The transcriptional landscape of cancer stem-like cell functionality in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) have been extensively researched as the primary drivers of therapy resistance and tumor relapse in patients with breast cancer. However, due to lack of specific molecular markers, increased phenotypic plasticity and no clear clinicopathological features, the assessment of CSCs presence and functionality in solid tumors is challenging. While several potential markers, such as CD24/CD44, have been proposed, the extent to which they truly represent the stem cell potential of tumors or merely provide static snapshots is still a subject of controversy. Recent studies have highlighted the crucial role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in influencing the CSC phenotype in breast cancer. The interplay between the tumor and TME induces significant changes in the cancer cell phenotype, leading to the acquisition of CSC characteristics, therapeutic resistance, and metastatic spread. Simultaneously, CSCs actively shape their microenvironment by evading immune surveillance and attracting stromal cells that support tumor progression. METHODS: In this study, we associated in vitro mammosphere formation assays with bulk tumor microarray profiling and deconvolution algorithms to map CSC functionality and the microenvironmental landscape in a large cohort of 125 breast tumors. RESULTS: We found that the TME score was a significant factor associated with CSC functionality. CSC-rich tumors were characterized by an immune-suppressed TME, while tumors devoid of CSC potential exhibited high immune infiltration and activation of pathways involved in the immune response. Gene expression analysis revealed IFNG, CXCR5, CD40LG, TBX21 and IL2RG to be associated with the CSC phenotype and also displayed prognostic value for patients with breast cancer. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the characterization of CSCs content and functionality in tumors can be used as an attractive strategy to fine-tune treatments and guide clinical decisions to improve patients therapy response.

Mammographic assessment of breast density as a tool for predicting the response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients.

Background and aims: Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide. For locally advanced diseases and high-risk tumors, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is the treatment of choice. Some studies show that mammographic density (MD) tumor margins and the presence of microcalcifications play a prognostic role in BC patients. Hence, the objective of this retrospective study was to assess if MD could predict the response to NAT among different molecular subtypes of BC patients undergoing NAT at The "Prof. Dr I. Chiricuta" Oncology Institute of Cluj-Napoca, Romania (IOCN). Furthermore, the association between MD, tumor margins and the presence of microcalcifications with clinico-pathological data was analyzed. Methods: Eighty-four breast cancer patients diagnosed and treated at IOCN were included in this study. The morphological characteristics of the tumors were framed according to the BIRADS lexicon. The presence or absence of microcalcifications was also assessed. First, the significance of associations between breast density, margins and microcalcifications and clinico-pathological parameters of the patients were tested with Fisher or Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact Test. Next, using multinomial logistic regression, we modelled the associations between the pathological response measured by Miller Payne and Residual cancer burden (RCB) systems and the BI-RADS. Variables having significant univariate tests were selected as candidates for the multivariable analysis (adjusted model). Results: Breast densities were significantly associated with the age of the patients (p=0.01), number of positive lymph nodes (p=0.037), margins (p=0.002) and combined categories of Miller-Payne (p=0.034) and RCB pathological response (p=0.021). Margins was significantly associated with ki67 proliferation index (p=0.029), estrogen receptor (ER) (p=0.007), progesterone receptor (PR) (p=0.019), molecular subtype (p<0.001) and the number of clinically observed positive lymph nodes at diagnosis (p=0.019). Conclusions: In our cohort, BC patients with lower MD had higher odds of achieving pCR following NAT, suggesting the role of MD as a clinical prognostic marker. Larger multicenter studies are warranted to validate the prognostic value of MD, which could aid in patients stratification based on their likelihood to respond to NAT.

Hereditary Breast Cancer in Romania-Molecular Particularities and Genetic Counseling Challenges in an Eastern European Country.

In Romania, breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women. However, there is limited data on the prevalence of predisposing germline mutations in the population in the era of precision medicine, where molecular testing has become an indispensable tool in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to determine the prevalence, mutational spectrum, and histopathological prediction factors for hereditary breast cancer (HBC) in Romania. A cohort of 411 women diagnosed with BC selected upon NCCN v.1.2020 guidelines underwent an 84-gene NGS-based panel testing for breast cancer risk assessment during 2018-2022 in the Department of Oncogenetics of the Oncological Institute of Cluj-Napoca, Romania. A total of 135 (33%) patients presented pathogenic mutations in 19 genes. The prevalence of genetic variants was determined, and demographic and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. We observed differences among BRCA and non-BRCA carriers regarding family history of cancer, age of onset, and histopathological subtypes. Triple-negative (TN) tumors were more often BRCA1 positive, unlike BRCA2 positive tumors, which were more often the Luminal B subtype. The most frequent non-BRCA mutations were found in CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2, and several recurrent variants were identified for each gene. Unlike other European countries, germline testing for HBC is still limited due to the high costs and is not covered by the National Health System (NSH), thus leading to significant discrepancies related to the screening and prophylaxis of cancer.

Circulating Small EVs miRNAs as Predictors of Pathological Response to Neo-Adjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients.

