Combined Targeted Muscle Reinnervation With Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces Decreases Long-Term Narcotic Use in Amputees: A Case Control Study.

PURPOSE: Combined targeted muscle reinnervation with regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces ("TMRpni") is a recently described nerve management strategy that leverages beneficial elements of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of TMRpni on long-term opioid consumption after amputation. We hypothesize that TMRpni decreases chronic opioid consumption in amputees. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent TMRpni between 2019 and 2021. These patients were age-matched at a 1:1 ratio with a control group of patients who underwent amputation without TMRpni. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 28.0. RESULTS: Thirty-one age-matched pairs of patients in the TMRpni and control groups were included. At 30 days after surgery, there was no significant difference in number of patients who required an additional refill of their opioid prescriptions (45% vs 55%, P = 0.45) or patients who continued to actively use opioids (36% vs 42%, P = 0.60). However, at 90 days after surgery, there was a significantly lower number of patients from the TMRpni group who reported continued opioid use compared with the control group (10% vs 32%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that TMRpni may translate to decreased rates of chronic opiate use. Continued study is indicated to optimize TMRpni techniques and patient selection and to determine its long-term efficacy.

Threatened Ventricular Assist Devices: Meta-analysis of Negative Pressure Therapy and Flap Reconstruction Outcomes.

Infected Ventricular Assist Device (VAD)-associated wounds are common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The efficacy of hardware salvage utilizing flaps and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) remains understudied. We hypothesized that patients treated with flaps and/or NPWT would have higher hardware salvage rates compared with other surgical management strategies. Methods: A meta-analysis study evaluating VAD-associated wounds was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Primary predictor variables were flap-reconstruction (FR), NPWT, no FR, and infection location (mediastinum versus driveline). Primary outcomes were hardware retention (salvage) versus explantation, infection recurrence, or death. Twenty-nine studies were included. Standard statistical methods included logistic regression analysis. Results: Seventy-four subjects with nonsignificant demographic differences between cohorts were identified. Overall salvage was 59.5% in both driveline and mediastinum cohorts. Overall, NPWT significantly improved salvage compared with no NPWT [77.4% versus 46.5% respectively (P = 0.009)], and FR significantly improved salvage compared with no FR [68.6% versus 39.1% respectively (P = 0.022)]. Logistic regression analysis predicting odds of salvage by FR (area under curve = 0.631) was significantly three times higher (95% CI: 1.2-9.5) and predicting the odds for salvage by NPWT (area under curve = 0.656) was significantly four times higher (95% CI: 1.4-11.1) compared with other treatment. Conclusions: NPWT or flap reconstruction for treatment of threatened VAD hardware was associated with a significantly improved device salvage compared with other surgical strategies. Further study should focus on subgroup analysis of flaps utilized and synergistic treatment benefits.

Pudendal tumor mimicking cauda equina syndrome and acute radiculopathy: case report.

INTRODUCTION: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is most caused by lumbar disc herniation, and the associated treatment involves prompt surgical decompression. Rarer causes of CES include perineural (Tarlov) cysts. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old female with history of rheumatoid arthritis, hip and knee replacements, and chronic low back pain presented with worsening back pain, left leg weakness and pain for 6 weeks, and bowel/bladder incontinence with diminished sensation in the perianal region for 24 h prior to presentation. MRI demonstrated severe spinal stenosis at L4-S1, central disc herniation at L5-S1, and compression of the cauda equina, consistent with CES. A lumbar decompression was performed. Patient did well at 2-week follow up, but presented 5 weeks post-discharge with increased left leg pain/weakness and genitalia anesthesia. Imaging was unremarkable. Two months later, the patient presented with diminished sensation in the buttocks and bilateral lower extremities and bowel/bladder incontinence. Imaging demonstrated a large cystic presacral mass with involvement of the left sciatic foramen and S3 neural foramen. A team of plastic, orthopedic, and neurological surgeons performed an S3 sacral laminectomy, foraminotomy, partial sacrectomy, and S3 rhizotomy, and excision of the large left hemorrhagic pudendal mass. Final pathology demonstrated a perineural cyst with organizing hemorrhage. On follow-up, the patient's pain and weakness improved. CONCLUSION: CES-like symptoms were initially attributed to a herniated disk. However, lumbar decompression did not resolve symptoms, prompting further radiographic evaluation at two separate presentations. This represents the first reported case of a pudendal tumor causing symptoms initially attributed to a herniated disc.

