Impact of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules (Qelbree®) on Select Cytochrome P450 Enzyme Activity and Evaluation of CYP2D6 Genetic Polymorphisms on Viloxazine Pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Viloxazine extended-release (ER) [Qelbree®] is a nonstimulant attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment. In vitro studies suggested potential for viloxazine to inhibit cytochrome 450 (CYP) enzymes 1A2, 2B6, 2D6 and 3A4. This clinical study therefore evaluated viloxazine ER effects on index substrates for CYP1A2, 2D6, and 3A4, and secondarily evaluated the impact of CYP2D6 polymorphisms on viloxazine pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Thirty-seven healthy subjects received a modified Cooperstown cocktail (MCC; caffeine 200 mg, dextromethorphan 30 mg, midazolam 0.025 mg/kg) on Day 1, viloxazine ER 900 mg/day on Days 3-5, and a combination of viloxazine ER 900 mg and MCC on Day 6. Viloxazine ER effects on MCC substrates were evaluated using analysis of variance. The impact of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms on steady-state viloxazine plasma concentrations was evaluated using Student's t test assessing pharmacokinetic parameter differences between poor versus extensive metabolizers. RESULTS: The least squares geometric mean ratio [GMR%] (90% CI) of MCC substrate + viloxazine ER/MCC substrate alone for caffeine maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUCt), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC∞) was 99.11 (95.84-102.49), 436.15 (398.87-476.92), and 583.35 (262.41-1296.80), respectively; 150.76 (126.03-180.35), 185.76 (155.01-222.61), and 189.71 (160.37-224.42) for dextromethorphan Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞, respectively; and 112.81 (104.71-121.54), 167.56 (153.05-183.45), and 168.91 (154.38-184.80) for midazolam Cmax, AUCt, and AUC∞, respectively. At steady state, viloxazine least squares GMR (90% CI) for poor/extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers were Cmax 120.70 (102.33-142.37) and area under the plasme concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24 125.66 (105.36-149.87)). CONCLUSION: Viloxazine ER is a strong CYP1A2 inhibitor and a weak CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 inhibitor. CYP2D6 polymorphisms did not meaningfully alter the viloxazine ER pharmacokinetic profile.

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder that typically begins in childhood and often persists into adulthood. Recent phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of viloxazine extended-release capsules (viloxazine ER; Qelbree®) in pediatrics (6-17 years of age). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of viloxazine ER in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. METHODS: This was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-arm trial in adults (18-65 years of age) with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eligible subjects were randomized 1:1 to viloxazine ER (flexible dose of 200-600 mg/day) or matched placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline at end of study (week 6) in the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) total score. The key secondary endpoint was the change from baseline at end of study in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score. Additional secondary outcome measures included the AISRS Inattention and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscales, the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult (BRIEF-A), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Item (GAD-7), and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I); each was analyzed at end of study. Responder rates on CGI scales and the AISRS were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 374 subjects were randomized. At end of study, the mean viloxazine ER dose was 504 mg. The reduction in the change from baseline at end of study AISRS total score (least-square means ± standard error) was significantly greater in subjects treated with viloxazine ER (-15.5 ± 0.91) compared with placebo (-11.7 ± 0.90), p = 0.0040. The reduction in the CGI-S score was also significantly greater in subjects treated with viloxazine ER (-1.4 ± 0.10) compared with placebo (-1.0 ± 0.10), p = 0.0023. The viloxazine ER group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in the AISRS Inattention (p = 0.0015) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (p = 0.0380) subscales, the CGI-I (p = 0.0076), and the BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite (p = 0.0468) and Metacognition Index (p = 0.0100). Analysis of categorical secondary endpoints revealed that the viloxazine ER group had a significantly higher AISRS 30% response rate compared with placebo (p = 0.0395); all other comparisons were not significant. Many treatment effects (including the primary and key secondary endpoints) were significant by week 2. The most common treatment-related adverse events that occurred in ≥5% of subjects receiving viloxazine ER were insomnia (14.8%), fatigue (11.6%), nausea (10.1%), decreased appetite (10.1%), dry mouth (9.0%), and headache (9.0%). Viloxazine ER was well tolerated, with a 9.0% discontinuation rate due to adverse events compared with 4.9% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with viloxazine ER resulted in a statistically significant improvement in primary and key secondary endpoints, indicating improvements in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptomology, executive function, and overall clinical illness severity in adults. Viloxazine ER was well tolerated at the tested doses in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04016779.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a condition characterized by inattention (difficulty maintaining focus), and/or impulsiveness/hyperactivity. In 2021, a nonstimulant medication called viloxazine ER (brand name: Qelbree^®) received US FDA-approval for ADHD in children and adolescents (aged 6 to 17 years), based on efficacy and safety demonstrated in clinical trials. Here we present results of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial that enrolled 374 adults with ADHD. In this trial, half the patients received viloxazine ER, and half received placebo (identical capsule without active ingredient). Medication doses ranged from 200­600 mg/day, based on symptom response and presence of side effects. To reduce bias, patients and investigators did not know which medication the patient was receiving. The primary measure of efficacy was the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS), a standardized questionnaire rating presence and severity of patient-reported ADHD symptoms. At the end of the 6-week trial, participants receiving viloxazine ER showed greater improvement in ADHD symptoms according to AISRS than those receiving placebo. Improvement was seen in both the Inattentive and Impulsive/Hyperactive components of ADHD and in other study measures, including a measure of behaviors called Executive Function. Viloxazine ER was generally safe and well-tolerated in the trial. The most common side effects were insomnia (14.8%), fatigue (11.6%), and nausea (10.1%). Overall, 9.0% of patients receiving viloxazine and 5% receiving placebo left the trial because of side effects. Due to these positive results, the US FDA recently approved viloxazine ER to treat adults with ADHD.

