Trends in Shoulder Arthroplasty in Germany: A 10-Year Epidemiological Analysis of Patients with Primary Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder.

Shoulder arthroplasty has significantly gained popularity in orthopedic surgery, driven by progress in prosthesis design and surgical techniques. This study explored the epidemiology of shoulder arthroplasty, analyzing healthcare data from 2012 to 2022 for primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder. The data included patient demographics and types of surgical procedures. Data analysis indicates a higher utilization rate of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA; n = 41,251) over total- (TSA; n = 18,679) and hemiarthroplasty (HSA; n = 12,827) for primary shoulder osteoarthritis. Overall, a significant increase in RTSA procedures from n = 2237 (2012) to n = 5415 (2022) was observed, representing more than a two-fold increase of 121.1%. The relative proportion of RTSA among all types of shoulder arthroplasty increased from 39% (2012) to 68.6% (2022), while HSA decreased and TSA essentially remained constant. Age analysis identified the following peaks: RTSA, 77 ± 7 y; HSA, 68 ± 12 y; and TSA, 67 ± 10 y. Among the over 60s, significantly more women were treated with any type of prosthesis, whereas in young patients (45 to 59 y), more men received HSA or TSA. Our study confirms that RTSA has become the preferred choice for elderly patients in Germany, reflecting the prevailing preference despite varying patient ages and conditions, with a noted difference in sex in treatment prevalence.

Individual Phenotype Does Not Impact the Outcome of Mechanical Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasties for Valgus Osteoarthritis.

Background and Objectives: There is an ongoing discussion about the best alignment targets in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mechanical alignment has been the standard in TKA for years. Alongside the development of various classification systems to describe the native alignment of the knee (knee phenotype), kinematic alignment restoring the individual phenotype of the knee has been advocated more recently. Alignment in TKA becomes even more challenging in knees with preoperative deformities such as valgus osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods: The study retrospectively evaluated 158 knees in 135 patients who underwent TKA with a mechanical alignment target for valgus osteoarthritis. Pre- and postoperative hip knee angle, lateral distal femur angle, and medial proximal tibial angle/tibial plate angle (pre-/postoperative) were measured on standing hip-to-ankle radiographs. Knees were grouped according to the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and patient-related outcome measures (WOMAC, UCLA, SF-12, pain) were assessed. Results: There was no difference in outcome for mechanically aligned TKA between the different CPAK phenotypes, suggesting that mechanical alignment is an appropriate target for the different phenotypes analyzed in the study. Remaining valgus alignment was associated with decreased postoperative UCLA scores and decreased improvement in SF-12 scores (p = 0.011/p = 0.028). Within CPAK III, mechanical aligned TKA showed better postoperative UCLA Scores than TKA with valgus alignment (p = 0.015). The individual knee phenotype in patients with valgus osteoarthritis did not influence the outcome of mechanical aligned TKA operated with standardized soft-tissue release.

[Treatment of symptomatic pseudarthrosis following acromion fracture with a patient-specific implant customized on a 3D-printed scapula]. / Versorgung symptomatischer Pseudarthrosen nach Akromionfraktur mit patientenspezifisch am 3-D-Modell angepasstem Implantat.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-specific osteosynthesis for pseudarthrosis of the acromion. INDICATIONS: Symptomatic pseudarthrosis of the acromion at the level of a meta/mesacromion. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Infection; patient noncompliance regarding postoperative treatment protocol. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Preoperatively, a patient-specific three-dimensional model of the scapula is printed. A locking compression plate (LCP) is individually adapted to this model. Via a dorsal surgical approach over the scapular spine, the pseudarthrosis is refreshed and autologous cancellous bone from the iliac crest is embedded in the fracture zone. This is followed by fixed-angle osteosynthesis with the individualized plate. In addition, tension banding with tapes is performed to reduce the tensile and shear forces on the fracture caused by the muscle. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Consistent wearing of a shoulder-arm brace for 6 weeks postoperatively, active-assisted increase in range of motion for an additional 3 weeks, then gradual increase in weight-bearing and initiation of daily activities without additional weights until 12 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Treatment with the presented technique resulted in radiographic consolidation of the fracture and significant improvement in range of motion and pain at the 1­year follow-up.

Current trends in rehabilitation of rotator cuff injuries.

