovery and left ventricular ejection fraction over a period of 1 year. Whether these beneficial effects are sustained across multiple years and are related to improved baroreceptor response was unknown. METHODS: All patients (n = 21) enrolled in the ANTHEM-HF clinical trial (NCT01823887, registered 4/3/2013) with 24 h ambulatory electrocardiograms at all time points and 54 normal subjects (PhysioNet database) were included. Intrinsic heart rate recovery, based on ~ 2000 spontaneous daily activity-induced heart rate acceleration/deceleration events per patient, was analyzed at screening and after 12, 24, and 36 months of chronic vagus nerve stimulation therapy (10 or 5 Hz, 250 µs pulse width, 18% duty cycle, maximum tolerable current amplitude). RESULTS: In response to chronic high-intensity vagus nerve stimulation (≥ 2.0 mA), intrinsic heart rate recovery (all time points, p < 0.0001), heart rate turbulence slope, an indicator of baroreceptor reflex gain (all, p ≤ 0.02), and left ventricular ejection fraction (all, p ≤ 0.04) were improved over screening at 12, 24, and 36 months. Intrinsic heart rate recovery and heart rate turbulence slope were inversely correlated at both screening (r = 0.67, p < 0.002) and 36 months (r = 0.78, p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: This non-randomized study provides evidence of an association between improvement in intrinsic heart rate recovery and left ventricular ejection fraction during high-intensity vagus nerve stimulation for a period of ≥ 3 years. Correlated favorable effects on heart rate turbulence slope implicate enhanced baroreceptor function in response to chronic, continuously cyclic vagus nerve stimulation as a physiologic mechanism.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Provides Multiyear Improvements in Autonomic Function and Cardiac Electrical Stability in the ANTHEM-HF Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFrEF) experience long-term deterioration of autonomic function and cardiac electrical stability linked to increased mortality risk. The Autonomic Neural Regulation Therapy to Enhance Myocardial Function in Heart Failure (ANTHEM-HF) trial reported improved heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate turbulence (HRT) and reduced T-wave alternans (TWA) after 12 months of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). We investigated whether the benefits of chronic VNS persist in the long term. METHODS AND RESULTS: Effects of chronic VNS on heart rate, HRV, HRT, TWA, R-wave and T-wave heterogeneity (RWH, TWH), and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) incidence were evaluated in all ANTHEM-HF patients with ambulatory ECG data at 24 and 36 months (n = 25). Autonomic markers improved significantly at 24 and 36 months compared to baseline [heart rate, square root of the mean squared differences of successive normal-to-normal intervals (rMSSD), standard deviation of the normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), HF-HRV, HRT slope, P < 0.05]. Peak TWA levels remained reduced at 24 and 36 months (P < 0.0001). Reductions in RWH and TWH at 6 and 12 months persisted at 24 and 36 months (P < 0.01). NSVT decreased at 12, 24, and 36 months (P < 0.025). No sudden cardiac deaths, ventricular fibrillation, or sustained ventricular tachycardia occurred. CONCLUSION: In symptomatic patients with HFrEF, chronic VNS appears to confer wide-ranging, persistent improvements in autonomic tone (HRV), baroreceptor sensitivity (HRT), and cardiac electrical stability (TWA, RWH, TWH).

Long-term Follow-Up of Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Receiving Autonomic Regulation Therapy in the ANTHEM-HF Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The ANTHEM-HF pilot study was an open-label study that evaluated the safety and feasibility of autonomic regulation therapy (ART) utilizing cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for patients with chronic HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). Patients in NYHA class II-III with EF ≤40% (n = 60) received ART for 6 months post-titration. ART was associated with sustained improvement in left ventricular (LV) function and HF symptoms at 6 and 12 months. METHODS: Continuously cyclic VNS was maintained to determine longer-term safety and chronic effects of ART. Echocardiographic parameters and HF symptoms were assessed throughout a follow-up period of at least 42 months. RESULTS: Between 12 and 42 months after initial titration, there were no device-related SAEs or malfunctions. There were 10 SAEs adjudicated to be unrelated to VNS, including 5 deaths. There were 6 non-serious adverse events that were adjudicated to be device-related (2 oropharyngeal pain, 1 implant site pain, 2 voice alteration, and 1 hoarseness). At 42 months, there was significant improvement from baseline in LVEF, NYHA class, 6-min walk distance, and MLHFQ score. However, these improvements at 42 months were not significantly different from mean values at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In a 42-month follow-up, ART was durable, safe, and was associated with beneficial effects on LVEF and 6-min walk distance. Long term, chronic, open-loop ART continued to be well-tolerated in patients with HFrEF. The open label, randomized, controlled, ANTHEM-HFrEF Pivotal Study is currently underway to further evaluate ART in patients with advanced HF.