Impact of a High-Fat Meal and Sprinkled Administration on the Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules (QelbreeTM) in Healthy Adult Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Viloxazine extended-release (viloxazine ER) capsules (QelbreeTM) is a novel nonstimulant recently approved as a treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Here, we determined whether the pharmacokinetics of viloxazine are impacted by consuming the capsule contents sprinkled on applesauce rather than an intact capsule, and the effect of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics of viloxazine ER. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, crossover, three-treatment, three-period study in healthy adults using orally administered single-dose viloxazine ER 200 mg capsules. Subjects consumed: (1) an intact capsule after a 10-h fast (control condition); (2) the capsule contents sprinkled on one tablespoon of applesauce; and (3) an intact capsule with a standard high-fat meal. Blood samples were collected for 48 h post-dosing. Relative bioavailability analyses were performed to assess the impact of each test condition against the control condition (intact capsule, fasting). The absence of an impact was indicated if the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the least-squares geometric mean ratio (LSGMR) of maximal concentration (Cmax), the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration time (AUClast), and the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) were within the predetermined no-difference limits of 80-125%. RESULTS: Out of 27 enrolled subjects, 25 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. The LSGMR (90% CI) for viloxazine ER sprinkled vs. intact were 90.10% (83.35-97.40) for Cmax, 93.71% (89.09-98.57) for AUClast, and 95.37% (89.80-101.28) for AUCinf. The LSGMR (90% CI) for viloxazine ER consumed in the fed state vs. fasting state were 90.86% (84.05-98.21) for Cmax, 89.68% (85.26-94.33) for AUClast, and 92.35% (86.96-98.07) for AUCinf. The 90% CIs of the LSGMRs were within the predetermined no-difference limits of 80-125%. Viloxazine ER was well tolerated, with most adverse events reported as mild. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that viloxazine ER can be consumed sprinkled on applesauce or as intact capsules with or without meals without significantly changing its pharmacokinetics.

A Phase 3 Placebo-Controlled Trial of Once-Daily 400-mg and 600-mg SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-Release) in Adolescents with ADHD.

