Bone consolidation under septic condition and hardware retention: about 69 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Management of infection on internal fixation hardware is particularly complex. The main aim of the present study was to assess bone consolidation rates under septic conditions in patients treated for bone and joint infection (BJI) with hardware retention. Secondary objectives were to determine a time limit beyond which it is unreasonable to retain hardware, and to assess risk factors for non-consolidation and functional results. The study hypothesis was that bone consolidation is possible under septic conditions without hardware exchange. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted on 69 patients for the period January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2019. We included all patients aged over 15 years with infection after internal fixation or fusion whose files had been discussed in the multidisciplinary team meeting during the study period. Bone healing was screened for on X-ray or CT. Study data comprised type of fracture, smoking status, time to treatment for open fracture, initial surgery time, type of hardware, interval between fixation and revision, and type of irrigation. Functional results were assessed at follow-up: walking, pain, return to work and SF12 and QuickDASH scores. RESULTS: The bone healing rate was 73.5% (50/68 patients) at a mean 24 weeks (range, 6-68 weeks). Time to revision did not significantly impact consolidation: 60% for 2 weeks (6/10 cases), 80% for 2-10 weeks (35/40 cases), and 64% for >10 weeks (9/14 cases) (p = 0.28). Smoking, longer initial surgery time and Gustilo type IIIb or IIIc were significant risks factors for non-consolidation. DISCUSSION: Bone consolidation under septic conditions with hardware retention adhering to an established medical and surgical protocol was reliable and straightforward, without extra morbidity. These findings are encouraging, and in line with the literature. We were unable to determine a time limit beyond which hardware prevented healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; descriptive epidemiological study.

Distal radius fractures after 75 years of age: are six-month functional and radiological outcomes better with plate fixation than with conservative treatment?

BACKGROUND: Surgery and non-operative treatment produce similar 1-year functional outcomes in patients older than 65 years. Data are lacking for patients older than 75 years. The main objective of this study was to compare surgical vs. non-operative treatment regarding short-term outcomes in patients older than 75 years. In addition to an overall analysis, sub-group analyses were done in patients with displacement and severe displacement (>20 ° posterior tilt). HYPOTHESIS: Surgery provides better clinical and radiological outcomes than does non-operative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients older than 75 years at the time of a distal radius fracture were included prospectively over a 2-year period. A follow-up duration of at least 6 months was required. Treatment choices were based on displacement, Charlson's Co-morbidity Index, and patient autonomy. Surgery consisted in open fixation using an anterior locking plate and non-operative treatment in a short arm cast without reduction. The main assessment was based on clinical criteria: range of motion, strength, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand tool (QuickDASH), the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The secondary assessment criteria were the radiological outcomes and the complications. RESULTS: 74 patients were included, among whom 24 were treated surgically and 50 non-operatively. At 1.5 months, surgery was associated with significantly better results for flexion, ulnar inclination, and supination, with range increases of at least 7 ° vs. non-operative treatment, and with greater dorsal angle and ulnar variance values (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). At 6 months, pronation and the radio-ulnar index were better with surgery (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). In the patients with displacement or severe displacement, surgery was associated with 10° gains vs. conservative treatment for flexion, ulnar inclination, and supination at 1.5 months (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). DISCUSSION: In patients older than 75 years, surgery for distal radius fracture was associated with significantly better clinical and radiological outcomes within 6 months. Surgery is recommended for displaced and severely displaced distal radius fractures to expedite the recovery of joint motion ranges. Beyond 6 months, the outcomes are similar. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Displaced humeral shaft fractures: Assessment of fracture union and complications following dual plate fixation using an anterior approach.

