Academy of Medicine, Singapore clinical guideline on the use of sedation by non-anaesthesiologists during gastrointestinal endoscopy in the hospital setting.

INTRODUCTION: In Singapore, non-anaesthesiologists generally administer sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy. The drugs used for sedation in hospital endoscopy centres now include propofol in addition to benzodiazepines and opiates. The requirements for peri-procedural monitoring and discharge protocols have also evolved. There is a need to develop an evidence-based clinical guideline on the safe and effective use of sedation by non-anaesthesiologists during gastrointestinal endoscopy in the hospital setting. METHODS: The Academy of Medicine, Singapore appointed an expert workgroup comprising 18 gastroenterologists, general surgeons and anaesthesiologists to develop guidelines on the use of sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy. The workgroup formulated clinical questions related to different aspects of endoscopic sedation, conducted a relevant literature search, adopted Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology and developed recommendations by consensus using a modified Delphi process. RESULTS: The workgroup made 16 recommendations encompassing 7 areas: (1) purpose of sedation, benefits and disadvantages of sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy; (2) pre-procedural assessment, preparation and consent taking for sedation; (3) Efficacy and safety of drugs used in sedation; (4) the role of anaesthesiologist administered sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy; (5) performance of sedation; (6) post-sedation care and discharge after sedation; and (7) training in sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy for non-anaesthesiologists. CONCLUSION: These recommendations serve to guide clinical practice during sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy by non-anaesthesiologists in the hospital setting.

Chapter of Gastroenterologists professional guidance for management of patients with liver disease in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic.

In this paper, we aim to provide professional guidance to clinicians who are managing patients with chronic liver disease during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Singapore. We reviewed and summarised the available relevant published data on liver disease in COVID-19 and the advisory statements that were issued by major professional bodies, such as the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and European Association for the Study of the Liver, contextualising the recommendations to our local situation.

Current role of selective internal radiation with yttrium-90 in liver tumors.

An expert panel met to review the evidence for selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma and metastases from colorectal cancer and neuroendocrine tumors. There is now convincing evidence for the safety and efficacy of SIRT in these situations albeit mostly from retrospective cohort studies. There are a number of ongoing prospective randomized controlled clinical trials investigating the role of SIRT in liver tumors; however, data from these trials are still several years away (although the SIRFLOX study has been recently published). In this evolving environment, published evidence and the authors' experience were used to summarize the current and potential role of SIRT in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma of intermediate or advanced stage and in liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer and metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

An analysis of the efficacy and safety of a strategy of early precut for biliary access during difficult endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a general hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The use of early precut during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is controversial because of its association with a higher risk of complications. This study examined the efficacy and safety of a strategy of early precut for biliary access during difficult ERCP in a general hospital. METHODS: Data from January 2007 to June 2009 were reviewed. Criteria for performing early precut were: (i) inadvertent guidewire cannulation of pancreatic duct on three occasions; (ii) biliary stone impacted at papilla; (iii) inability to achieve deep cannulation within 10 min. Study exclusion criteria were: (i) the inability to visualize the papilla because of anatomical distortions; (ii) complete tumour occlusion of distal bile duct; (iii) failure to adhere to inclusion criteria. The efficacy and safety of this strategy of early precut for biliary access was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 765 ERCP cases were analyzed. A precut was performed in 55 out of 765 cases (7.2%). There were no significant differences in terms of age, gender and diagnoses between the precut and no precut groups. After precut immediate biliary cannulation was achieved in 89% of patients and this increased to 98.2% with a repeat ERCP. The overall complication rate after ERCP was 2.1% (bleeding: 0.7%; pancreatitis: 1.3%; perforation: 0.3%). The only complication after the precut was pancreatitis, and this was not significantly different from the group without a precut (1.8 vs 1.3%). CONCLUSION: The strategy of early precut for biliary access was safe and effective.