Fabricating Stiffness-Matched Three Dimensional -Printed Metal Implants for Total Wrist Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) is a motion-sparing treatment for pancarpal arthritis; however, complication rates up to 50% have limited widespread use. Implant micromotion, stress shielding, and periprosthetic osteolysis result in implant failure and revision to arthrodesis. Metal 3-dimensional (3D) printing allows for more accurate matching of surrounding bone biomechanical properties, theoretically reducing periprosthetic osteolysis. Herein, we use computed tomography to characterize the relationship of relative stiffness along the length of the distal radius with patient demographic factors. METHODS: After institutional review, wrist computed tomography scans at a single institution between 2013 and 2021 were identified. Exclusion criteria were history of radius or carpal trauma or fracture. Collected demographics included age, sex, and comorbidities (including osteoporosis/osteopenia). Scans were analyzed using Materialize Mimics Innovation Suite 24.0 (Leuven, Belgium). Distal radius cortical density (in Hounsfield units) and medullary volume (in cubic millimeters) with relation to distance from the radiocarpal joint were recorded. Average values for each variable were used to 3D-printed distal radius trial components with stiffness matched to bone density by length. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Distal radius cortical bone density progressively increased proximal to the radiocarpal joint, whereas medullary volume decreased; changes in both plateaued 20 mm proximal to the joint. Distal radius material properties differed by age, sex, and comorbidities. Total wrist arthroplasty implants were fabricated to match these variables as proof of concept. CONCLUSIONS: Distal radius material properties vary along the bone length; conventional implants do not account for this variance. This study showed 3D-printed implants can be created to match bone properties along the length of the implant.

Traditional Neuroma Management Strategies: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: In this systematic review, the authors discuss traditional management strategies of neuromas. Surgical management can be described as either passive and ablative or active and reconstructive. Our aim was to evaluate the evidence supporting traditional management strategies in patients affected by neuromas. METHODS: The systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE databases using search terms related to neuromas and their surgical management. Studies involving targeted muscle reinnervation or regenerative peripheral nerve interface were excluded. Two reviewers selected the studies, evaluated their methodological quality, and retrieved data independently. This review was conducted in a manner consistent with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Selected studies were analyzed for pain and functional outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1064 articles were identified, and 22 studies were selected for review. Passive or ablative modalities for treatment of neuromata include excision of neuroma, excision with implantation into adjacent tissue, nerve caps, vein cap, and relocation nerve grafting. Active or reconstructive modalities that allow for nerve regeneration include hollow tube reconstruction, reconstruction with an allograft, and centrocentral nerve anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS: Passive treatment modalities can offer reliable pain relief in appropriately selected patients but do not allow for nerve regeneration. As such active, reconstructive modalities should be used when possible.

The State of Breast Cancer Reconstruction in Virginia: An Evidence-Based Framework for Identifying Locoregional Health Disparities.

BACKGROUND: Age, race, socioeconomic status, and proximity to plastic surgeons have been shown to impact receipt of reconstruction after mastectomy in several national studies. Given that targeted outreach efforts and programs to address these discrepancies would occur locoregionally, investigation of these reconstructive trends on a state level is warranted. STUDY DESIGN: Patients diagnosed with breast cancer in Virginia between 2000 and 2018 were identified in the Virginia Department of Health Cancer Registry. Patients who underwent mastectomy breast conservation surgery, and/or breast reconstruction at the time of oncologic surgery were identified. Patient demographics were analyzed, and logistic regression analyses were used to determine the likelihood of receipt of mastectomy, receipt of mastectomy versus breast conservation surgery, receipt of mastectomy with reconstruction versus mastectomy alone, and receipt of mastectomy with reconstruction versus breast conservation surgery with respect to the demographic variables. Geographically weighted regression analyses were also performed to determine impact of geographic location on receipt of mastectomy and reconstruction after mastectomy. RESULTS: A total of 78,682 patients in Virginia underwent surgical treatment for breast cancer between 2000 and 2018. Living outside a metropolitan area, increased age, lower socioeconomic status, non-White race, and lower number of plastic surgeons within 50 miles were associated with decreased rates of postmastectomy reconstruction. Rural setting, lower socioeconomic status, and lower plastic surgeon supply were also associated with decreased rates of breast conservation surgery. Reconstruction after mastectomy was lowest in the northwest, central, and southwest regions of Virginia. CONCLUSIONS: Within the state of Virginia, programs to improve access to breast reconstruction for patients residing in rural regions, as well as non-White patients, older patients, and those in lower socioeconomic groups should be implemented. Future studies would implement and study the efficacy of such outreach programs, which could then be applied and tailored to other states or regions to address sociodemographic disparities in access to breast reconstruction.

Estimating the Impact of Postamputation Pain.

BACKGROUND: Neuromas, neuralgia, and phantom limb pain commonly occur after lower-extremity amputations; however, incidence of these issues is poorly reported and understood. Present literature is limited to small cohort studies of amputees, and the reported incidence of chronic pain after amputation ranges as widely as 0% to 80%. We sought to objectively investigate the incidence of postamputation pain and nerve-related complications after lower-extremity amputation. METHODS: Patients who underwent lower-extremity amputation between 2007 and 2017 were identified using a national insurance-based claims database. Incidence of reporting of postoperative neuroma, neuralgia, and phantom limb pain were identified. Patient demographics and comorbidities were assessed. Average costs of treatment were determined in the year after lower-extremity amputation. Logistic regression analyses and resulting odds ratios were calculated to determine statistically significant increases in incidence of postamputation nerve-related pain complications in the setting of demographic factors and comorbidities. RESULTS: There were 29,507 lower amputations identified. Postoperative neuralgia occurred in 4.4% of all amputations, neuromas in 0.4%, and phantom limb pain in 10.9%. Nerve-related pain complications were most common in through knee amputations (20.3%) and below knee amputations (16.7%). Male sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index > 3, diabetes mellitus, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic angiopathy, diabetic retinopathy, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, and tobacco abuse were associated with statistically significant increases in incidence of 1-year nerve-related pain or phantom limb pain. CONCLUSIONS: Given the incidence of these complications after operative extremity amputations and associated increased treatment costs, future research regarding their pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention would be beneficial to both patients and providers.

Risk Factors for Prolonged Opioid Consumption in Lower Extremity Amputees.

Extremity amputation is a common procedure performed to treat a variety of different problems and affects quality of life in a number of ways. In addition to acute postoperative pain, amputations have been shown to cause chronic pain that is often neuropathic in many amputees. This study sought to better characterize the role of opioids in postoperative pain control in lower extremity amputees. METHODS: Patients who underwent lower extremity amputation between 2010 and 2018 were identified in a national insurance-claims database using ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative opioid use, and prolonged postoperative opioid use were then determined for both groups. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were utilized to evaluate the association of patient-related risk factors and neuropathic pain conditions with perioperative and prolonged postoperative opioid use. RESULTS: In total, 2247 opioid-naive lower extremity amputees were identified. An estimated 54.7% of patients utilized opioids in the perioperative period, and 44.6% were found to have prolonged opioid use. Younger age (ages 40-50 versus older), history of chronic pain, migraines, lower back pain, Charlson Comorbidity Index greater than 1, preoperative benzodiazepine, muscle relaxant, anticonvulsant, and antidepressant use were all significantly related to prolonged postoperative opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged postoperative opioid use is a problem that affects nearly half of lower extremity amputees and seems to be significantly related to the preoperative use of benzodiazepines, muscle relaxants, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants. Further research into the diagnosis and treatment of postamputation neuropathic pain is needed to prevent reliance on opioids in this patient population.