Estimating Microplastics related to Laundry Wash and Personal Care Products released to Wastewater in Major Estonian Cities: a comparison of calculated and measured microplastics.

Microplastics (MPs) research still at the budding stage in Estonia. A theoretical model build on substance flow analysis principles was developed. The goal of this study is to broaden understanding of MPs-types in wastewater and their contribution from known sources, quantify their presence based on model prediction and in-situ measurements. The authors estimate MPs from laundry wash (LW) and personal care products (PCPs)) in wastewater in Estonia. We found out that total estimated MPs load per capita from PCPs and LW in Estonia were between 4.25 - 12 tons/year, 3.52 - 11.24 tons / year respectively, and estimated load ended up in wastewater were between 700 - 30,000 kg/yr. and 2 - 1500 kg/yr. in WWTPs influent and effluent stream respectively. Finally. We conducted a comparison between estimated MPs load and on-site sample analysis and observed a medium-high level of MPs being discharged into the environment annually. During quantification and chemical characterization using µFTIR analysis, we found that microfibers with a length of 0.2-0.6 mm accounted for over 75% of the total MPs load in the effluent samples collected from four coastal WWTPs in Estonia. The estimation avails us broader overview about the theoretical MPs load in wastewater and gain valuable insight into developing process methods that prevent MPs accumulation in sewage sludge for safe application in agriculture.

Expected impact of MRI-related interreader variability on ProScreen prostate cancer screening trial: a pre-trial validation study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the potential impact of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) -related interreader variability on a population-based randomized prostate cancer screening trial (ProScreen). METHODS: From January 2014 to January 2018, 100 men aged 50-63 years with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) in Helsinki University Hospital underwent MRI. Nine radiologists individually reviewed the pseudonymized MRI scans of all 100 men in two ProScreen trial centers. All 100 men were biopsied according to a histological composite variable comprising radical prostatectomy histology (N = 38) or biopsy result within 1 year from the imaging (N = 62). Fleiss' kappa (κ) was used to estimate the combined agreement between all individual radiologists. Sample data were subsequently extrapolated to 1000-men subgroups of the ProScreen cohort. RESULTS: Altogether 89% men of the 100-men sample were diagnosed with PCa within a median of 2.4 years of follow-up. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was identified in 76% men. For all PCa, mean sensitivity was 79% (SD ±10%, range 62-96%), and mean specificity 60% (SD ±22%, range 27-82%). For csPCa (Gleason Grade 2-5) MRI was equally sensitive (mean 82%, SD ±9%, range 67-97%) but less specific (mean 47%, SD ±20%, range 21-75%). Interreader agreement for any lesion was fair (κ 0.40) and for PI-RADS 4-5 lesions it was moderate (κ 0.60). Upon extrapolating these data, the average sensitivity and specificity to a screening positive subgroup of 1000 men from ProScreen with a 30% prevalence of csPCa, 639 would be biopsied. Of these, 244 men would be true positive, and 395 false positive. Moreover, 361 men would not be referred to biopsy and among these, 56 csPCas would be missed. The variation among the radiologists was broad as the least sensitive radiologist would have twice as many men biopsied and almost three times more men would undergo unnecessary biopsies. Although the most sensitive radiologist would miss only 2.6% of csPCa (false negatives), the least sensitive radiologist would miss every third. CONCLUSIONS: Interreader agreement was fair to moderate. The role of MRI in the ongoing ProScreen trial is crucial and has a substantial impact on the screening process.

The role of magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the evaluation of disease activity and severity in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) has been considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and follow-up of primary sclerosing cholangitis, but it has been replaced by less invasive magnetic resonance imaging and cholangiopancreatography (MRI-MRCP). However, the role of these two techniques in the evaluation of disease activity and severity needs to be elucidated. METHODS: Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (n: 48, male 31, median age: 35.7; 28.0-44.2) who underwent ERCP and MRI-MRCP within ±3 months for diagnosis or follow-up, were reviewed. ERCP and MRI-MRCP images were scored using the modified Amsterdam score. Serum and biliary cytology markers of disease activity and severity were related to the imaging findings. Agreement on the assessment of the ERCP/MRCP score was calculated by kappa-statistics. Spearman's ρ was calculated when appropriate. RESULTS: The agreement between ERCP and MRCP in scoring bile duct changes for disease severity was only moderate (weighted kappa: 0.437; 95% CI: 0.211-0.644 for intra- and 0.512; 95% CI: 0.303-0.720 for extra-hepatic bile ducts). ERCP and MRCP intra-hepatic scores were associated to the surrogate marker alkaline phosphatase (P = .02 for both). A weak correlation between MRCP score for extra-hepatic bile ducts and liver transplantation/death was found (Spearman's ρ = .362, 95% CI: 0.080-0.590, P = .022). A weak correlation between intra- (Spearman's ρ = .322, 95% CI: 0.048-0.551, P = .022) and extra-hepatic (Spearman`s ρ = .319, 95% CI: 0.045-0.549, P = .025) peribiliary enhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI and severity of biliary cytologic classification was found. CONCLUSIONS: The overall agreement between ERCP and MRI-MRCP in assessing disease severity was moderate for intra- and extra-hepatic bile ducts. MRI-MRCP seems to have a minor role as surrogate marker of disease activity and progression in PSC.