Rehabilitation has a fundamental role in the management of rotator cuff pathology whether the final choice is conservative or surgical treatment. Conservative treatment can give excellent results in cases of rotator cuff tendinopathies without rupture, partial tears less than 50% of the thickness of the tendon, chronic full-thickness tears in elderly patients and irreparable tears. It is an option prior to reconstructive surgery in non-pseudo paralytic cases. When surgery is indicated, adequate postoperative rehabilitation is the best complement to obtain a successful result. No consensus has still been established on the optimal postoperative protocol to follow. No differences were found between delayed, early passive and early active protocols after rotator cuff repair. However, early motion improved the range of motion in the short and mid-term, allowing faster recovery. A 5-phase postoperative rehabilitation protocol is described. Rehabilitation is also an option in specific failed surgical procedures. To choose a therapeutic strategy in these cases, it is reasonable to differentiate between Sugaya type 2 or 3 (tendinopathy of the tendon) and type 4 or 5 (discontinuity/retear). The rehabilitation program should always be tailored to the individual patient.

Patient-specific articulating spacer for two-stage shoulder arthroplasty exchange.

OBJECTIVE: Two-stage exchange with an antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer is standard treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection of the shoulder. We present a safe and simple technique for patient-specific spacer implants. INDICATION: (Chronic) periprosthetic joint infection of the shoulder. RELATIVE CONTRAINDICATIONS: Known allergy against components of PMMA bone cements. Inadequate compliance for two-stage exchange. Patient is unfit to undergo two-stage exchange. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Hardware removal, histologic and microbiologic samples, and debridement. Preparation of targeted or calculated antibiotic-loaded PMMA. Tailoring of patient-specific spacer. Spacer implantation. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Rehabilitation protocol. Antibiotic treatment. Reimplantation after successful eradication of infection.

Patella component diameters of 38 mm and up might be associated with higher revision rates after patella resurfacing.

PURPOSE: Patellar resurfacing is considered the standard of care for total knee arthroplasty in the USA. Complications of patella resurfacing include aseptic loosening or patella fractures and can threaten the integrity of the extensor mechanism. The goal of this study was to report on patella button revision rates in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 01/2010 and 08/2016 patella buttons were implanted in 1056 patients (267 men and 550 women) as part of a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. RESULTS: Of 1056 cases, 35 cases (14 women, 15 men, 5 bilateral, 3.3%) showed early loosening at a mean 52.5 months postoperatively. Patella components of 38 mm or larger diameters showed a significantly higher loosening rate than the 29, 32, 35 mm buttons (p < 0.01). Mean BMI of patients identified with aseptic loosening was 31.7 kg/m2, mean age at time of revision surgery was 63.3 years. All of the patients with loosening of the patella button required revision surgery; in 33 cases an exchange of the button was performed, in two cases a removal of the button and patellar bone grafting was indicated. No complications occurred after revision surgery. CONCLUSION: The current study reports a 3.3% patella loosening rate during this mid-term follow-up. Size 38 mm and larger patella components showed a significantly higher revision rate than smaller buttons and the authors advise caution when using large diameter patella components.

Does radiolucency really predict loose components in revision shoulder arthroplasty?

OBJECTIVE: The number of shoulder arthroplasties is increasing along with the need for revision surgeries. Determining the stability of the implant is crucial in preoperative planning. This study aims to investigate whether radiolucent lines (RLL) in preoperative radiographs predict component loosening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative radiographs of 93 cases in 88 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty revision were evaluated regarding the presence of RLL. Correlation analyses were performed for radiographic findings and demographic factors (age, gender, BMI, prior surgeries) compared to intraoperative findings. RESULTS: The presence of RLL around the humeral component correlated with loosening (p < 0.001, Phi 0.511), and the distal zones 3 and 5 showed the strongest correlation (Phi 0.536). While RLL in only one zone did not predict loosening (p = 0.337), RLL present in two or more zones showed correlation with loosening (p < 0.001). Risk factors associated with loosening were a higher age at the time of revision surgery (p = 0.030) and the number of zones with RLL (p < 0.001). The glenoid component was loose in 39.0% of the cases; 5.5% of the glenoid components with RLL were stable. Nevertheless, the presence of RLL was highly associated with loosening (p < 0.001, Phi 0.603). A longer time between implantation and revision correlated with loosening of the glenoid component (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: While RLL do not predict loosening of the implant in general, occurrence in more than one zone correlates with loosening. If located in distal zones and with increasing number of zones with RLL, the correlation becomes even stronger and loosening is more likely.