Assessment of myocardial infarct size with body surface potential mapping: validation against contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of myocardial infarct (MI) size is important for therapeutic and prognostic reasons. We used body surface potential mapping (BSPM) to evaluate whether single-lead electrocardiographic variables can assess MI size. METHODS: We performed BSPM with 120 leads covering the front and back chest (plus limb leads) on 57 patients at different phases of MI: acutely, during healing, and in the chronic phase. Final MI size was determined by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMR) and correlated with various computed depolarization- and repolarization-phase BSPM variables. We also calculated correlations between BSPM variables and enzymatic MI size (peak CK-MBm). RESULTS: BSPM variables reflecting the Q- and R wave showed strong correlations with MI size at all stages of MI. R width performed the best, showing its strongest correlation with MI size on the upper right back, there representing the width of the "reciprocal Q wave" (r = 0.64-0.71 for DE-CMR, r = 0.57-0.64 for CK-MBm, P < 0.0001). Repolarization-phase variables showed only weak correlations with MI size in the acute phase, but these correlations improved during MI healing. T-wave variables and the QRSSTT integral showed their best correlations with DE-CMR defined MI size on the precordial area, at best r = -0.57, P < 0.0001 in the chronic phase. The best performing BSPM variables could differentiate between large and small infarcts at all stages of MI. CONCLUSIONS: Computed, single-lead electrocardiographic variables can estimate the final infarct size at all stages of MI, and differentiate large infarcts from small.

Predicting recovery of myocardial function by electrocardiography after acute infarction.

BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, distinguishing viable myocardium is clinically important. METHODS: Body surface potential mapping (Electrocardiography [ECG] with 123 leads), was recorded in 62 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). ECG variables were computed from de- and repolarization phases. LV segmental wall motion was assessed by echocardiography acutely and after 1 year. RESULTS: The number of dysfunctional segments (DFS) diminished during follow-up in 37 patients (recovery group) and remained the same or increased in 25 patients (nonrecovery group). Acutely, DFS was 5.7 ± 2.1 versus 4.4 ± 2.4 (P = 0.02), and peak CK-MBm 141 ± 157 versus 156 ± 167 µg/L (P = 0.78) in the recovery versus nonrecovery group. At follow-up, DFS was 1.9 ± 1.7 versus 6.5 ± 2.6 (P < 0.001). The best ECG variable to predict decrease in DFS depended on the region of acute LV dysfunction: The best variable in the left anterior descending region was the integral of the first QRS integral (area under the curve [AUC] 0.82, P = 0.002); in the right coronary artery region, this was the integral of the ST segment (AUC 0.98, P = 0.003); and in the left circumflex region, the area including the ST segment and the T wave (AUC 0.97, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In ACS patients, computed ECG variables predict recovery of LV function from ischemic myocardial injury, even in the presence of comparable CK-MBm release and LV dysfunction.