Mapping research on LGBT+ persons' health: a bibliometric analysis.

AIMS: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and other people (LGBT+) individuals may have a greater risk of experiencing mental and physical health issues. In the past years, the predominant theme of research was HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This study aimed to explore the most recent patterns in medical research concerning LGBT+ persons. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis using Biblioshiny was conducted. Based on previous studies, years of observation ranged between 2008 and 2021. Web of Science Core Collection was used. RESULTS: A total of 31,039 articles were selected. Top journals centered around HIV/AIDS and STIs (n = 6), followed by sexual behaviors/sexuality (n = 2) and LGBT+ health (n = 2). The US led in research output (n = 16,249). Papers were categorized into three main clusters (which showed different evolution across time): one addressing HIV/AIDS, STIs, and sexual behaviors, another focusing on mental health, discrimination, and stigma, and a third, smaller cluster examining transgender, intersex, and gender-diverse health. CONCLUSIONS: This article highlighted a growth in LGBT+ health research, uncovering research disparities among countries. While HIV/AIDS and STIs still dominated, a crucial theme concerning mental health, discrimination, and stigma has been rising. Declining interest in gender-diverse health, and disparities in research attention to different LGBT+ subgroups, underscored the need for more comprehensive and inclusive research to address complex health disparities.

Analysis of a direct access testing system for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the paediatric population attending school.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the paediatric population plays a minor role in the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, in order to keep schools open and reduce SARS-CoV spreading, it is necessary to identify and isolate early SARS-CoV-2 positive paediatric patients even if they are asymptomatic. The aim of this study was to describe a setting for SARS-CoV 2 testing based on the spontaneous presentation of paediatric patients attending school without a medical prescription and explore its appropriateness. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The study performed between September 2020 and March 2021 among a sample of 13,283 paediatric patients who underwent a swab in four different hospital settings (school hot spot, emergency department, day hospital setting and hospital wards). For each patients we collected: date of swab execution, type of swab, execution setting of the swab, result of the swab, information about community spread of the virus in the 14 days prior to the swab execution, sex and age. Results: In our sample, females accounted for 45.8%. The median age was 6.8 years (IQR 3.0-11.2) and the most frequent age category was between 6 and 11 years (27.9%). At multivariable models with a swab tested positive as outcome. The swabs executed in all the hospital settings had a lower likelihood of resulting positive compared with the school hot spot setting. Compared with adolescents aged between 14 and 19 years old, new-borns below 3 months (adjOR 1.83, 95% C.I. 1.14-3) and patients aged between 11 and 14 years old (adjOR 1.32, 95% C.I. 1.07-1.63) reported a higher probability of a swab tested positive. Instead, children aged between 3 months and 3 years (adjOR 0.77, 95% C.I. 0.61-0.96) and children aged between 3 years and 6 years (adjOR 0.66, 95% C.I. 0.53-0.83) were less likely to result positive. The higher was the mean of pooled Rt in the 14 days preceding the swab, the higher was the likelihood of resulting positive (adjOR 1.75, 95% C.I. 1.53-1.99). Conclusion: In conclusion, we found a high incidence of paediatric patients positive to the test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 at the school hot spot compared with other settings during the period of observation. The free access modality to the nasopharyngeal swab was effective in identifying patients with COVID-19. Public health authorities should implement these testing modality in order to help reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in school settings.

Prevention of the Werther effect: compliance of the Italian newspapers to the 'reporting on suicide' recommendations.

OBJECTIVES: Suicide media coverage could lead to imitation, the so-called 'Werther effect'. The World Health Organization (WHO) published specific recommendations for reporting suicide news. This study aimed to quantify the compliance of Italian newspapers with the WHO suicide reporting guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: This was a quantitative content analysis study. METHODS: All articles published by the three main Italian newspapers from June 2019 to May 2020 describing suicides or attempted suicides were included. The articles were analyzed using a checklist based on the WHO recommendations, which included 18 'negative' items (e.g. 'presence of the word 'suicide' in the title') and nine 'positive' items (e.g. 'the article reports the contacts of a suicide prevention hotline'). Each negative item was scored -1, and each positive item was scored +1. Multivariate linear regressions were performed to identify factors associated with lower adherence to WHO recommendations and higher social media engagement with the articles. RESULTS: A total of 3483 articles were screened, and 110 articles were included in the final analysis. The suicidal was male in 73.6% of cases. The median checklist score was -6 (interquartile range 3). Five percent of the articles had at least one positive item. The word 'suicide' was found in 90% of the titles. Female suicides were associated with a higher checklist score (coefficient 0.81, P = 0.039). No correlation was found between the checklist score and the social media engagement of the articles. CONCLUSIONS: Italian newspapers do not adhere completely to the WHO recommendations on reporting suicide, leading to a potential imitation effect. Public health professionals should make decision-makers and journalists aware of the importance of these recommendations.