Objectives: Three Phase 3 trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of SPN-812 in pediatric subjects with ADHD. Here, we report the results of a fourth trial. Methods: Eligible adolescent subjects (N = 297) were randomized to SPN-812 (400- or 600-mg/day) or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) at end of study (EOS) in the ADHD Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) Total score. Statistical analyses included sequential testing for multiple treatment comparisons. Key secondary endpoints included: Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) score at EOS and CFB at EOS in the Conners 3-Parent Short Form (Conners 3-PS) Composite T-score and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent (WFIRS-P) Total average score. Results: The CFB at EOS ADHD-RS-5 Total score (least square [LS] means ± SE) for 400-mg/day, 600-mg/day SPN-812, and placebo was -18.3 ± 1.36, -16.7 ± 1.39, and -13.2 ± 1.38, respectively. The difference vs. placebo was statistically significant only for the 400-mg/day SPN-812 treatment group (600 mg/day: p = 0.0712; 400 mg/day: p = 0.0082). Neither dose could be considered superior to placebo due to the use of statistical method of sequential testing. Significant improvements were observed on a number of secondary endpoints. SPN-812 was well tolerated at both doses, with <5% discontinuation rate due to adverse events. Conclusions: Treatment with 400- but not 600-mg/day SPN-812 resulted in statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint. The negative result seen in the 600-mg/day SPN-812 group was likely due to an unusually high placebo response. Safety data were consistent across all doses in the SPN-812 trials.

The Effect of Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules on Functional Impairments Associated with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children and Adolescents in Four Phase 3 Placebo-Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: The ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) assesses 18 symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity and has been used in many clinical trials to evaluate the treatment effect of drugs on ADHD. The fifth edition of this scale (ADHD-RS-5) also assesses the impact of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms on six domains of functional impairment (FI): family relationships, peer relationships, completing/returning homework, academic performance at school, controlling behavior at school, and self-esteem. Here, we report the effect of viloxazine extended-release capsules (viloxazine ER), a novel nonstimulant treatment for ADHD in children and adolescents (ages 6-17 years), on FI from a post hoc analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical trials (N=1354). PATIENTS AND METHODS: ADHD-RS-5 investigator ratings of ADHD symptoms and FIs were conducted at baseline and weekly post-baseline for 6-8 weeks in the four trials. Change from baseline (CFB) in ADHD-RS-5 FI scores (Total score [sum of 12 FI items] and Inattention and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale scores [sum of 6 corresponding FI items]) and the 30% and 50% Responder Rates (ADHD-RS-5 FI Total score) were compared between viloxazine ER and placebo. RESULTS: The reduction (improvement) in ADHD-RS-5 FI scores (Total and subscale scores) and the percentage of responders (30% and 50%) at Week 6 were significantly greater in each viloxazine ER dose group vs placebo. In the 100-400 mg/day viloxazine ER groups, improvements were found as early as Week 1 (100-mg/day) or Week 2 (200-, 400-mg/day) of treatment. Analysis of individual items of ADHD-related FIs demonstrated that the effect of viloxazine ER was observed across all domains of impairment. CONCLUSION: Significant improvements observed in ADHD-related FIs are consistent with the reduction in inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms demonstrated in the viloxazine ER Phase 3 pediatric trials. Therefore, viloxazine ER provides clinically meaningful improvement of ADHD symptoms and functioning in children and adolescents with ADHD, starting as early as Week 1-2 of treatment.

A Phase 3, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Once-Daily Viloxazine Extended-Release Capsules in Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

PURPOSE: This phase 3 clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of viloxazine extended-release capsules (VLX-ER) as a monotherapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents (12-17 years). METHODS: Eligible subjects (n = 310) were randomized to receive once-daily 200 and 400 mg VLX-ER, or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline (CFB) at the end of study (EOS) in ADHD Rating Scale-5 Total score. Key secondary end points were Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score at EOS, CFB at EOS in Conners 3-Parent Short Form Composite T-score, and CFB at EOS in Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Total average score. RESULTS: In the 200-mg/d and 400-mg/d VLX-ER treatment groups, a significant improvement was found in the CFB at EOS in ADHD Rating Scale-5 Total (P = 0.0232, P = 0.0091) and Inattention (P = 0.0424, P = 0.0390) and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (P = 0.0069, P = 0.0005) subscale scores versus placebo. The Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score was significantly improved at EOS in the 200-mg/d and 400-mg/d VLX-ER groups versus placebo (P = 0.0042, P = 0.0003). The Conners 3-Parent Short Form composite T-score and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Total average score exhibited improvement in both VLX-ER groups; however, the difference versus placebo was not statistically significant. The most common treatment-related adverse events were somnolence, headache, decreased appetite, nausea, and fatigue. The adverse event-related discontinuation rates were <5% in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Viloxazine extended-release demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in ADHD symptoms in adolescents and was generally well tolerated.

