Electrodiagnostic Study of the Patients with Suspected Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Various electrodiagnostic tests are employed for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome reporting wide range of sensitivity and specificity for each test in clinical practice. Therefore, the aim of our study is to assess the sensitivity of electrodiagnostic tests used in our set up for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of 21 patients suspected with carpal tunnel syndrome who were referred to neurophysiology lab for electrodiagnostic evaluation and 21 age-group gender matched healthy controls. Digit 4, lumbrical versus ulnar interossei latencies and conventional nerve conduction variables were recorded. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The sensitivity of median versus ulnar digit 4 sensory latency difference was the highest (72.72 %) whereas the conduction velocity of median nerve was the lowest (45.45%). The lumbrical versus ulnar interossei latency difference was significant between groups; however the sensitivity was only 51.52%. The conduction velocity of median nerve was relatively slower in the suspected cases than controls (49.67±13.75 vs. 60.90 ±6.70; p=0.007). The distal sensory latency of median nerve was significant between groups (3.47 ±0.58 vs. 2.16±0.25; p=0.03). The distal and proximal latencies of motor median nerve were significant between suspected cases and controls (4.70±1.82 vs. 2.75±0.38; p=<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of median versus ulnar digit 4 sensory latency difference was the highest in our set up therefore, addition of this test with conventional method can be helpful in achieving a higher diagnosis rate.

Mean Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity of Right Ulnar Nerve among Physically Trained Adult Males in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: Neural adaptation to physical training allows a person to better coordinate the activation of all relevant muscles producing maximum force. Nerve conduction velocity measures the speed of impulse along the motor neuron and is strongly associated with muscle contraction time. This study aimed to find out the mean motor nerve conduction velocity of the right ulnar nerve among physically trained adult males in a tertiary care centre. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Neurophysiology Laboratory of a tertiary care centre from 3rd November, 2019 to 2nd November, 2020. Thirty young adult males who were engaged in the physical training at a training centre for more than 3 months were studied after receiving ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 1578/019). Motor nerve conduction parameters of the right ulnar nerve were measured and data were entered in Microsoft Excel. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences version 25.0. Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and percentages for binary data, and mean and standard deviation for continuous data. Results: Among 30 males studied, the mean motor nerve conduction velocity of the ulnar nerve was found to be 61.02±5.86 m/sec (58.92-63.11 at 95% Confidence Interval). The mean distal latency and amplitude of the muscle action potential were 2.33±0.53 ms and 8.08±1.17 mv respectively. Conclusions: Our study found that the mean nerve conduction velocity of the ulnar nerve was similar when compared to studies conducted in similar settings. Keywords: Nepal; nerve conduction; ulnar nerve.

Effect of Hand Held Vibrating Tools on Nerve Conduction Study in Dental Residents.

BACKGROUND: Repetitive exposure to vibration has been shown to induce peripheral nerve dysfunction. Dentists are exposed to handheld vibrating tools in their daily clinical practice. Most of the studies are done in dentists who have symptoms such as paresthesia and numbness of the hands. Thus, we conducted the study to explore the effect of vibration on nerve conduction variables in apparently healthy asymptomatic dental residents. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled 22 dental residents and age matched 22 medical residents as controls. Nerve conduction study was performed in median and ulnar nerves of both hands. RESULTS: Anthropometric and cardiorespiratory variables were comparable between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences between dental and medical residents in the sensory conduction variables (right median onset latency=2.05±0.27 vs 1.91±0.21, p value=0.07; right median amplitude =27.80±8.11 vs 29.55±7.04, p=0.45; right median conduction velocity = 59.54±7.05 vs 61.06±5.15, p= 0.42) and motor conduction variables (right median distal latency = 2.87±0.38 vs 2.87±0.38, p= 0.94; right median distal amplitude=10.71±2.19 vs 11.10±2.37, p=0.58; right median conduction velocity= 70.57±13.16 vs 68.53±7.73, p= 0.54) of median and ulnar nerves. Further, there was no significant difference between the dominant and non-dominant hands of dental residents. CONCLUSIONS: Hand held vibration tools did not alter nerve conduction study parameters of dental residents.