TMRpni: Combining Two Peripheral Nerve Management Techniques.

Amputee patients suffer high rates of chronic neuropathic pain, residual limb dysfunction, and disability. Recently, targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) are 2 techniques that have been advocated for such patients, given their ability to maximize intuitive prosthetic function while also minimizing neuropathic pain, such as residual and phantom limb pain. However, there remains room to further improve outcomes for our residual limb patients and patients suffering from symptomatic end neuromas. "TMRpni" is a nerve management technique that leverages beneficial elements described for both TMR and RPNI. TMRpni involves coaptation of a sensory or mixed sensory/motor nerve to a nearby motor nerve branch (ie, a nerve transfer), as performed in traditional TMR surgeries. Additionally, the typically mismatched nerve coaptation is wrapped with an autologous free muscle graft that is akin to an RPNI. The authors herein describe the "TMRpni" technique and illustrate a case where this technique was employed.

Pulley Release and Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix After Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Injury.

Zone 2 flexor tendon repair has been historically associated with poor outcomes, mainly due to stiffness. In an effort to minimize adhesions, accommodate flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis bulk, and prevent bowstringing, we have developed a novel approach to flexor tendon repair that relies on aggressive flexor tendon pulley release and pulley reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix. This technique leverages the antiadhesive properties and high tensile strength of acellular dermal matrix to maximize gliding and prevent bowstringing. Here we describe the details of our technique and illustrate a case where this technique was employed.

Successful Digital Revascularization in a Patient With Factor V Leiden Mutation.

Replantation/revascularization involves microsurgical anastomosis of the digital arteries and veins, which are often 2 mm or less in diameter. Thrombosis is a known risk of revascularization that ultimately can lead to ischemic digital loss. Factor V Leiden mutation is present in 3% to 8% of the population and results in generalized hypercoagulability. We present the case of a single-digit revascularization that was successful following vein grafting in a patient with factor V Leiden mutation.

The Management of Partial Zone II Intrasynovial Flexor Tendon Lacerations: A Literature Review of Biomechanics, Clinical Outcomes, and Complications.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating trauma or lacerations within zone II of the flexor sheath may result in partial tendon injury. The proper management of this injury is controversial; the literature contains differing indications for surgical treatment and postoperative rehabilitation. METHODS: A literature review of the Cochrane, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases was performed using the following search criteria: partial, flexor, tendon, and laceration. All English language studies that evaluated biomechanical strength, complications, and outcomes after partial tendon injury in human and animal studies were included and reviewed by two of the authors. RESULTS: Animal and cadaveric biomechanical studies have demonstrated that partial lacerations involving up to 95 percent of the tendon cross-sectional area can safely tolerate loads generated through unresisted, active finger flexion. Suture tenorrhaphy of partial tendon injury is associated with decreased tendon tensile strength, increased resistance, and decreased tendon gliding. Complications of nonsurgical management include triggering and entrapment, which can be managed by tendon beveling or pulley release. Late rupture is extremely uncommon (one report). CONCLUSIONS: Partial tendon lacerations involving 90 percent of the cross-sectional area can be safely treated without surgical repair and immediate protected active motion. Indications for exploration and treatment include concern for complete injury, triggering of the involved digit, or entrapment of the tendon. Surgical treatment for tendon triggering or entrapment with less than 75 percent cross-sectional injury is beveling of the tendon edges and injuries greater than 75 percent should be repaired with a noncircumferential, simple epitendinous suture. All patients should be allowed to perform early protected active motion after surgery.

