Usefulness of somatosensory evoked potentials for monitoring the clinical course of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are described as a supportive tool to diagnose chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP); however, there is a lack of studies determining the effectiveness of SSEPs in monitoring the clinical course of individuals with this condition. The aims of this study are to evaluate the utility of SSEPs in monitoring patients with CIDP and to assess their association with clinical outcomes following immunomodulatory therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective observational study that included patients who met European Federation of Neurological Societies and Peripheral Nerve Society criteria for CIDP between 2018 and 2023. SSEPs were performed at diagnosis and during follow-up after the start of immunomodulatory treatment. Fisher's exact test was employed to assess the association between clinical improvement and SSEP improvement. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included in the study. Ten patients had a typical CIDP pattern and 11 were male. In 17, SSEPs were abnormal prior to the start of immunomodulatory treatment. In patients who showed clinical improvement with immunomodulatory therapy, we observed that 15/17 had partial or complete improvement in SSEPs. Patients who showed no clinical improvement with first-line treatment exhibited worsening SSEPs. There was a significant association between clinical and SSEPs improvement (p = 0.009). DISCUSSION: We observed a positive association between improvement in SSEPs and clinical improvement in patients with CIDP. Our data suggest that SSEPs may be useful for monitoring the clinical course of patients with CIDP, but additional, larger studies are needed.

Comparison of water- vs. land-based exercise for improving functional capacity and quality of life in patients living with and beyond breast cancer (the AQUA-FiT study): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients living with and beyond breast cancer frequently exhibit several side effects that can impact quality of life and physical functioning way beyond diagnosis and cancer therapies. Traditional on-land exercise has shown to be effective in reducing several symptoms of BC but little is known about the role of water-based exercise in improving physical and psychological well-being. OBJECTIVES: To compare land- vs. water-based exercise training for BC survivors to improve Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), cancer-related fatigue (CRF), physical functioning, body composition and physical activity in patients with BC. METHODS: A randomised, parallel group (1:1) controlled trial was conducted between 2020 and 2022. Patients were randomly allocated to complete a similar exercise training twice weekly during 12 weeks either on land (LG) using traditional gym equipment or in a swimming pool (WG) using body-weight exercises and water-suitable accessories. Both groups were supervised and monitored by an experienced physiotherapist. Main outcome was HRQoL (EORTC QLQ C30 and B23 module) and CRF measured with the Piper Scale. Secondary variables included functional capacity with the 6 Minutes Walking Test (6MWT), upper and lower body strength (handgrip strength and 30″ Sit-to-Stand (STS) test), body composition and objectively measured physical activity. RESULTS: 28 patients were assessed and randomised during the study period. One patient did not receive the allocated intervention due to skin issues and one patient was dropped out during the intervention. A significant effect of time was found for both symptom severity (F(2,52) = 6.46, p = 0.003) and overall functioning (F1.67,43.45 = 5.215, p =0 .013) but no interaction was found between group and time. No effects were reported for CRF. Similar findings were reported for functional capacity (time effect F1.231,32.019 = 16.818, p < 0.001) and lower body strength (time effect F2,52 = 15.120, p < 0.001) as well as fat mass (time effect F2,52 = 4.38, p = 0.017). Notably, a significant time per group interaction was reported for physical activity (F2,52 = 6.349, p =0.003) with patients in the WG significantly improving PA levels over time while patients in the LG exhibited a marked decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise training either in water or on land can decrease symptom severity and improve functionality and body composition. Water-based training seems more effecting than land-based exercise to improve physical activity patterns over time.

Implications of starting antiepileptic treatment prior to electroencephalography in first epileptic seizures.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine whether the administration of antiepileptic drugs (AED) alters the likelihood of detecting epileptiform abnormalities in electroencephalographies (EEG) performed early after a first epileptic seizure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study including patients with a first seizure attended at our centre's emergency department between July 2014 and November 2019. We collected clinical data, as well as technical data on the acquisition and interpretation of the EEG performed within the first 72 hours after the seizure, and the factors related with seizure recurrence. RESULTS: We recruited 155 patients with a mean (SD) age of 48.6 (22.5) years; 61.3% were men. Regarding seizure type, 51% presented tonic-clonic seizures of unknown onset and 12% presented focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Thirty-nine patients (25.2%) received AED treatment before the EEG was performed: 33 received a non-benzodiazepine AED and 6 received a benzodiazepine. Epileptiform abnormalities were observed in 29.7% of patients. Previous administration of AEDs was not significantly associated with the probability of detecting interictal epileptiform abnormalities (P = .25) or with the risk of recurrence within 6 months (P = .63). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of AEDs before an early EEG following a first seizure does not decrease the likelihood of detecting epileptiform abnormalities. These findings suggest that starting AED treatment immediately in patients with a high risk of early recurrence does not imply a reduction in the diagnostic accuracy of the test.

