Application of Computer-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasonography Based on Texture Features in Differentiating Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors from Benign Gastric Mesenchymal Tumors.

BACKGROUND/AIMS:  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are common gastric mesenchymal tumors that are potentially malignant. However, endoscopic ultrasonography is poor in diagnosing gastrointestinal stromal tumors. The study investigated the efficacy of texture features extracted from endoscopic ultrasonography images to differentiate gastrointestinal stromal tumors from gastric mesenchymal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  The endoscopic ultrasonography examinations of 120 patients with confirmed gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors, leiomyoma, or schwannoma were evaluated. Histology was considered the gold standard. Three feature combinations were extracted from endoscopic ultrasonography images of each lesion: 48 gray-level co-occurrence matrix-based features, 48 gray-level co-occurrence matrix-based features plus 3 global gray features, and 15 gray-gradient co-occurrence matrix-based features. Support vector machine classifiers were constructed by using feature combinations to diagnose gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance. The support vector machine model's diagnostic performance was compared with the endoscopists. RESULTS:  The 3 feature combinations had better performance in differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors: gray-gradient cooccurrence matrix-based features yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90, which was significantly greater than an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 in gray-level co-occurrence matrix-based features and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 in the texture features plus 3 global features. The support vector machine model (81.67% accuracy, 81.36% sensitivity, and 81.97% specificity) was also better than endoscopists (an average of 69.31% accuracy, 65.54% sensitivity, and 72.95% specificity) Conclusion: Texture features in computer-assisted endoscopic ultrasonography diagnosis are useful to differentiate gastrointestinal stromal tumors from benign gastric mesenchymal tumors and compare favorably with endoscopists. Support vector machine model using gray-gradient co-occurrence matrix-based texture features revealed the best diagnostic performance in diagnosing gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy: current and the future.

This article presents an overview of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT), an innovative and minimally invasive treatment for appendicitis with an appendix-preserving manner. Since its initial application in 2009, ERAT has gained significant popularity in China, due to its rapid recovery and minimal risk of complications. The ERAT procedures comprise several steps, including appendiceal orifice access and intubation, appendiceal lumen imaging, decompression and irrigation, fecalith removal, and stenting. ERAT has been used in various forms of complicated appendicitis, such as in pregnant women and children, with continuous improvements in both technique and safety. It has the potential to become the preferred diagnostic and treatment method for appendicitis. Until 2023, over 10,000 ERAT procedures have been successfully conducted in China, and the technique has gained more attention worldwide. However, challenges remain, including training, standardization of ERAT practice, research and technology improvement, enhancing public awareness, and fostering international collaboration. In summary, ERAT can be the standard treatment for appendicitis treatment, which represents a paradigm shift in the conventional clinical practice.

Injectable Modified Sodium Alginate Microspheres for Enhanced Operative Efficiency and Safety in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective method for resecting early-stage tumors in the digestive system. To achieve a low injection pressure of the injected fluid and continuous elevation of the mucosa following injection during the ESD technique, we introduced an innovative injectable sodium-alginate-based drug-loaded microsphere (Cipro-ThSA) for ESD surgery, which was generated through an emulsion reaction involving cysteine-modified sodium alginate (ThSA) and ciprofloxacin. Cipro-ThSA microspheres exhibited notable adhesiveness, antioxidant activity, and antimicrobial properties, providing a certain level of postoperative wound protection. In vitro cell assays confirmed the decent biocompatibility of the material. Lastly, according to animal experiments involving submucosal elevation of porcine colons, Cipro-ThSA microspheres ensure surgically removable lift height while maintaining the mucosa for approximately 246% longer than saline, which could effectively reduce surgical risks while providing sufficient time for operation. Consequently, the Cipro-ThSA microsphere holds great promise as a novel submucosal injection material, in terms of enhancing the operational safety and effectiveness of ESD surgery.

Endoscopic transgastric fenestration versus percutaneous drainage for management of (peri)pancreatic fluid collections adjacent to gastric wall (with video).

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous drainage (PCD) and endoscopic approaches have largely replaced surgical drainage as the initial approach for (peri) pancreatic fluid collections (PFC)s, while complications associated with endoscopic stent implantation are common. AIM: To introduce a novel endoscopic therapy named endoscopic transgastric fenestration (ETGF), which involves resection of tissue by endoscopic accessory between gastric and PFCs without stent implantation, and to evaluate its efficacy and safety compared with PCD for the management of PFCs adjacent to the gastric wall. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PFCs adjacent to the gastric wall and who subsequently received ETGF or PCD were restrospectively enrolled. Indications for intervention were consistent with related guidelines. We analyzed patients baseline characteristics, technical and clinical success rate, recurrence and reintervention rate, procedure-related complications and adverse events. RESULTS: Seventy-two eligible patients were retrospectively identified (ETGF = 34, PCD = 38) from October 2017 to May 2021. Patients in the ETGF group had a significantly higher clinical success rate than those in the PCD group (97.1 vs 76.3%, P = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences regarding recurrence, reintervention and incidence of complication between the two groups. While long-term catheter drainage was very common in the PCD group. CONCLUSION: Compared with PCD, ETGF has a higher clinical success rate in the management of PFCs adjacent to the gastric wall. ETGF is an alternative effective strategy for the treatment of PFCs adjacent to the gastric wall.