Baseline NT-proBNP and responsiveness to autonomic regulation therapy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Recent heart failure studies have associated lower baseline natriuretic peptide levels with improved morbidity/mortality outcomes during pharmaceutical treatment, and better clinical outcomes during neuromodulation (NM) with carotid nerve plexus stimulation for HFrEF when NT-proBNP < 1600 pg/ml. Whether baseline NT-proBNP is associated with HFrEF responsiveness to NM using vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has not been examined. Hence, we evaluated the interaction of baseline NT-proBNP with changes in symptoms and function that occurred during chronic VNS in the ANTHEM-HF study. METHODS: A repeated measures, generalized-estimating, equations model evaluated the relationship of baseline NT-proBNP values above and below 1600 pg/ml to symptomatic and functional responses in ANTHEM-HF. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range; maximum) NT-proBNP was 868 (322, 1875; 14,656) pg/ml (N = 58). Heart rate (HR), HR variability (SDNN), 6-minute walk distance, MLWHF mean score, and NYHA improved significantly, independent of baseline NT-proBNP. While there was a statistical interaction between baseline NT-proBNP and better LVEF improvement during VNS, LVEF improved overall in the study cohort (N = 60; 32 ± 7 to 37 ± 10%; p = 0.0042), and in those patients whose baseline NT-proBNP was below the median baseline NT-proBNP value (n = 29; 36 ± 6 to 42 ± 10%; p < 0.0025)] or above this value (n = 29; 29 ± 7 to 32 ± 9%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In ANTHEM-HF, overall symptomatic and functional improvement during chronic VNS was independent of baseline NTproBNP. These are preliminary and hypothesis-generating findings, and the reason for a differing interaction between baseline NT-proBNP and response to CNPS and VNS remains unclear. It is anticipated that the ongoing ANTHEM-HFrEF Pivotal Study of VNS will provide additional insight.

Comparison of symptomatic and functional responses to vagus nerve stimulation in ANTHEM-HF, INOVATE-HF, and NECTAR-HF.

AIMS: Clinical studies of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction have had mixed results to date. We sought to compare VNS delivery and associated changes in symptoms and function in autonomic regulation therapy via left or right cervical vagus nerve stimulation in patients with chronic heart failure (ANTHEM-HF), increase of vagal tone in heart failure (INOVATE-HF), and neural cardiac therapy for heart failure (NECTAR-HF) for hypothesis generation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Descriptive statistics were used to analyse data from the public domain for differences in proportions using Pearson's chi-square test, differences in mean values using Student's unpaired t-test, and differences in changes of mean values using two-sample t-tests. Guideline-directed medical therapy recommendations were similar across studies. Fewer patients were in New York Heart Association 3, and baseline heart rate (HR) was higher in ANTHEM-HF. In INOVATE-HF, VNS was aimed at peripheral neural targets, using closed-loop delivery that required synchronization of VNS to R-wave sensing by an intracardiac lead. Pulse frequency was low (1-2 Hz) because of a timing schedule allowing ≤3 pulses of VNS following at most 25% of detected R waves. NECTAR-HF and ANTHEM-HF used open-loop VNS delivery (i.e. independent of any external signal) aimed at both central and peripheral targets. In NECTAR-HF, VNS delivery at 20 Hz caused off-target effects that limited VNS up-titration in a majority of patients. In ANTHEM-HF, VNS delivery at 10 Hz allowed up-titration until changes in HR dynamics were confirmed. Six months after VNS titration, significant improvements in both HR and HR variability occurred only in ANTHEM-HF. When ANTHEM-HF and NECTAR-HF were compared, greater improvements from baseline were observed in ANTHEM-HF in standard deviation in normal-to-normal R-R intervals (94 ± 26 to 111 ± 50 vs. 146 ± 48 to 130 ± 52 ms; P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (32 ± 7 to 37 ± 0.4 vs. 31 ± 6 to 33 ± 6; P < 0.05), and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure mean score (40 ± 14 to 21 ± 10 vs. 44 ± 22 to 36 ± 21; P < 0.002). When compared with INOVATE-HF, greater improvement in 6-min walk distance was observed in ANTHEM-HF (287 ± 66 to 346 ± 78 vs. 304 ± 111 to 334 ± 111 m; P < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this post-hoc analysis, differences in patient demographics were seen and may have caused the differential responses in symptoms and function observed in association with VNS. Major differences in technology platforms, neural targets, VNS delivery, and HR and HR variability responses could have also potentially played a very important role. Further study is underway in a randomized controlled trial with these considerations in mind.