[Guillain-Barre syndrome and thrombocytopenia after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with Moderna. A case report]. / Síndrome de Guillain-Barré y trombocitopenia tras la vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2 con Moderna. Descripción de un caso.

INTRODUCTION: The massive vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus has demonstrated to be one of the major measures for the reduction of the morbidity and mortality that this virus causes. However, during the last months the administration of the vaccine has been also associated with some rare, but life-threatening, adverse effects. CASE REPORT: In this article we describe the case of a patient that developed a Guillain-Barre syndrome and an Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura nine days after the vaccination with the third dose for the SARS-CoV-2 virus (Moderna). He had received previously two doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine. Moreover, the patient was positive for auto-antibodies anti-SSA/Ro60 and auto-antibodies IgG anti-GM1 and IgG anti-GM3. DISCUSSION: Even though it is not possible to stablish a clear relation of causality between the administration of the vaccine booster for SARS-CoV-2 and the diseases developed by the patient, the association of two concomitant autoimmune processes is remarkable. As well as the positivity for the auto-antibodies anti-SSA/Ro60, which have been described in the bibliography in cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

TITLE: Síndrome de Guillain-Barré y trombocitopenia tras la vacunación contra el SARS-CoV-2 con Moderna. Descripción de un caso.Introducción. La vacunación masiva contra el virus SARS-CoV-2 constituye una de las principales estrategias en la reducción de la morbimortalidad que presenta dicho virus. No obstante, a lo largo de los últimos meses, su administración también se ha relacionado con diversos efectos adversos raros, pero potencialmente graves. Caso clínico. En el presente artículo describimos el caso de un paciente que desarrolló un síndrome de Guillain-Barré y una púrpura trombocitopénica idiopática nueve días después de la vacunación con la tercera dosis contra el virus SARS-CoV-2 (Moderna), con dos dosis previas de AstraZeneca. Adicionalmente, destaca la presencia de positividad para autoanticuerpos anti-SSA/Ro60 y para anticuerpos inmunoglobulina G anti-GM1 e inmunoglobulina G anti-GM3. Conclusión. Aunque no es posible establecer una relación de causalidad entre la administración del booster de la vacuna y el desarrollo de la enfermedad, es destacable la asociación de dos procesos autoinmunes concomitantes, junto con la positividad en los autoanticuerpos anti-SSA/Ro60, lo cual se ha descrito en la bibliografía en casos de infección del virus SARS-CoV-2.

[Prognostic and monitoring biomarkers in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy]. / Biomarcadores pronósticos y de seguimiento en la polineuropatía desmielinizante inflamatoria crónica.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a clinical entity with significant phenotypic variability both in its onset and in its course. Therefore, it is important to have objective biomarkers with which to monitor its evolution. In this review we present clinical, neurophysiological, neuroimaging, blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for the monitoring and prognosis of CIDP. DEVELOPMENT: Different clinical tools have been developed and validated to monitor CIDP by assessing strength and disability. However, the best parameter for monitoring gait remains to be determined. Monitoring by neurophysiological examination is also widespread and the amplitude of the compound muscle action potential is the most commonly used. More recently, the Motor Unit Number Index sum score has been developed, which is an accurate and reproducible technique. The role of nerve ultrasonography is under development and a correlation between clinical evolution and ultrasound findings has been described. Multiple biomarkers have been described in blood and CSF, including antinodal/paranodal antibodies, neurofilament light chain, serum immunoglobulin G levels and CSF sphingomyelin levels. Genetic variants and cytokines associated with prognosis and response to treatment have also been described. CONCLUSIONS: One of the most important challenges in the management of CIDP is the monitoring of clinical changes after treatment initiation. The combination of biomarkers that allow an accurate understanding of the disease is crucial for the optimal management of CIDP.

