Comparison of Fragmentation and Dusting Modality Using Holmium YAG Laser during Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Ureteral Stone: A Single-Center's Experience.

Laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is an efficacious treatment for ureteral stones. There have been few previous studies comparing the different energy and frequency settings for URSL in a single center. We compared these two laser modalities, which were simultaneously used in our medical center for the treatment of ureteral stones. Patients who underwent fragmentation or dusting laser URSL between September 2018 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared patients who underwent fragmentation and dusting laser and assessed the enhancing factors for stone free rate. There were a total of 421 patients with ureteral stones who met the study criteria. There was no significant difference between the characteristics of both groups. The fragmentation group had a better stone free rate and a lower retropulsion rate compared with the dusting group. Multivariate analysis revealed that stone basket use, no upper ureteral stone or pyuria significantly improved the stone free rate. Both laser modes were effective and safe for ureteral lithotripsy although the fragmentation system showed slightly higher effectiveness and lower complication rate.

The risk factors and complications of forgotten double-J stents: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urology patients may require the insertion of a ureteral stent. However, the delayed removal or change of the ureteral stent may lead to serious consequences for some patients. This study primarily aimed to examine the risk factors and complications associated with forgotten double-J stents (DJSs). METHODS: In this retrospective study, postoperative patients who underwent DJS insertion were recruited. Based on the brand of DJS, the maximal stent life (MSL) was classified into 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month groups, and a forgotten DJS was defined as the one that had yet to be removed 2 weeks past its MSL. A total of 479 patients were analyzed. The reasons for the use of DJSs use and the time and method of their insertion were recorded, and the risk factors and possible complications associated with forgotten DJSs were analyzed. RESULTS: The primary reason for DJS insertion was urolithiasis (69.7%), and insertions performed using ureterorenoscopy were the most common (413/479, 86.2%). Eighteen patients (3.8%) had forgotten DJSs, with an average overdue period of 63.17 days (18-189 days). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients older than 60 years (odds ratio [OR] = 3.626, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.070-12.289; p = 0.039) and DJSs exchanged using fibrocystoscopy (OR = 5.437, 95% CI = 1.060-28.256; p = 0.042) were significantly associated with forgotten DJSs. Out of the 18 patients with forgotten DJS, three (16.67%) experienced symptomatic complications, with one developing acute pyelonephritis, and the remaining two experiencing stone encrustation. CONCLUSION: Patients older than 60 years were 3.6 times more likely to have forgotten DJSs than patients aged 60 and below, and DJSs exchanged using fibrocystoscopy were 5.4 times more likely to be forgotten than those inserted using ureterorenoscopy. Greater attention with regards to tracking and recalling DJSs should be paid in high-risk patients to prevent forgotten DJSs and associated complications.

Compare Fuhrman Nuclear and Chromophobe Tumor Grade on Chromophobe RCC.

BACKGROUND: Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) has a favorable prognosis. Due to irregular nuclei and nuclear pleomorphism, chRCC has a high Fuhrman nuclear grade (FNG). The chromophobe tumor grade (CTG) is a novel three-tier grading system that has been reported to be a better prognosticator than the traditional FNG. We compared the two nuclear grading systems in terms of patients' clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We performed this retrospective chart review of all patients with chRCC from 2000 to 2017. All pathologic features and CTG and FNG results were re-evaluated. RESULT: Eighteen patients' records were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 70.6 months. The nuclear grading distribution was as follows: FNG 2, 56%; FNG 3, 39%; FNG 4, 5%; CTG 1, 78%; CTG 2, 17%; and CTG 3, 6%. Only one patient died. This patient had adrenal invasion, lung metastasis, sarcomatoid change and tumor necrosis, and the tumor was graded as FNG 4 and CTG 3. Overall survival was associated with both FNG and CTG. CONCLUSION: Chromophobe RCC was associated with a low rate of cancer-specific death and sarcomatoid differentiation. Both FNG and CTG were associated with overall survival.