Impact of Autonomic Regulation Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure: ANTHEM-HFrEF Pivotal Study Design.

BACKGROUND: The ANTHEM-HFrEF (Autonomic Regulation Therapy to Enhance Myocardial Function and Reduce Progression of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) pivotal study is an adaptive, open-label, randomized, controlled study evaluating whether autonomic regulation therapy will benefit patients with advanced HFrEF. While early-phase studies have supported potential use of vagus nerve stimulation to deliver autonomic regulation therapy for HFrEF, results of larger clinical trials have been inconsistent. The ANTHEM-HFrEF study uses a novel design, with adaptive sample size selection, evaluating effects on morbidity and mortality as well as symptoms and function. METHODS: The ANTHEM-HFrEF study will randomize patients (2:1) to autonomic regulation therapy plus guideline-directed medical therapy, or guideline-directed medical therapy alone. The morbidity and mortality trial utilizes a conventional frequentist approach for analysis of the primary outcome end point-reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or first HF hospitalization-and a Bayesian adaptive approach toward sample size selection. Embedded within the ANTHEM-HFrEF study is a second trial evaluating improvement in symptoms and function. Symptom/function success will require meeting 2 risk-related conditions (trend for reduced cardiovascular death/HF hospitalization and sufficient freedom from device-related serious adverse events) and 3 efficacy end point components (changes in left ventricular EF, 6-minute walk distance, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall score). CONCLUSIONS: Vagus nerve stimulation remains a promising, yet unproven treatment in HFrEF. A successful ANTHEM-HFrEF pivotal study would provide an important advance in HFrEF treatment and offer a model for expediting evaluation of new therapies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03425422.

Background pharmacological therapy in the ANTHEM-HF: comparison to contemporary trials of novel heart failure therapies.

AIMS: Clinical trials of new heart failure (HF) therapies administer guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) as background pharmacologic treatment (BPT). In the ANTHEM-HF Pilot Study, addition of autonomic regulation therapy to GDMT significantly improved left ventricular function, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, 6 min walk distance, and quality of life in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A post hoc analysis was performed to compare BPT in ANTHEM-HF with two other trials of novel HF therapies: the PARADIGM-HF study of sacubitril-valsartan and the SHIFT study of ivadrabine. All three studies evaluated patients with HFrEF, and the recommendations for use of GDMT were similar. A left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% was required for entry into ANTHEM-HF and PARADIGM-HF and ≤35% for SHIFT. NYHA 2 or 3 symptoms were required for entry into ANTHEM-HF, and patients with predominantly NYHA 2 or 3 symptoms were enrolled in PARADIGM-HF and SHIFT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on BPT were obtained from peer-reviewed publications and the public domain. Pearson's χ2 test was used to evaluate differences in proportions, and Student's unpaired t-test was used to evaluate differences in mean values. The minimum period of stable GDMT required before randomization was longer in ANTHEM-HF: 3 months vs. 1 month in PARADIGM-HF and SHIFT, respectively. When compared with PARADIGM-HF and SHIFT, more patients in ANTHEM-HF received beta-blockers (100% vs. 93% and 89%, P < 0.04 and P < 0.007) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (75% vs. 55% and 61%, P < 0.002 and P < 0.03). More patients in PARADIGM-HF received an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker than in ANTHEM-HF or SHIFT (100% vs. 85%, P < 0.0001, and 100% vs. 91%, P < 0.001), which was related to PARADIGM's design. When beta-blocker doses in ANTHEM-HF and SHIFT were compared, significantly fewer patients in ANTHEM-HF received doses ≥100% of target (10% vs. 23%, P < 0.02), and fewer patients tended to receive doses ≥50% of target (17% vs. 26%, P = 0.11). When ANTHEM-HF and PARADIGM-HF were compared, more patients in ANTHEM-HF tended to receive doses ≥100% of target (10% vs. 7%, P = 0.36), and fewer patients tended to receive doses ≥50% of target (17% vs. 20%, P = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Background treatment with GDMT in ANTHEM-HF compared favourably with that in two other contemporary trials of new HF therapies. The minimum period of stable GDMT required before randomization was longer, and GDMT remained unchanged for the study's duration. These findings serve to further support the potential role of autonomic regulation therapy as an adjunct to GDMT for patients with HFrEF.