TITLE: Biomarcadores pronósticos y de seguimiento en la polineuropatía desmielinizante inflamatoria crónica.Introducción. La polineuropatía desmielinizante inflamatoria crónica (PDIC) es una entidad clínica con una variabilidad fenotípica muy importante tanto en el inicio como en la evolución. Por lo tanto, es importante disponer de biomarcadores objetivos para monitorizar la evolución. En esta revisión presentamos los biomarcadores clínicos, neurofisiológicos, de neuroimagen, y en la sangre y el líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR) para el seguimiento y el pronóstico de la PDIC. Desarrollo. Se han desarrollado diferentes herramientas clínicas validadas para el seguimiento de la PDIC mediante la evaluación de la fuerza y la discapacidad. No obstante, falta determinar el mejor parámetro para monitorizar la marcha. El seguimiento mediante examen neurofisiológico también está ampliamente extendido, y la amplitud del compound muscle action potential es lo más utilizado. Más recientemente, se ha desarrollado la Motor Unit Number Index sum score, que es una técnica precisa y reproducible. El papel de la ecografía de nervio se encuentra en desarrollo, y se ha descrito correlación entre la evolución clínica y los hallazgos por ecografía. Se han descrito múltiples biomarcadores en sangre y el LCR, entre los que destacan los anticuerpos antinodales/paranodales, los neurofilamentos de cadena ligera, los niveles de inmunoglobulina G en el suero y los niveles de esfingomielina en el LCR. Asimismo, se han descrito variantes genéticas y citocinas relacionadas con el pronóstico y la respuesta a los tratamientos. Conclusiones. Uno de los retos más importante en el manejo de la PDIC es la monitorización de los cambios clínicos tras el inicio del tratamiento. La combinación de biomarcadores que permitan una comprensión exacta de la enfermedad es crucial para el manejo óptimo de la PDIC.

[Weakness as a complication of COVID-19 in critically ill patients: clinical features and prognostic factors in a case series]. / Debilidad como complicación del paciente crítico por COVID-19: características clínicas y factores pronósticos en una serie de casos.

INTRODUCTION: Weakness is a frequent complication in those critically ill due to COVID-19. This study describes its characteristics and the factors that can condition and predict it. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, descriptive, observational study of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to COVID-19 between April and May 2020 with muscle weakness. A motor balance equal to or lower than 3/5 according to the modified Medical Research Council muscle strength scale was considered to be severe clinical impairment. Altogether 25 analytical studies, 16 neurophysiological studies and one muscle biopsy were performed, with a telephone follow-up at one month, a comparative analysis between the groups with and without severe compromise, and determination of cut-off points for analytical parameters to predict severe involvement using ROC curves. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 25 patients with a mean age of 58 years (standard deviation ± 9). The median length of stay in the ICU was 27.5 days. All the electromyograms exhibited a myogenic pattern and 75% also showed neuropathy. The group with severe clinical involvement had higher levels of D-dimer (p = 0.08), lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.03) and interleukin-6 (p = 0.10), and the combination of the alteration of any two of these three parameters predicted severe involvement with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 76.9%. At one month of follow-up, 36% were unable to walk autonomously and 92% continued with muscle weakness. CONCLUSIONS: Weakness in severe COVID-19 patients has a major clinical impact. Its early detection and study by means of predictors of its development may allow for better management. The absence in some cases of classical risk factors for ICU-acquired weakness suggests a different pathophysiology.

TITLE: Debilidad como complicación del paciente crítico por COVID-19: características clínicas y factores pronósticos en una serie de casos.Introducción. La debilidad es una complicación frecuente en el enfermo crítico por COVID-19. Se describen sus características, y los factores que pueden condicionarla y predecirla. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio observacional descriptivo prospectivo con pacientes ingresados en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) por COVID-19 entre abril y mayo de 2020 con debilidad muscular. Se consideró una afectación clínica grave un equilibrio motor igual o inferior a 3/5 según la escala de fuerza muscular modificada del Medical Research Council. Se han realizado 25 estudios analíticos, 16 estudios neurofisiológicos y una biopsia muscular; seguimiento telefónico al mes; análisis comparativo entre los grupos con y sin afectación grave, y determinación de puntos de corte de parámetros analíticos para predecir afectación grave mediante curvas ROC. Resultados. Se incluyó a 25 pacientes con 58 años (desviación estándar ± 9) de edad media. La mediana de estancia en la UCI fue de 27,5 días. Todos los electromiogramas mostraban un patrón miógeno y el 75%, también una neuropatía. El grupo con afectación clínica grave tenía mayores niveles de dímero-D (p = 0,08), lactato deshidrogenasa (p = 0,03) e interleucina 6 (p = 0,10), y la combinación de la alteración de dos cualquiera de estos tres parámetros pronosticaba la afectación grave con una sensibilidad del 100% y una especificidad del 76,9%. Al mes de seguimiento, el 36% no podía deambular autónomamente y el 92% seguía con debilidad muscular. Conclusiones. La debilidad en el enfermo por COVID-19 grave tiene una repercusión clínica importante. Su detección y estudio precoces mediante predictores de su desarrollo pueden permitir un mejor manejo. La ausencia en algunos casos de los factores de riesgo clásicos para la debilidad adquirida en la UCI sugiere una fisiopatología diferente.