A retrospective comparison of the management of recalcitrant lateral elbow tendinosis: platelet-rich plasma injections versus surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections to surgical release and decortication for lateral elbow tendinosis within a similar patient population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on two groups of patients, receiving either PRP injections (n = 28) or surgery (n = 50). Patient demographics, clinical presentation, pain score, worker's compensation status, and previous steroid injections were recorded. Primary outcomes included pain and symptom improvement, range of motion, return to work, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Demographics, duration of symptoms, and exam findings were similar between the PRP and surgical patients. There was no significant difference in pain and symptom improvement. Pain improvement was reported in 89.3 % of PRP patients and 84 % of surgical patients, with a reported percent reduction in pain of 61.1 and 55 %, respectively. Symptoms other than pain improved in 85.7 and 88 % of the PRP and surgical patients, respectively. Tenderness to palpation at the lateral epicondyle (64.3 % PRP, 44 % surgical), pain with resisted wrist extension (35.7 % PRP, 30 % surgical), or residual symptoms other than pain (14.3 % PRP, 10 % surgical) were not significantly different between groups at last follow-up. Eighty-two percent of patients in both the PRP and surgical groups returned to work. No complications were reported. Mean follow-up was 315 vs. 352 days for the PRP and surgical groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Similar outcomes in pain improvement and return to work may be achievable with either PRP injections or surgery in recalcitrant lateral elbow tendinosis. PRP injections may be a reasonable alternative for patients apprehensive to proceed with surgery or poor surgical candidates.

A retrospective review of the outcomes of migraine surgery in the adolescent population.

BACKGROUND: Migraine surgery has been studied extensively in adult patients with refractory headaches. The purpose of this study was to review a single surgeon's outcomes following migraine surgery in an adolescent population. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients operated on by the senior author (B.G.) from 2000 to 2014 was performed. All patients aged 18 years or younger with at least 1 year of follow-up after surgery were included. Preoperative and postoperative migraine frequency, duration, severity, and migraine headache days and migraine index were analyzed for statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients and 15 operations were analyzed. After an average follow-up of 38.2 months, the frequency of migraine headaches per 30-day period was reduced from 25 to 5 (p < 0.0001), the migraine headache index decreased from 148.1 to 12.4 (p < 0.0001), the duration of headaches (number of hours per 24 hours) declined from 0.71 to 0.25 (p = 0.002), severity of headaches diminished from 8.2 to 4.3 (p = 0.0004), and migraine days per month declined from 25 to 5 (p < 0.0001). Five patients remained free of any symptoms following surgery. One patient had no improvement in frequency of headaches, but did have improvement in severity and duration of headaches. No postoperative complications were noted in this group of patients. CONCLUSION: In the adolescent population with migraine headaches refractory to traditional medical management, migraine surgery may offer symptomatic improvement of migraine headache frequency, duration, and severity in patients with identifiable anatomical trigger sites. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Intraoperative corticosteroid injections in migraine surgery: efficacy in preventing refractory symptoms.

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients have been noted to have refractory migraine symptoms in site IV (occipital triggers) following primary surgery. It was postulated that the cause of refractory migraine symptoms is new scar tissue formation causing irritation of the greater occipital nerve. The goal of this study was to determine whether intraoperative corticosteroid injections have the potential to prevent these refractory symptoms. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients operated on by the senior author (B.G.) from 2000 to 2010 was undertaken. All patients who had site IV decompression and at least 1 year of follow-up were included. Patients were divided into two groups, those who had corticosteroids injected and those who did not. Data analyzed included demographics and preoperative and postoperative migraine headache symptoms review based on the migraine headache questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 476 patients were included in the study. There were 282 patients in the corticosteroid group and 194 in the no-corticosteroid group. A significant reduction was found in the frequency of migraine headaches (-9.8 versus -8.0; p = 0.03) and the migraine headache index (-92.9 versus -65.2; p = 0.0065). There was no significant reduction in migraine headache duration (-0.50 versus -0.70; p = 0.10) or severity (-3.50 versus -3.80; p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative injection of corticosteroids during site IV migraine surgery may reduce migraine frequency and migraine headache index postoperatively. Corticosteroid injection in migraine site IV surgery is an effective adjunctive measure in reducing the migraine headache index. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

The role of the third occipital nerve in surgical treatment of occipital migraine headaches.