Evaluating the likelihood to be helped or harmed after treatment with viloxazine extended-release in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

AIMS: When clinicians evaluate potential medications for their patients, they must weigh the probability of a treatment's benefits against the possible risks. To this end, the present analyses evaluate the novel nonstimulant viloxazine extended-release (viloxazine ER) using measures of effect size to describe the potential benefits of its treatment in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as well as the risk of discontinuation because of intolerable adverse events. METHODS: These post hoc analyses use pooled data from four pivotal Phase 3 trials in paediatric patients treated with viloxazine ER. The Likelihood to be Helped or Harmed (LHH) effect size measure was calculated to describe the probability of patients benefiting from treatment vs discontinuing. The Number Needed to Treat (NNT) was calculated from frequently used thresholds of response. The Number Needed to Harm (NNH) was calculated using discontinuations because of adverse events. RESULTS: LHH values for viloxazine ER ranged from 5 to 13, suggesting that subjects were 5-13 times more likely to benefit from, rather than discontinue, viloxazine ER treatment. Specifically, NNT values for viloxazine ER treatment ranged from 6 to 7. NNH values for viloxazine ER treatment ranged from 31 to 74. By convention, single-digit NNTs (<10) suggest the intervention is potentially useful, while NNH values ≥10 for adverse events suggest it is potentially safe or tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that patients with ADHD are likely to benefit from treatment with viloxazine ER, and are unlikely to discontinue, as viloxazine ER treatment was associated with favourable LHH, NNT, and NNH values. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03247530, NCT03247543, NCT03247517, NCT03247556.

Once-Daily SPN-812 200 and 400 mg in the treatment of ADHD in School-aged Children: A Phase III Randomized, Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: SPN-812 (viloxazine extended-release) is under investigation for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. This Phase III study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of SPN-812 200 and 400 mg once daily in children 6-11 years of age with ADHD. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive SPN-812 200 mg, SPN-812 400 mg, or placebo, once daily for 8 weeks (including ≤3 weeks titration period). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline (CFB) in ADHD Rating Scale (RS)-5 Total score at end of study (EOS). Key secondary endpoints included Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) score at EOS, CFB in Conners 3-Parent Short Form (PS) composite T-score at EOS, and CFB in Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent (WFIRS-P) Total average score at EOS. FINDINGS: A total of 313 patients were enrolled, with 301 in the intent-to-treat population (194 boys, 107 girls; mean age [SD], 8.4 [1.7] years). At EOS, the CFBs in ADHD-RS-5 Total score and CGI-I score were significantly improved with both 200- and 400-mg/d SPN-812 versus placebo (ADHD-RS-5, P = 0.0038 and 0.0063, respectively; CGI-I, P = 0.0028 and 0.0099). At EOS, the CFB in Conners 3-PS composite T-score was significantly improved with 200- (P = 0.0064), but not 400-mg/d (P = 0.0917), SPN-812 compared to placebo. No significant difference between the groups was found in WFIRS-P Total average score. The rate of discontinuations due to adverse events in both SPN-812 treatment groups combined was <5%. IMPLICATIONS: SPN-812 200 and 400 mg once daily was associated with improvements in ADHD symptoms in school-aged children and was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03247543.

