Body Mass Index and the Risk of Postoperative Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Given the growing prevalence of obesity, it is crucial to understand the effect of obesity on complications after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), medical complications, and surgical complications after TKA. METHODS: The Premier Healthcare Database was used to identify all primary elective TKAs between 2016 and 2021. The primary outcome was risk of PJI within 90 days of surgery. Using logistic regression, restricted cubic splines were generated to assess the relationship between BMI as a continuous variable and PJI risk. Bootstrap simulation was then done to identify a BMI inflection point on the final restricted cubic spline model past which the risk of PJI increased. The relationship between BMI and composite 90-day medical and surgical complications was also assessed. RESULTS: A direct relationship was observed between increasing BMI and increasing risk of PJI with a BMI changepoint of 31 kg/m2 identified as being associated with increased risk. Above a BMI of 31 kg/m2, there was an average relative risk increase of PJI of 13.6% for every unit BMI. This relative risk per unit BMI increased from 5.8% for BMI 31 to 39 to 11.5% between BMI 40 and 49 kg/m2, and 21.3% for BMIs ≥50 kg/m2. Similarly, a direct relationship was also found between increasing BMI and both medical and surgical complications with BMI changepoints of 34 and 32 kg/m2 identified, respectively. DISCUSSION: Obese patients with a BMI >31 kg/m2 were at increased risk of PJI. Although the relative risk increase was small per unit BMI above 31 kg/m2, the cumulative increase in risk may be marked for patients with higher BMIs. CONCLUSION: These data should be used to inform discussions that involve shared decision making between patients and surgeons who weigh the risks and benefits of surgery.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of epinephrine nasal spray versus intramuscular epinephrine auto-injector in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Standard of care for anaphylaxis treatment is intramuscular (IM) epinephrine. An epinephrine nasal spray (ENS) is under development as an alternative form of administration. OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of 13.2 mg ENS with 0.3 mg IM epinephrine auto-injector. METHODS: Data from 4 open-label phase 1 crossover studies conducted in healthy adults were pooled to determine the PK and PD profile of a single 13.2 mg ENS dose delivered by 2 consecutive sprays of 6.6 mg each in opposite (n=224 doses) or the same nostril (n=75 doses) compared with the 0.3 mg IM auto-injector (n=215 doses). Each participant served as their own control. Blood samples and vital signs were collected pre-dose and at multiple intervals from 0-360 minutes post-dose. RESULTS: ENS rapidly increased the plasma epinephrine concentration, with levels that were overall greater than IM auto-injector. Median (range) time to maximum plasma epinephrine concentration with ENS opposite nostrils, ENS same nostril, and IM auto-injector was 25.1 (1.3, 362.1), 20.1 (3.0, 120.2), and 20.0 (1.0, 121.3) minutes, respectively. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve for 0-360 minutes was significantly higher with ENS than the IM auto-injector (geometric mean ratio [90% CI]=155% [140%, 172%] with ENS opposite nostrils, 159% [138%, 182%] with ENS same nostril). The PD effects on heart rate and blood pressure were similar in pattern and magnitude among all 3 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: ENS rapidly achieved plasma epinephrine levels greater and more sustained than the IM auto-injector and with a similar PD effect.

Evaluating the 2023 Standardized Letter of Recommendation Form in Applications to Orthopaedic Surgery Residency.

