Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Heart ; 90(10): 1137-43, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15367507

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore the relation between non-invasive measures of cardiac function and sudden cardiac death, as well as the development and utility of an index integrating these variables to identify patients at increased risk of this mode of death. DESIGN: UK-HEART (United Kingdom-heart failure evaluation and assessment of risk trial) was a prospective study conducted between December 1993 and April 2000. The study was specifically designed to identify non-invasive markers of death and mode of death among patients with chronic heart failure. SETTING: 8 UK general hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death and mode of death. RESULTS: 553 patients aged a mean (SD) of 63 (10) years, in New York Heart Association functional class 2.3 (0.02), recruited prospectively. After 2365 patient-years' follow up, 201 patients had died (67 suddenly). Predictors of sudden death were greater cardiothoracic ratio, QRS dispersion, QT dispersion corrected for rate (QTc) across leads V1-V6 on the 12 lead ECG, and the presence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. The hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of sudden death for a 10% increase in cardiothoracic ratio was 1.43 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.71), for a 10% increase in QRS dispersion 1.11 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.19), for the presence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia 2.03 (95% CI 1.27 to 3.25), and for a 10% increase in QTc dispersion across leads V1-V6 1.03 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.07) (all p < 0.04). An index derived from these four factors performed well in identifying patients specifically at increased risk of sudden death. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that an index derived from three widely available non-invasive investigations has the potential to identify ambulant patients with chronic heart failure at increased risk of sudden death. This predictive tool could be used to target more sophisticated investigations or interventions aimed at preventing sudden death.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Anciano , Cardiomegalia/complicaciones , Cardiomegalia/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Crónica , Electrocardiografía , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Taquicardia Ventricular/complicaciones , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatología
2.
Nucl Med Commun ; 22(12): 1305-11, 2001 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11711900

RESUMEN

We evaluated the use of adenosine, dobutamine and arbutamine with (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging. Forty patients under investigation for suspected coronary artery disease were recruited. Each had a resting scan and two separate stress scans on different days, in a randomized cross-over study. Resultant images were blindly reported in 13 segments per scan as normal, reversible or fixed defects. A score was given (0-3) for segmental defect severity. Haemodynamic responses were as expected for each agent. Subjective side effect scores did not differ overall between agents. Adenosine caused a significantly higher incidence of abnormal taste (54%) than dobutamine and arbutamine (both 23%) and a lower incidence of palpitations (25% vs 69% and 54%, respectively), all P<0.05. Arbutamine caused significantly more chest pain than adenosine (77% vs 46%) though less flushing (35% vs 68%), both P<0.05. Comparison of the results obtained showed highly significant levels of segmental agreement for visual and semi-quantitative analysis between adenosine and arbutamine, kappa value and correlation coefficient of 0.78 and 0.86, respectively, dobutamine and adenosine 0.69 and 0.78, and arbutamine and dobutamine 0.75 and 0.78, all P<0.0001. Adenosine, arbutamine and dobutamine differ in their haemodynamic response and side effect profile but provide highly comparable results during (99m)Tc SPECT imaging.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta , Catecolaminas , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Dobutamina , Corazón/diagnóstico por imagen , Compuestos Organofosforados , Compuestos de Organotecnecio , Radiofármacos , Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único , Adenosina/efectos adversos , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Catecolaminas/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Coronaria/fisiopatología , Estudios Cruzados , Dobutamina/efectos adversos , Electrocardiografía , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador
3.
Health Technol Assess ; 4(35): 1-117, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11109031

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is the generic name for any ultrasound technology used in vivo within the blood vessels. More specifically, intracoronary ultrasound enables imaging of the coronary arteries from within the lumen. This review concentrates on the role of intracoronary ultrasound as an adjunct to interventional cardiology. OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify the literature on IVUS for guiding coronary interventions, and to synthesise evidence about outcomes compared with outcomes when IVUS guidance has not been used. (2) To use this evidence, together with other information about costs and outcomes, to model the cost effectiveness of IVUS guidance. (3) To synthesise the evidence on the reproducibility of measurements of cross-sectional area made using IVUS. DATA SOURCES: (1) Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings, Engineering Compendex, Engineering Page One, Cochrane Library, Inside (British Library), 1990-98. (2) Contacting experts and centres of expertise, 1990-99. (3) Internet search, 1990-99. STUDY SELECTION: Studies of IVUS-guided coronary interventions performed on humans were included in the review. Non-English language studies were also included when they covered IVUS-guided stenting or angioplasty. Control evidence regarding outcomes without IVUS guidance was sought only from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Studies investigating the reproducibility of measurements of cross-sectional area were included only if the results were expressed in terms of the mean and standard deviation of paired differences. DATA EXTRACTION: Checklists that covered study details, patient characteristics and results were completed independently by three reviewers. Consensus was reached on any disagreements. Local data were gathered on the costs of IVUS-guided stenting. DATA SYNTHESIS: Overall event rates were calculated by pooling patient results from the included studies. A decision-analytic model was used to combine information from the literature with cost estimates, in order to predict cost-effectiveness in terms of cost per restenosis event avoided by the use of IVUS guidance. The analysis was performed from the perspective of the healthcare provider. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken. A simple extrapolation was made to long-term outcome so that cost-utility (using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)) could be estimated. The minimum detectable change in cross-sectional area was estimated from the reproducibility results. RESULTS: Only one study on IVUS-guided angioplasty satisfied the inclusion criteria, and there were no studies on IVUS-guided atherectomy or other IVUS-guided interventions that satisfied the inclusion criteria. Of the 15 articles on IVUS-guided stenting that satisfied the inclusion criteria, seven presented data on outcomes at 6 months post-intervention. The angiographic restenosis rate was 16 +/- 1%. This compared with 24 +/- 2% derived from five articles on stenting without IVUS guidance. Data for follow-up periods longer than 6 months were presented in only two studies. Data from a total of five studies were included in the decision-analytic model. The cost per restenosis event avoided was 1545 pound sterling. After extrapolation to long-term outcome, the calculated cost per QALY was 6438 pound sterling. The baseline QALY gain was only 0.03 years. Sensitivity analysis resulted in large differences between the best- and worst-case scenarios, for example, from a saving of 5000 pound sterling to a cost of 24,000 pound sterling restenosis event avoided. The smallest changes in cross-sectional area that could be measured were 1.6 mm2 by a single observer and 1.9 mm2 by different observers. CONCLUSIONS: Implications for healthcare: The evidence available is too weak for there to be any reliable implications for clinical practice. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Coronaria/terapia , Árboles de Decisión , Selección de Paciente , Stents , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Algoritmos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Morbilidad , Recurrencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
5.
Br Heart J ; 71(4): 363-5, 1994 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8198887

RESUMEN

A 63 year old man with symptomatic obstruction of the superior vena cava associated with an indwelling pacemaker was successfully treated with balloon venoplasty and stent insertion. He was symptom free with normal pacemaker function nine months later.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Stents , Síndrome de la Vena Cava Superior/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Síndrome de la Vena Cava Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de la Vena Cava Superior/terapia , Vena Cava Superior/diagnóstico por imagen
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...