RESUMEN
To evaluate the performance of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (MRI-TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We prospectively enrolled 164 patients with at least one Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) ≥ 3 lesions who underwent MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy. Of the PSA-derived biomarkers, the PHI had the best performance in predicting csPCa (AUC 0.792, CI 0.707-0.877) in patients with PI-RADS 4/5 lesions. Furthermore, the predictive power of PHI was even higher in the patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions (AUC 0.884, CI 0.792-0.976). To minimize missing csPCa, we used a PHI cutoff of 27 and 7.4% of patients with PI-RADS 4/5 lesions could have avoided a biopsy. At this level, 2.0% of cases with csPCa would have been missed, with sensitivity and NPV rates of 98.0% and 87.5%, respectively. However, the subgroup of PI-RADS 3 was too small to define the optimal PHI cutoff. PHI was the best PSA-derived biomarker to predict csPCa in MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsies in men with PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions, especially for the patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions who gained the most value.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the performance of histogram analysis in the time course of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for differentiating cancerous tissues from benign tissues in the prostate. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the histograms of DCE-MRI of 30 patients. Histograms within regions of interest(ROI) in the peripheral zone (PZ) and transitional zone (TZ) were separately analyzed. The maximum difference wash-in slope (MWS) and delay phase slope (DPS) were defined for each voxel. Differences in histogram parameters, namely the mean, standard deviation (SD), the coefficient of variation (CV), kurtosis, skewness, interquartile range (IQR), percentile (P10, P25, P75, P90, and P90P10), Range, and modified full width at half-maximum (mFWHM) between cancerous and benign tissues were assessed. RESULTS: In the TZ, CV for ROIs of 7.5 and 10mm was the only significantly different parameter of the MWS (P = 0.034 and P = 0.004, respectively), whereas many parameters of the DPS (mean, skewness, P10, P25, P50, P75 and P90) differed significantly (P = <0.001-0.016 and area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73-0.822). In the PZ, all parameters of the MWS exhibited significant differences, except kurtosis and skewness in the ROI of 7.5mm(P = <0.001-0.017 and AUC = 0.865-0.898). SD, IQR, mFWHM, P90P10 and Range were also significant differences in the DPS (P = 0.001-0.035). CONCLUSION: The histogram analysis of DCE-MRI is a potentially useful approach for differentiating prostate cancer from normal tissues. Different histogram parameters of the MWS and DPS should be applied in the TZ and PZ.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Curva ROC , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prostate cancer yield rate of targeted transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy with cognitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) registration without concurrent systematic biopsy in patients with previous negative systematic TRUS-guided biopsy results and persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. METHODS: In this prospective study conducted from August 2013 to January 2015, patients with at least one previous negative systematic TRUS-guided biopsy and persistently high PSA (≥4 ng/mL) levels were referred for multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Those patients with suspicious findings on mpMRI received a subsequent cognitive MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy. The cancer-detection rate, tumor location, and Gleason score were confirmed, and PSA-related data were compared between cancer-yield and noncancer-yield groups. RESULTS: In total, 48 patients were included in this study. MRI was designated to be four and five in 17 patients. Fifteen patients received a cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy, and prostate cancers were detected in 10 patients. The cancer-detection rate was 20.8% (10/48), and the positive-predictive value of MRI was 66.7%. No significant differences were observed in the PSA level, PSA velocity, or transitional zone volume between the cancer-yield and noncancer-yield groups; however, the corresponding difference in PSA transitional zone density was significant (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: Cognitive MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy without concurrent systematic biopsy can detect significant prostate cancer in patients with previous negative systematic biopsy results and persistently elevated PSA levels. Noncancer-yield patients should undergo active surveillance and further follow-ups.