BACKGROUND: Successfully matching into orthopaedic surgery residency is a challenging endeavor due to the limited number of available positions. Implementation of the Standard Letter of Recommendation (SLOR) in 2017 was intended to allow better comparisons between applicants; however, the form suffered from notable rank inflation ultimately requiring introduction of an updated SLOR for the 2023 to 2024 application cycle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the 2023 SLOR improves on deficiencies of the 2017 SLOR. METHODS: Applications submitted to our institution during the 2023 to 2024 orthopaedic surgery residency application cycle were analyzed. Applicant objective metrics were collected, including US Medical Licensing Exam scores, clerkship grades, AΩA status, and research productivity. Scores for each domain of the 2023 SLOR forms were recorded. Mean scores were calculated for each question, and cumulative scores per SLOR were determined. Intraclass correlation coefficients were determined per applicant and evaluator. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was calculated for comparison of SLOR cumulative scores and objective metrics. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-eight applications were reviewed, and 743 2023 SLORs were submitted in conjunction with these applications. Most of the 2023 SLORs (n = 399, 53.70%) had cumulative scores placing applicants in at least the 90th percentile. Furthermore, 267 evaluators (72.36%) consistently gave scores of 99s and 10s for each question. Intraclass correlation coefficients were rated as fair to moderate agreement between evaluators for each applicant. Objective applicant metrics did not meaningfully correlate with SLOR cumulative scores. DISCUSSION: The 2023 SLOR demonstrated notable rank inflation with only 22.7% of applicants receiving a score of less than 7 on any domain. By contrast, 69.9% of applicants received a score of "rare, perfect gem" on at least one domain of the form. We encourage the American Orthopaedic Association Council of Orthopaedic Residency Director to continue to improve the form and provide guidance to residency program leadership on proper use of the grading system.

Development and acceptability of a decision-aid for food allergy Oral immunotherapy in children.

BACKGROUND: Limited decision-support tools are available to help shared decision-making (SDM) regarding food oral immunotherapy (OIT) initiation. No current tool covers all foods, forms, and pediatric ages for which OIT is offered. METHODS: In compliance with International Patient Decision Aid Standards criteria, this pediatric decision-aid comparing OIT versus avoidance was developed in three stages. Nested qualitative data assessing OIT decisional needs were supplemented with evidence-synthesis from the OIT literature to create the prototype decision-aid content. This underwent iterative development with food allergy experts and patient advocacy stakeholders until unanimous consensus was reached regarding content, bias, readability, and utility in making a choice. Lastly, the tool underwent validated assessment of decisional acceptability, decisional conflict, and decisional self-efficacy. RESULTS: The decision-aid underwent 5 iterations, resulting in a 4-page written aid (Flesch-Kincaid reading level 6.1) explaining therapy choices, risks and benefits, providing self-rating for attribute importance for the options and self-assessment regarding how adequate the information was in decision-making. A total of n = 135 caregivers of food-allergic children assessed the decision-aid, noting good acceptability, high decisional self-efficacy (mean score 85.9/100) and low decisional conflict (mean score 20.9/100). Information content was rated adequate and sufficient, the therapy choices wording balanced, and presented without bias for a "best choice." Lower decisional conflict was associated with caregiver-reported anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: This first pediatric OIT decision-aid, agnostic to product, allergen, and age has good acceptability, limited bias, and is associated with low decisional conflict and high decisional self-efficacy. It supports SDM in navigating the decision to start OIT or continue allergen avoidance.

Getting in Shape: Updates in Exercise Anaphylaxis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Exercise induced anaphylaxis (EIA) can be difficult to diagnose due to the interplay of co-factors on clinical presentation and the lack of standardized, confirmatory testing. RECENT FINDINGS: EIA has been historically categorized as either food-independent or food-dependent. However, recent literature has suggested that perhaps EIA is more complex given the relationship between not only food on EIA but other various co-factors such as medications and alcohol ingestion that are either required to elicit symptoms in EIA or make symptoms worse. For the practicing clinician, understanding how these co-factors can be implicated in EIA can enable one to take a more personalized approach in treating patients with EIA and thus improve quality of life for patients.

Identifying thresholds of reaction for different foods.

Current food allergy management universally treats all patients with food allergy as being at risk for anaphylaxis (with the exception perhaps of pollen food allergy syndrome). Thus, patients are told to avoid the allergenic food in all potentially allergic forms and amounts. However, research over the past 2 decades has shown that many patients will tolerate small amounts of the allergen without any allergic reaction. Thus, if one were able to identify the threshold of reactivity, this could change management. At the population level, establishing levels at which the vast majority of patients (e.g., 95%) do not react could have public health ramifications, such as altering labeling laws. At the individual patient level, personal threshold levels could determine avoidance strategies, affect quality of life, and alter treatment decisions, e.g., oral immunotherapy starting doses. In this review, threshold data for various allergens and their potential effect on the management of the patient with food allergy are examined.