BACKGROUND: The third occipital nerve is often encountered during the occipital migraine surgery, however its contribution to migraine headaches is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine whether removing the third occipital nerve plays any role in the clinical outcomes of occipital migraine surgery. METHODS: A retrospective comparative review was conducted on all occipital migraine headache (Site IV) patients from 1/2000 to 12/2010. Inclusion criteria were: 1) completion of migraine questionnaire, 2) migraine Site IV decompression, and 3) minimum 6 months of follow-up. Patients were divided into those who had the third occipital nerve removed and those who did not. Outcome variables included overall Migraine Headache Index reduction and Site IV pain elimination. RESULTS: 229 patients met the study inclusion criteria. The third occipital nerve removed group (111 patients) and the third occipital nerve not removed group (118 patients) were comparable in terms of age, gender, number of surgical sites, and statistically well matched regarding preoperative headache characteristics. Comparing the third occipital nerve removed to the third occipital nerve not removed group, Migraine headache index reduction was 63% vs. 64%. Patients experiencing migraine headache elimination (third occipital nerve removed 26% vs. third occipital nerve not removed 29%; p=0.45) and surgery success with at least 50% reduction in migraine headache (third occipital nerve removed 80% vs. third occipital nerve not removed 81%; p=0.82) were also similar. There was also no difference between the two groups in symptomatic neuroma formation. Site IV specific pain elimination was similar between the two groups (third occipital nerve removed 58% vs. third occipital nerve not removed 64%; p=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Removal of the third occipital nerve did not alter migraine surgery success.

Capsular contracture rate in a low-risk population after primary augmentation mammaplasty.

BACKGROUND: The safety of augmentation mammaplasty has increased dramatically in the past 20 years. Capsular contracture (CC) is the most commonly reported complication of augmentation mammaplasty. OBJECTIVES: The authors report the incidence of CC in a low-risk patient population after primary augmentation. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 856 consecutive patients who underwent primary augmentation mammaplasty between 1999 and 2009. This series did not include patients who underwent breast augmentation-mastopexy, secondary augmentation, revision, and/or reconstruction. Data points included demographics, functional and aesthetic outcomes, complications, and revision rate/type. RESULTS: The overall incidence of CC in 856 patients was 2.8%. Average follow-up time was 14.9 months. Antibiotic irrigation decreased CC rates from 3.9% to 0.4% (P = .004). Tobacco users had higher rates of contracture than nonsmokers (5.5% vs 1.9%; P = .036). Saline implants had a higher CC rate than silicone gel (4.3% vs 1.3%; P = .032). Using multivariate logistic regression, CC was 7.89 times more likely in saline implants than in silicone gel (P = .027, 95% confidence interval, 1.26-49.00). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, it is apparent that the early CC rate in primary augmentation can be less than 1%. To avoid CC, we advocate an inframmamary approach, submuscular implant placement, and antibiotic irrigation of the breast pocket. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Cutaneous mucormycosis of the upper extremity in an immunocompetent host: case report.

Cutaneous mucormycosis, a relatively common infection in immunocompromised patients, remains rare in the immunocompetent patient outside the setting of major trauma. We report a case of an immunocompetent patient who developed left upper extremity Rhizopus infection following arterial puncture. Treatment included surgical debridement, liposomal amphotericin B, and hyperbaric oxygen wound therapy; the patient recovered fully. A review of the literature of cases of upper extremity Mucor infection is included for context. We feel that a high degree of suspicion for Mucor infection is warranted in patients with the described risk factors who do not respond to first-line antibiotics.