Neo-adjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly used in the clinic for the treatment of breast cancer (BC). Pathological response to NAT has been associated with improved patients' survival; however, the current techniques employed for assessing the tumor response have significant limitations. Small EVs (sEVs)-encapsulated miRNAs have emerged as promising new biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction. Therefore, our study aims to explore the predictive value of these miRNAs for the pathological response to NAT in BC. By employing bioinformatic tools, we selected a set of miRNAs and evaluated their expression in plasma sEVs and BC biopsies. Twelve miRNAs were identified in sEVs, of which, miR-21-5p, 221-3p, 146a-5p and 26a-5p were significantly associated with the Miller-Payne (MP) pathological response to NAT. Moreover, miR-21-5p, 146a-5p, 26a-5p and miR-24-3p were independent as predictors of MP response to NAT. However, the expression of these miRNAs showed no correlation between sEVs and tissue samples, indicating that the mechanisms of miRNA sorting into sEVs still needs to be elucidated. Functional analysis of miRNA target genes and drug interactions revealed that candidate miRNAs and their targets, can be regulated by different NAT regimens. This evidence supports their role in governing the patients' therapy response and highlights their potential use as prediction biomarkers.

Imaging Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

DCIS became a topic of interest mainly after the onset of mammography screening programs. Almost 90% of DCIS are detected by mammography, in particular screening, and this remains the main imaging method for DCIS. The evaluation of tumor size made by imaging methods helped surgeons to use conservative breast surgery more frequently, instead of mastectomy, with safe oncological results. In many situations mammography could be considered enough to determine the correct extension of the disease. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proved to be more accurate in the evaluation of the extension of the disease, especially in young women. The ultrasound is not the method of choice for DCIS but seems to bring its contribution in detecting specific signs of the diagnosis and the tumor extension. The review of the literature is passed through the light of authors own experience.

Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Interventional Diagnosis.

Most ductal carcinomas in situ are clinically occult; therefore, proper techniques must be used for adequate diagnosis. Current guidelines recommend minimally invasive tissue sampling before surgical excisions of all breast malignancies. Regardless of the technique used, correctly performed biopsies that are geographically, dimensional and numerical representative are essential, and post-interventional markers can be placed at the site. Whenever possible, vacuum-assisted guided by mammography should be the first choice of biopsy for all nonpalpable lesions of the breast, especially for microcalcifications. Surgical excision is expected in most ductal carcinomas in situ; therefore, appropriate imaging-guided localization techniques must be deployed in the hope of aiding the surgeon to perform a free-margin cosmetically adequate procedure. No significant performance differences have been noticed by comparing wire localization to radio guided occult lesion localization or radioactive seed technique, while the choice of imaging guidance should consider the best visibility of the lesion or marker. In the current paper we review the main interventional procedures used for diagnosis in ductal carcinoma in situ, illustrated with images from the database of the Cluj-Napoca Institute of Oncology and Fundeni Clinical Institute.

Blood Genome-Wide Transcriptional Profiles of HER2 Negative Breast Cancers Patients.

Tumors act systemically to sustain cancer progression, affecting the physiological processes in the host and triggering responses in the blood circulating cells. In this study, we explored blood transcriptional patterns of patients with two subtypes of HER2 negative breast cancers, with different prognosis and therapeutic outcome. Peripheral blood samples from seven healthy female donors and 29 women with breast cancer including 14 triple-negative breast cancers and 15 hormone-dependent breast cancers were evaluated by microarray. We also evaluated the stroma in primary tumors. Transcriptional analysis revealed distinct molecular signatures in the blood of HER2- breast cancer patients according to ER/PR status. Our data showed the implication of immune signaling in both breast cancer subtypes with an enrichment of these processes in the blood of TNBC patients. We observed a significant alteration of "chemokine signaling," "IL-8 signaling," and "communication between innate and adaptive immune cells" pathways in the blood of TNBC patients correlated with an increased inflammation and necrosis in their primary tumors. Overall, our data indicate that the presence of triple-negative breast cancer is associated with an enrichment of altered systemic immune-related pathways, suggesting that immunotherapy could possibly be synergistic to the chemotherapy, to improve the clinical outcome of these patients.

Baseline blood immunological profiling differentiates between Her2-breast cancer molecular subtypes: implications for immunomediated mechanisms of treatment response.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer patients' response to treatment is highly dependent on the primary tumor molecular features, with triple-negative breast tumors having the worst prognosis of all subtypes. According to the molecular features, tumors stimulate the microenvironment to induce distinct immune responses, baseline immune activation being associated with higher likelihood of pathologic response. In this study, we investigated the deconvolution of the immunological status of triple-negative tumors in comparison with luminal tumors and the association with patients' clinicopathological characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gene expression of 84 inflammatory molecules and their receptors were analyzed in 40 peripheral blood samples from patients with Her2- primary breast cancer tumors. We studied the association of triple-negative phenotype with age, clinical stage, tumor size, lymph nodes, and menopausal status. RESULTS: We observed that more patients with estrogen (ER)/progesterone (PR)-negative tumors had grade III, while more patients with ER/PR-positive tumors had grade II tumors. Gene expression analysis revealed a panel of 14 genes to have differential expression between the two groups: several interleukins: IL13, IL16, IL17C and IL17F, IL1A, IL3; interleukin receptors: IL10RB, IL5RA; chemokines: CXCL13 and CCL26; and cytokines: CSF2, IFNA2, OSM, TNSF13. CONCLUSION: The expression levels of these genes have been previously shown to be associated with reduced immunological status; indeed, the triple-negative breast cancer patients presented with lower counts of lymphocytes and eosinophils than the ER/PR-positive ones. These results contribute to a better understanding of the possible role of antitumor immune responses in mediating the clinical outcome.