Risk Factors for Femoral Head Collapse in Osteonecrosis.

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) affects at least 20,000 patients annually in the United States; however, the pathophysiology of disease progression is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative importance of three distinct elements and their relationship to the collapse of the femoral head: (1) identifiable risk factors; (2) femoral head anatomy; and (3) the extent of the necrotic lesion. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed on patients ≥ 18 years old who presented with ONFH. Ficat classification and femoral head anatomic parameters were measured on radiographs. Osteonecrotic lesion size was measured on magnetic resonance imaging using four validated methods. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of femoral head collapse. RESULTS: There were 105 patients and 137 hips included in the final cohort, of which 50 (36.5%) had collapse of the femoral head. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that medical risk factors (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.15), alcohol exposure (aOR: 1.23), and increased alpha angle (aOR: 4.51) were predictive of femoral head collapse. Increased femoral head offset (aOR: 0.54) was protective against collapse. An increased size of the osteonecrotic lesion was significantly predictive of collapse with all four measure methods evaluated: three-dimensional (3D) volumetric (aOR: 3.73), modified Kerboul (aOR: 2.92), index of necrotic extent (aOR: 1.91), and modified index of necrotic extent (aOR: 2.05). CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of patients who had ONFH, we identified risk factors such as alcohol exposure, high alpha angle, increased lesion size, and decreased femoral offset as increasing the risk of femoral head collapse. Given the challenges of studying this patient population, large prospective studies of patients who have ONFH should seek to identify whether these factors are reliable indicators of femoral head collapse.

Impact of gender, race, and age of onset on the phenotype and comorbidities of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis.

Objectives: To investigate differences in symptoms, allergy comorbidities, and eosinophilic inflammation at the time of diagnosis for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) based on gender, race, and age of onset. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a multidisciplinary EoE clinic; the correlation between histological findings, previously identified symptoms, associated comorbidities, and demographics including gender, race, as well as age of onset was examined. Chi-squared and Student's T-tests were utilized for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 91 patients were enrolled in this study, with 70% being male and 67% identifying as White. Among the patients, 45% had an early onset of EoE (defined as ≤6 years old). We revealed that White patients and females were significantly more likely to report dysphagia, while non-White patients experienced significantly more vomiting symptoms and had a higher prevalence of asthma as a comorbidity. Early-onset patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of vomiting and had elevated eosinophilic counts compared to patients with EoE onset at a regular age. We also revealed that abdominal pain is associated with a lower average proximal eosinophilic counts. Conclusions: Our study revealed the significant impact of gender, race, and age of onset on the phenotype and comorbidities of EoE, suggesting these factors should be considered when caring for these patients.

Perioperative Dexamethasone in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The perioperative use of dexamethasone in diabetic patients remains controversial due to concerns related to infection and adverse events. This study aimed to determine whether clinical evidence supports withholding dexamethasone in diabetic patients due to concern for infection risk. We hypothesized that there is no difference in infectious outcomes between dexamethasone-treated patients and controls. METHODS: A literature search was performed on November 22, 2022 to identify randomized, placebo-controlled trials investigating short-course (<72 hours), perioperative dexamethasone that explicitly included diabetic patients and measured at least 1 clinical outcome. Pertinent studies were independently searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Authors for all identified studies were contacted with the aim of performing quantitative subgroup analyses of diabetic patients. The primary end point was surgical site infection and the secondary end point was a composite of adverse events. Qualitative remarks were reported based on the total available data and a quality assessment tool. Meta-analyses were performed using inverse variance with random effects. Heterogeneity was assessed via standard χ2 and I2 tests. RESULTS: Sixteen unique studies were included, 5 of which were analyzed quantitatively. Of the 2592 diabetic patients, 2344 (1184 randomized to dexamethasone and 1160 to placebo) were analyzed in at least 1 quantitative outcome. Quantitative analysis showed that the use of perioperative dexamethasone had no effect on the risk of surgical site infections (log odds ratio [LOR], -0.10, 95%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.64 to 0.44) while significantly reducing the risk of composite adverse events (LOR, -0.33; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.05). Qualitative analysis reinforced these findings, demonstrating noninferior to superior results across all clinical outcomes. There was high heterogeneity between the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests perioperative dexamethasone may be given to diabetic patients without increasing the risk of infectious complications. Prospective investigations aimed at optimizing dose, frequency, and timing are needed, as well as studies aimed explicitly at exploring the use of dexamethasone in patients with poorly controlled diabetes.