Translating Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-5 and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Effectiveness Scores into Clinical Global Impressions Clinical Significance Levels in Four Randomized Clinical Trials of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-Release) in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objectives: Clinical trials in psychiatry frequently report results from lengthy, comprehensive assessments to characterize a subject emotionally, cognitively, and behaviorally before and after treatment. However, the potential treatment implications of these results and how they translate into clinical practice remain unclear. Conversely, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scales are quick, intuitive assessments used to assess the functional impact of a treatment in clinically relevant terms. The objectives of the present analyses are to translate scores from comprehensive assessments of symptom severity and functional impairment into clinically meaningful CGI levels. Methods: These post-hoc analyses use data integrated from four pivotal Phase 3 trials in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents treated with the novel nonstimulant SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-Release). In this study, we evaluated the ADHD Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent (WFIRS-P), assessments of symptom severity and functional impairment, respectively, by linking these scales with the CGI scales at baseline and end of study. Results: For participants that improved, a one-level change on the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) was associated with a 10-15-point change on the ADHD-RS-5, and a 0.2-0.5-point change on the WFIRS-P. On the CGI-I, ratings of much improved and very much improved were associated with a percent score decrease (i.e., improvement) of ∼55% and 80% on the ADHD-RS-5 and ∼40% and 70% on the WFIRS-P, respectively. Differences between children and adolescents were minor and are unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Conclusion: These post-hoc analyses provide clinically meaningful benchmarks for the interpretation of scores on the ADHD-RS-5 and WFIRS-P in terms of CGI evaluations in subjects with ADHD. These results may be useful for physicians seeking to understand a treatment's potential impact on their ADHD patients or for researchers looking to define their study results within a clinically relevant context. Data are from clinical trials NCT03247530, NCT03247543, NCT03247517, and NCT03247556.

A Double-Blind, Randomized Study of Extended-Release Molindone for Impulsive Aggression in ADHD.

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of SPN-810 (extended-release molindone) in a Phase-2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of children (6-12 years) with ADHD and persistent impulsive aggression (IA). Method: After lead-in, children were randomized to (a) placebo (N = 31); (b) low-dose (N = 29, 12/18 mg/day); (c) medium-dose (N = 30, 24/36 mg/day); and (4) high-dose (N = 31, 36/54 mg/day) groups. Treatment included ~2.5-week titration, 3-week maintenance, and 1-week tapering/conversion, alongside existing monotherapy (stimulants/nonstimulants) and behavioral therapy. The primary endpoint was change in Retrospective-Modified Overt Aggression Scale (R-MOAS) score at end of study, with safety monitored. Results: A total of 95 (78.5%) children completed the study. Aggression (R-MOAS) improved with low and medium doses (low dose: p = .031; medium dose: p = .024; high dose: p = .740). The most common adverse events were headache (10.0%), sedation (8.9%), and increased appetite (7.8%). Conclusion: These results suggest SPN-810 may be effective in reducing residual IA behaviors in children with ADHD. Research is still needed to support the benefit-risk profile of SPN-810 in pediatric populations.

Evaluation of the Effect of SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-Release) on QTc Interval in Healthy Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a supratherapeutic dose of SPN-812, a drug currently under investigation as a treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, on cardiac repolarization (QTc) in healthy adults. METHODS: The study was conducted from June 27, 2018, to July 10, 2018. It had a double-blind, randomized, crossover design in which subjects received a 3-treatment sequence-placebo, 400 mg moxifloxacin, and 1,800 mg SPN-812 for 2 consecutive days (separated by at least a 3-day washout). The primary endpoint was the correlation between the change from baseline (CFB) in individual heart rate corrected QT interval (QTcI) (ΔQTcI) and viloxazine and 5-hydroxyviloxazine glucuronide (5-OH-VLX-gluc) plasma concentrations (Cps). The secondary endpoint was the time point placebo-adjusted CFB in QTcI (ΔΔQTcI) for viloxazine. For assay sensitivity, the correlations between moxifloxacin Cp and the ΔQTcI, and moxifloxacin and time point ΔΔQTcI were evaluated. Additional evaluations included Fridericia's formula QT correction, heart rate, and the PR and QRS intervals. Changes in electrocardiogram (ECG) morphology along with other safety parameters were also analyzed and reported. RESULTS: The correlation between ΔQTcI and viloxazine Cp demonstrated a statistically significant negative slope (P = .0012). 5-OH-VLX-gluc Cp and ΔQTcI also demonstrated a statistically significant negative slope (P = .0007). Secondary time point analyses showed no effect of SPN-812 on QTcI. Assay sensitivity with moxifloxacin was confirmed. Safety parameters were acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that SPN-812 had no effect on cardiac repolarization or other ECG parameters in healthy adults, suggesting that it is not associated with a risk for cardiac arrhythmias or other electrocardiographic parameters.