Outbreaks of COVID-19 in indoor places of worship: a systematic review.

AIMS: This review aimed to describe what has been published on COVID-19 outbreaks originating from indoor places of worship. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist by searching PubMed, Scopus and Embase from 1 January 2020 to 29 March 2021. Citation chasing was also performed. Studies with information about COVID-19 outbreaks originating in indoor places of worship of any religion were included. RESULTS: A total of 9729 records were identified and 36 were selected. The articles reported 119 descriptions of outbreaks linked to churches, mosques, synagogues, and temples, referring to approximately 52-74 unique outbreaks. The outbreaks were mostly located in three major areas: East and Southeast Asia (46%), the USA (27%), Europe (22%). All the outbreaks began in 2020. Mainly, there were no restrictive measures, or such measures were not followed at the time of the outbreak. Choir practices presented the highest attack rate (up to 0.867). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of preventive measures and the role of singing practices were highlighted. Reports were often lacking contact tracing and sometimes did not report the date of outbreak extinction. Moreover, reports came from few geographical areas. Thus, the impact of transmission in places of worship may be largely underestimated.

Is the pandemic leading to a crisis of trust? Insights from an Italian nationwide study.

OBJECTIVES: Along with mistrust toward politics and journalism, the pandemic is amplifying mistrust in healthcare. To explore trust in key professionals among the Italian population, we focused on perceived change in trust during the pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Nationwide online cross-sectional survey (called COCOS). METHODS: COCOS was conducted in Italy in two periods: the end of the first lockdown (T1: April-May 2020) and the end of 2020 (T2: November-December 2020). Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regressions were performed (sample size = 2673). RESULTS: Trust in healthcare workers (HCWs) was reduced in 1.5% of participants (T1) and 2.8% (T2). Trust in scientists/researchers was reduced in 5.8% (T1) and 7.6% (T2). Trust in politicians was reduced in 37.6% (T1) and 52.3% (T2). Trust in journalists was reduced in 41.7% (T1) and 48.3% (T2). Considering multivariable models, participants of the second period, participants who were HCWs, participants with anxiety symptoms, and those experiencing economic struggle due to the pandemic had a higher likelihood of having a reduced trust. The period had the strongest association with reduced trust. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that a central role might be played by the pandemic fatigue. We suggest leading figures should be more aware of the relationship between communication and trust. The pandemic is a real-world experiment in reshaping mediated communication and, although social media play an important role, other approaches might be successful. As a notable part of the population is trusting politicians and media less and less, Italian key professionals should implement initiatives to reinvigorate public support.

Knowledge, attitudes and eating habits red and processed meat among gym users: a cross-sectional survey.

AIMS: In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified red meat (RM) and processed meat (PM) intakes as 'probably carcinogenic' and 'carcinogenic' to humans, respectively. The aim of the study was to evaluate eating behaviours and knowledge on the potential risks of RM-PM consumption among gym users. METHODS: In 2018, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in 20 gyms in Turin using a 48-item questionnaire assessing sociodemographic, sports, dietary information and knowledge about RM-PM (sample size = 298). Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were performed. The significance level was p ⩽ 0.05. RESULTS: Around 75% of the sample consumed RM and PM at least once a week, with an average of 240.55 ± 435.99 g and 106.50 ± 157.88 g consumed weekly, respectively. Only 7.69% exceeded 700 g of raw RM weekly. Females, those with higher education, those who practise sport outside gyms and those who declared to practise sport to stay healthy, declared to consume less RM. Those who practise sport at a competitive level, those who are on a diet for athletic needs, those with higher body mass index (BMI) and those who consume more eggs and alcohol had a higher RM intake. The association with PM consumption was negative for females and positive for those living without a partner. The likelihood of answering incorrectly to one of the knowledge outcomes was lower for those who had a healthcare-related background and declared to practise sport to stay healthy, while it was higher for participants who stated to have a sport-related background, to be on a diet to lose weight, to read rarely/never the RM-PM nutrition labels and to consume <400 g of fruit and vegetables daily. CONCLUSIONS: Given the relatively low knowledge of the potential risks of RM-PM consumption, it would be advisable to implement campaigns specifically focused on male athletes and people with lower socioeconomic status, in order to raise awareness about this topic.