Awareness and Application of United States Food Allergy Prevention Guidelines Among Pediatricians and Other Clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the awareness of, adherence to, and barriers to the 2017 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) peanut allergy prevention guidelines among the pediatrics health care workforce. STUDY DESIGN: Pediatricians, family physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), and dermatologists who provide care for infants were solicited for a population-based online survey, administered from June 6, 2022, through July 3, 2022. The survey collected information about NIAID guideline awareness, implementation, and barriers as well as concerns related to the guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 250 pediatricians, 250 family physicians, 504 APPs, and 253 dermatologists met inclusion criteria. Self-reported guideline awareness was significantly higher for pediatricians (76%) compared with dermatologists (58%), family physicians (52%), and APPs (45%) (P < .05). Among participants who were aware of the guidelines, most reported using part or all of the guidelines in their clinical practices. Reported practice patterns for peanut introduction in 6-month-old infants were variable and did not always align with guidelines, particularly for infants with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Although pediatricians have the highest self-reported level of NIAID guideline awareness, awareness was suboptimal irrespective of provider type. Education for all pediatric clinicians is urgently needed to promote evidence-based peanut allergy prevention practices.

Evidence-based use of epinephrine in anaphylaxis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Epinephrine is the first line treatment for anaphylaxis, however, there are limited data to support this. This review examines data surrounding evidence for the use of epinephrine in anaphylaxis, data on prescription for and use of epinephrine autoinjectors, and data examining newer routes of delivery of epinephrine; with a focus on recent publications over the past few years. RECENT FINDINGS: With recent epidemiologic studies of anaphylaxis and new forms of epinephrine being studied, new data on the effects of epinephrine are aiding in the understanding of epinephrine's effects and the shortcomings of epinephrine both in its effect and utility in the real world. SUMMARY: Epinephrine is still considered the first line therapy for anaphylaxis, and we are starting to have a better understanding of its effects in both healthy patients and those with anaphylaxis.

Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor-1 Agonists Used for Medically-Supervised Weight Loss in Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Critical Considerations for the Arthroplasty Surgeon.

Patients with morbid obesity and concomitant hip or knee osteoarthritis represent a challenging patient demographic to treat as these patients often present earlier in life, have more severe symptoms, and have worse surgical outcomes following total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Previously, bariatric and metabolic surgeries represented one of the few weight loss interventions that morbidly obese patients could undergo prior to total joint arthroplasty. However, data regarding the reduction in complications with preoperative bariatric surgery remain mixed. Glucagon-like peptide receptor-1 (GLP-1) agonists have emerged as an effective treatment option for obesity in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, recent data suggest these medications may serve as potential anti-inflammatory and disease-modifying agents for numerous chronic conditions, including osteoarthritis. This review will discuss the GLP-1 agonists and GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide dual agonists currently available, along with GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon triple agonists presently being developed to address the obesity epidemic. Furthermore, this review will address the potential problem of GLP-1-related delayed gastric emptying and its impact on the timing of elective total joint arthroplasty. The review aims to provide arthroplasty surgeons with a primer for implementing this class of medication in their current and future practice, including perioperative instructions and perioperative safety considerations when treating patients taking these medications.