A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Once-daily SPN-812 (Viloxazine Extended-release) in the Treatment of Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in School-age Children.

PURPOSE: The limitations of current US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) set the need for the development of novel, effective, and tolerable medications to treat this disorder. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether treatment with SPN-812 (viloxazine extended-release) significantly reduces symptoms of ADHD in children. METHODS: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-week trial to assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily 100- and 200-mg SPN-812 in the treatment of ADHD in male and female children 6-11 years of age. Inclusion criteria required subjects to have a confirmed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, ADHD diagnosis, an ADHD-Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) score ≥28, a Clinical Global Impression-Severity score ≥4, and for subjects to be free of ADHD medication ≥1 week before randomization. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline (CFB) at end of study (EOS) in ADHD-RS-5 Total score. Key secondary endpoints included Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores at EOS and CFB at EOS in the Conners 3-Parent Short Form (Conners 3-PS) Composite T-score and the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent (WFIRS-P) Total average score. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, ECGs, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. The primary efficacy endpoint was analyzed by using a mixed model for repeated measures; all secondary measures were analyzed by using an ANCOVA model. RESULTS: A total of 477 subjects were randomized to treatment (intent-to-treat population, n = 460). The majority of subjects were male (63%) and either White (51.3%) or African American (43.7%). The demographic and baseline characteristics between the groups were similar. Statistically significant improvements in ADHD-RS-5 Total score were observed in both the 100- and 200-mg/day SPN-812 treatment groups compared to placebo at week 1 of treatment (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.0244, respectively), which was maintained through EOS (P = 0.0004 and P < 0.0001). Significant improvements were also observed at EOS in the CGI-I scale (P = 0.0020 and P < 0.0001), Conners 3-PS Composite T-score (P = 0.0003 and P = 0.0002), and WFIRS-P Total average score (P = 0.0019 and P = 0.0002) versus placebo. Treatment-related AEs reported in ≥5% of subjects included somnolence, decreased appetite, and headache. The discontinuation rate due to AEs was <5%. IMPLICATIONS: SPN-812 significantly reduced ADHD symptoms in children and was well tolerated. SPN-812 may prove to be an effective treatment for children with ADHD. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03247530.

A Phase II Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of SPN-812 (Extended-Release Viloxazine) in Children With ADHD.

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of SPN-812 (extended-release viloxazine) for ADHD in children aged 6 to 12 years. Method: In an 8-week study, 222 participants were randomized to placebo or SPN-812 100, 200, 300, or 400 mg/day. Measurements included ADHD Rating Scale (RS)-IV total score and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores. Safety assessments included laboratory and electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements, suicidality monitoring (Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale), and adverse event (AE) reporting. Results: Significant improvements in ADHD-RS-IV total score were observed for 200, 300, and 400 mg dose groups versus placebo (p < .05; effect size [ES] = 0.547, 0.596, and 0.623). CGI-I score for the 300 mg group and CGI-S score for all SPN-812 groups except for 100 mg improved significantly (p < .05) versus placebo. The most frequent AEs (≥15%) were somnolence, headache, and decreased appetite. Conclusion: SPN-812 significantly reduced the severity of ADHD symptoms and was well tolerated. The efficacy and safety of SPN-812 are being investigated in Phase III trials.

