Asthma management, focused on the use of oral corticosteroids: the opinions of Italian asthmatic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Patients' perceptions of asthma symptoms, and attitudes regarding diagnosis and management, can affect their ability to reach good asthma control. The aim of the study was to explore patients' perceptions of asthma management, with focus on treatment with oral corticosteroids (OCS). METHODS: A DOXAPHARMA survey was conducted. A questionnaire with 46 multiple choice questions was completed by 50 patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, and 258 with mild-moderate controlled or partly controlled asthma. Participants were representative of Italian asthmatic patients-with medium age, long asthma duration, delayed diagnosis, poor asthma control, and frequent exacerbations. RESULTS: Many asthmatics reported inadequate pharmacologic treatment. The majority but not all patients regularly used ICS/LABA. Oral treatment was common, mainly with OCS, particularly in severe asthmatics. One-fourth of patients did not regularly use inhaled therapy, and adherence was poor, resulting in frequent OCS use to treat exacerbations, which were common in mild-moderate cases. Patients were fairly satisfied with asthma therapies, but many had concerns about long-term corticosteroid use. Patients complained about poor management of comorbidities associated with asthma and OCS use, but were generally satisfied with their patient/doctor relationships. Many patients failed to achieve optimal health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mainly those with severe asthma who used OCS treatment and emphasized how OCS therapy impacted QoL. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results confirmed many problems related to mild-moderate and severe asthma management in Italy and highlighted the overuse of OCS rather than more effective and safe treatments, which had strong negative effects on HRQoL.

[The independent research on rare diseases financed by the Italian Medicines Agency.] / La ricerca indipendente sulle malattie rare finanziata dall'Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco.

INTRODUCTION: Rare diseases have a high social and health impact. Since 2005, AIFA has been funding independent clinical research. The objective of this paper is to describe data on independent research on rare diseases financed by the Agency. METHODS: With reference to studies financed by AIFA between 2005-2018 the following data have been collected: financial characteristics, study design, therapeutic area, population included, completion status, availability of study results publications, publication characteristics and conclusions. Data have been analyzed in order to provide information on characteristics and scientific productivity of clinical studies on rare diseases. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2018, AIFA published 9 Calls for Funding of Independent Research and financed 282 clinical studies, 111 (about 40%) of which were on a rare disease and/or a rare tumor for a total of € 43,455,438. Studies were interventistic in 93.6% (mainly phase II or III). The most represented therapeutic area was oncology (19.9%), followed by neurology (17.1%), and onco-hematology (16.2%). 28.8% of clinical studies enrolled fragile population (children, elderly, pregnant women). Fourty eight studies (43.2%) completed according to protocol, 8 (7.2%) completed with reduced sample size, 18 (16.2%) were prematurely terminated, while 37 of them are still ongoing. In the subgroup of 74 closed studies at least a scientific publication is available for 49 of them. A total of 81 papers are available including two publications related to ongoing studies (range 1-8; mean 1.5; median 1). Cumulative Impact Factor is 619.269 (range for single paper 0.17-34.492). DISCUSSION: A good percentage of clinical studies financed by AIFA were on rare diseases and/or rare tumors. Clinical trials were less likely to complete according to protocol than observational ones, in agreement with literature data; on the other hand once completed, clinical trials were more likely to publish research findings. Overall, 66.2% of closed studies has at least one publication; this percentage is higher if we consider the subgroup of clinical trials and if we consider clinical trials completed according to study protocol (95.3%).

Novel sensitive, specific and rapid pharmacogenomic test for the prediction of abacavir hypersensitivity reaction: HLA-B*57:01 detection by real-time PCR.

AIM: International HIV treatment guidelines recommend HLA-B*57:01 typing before abacavir administration, in order to reduce the incidence of abacavir hypersensitivity reactions, the major cause of early therapy discontinuation. A fast, sensitive and specific test for HLA-B*57:01 detection has been developed in the present study. MATERIALS & METHODS: Two sets of sequence-specific primers were designed, and amplification rapidly detected by real-time PCR. RESULTS: A total of 108 samples were analyzed in a single-blind fashion, and 41 samples were identified as positive. Complete agreement, with κ = 1 (standard error = 0.0962, p < 0.0001), was found, with a validated methodology used in the EPI109367 clinical trial funded by GlaxoSmithKline, and consisting of low-resolution sequence-specific oligonucleotide PCR, followed by high-resolution sequence-specific oligonucleotide PCR carried out on the HLA-B*57-positive samples. CONCLUSION: We provided a detailed characterization of a novel HLA-B*57:01 screening test, which can be easily implemented by those laboratories already involved in the detection of viral load and virus genotyping. Original submitted 26 October 2010; Revision submitted 13 December 2010.