The Association Between Surgeon Volume and Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Evaluation of 5,106 Orthopaedic Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between surgeon volume and risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is debated. This study sought to characterize this association and assess patient outcomes using a nationwide patient and surgeon registry. METHODS: The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for adult primary elective THA patients from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Annual surgeon volume and 90-day risk of dislocation were modeled using multivariable logistic regression with restricted cubic splines. Bootstrap analysis identified a threshold annual case volume, corresponding to the maximum decrease in dislocation risk. Surgeons with an annual volume greater than the threshold were deemed high volume, and those with an annual volume less than the threshold were low volume. Each surgeon within a given year was treated as a unique entity (surgeon-year unit). 90-day complications of patients treated by high-volume and low-volume surgeons were compared. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2019, 352,131 THAs were performed by 5,106 surgeons. The restricted cubic spline model demonstrated an inverse relationship between risk of dislocation and surgeon volume (threshold: 109 cases per year). A total of 9,967 (87.8%) low-volume surgeon-year units had individual dislocation rates lower than the average of the entire surgeon cohort. Patients treated by high-volume surgeons had decreased risk of dislocation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.67), periprosthetic fracture (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.99), periprosthetic joint infection (aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.69), readmission (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.73), and in-hospital death (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.80). CONCLUSION: While most of the low-volume surgeons had dislocation rates lower than the cohort average, increasing annual surgeon case volume was associated with a reduction in risk of dislocation after primary elective THA. THERAPEUTIC LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Super-Obesity is Associated With an Increased Risk of Complications Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30, is an ever-growing epidemic, with > 35% of adults in the United States currently classified as obese. Super-obese individuals, defined as those who have a BMI ≥ 50, are the fastest-growing portion of this group. This study sought to quantify the infection risk as well as the incidence of surgical, medical, and thromboembolic complications among super-obese patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: An all-payer claims database was used to identify patients who underwent elective, primary TKA between 2016 and 2021. Patients who had a BMI ≥ 50 were compared to those who had a normal BMI of 18 to 25. Demographics and the incidence of 90-days postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. Univariate analysis and multivariable regression were used to assess differences between groups. RESULTS: In total, 3,376 super-obese TKA patients were identified and compared to 17,659 patients who had a normal BMI. Multivariable analysis indicated that the super-obese cohort was at an increased postoperative risk of periprosthetic joint infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1 to 6.4, P < .001), pulmonary embolism (aOR 2.2, 95%-CI: 1.0 to 5.0, P = .047), acute respiratory failure (aOR 4.1, 95%-CI: 2.7 to 6.1, P < .001), myocardial infarction (aOR 2.5, 95%-CI: 1.1 to 5.8, P = .026), wound dehiscence (aOR 2.3, 95%-CI: 1.4 to 3.8, P = .001), and acute renal failure (aOR 3.2, 95%-CI: 2.4 to 4.2, P < .001) relative to patients who have normal BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Super-obese TKA patients are at an elevated risk of postoperative infectious, surgical, medical, and thromboembolic complications. As such, risk stratification, as well as appropriate medical management and optimization, is of utmost importance for this high-risk group.

Anaphylaxis in Practice: A Guide to the 2023 Practice Parameter Update.

This review summarizes new research developments and clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis presented in the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters 2023 Anaphylaxis practice parameter Update. It is intended to serve as a high-level summary of the 2023 practice parameter, which makes clinically impactful recommendations based on evidence that has emerged since the 2015 practice parameter. We invite clinicians to explore the full 2023 practice parameter to understand the research methods and underlying evidence that have informed the recommendations summarized here. There are new and evolving diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis, rules for defining elevated tryptase levels, and recognition of signs and symptoms particular to infants and toddlers. The administration of epinephrine should not be used as a surrogate to diagnose anaphylaxis. Risk factors for anaphylaxis should be assessed on a case-by-case basis. Patient counseling and shared decision-making are essential to support patients' treatment decisions and capacity to manage the risk of anaphylaxis at home and in other community settings. Activation of emergency medical services after home epinephrine administration may not be required in all cases, and patients should be engaged in shared decision-making to determine when home management may be appropriate.