A Novel Assessment Tool for Impulsive Aggression in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objective: To establish the validity and reliability of a provisional 30-item impulsive aggression (IA) diary in children (ages 6-12 years, inclusive) with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: The provisional 30-item IA diary was administered for 14 days to parents of children with ADHD and IA symptoms (n = 103). Key inclusion criteria: confirmed ADHD diagnosis; signs of IA as measured by a Retrospective-Modified Overt Aggression Scale (R-MOAS) score ≥20 and an Aggression Questionnaire score of -2 to -5. Analyses included inter-item correlations, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), item response theory (IRT) modeling, internal consistency, test-retest reliability (TRT), concurrent validity (estimated by correlation between the IA diary and the R-MOAS/Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form), and known-groups methods. Results: The prevalence rates of 15 (50.0%) items were found to be too low (<1%) for analysis; three items with prevalence rates ≤1% were retained, as content validity was deemed high by clinical experts. The remaining 12 behavior items had prevalence rates of 2.7%-73.6%. EFA and IRT models confirmed two subdomains in the IA diary included within a general domain of IA behavior frequency, yielding a single total behavioral frequency score (TBFS). Internal consistency was high for this TBFS (marginal reliability = 0.86 and α = 0.73). TRT for the TBFS, based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, was 0.8. Concurrent validity of TBFS with R-MOAS ranged from r = 0.49 to r = 0.62. Conclusion: The final 15-item IA diary is a reliable, psychometrically validated IA measurement tool that will allow clinicians and researchers to assess the frequency of IA behavior.

Application of the Impulsive Aggression Diary in Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objective: Impulsive aggression (IA) is a maladaptive form of aggressive behavior that is an associated feature of neuropsychiatric disorders, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). As one of the most common forms of aggressive behavior, IA is a serious clinical concern. Recognition, monitoring, and management of IA symptoms are complicated by the lack of IA-specific psychometric instruments and evidence-based treatments. A recently developed electronic observer-reported outcome instrument has been validated in children for monitoring the frequency of 15 IA-related behaviors in the context of ADHD. This study seeks to first determine if the behaviors included in the pediatric IA diary are applicable to adolescents with ADHD, and second, compare the reliability of adolescent versus parent reporters. Methods: We evaluated the utility of the pediatric IA diary through concept elicitation and cognitive interviews with 17 pairs of parents and adolescents (aged 13-17 years) with IA and ADHD, supplemented with 15 new behaviors potentially applicable to adolescents. Results: The behaviors most frequently reported by adolescents included arguing (93.8%), raising their voice/shouting/yelling (93.8%), hitting others (87.5%), slamming (87.5%), pushing/shoving (81.3%), breaking (75.0%), fighting (75.0%), throwing (75.0%), and cursing (68.8%). The behaviors most commonly reported by parents included raising their voice/shouting/yelling (94.1%), arguing (88.2%), being disrespectful/mean/rude (88.2%), slamming (88.2%), throwing (88.2%), cursing (82.4%), hitting others (82.4%), pushing/shoving (82.4%), breaking (76.5%), name-calling (76.5%), and threatening (70.6%). Of all commonly reported behaviors, only being "disrespectful/mean/rude" and "breaking" are not part of the pediatric IA diary, likely due to the imprecision of these terms. No significant usability issues were found for the IA diary device. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the 15-item pediatric IA diary should be applicable to adolescent populations to appropriately characterize IA behaviors in individuals with ADHD. Furthermore, this study indicated that parents may be more reliable reporters of IA behavior than adolescents.

Real-world assessment of treatment with extended-release topiramate (Trokendi XR®) and comparison with previous immediate-release topiramate treatment.

AIM: Examine clinical profile of extended-release topiramate (Trokendi XR®) and compare treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) associated with Trokendi XR versus previous immediate-release topiramate (TPM-IR) treatment. PATIENTS & METHODS: Pilot retrospective study analyzing data extracted from medical charts of patients ≥6 years of age prescribed Trokendi XR. RESULTS: Trokendi XR was the most commonly used to prevent migraine. The most common TEAEs recorded during topiramate treatment were cognitive symptoms (word-finding difficulty, attention/concentration difficulty, slowed thinking), paresthesia, gastrointestinal problems and decreased appetite/weight loss. TEAE incidence was significantly (p < 0.001) lower during Trokendi XR versus previous TPM-IR treatment. CONCLUSION: Trokendi XR use and outcomes in clinical practice were consistent with established profile of topiramate. Results supported the potential for better tolerability of Trokendi XR versus TPM-IR.