Hangman's fracture: Management strategy and healing rate in a prospective multi-centre observational study of 34 patients.

BACKGROUND: Hangman's fractures account for 15% to 20% of all cervical spine fractures. The grading system developed by Effendi and modified by Levine and Edwards is generally used as the basis for management decisions. Nonetheless, the optimal management remains controversial. The objective of this study was to describe the treatments used in France in patients with hangman's fractures. The complications and healing rates were analysed according to the fracture type and treatment used. HYPOTHESIS: Among patients with hangman's fracture, those with disc damage must be treated surgically. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, multi-centre, observational study was conducted under the aegis of the French Society for Spine Surgery (SociétéFrançaisedeChirurgieRachidienne, SFCR). Patients were included if they had computed tomography (CT) evidence of hangman's fracture. Follow-up data were collected prospectively. Fracture healing was assessed on CT scans obtained 3 and 12 months after the injury. The type of treatment and complications were recorded routinely. RESULTS: We included 34 patients. The fracture type according to Effendi modified by Levine and Edwards was I in 68% of patients, II in 29% of patients, and III in a single patient (3%). The treatment was non-operative in 21 (62%) patients and surgical in 11 (32%). All 28 patients re-evaluated after 1 year had evidence of fracture healing. The remaining 6 patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Hangman's fracture is associated with low rates of mortality and neurological complications. Non-operative treatment is appropriate in Type I hangman's fracture, with a 100% healing rate in our study. Types II and III are characterised by damage to the ligaments and discs requiring either anterior C2-C3 fusion or posterior C1-C3 screw fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Mortality, complication, and fusion rates of patients with odontoid fracture: the impact of age and comorbidities in 204 cases.

PURPOSE: The French Society of Spine Surgery (SFCR) conducted a prospective epidemiologic multicenter study. The purpose was to investigate mortality, complication, and fusion rates in patients with odontoid fracture, depending on age, comorbidities, fracture type, and treatment. METHODS: Out of 204 patients, 60 were ≤ 70 years and 144 were > 70 years. Demographic data, comorbidities, treatment types and complications (general medical, infectious, neurologic, and mechanical), and death were registered within the first year. Fractures were classified according to Anderson-D'Alonzo and Roy-Camille on the initial CT. A 1-year follow-up CT was available in 144 patients to evaluate fracture consolidation. RESULTS: Type II and oblique-posterior fractures were the most frequent patterns. The treatment was conservative in 52.5% and surgical in 47.5%. The mortality rate in patients ≤ 70 was 3.3% and 16.7% in patients > 70 years (p = 0.0002). Fracture pattern and treatment type did not influence mortality. General medical complications were significantly more frequent > 70 years (p = 0.021) and after surgical treatment (p = 0.028). Neurologic complications occurred in 0.5%, postoperative infections in 2.0%, and implant-related mechanical complications in 10.3% (associated with pseudarthrosis). Fracture fusion was observed in 93.5% of patients ≤ 70 years and in 62.5% >70 years (p < 0.0001). Pseudarthrosis was present in 31.5% of oblique-posterior fractures and in 24.3% after conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Age and comorbidities influenced mortality and medical complication rates most regardless of fracture type and treatment choice. Pseudarthrosis represented the main complication, which increased with age. Pseudarthrosis was most frequent in type II and oblique-posterior fractures after conservative treatment.

C1 fracture: Analysis of consolidation and complications rates in a prospective multicenter series.

INTRODUCTION: Three types of C1 fracture have been described, according to location: type 1 (anterior or posterior arc), type 2 (Jefferson: anterior and posterior arc), and type 3 (lateral mass). Stability depends on transverse ligament integrity. The main aim of the present study was to analyze complications and consolidation rates according to fracture type, age and treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The French Society of Spinal Surgery (SFCR) performed a multicenter prospective study on C1-C2 trauma. All patients with recent fracture diagnosed on CT were included. Consolidation on CT was studied at 3 months and 1 year. Medical, neurologic, infectious and mechanical complications were inventoried using the KEOPS data-base. RESULTS: Sixty-three of the 417 patients (15.1%) had C1 fracture: type 1 (33.3%), type 2 (38.1%), or type 3 (28.6%). The transverse ligament was intact in 53.9% of cases. Treatment was non-operative in 63.5% of cases, surgical in 27.0%, and surgical after failure of non-operative treatment in 9.5%. There were 8 medical complications, more frequently in patients aged >70 years, following surgery (p<0.0001). The consolidation rate was 84.2% with non-operative treatment, 100% for primary surgery, and 33.3% for secondary surgery (p=0.002). There were 10 cases of non-union, in 4.8% of type 1, 13.6% of type 2 and 33.3% of type 3 fractures (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Medical complications showed association with age and with type of treatment. Non-operative treatment was suited to types 1, 2 and 3 with minimal displacement and intact transverse ligament. C1-C2 fusion was suited to displaced unstable type 2 fracture. Displaced type 3 fracture incurred risk of non-union. Early surgery may be recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.