Implications of initiating antiseizure drugs prior to the performance of EEG in first epileptic seizures. / Implicaciones de iniciar fármacos antiepilépticos previo a la realización de EEG en primeras crisis epilépticas.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine whether the administration of antiepileptic drugs (AED) alters the likelihood of detecting epileptiform abnormalities in electroencephalographies (EEG) performed early after a first epileptic seizure. METHOD: We performed a retrospective, observational study including patients with a first seizure attended at our centre's emergency department between July 2014 and November 2019. We collected clinical data, as well as technical data on the acquisition and interpretation of the EEG performed within the first 72hours after the seizure, and the factors related with seizure recurrence. RESULTS: We recruited 155 patients with a mean (SD) age of 48.6 (22.5) years; 61.3% were men. Regarding seizure type, 51% presented tonic-clonic seizures of unknown onset and 12% presented focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Thirty-nine patients (25.2%) received AED treatment before the EEG was performed: 33 received a non-benzodiazepine AED and 6 received a benzodiazepine. Epileptiform abnormalities were observed in 29.7% of patients. Previous administration of AEDs was not significantly associated with the probability of detecting interictal epileptiform abnormalities (P=.25) or with the risk of recurrence within 6 months (P=.63). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of AEDs before an early EEG following a first seizure does not decrease the likelihood of detecting epileptiform abnormalities. These findings suggest that starting AED treatment immediately in patients with a high risk of early recurrence does not imply a reduction in the diagnostic accuracy of the test.

How soon should urgent EEG be performed following a first epileptic seizure?

PURPOSE: Patients with a first unprovoked epileptic seizure are often seen in emergency services. Electroencephalography (EEG) is indicated for diagnosing epilepsy, but the optimal time to perform this test has not been defined. This study aimed to determine the time interval following a seizure within which EEG has the greatest diagnostic yield. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all adult patients with a first unprovoked seizure who had undergone emergency EEG (July 2014-December 2019). Data collection included demographics, seizure type, time interval to EEG study, EEG pattern identified, and the prescription after emergency assessment. An optimal cut-off point for time to EEG was obtained, and an adjusted regression model was performed to establish associations with the presence of epileptiform abnormalities. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were included (mean age: 50.7 years, 40.6% women). Epileptiform discharges were identified in 34.1% of recordings, nonepileptiform abnormalities in 46.5%, and normal findings in 19.4%. A lower latency from seizure to EEG was associated with a higher probability of finding epileptiform discharges (median: 12.7 in the epileptiform EEGs vs. 20 h in the nonepileptiform EEGs, p < 0.001). The time interval associated with the highest probability of detecting an epileptiform EEG pattern was within the first 16 h after seizure onset: 52.1% of recordings performed before the 16-h cut-off showed these abnormal patterns compared with 20.2% performed after (p < 0.001). These findings were not related to the presence of an epileptogenic lesion in neuroimaging or to other clinical variables. The finding of epileptiform abnormalities was followed by a greater prescription of antiseizure drugs (96.4% vs. 66% in nonepileptiform patterns, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic yield of EEG following a first unprovoked epileptic seizure is highest when this test is performed within the first 16 h after onset of the event.

Factitial dermatosis of the breast: a possible dermatologic manifestation of Munchausen's syndrome.

We report on two cases of factitial dermatosis of the breast associated with benign fibrocystic disease. One of the patients could also be diagnosed as showing Munchausen's syndrome. The lesions were protracted and intractable, painful ulcers that recurred and eventually became bilateral, despite attempts at surgical correction. The management of factitial dermatosis of the breast is complex, and should include psychiatric referral as well as avoidance of further surgical treatment if possible.