Chronic Low-Level Vagus Nerve Stimulation Improves Long-Term Survival in Salt-Sensitive Hypertensive Rats.

Chronic hypertension (HTN) affects more than 1 billion people worldwide, and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Despite decades of promising research, effective treatment of HTN remains challenging. This work investigates vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as a novel, device-based therapy for HTN treatment, and specifically evaluates its effects on long-term survival and HTN-associated adverse effects. HTN was induced in Dahl salt-sensitive rats using a high-salt diet, and the rats were randomly divided into two groups: VNS (n = 9) and Sham (n = 8), which were implanted with functional or non-functional VNS stimulators, respectively. Acute and chronic effects of VNS therapy were evaluated through continuous monitoring of blood pressure (BP) and ECG via telemetry devices. Autonomic tone was quantified using heart rate (HR), HR variability (HRV) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) analysis. Structural cardiac changes were quantified through gross morphology and histology studies. VNS significantly improved the long-term survival of hypertensive rats, increasing median event-free survival by 78% in comparison to Sham rats. Acutely, VNS improved autonomic balance by significantly increasing HRV during stimulation, which may lead to beneficial chronic effects of VNS therapy. Chronic VNS therapy slowed the progression of HTN through an attenuation of SBP and by preserving HRV. Finally, VNS significantly altered cardiac structure, increasing heart weight, but did not alter the amount of fibrosis in the hypertensive hearts. These results suggest that VNS has the potential to improve outcomes in subjects with severe HTN.

Electrical Interaction between Implantable Vagus Nerve Stimulation Device and Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Management Device.

BACKGROUND: Autonomic regulation therapy via vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was recently approved as a therapy for chronic heart failure, and will likely be utilized in patients who are also indicated for cardiac rhythm management device implantation. This study is designed to assess the degree to which VNS is likely to cause interference in the cardiac sensing of an implantable cardiac rhythm management device. METHODS: A VNS stimulation lead and a cardiac sensing lead were placed in a simulated biological medium. A nonconductive carrier frame was used to position the leads at a precise electrode spacing. Stimulation was delivered through the VNS Therapy lead at a maximum output current and a variety of combinations of stimulation frequencies from 5-30 Hz and stimulation pulse widths from 130-1000 µs. The electrode spacing began at 0 cm and was increased in 1 cm increments until the measured signal dropped below the cardiac rhythm management device noise floor for sensing. The test was conducted with both bipolar and unipolar sensing. RESULTS: In the bipolar sensing configuration, the maximum sensed signal amplitude was 687 µV at an electrode separation of 0 cm, signal frequency of 30 Hz, pulse width of 1000 µs, and output current of 3.5 mA. In the unipolar sensing configuration, the maximum amplitude was 406 µV. In both configurations, the measured signal with maximum stimulation intensity decreased significantly with electrode separation, and dropped below the noise floor at an electrode spacing of 3.0 cm. The sensed signal amplitude was further attenuated at lower stimulation amplitudes and pulse widths. CONCLUSION: Even at maximum neural stimulation intensity of 3.5 mA, at an electrode separation of at least 3.0 cm, neural stimulation did not result in a detectable level of interference with either bipolar or unipolar sensing. Because this separation is significantly smaller than the minimum electrode separation of 15 cm in clinical practice, VNS Therapy is not expected to interfere with the function of implantable cardiac devices.