The humeral bone is subject to torsional forces. In case of displaced shaft fractures, internal fixation remains the standard of care. This retrospective two-center study assessed the fracture union rate and complications after dual 3.5 mm locking compression plate (LCP) fixation using an anterolateral approach. Over a 9-year period, 38 patients underwent surgery in two centers. They had a mean age of 53.7 years (15-97, ± standard deviation (SD) 26) and there were three open fracture cases (7.9 %). The dominant side was affected in 21 cases (55.3 %) and there were 11 polytrauma patients (29 %). Mean operative time was 78 min (40-124, ± 19.8 SD). Patients were treated with dual 3.5 mm LCP fixation (6 screws on either side of the fracture line, anterolateral approach without a tourniquet). The first two orthogonal views showing at least 3 cortical bridges out of 4 determined fracture healing, as assessed by two independent raters. Pre- and postoperative complications were tabulated. Clinical outcomes included range of motion (ROM) and return to activities, while functional outcomes were assessed with the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Constant score, the Subjective Shoulder Score (SSV) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Four patients were given a shoulder immobilizer to wear for 3 weeks; immediate mobilization was the standard of care for the other patients. Fracture union was achieved in all cases within a mean of 11.7 weeks (6-28 ± 7.1 SD) without any heterotopic ossification of the brachialis muscle. There were eight patients with preoperative radial nerve palsy and two cases of postoperative palsy. There was one surgical site infection (2.6 %). Return to work for active patients was possible in 87 % of cases within a mean of 23 weeks (6-72 ± 11 SD). The Constant score was 84.6 (35-100, ± 13.4 SD), the SSV score was 80.7 (60-100, ± 8.2 SD), the DASH score was 13.5 (0-38.3, ± 8.8 SD) and the MEPS score was 85 (55-100, ± 11.9 SD). Traditional fixation methods provide little control over torsional forces, leading to non-union rates between 3 % and 12 % and delayed union (12 to 20 weeks). The simplicity of the technique described here, and the short operative time, may help explain the low infection rate. Dual plate fixation makes it possible to use more screws and allows nerve exploration and decompression in case of preoperative nerve palsy. Dual plate fixation to treat humeral shaft fractures is a simple and reliable technique.

Distal humerus fracture in older patients: ORIF vs. total elbow arthroplasty.

Distal humerus fractures are a contemporary problem because the life expectancy, autonomy and functional demands of older patients continue to grow. This is combined with surgical advances in bone reconstruction, especially in fragile patients. A distal humerus fracture in an older adult is a serious injury with an uncertain prognosis. In fact, damage to the elbow joint in this complex anatomical area overwhelmed by low-quality bone occurs in patients who often have unfavorable characteristics (fragile skin, low physiological reserves, organ failure) combined with pharmaceutical treatments that can be iatrogenic. The treatment indication must not be based solely on the conventional radiographs used for classification purposes; the fracture and bone quality must be analyzed in three dimensions. Also, the surgeon must understand the patient's needs, worries and risks fully to decide between conservative treatment and anatomical locking plate fixation or elbow arthroplasty (hemi or total). In the end, the chosen treatment must allow at least 100̊ and preferably 120̊ of flexion-extension at the elbow. In this age range, the choice between arthroplasty and plate fixation is definitive; the surgical approach must make it possible to carry out either option, with arthroplasty implants available in case the trochlear fracture cannot be plated. The aim of this lecture is to provide a fresh perspective on the anatomy of the distal humerus, its fracture and the best surgical approaches, discuss how to decide on the indication, outline the safest and most reliable ways to reconstruct and stabilize the elbow, and lastly, summarize the expected outcomes and potential complications of each treatment option. Level of evidence: V; expert opinion.

Reproducibility of the Mayo and Schatzker classification systems in proximal ulna fractures.

INTRODUCTION: A fracture classification system should provide a reliable and reproducible means of communication between different parties. It should be logical and understandable, with few categories to memorize. The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of the Schatzker and Mayo classification systems for the assessment of proximal ulna fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intra- and interobserver reliability studies were conducted on 39 X-rays of injured elbows drawn randomly from 74 cases previously used in a series on predictors of ulnohumeral osteoarthritis in proximal ulna fractures. Ten observers independently reviewed these X-rays on 2 separate occasions 3 months apart. The fracture type was assessed according to the Schatzker and Mayo classification systems during each reading session. Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa were used to measure the intra- and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: The Schatzker classification had a fair interobserver reliability for the first (Schatzker R1, Fleiss' κ: 0.394) and second (Schatzker R2, Fleiss' κ: 0.351) readings. The mean intraobserver reliability value between the 10 reviewers for the Schatzker classification was rated as substantial (0.61). The Mayo classification had a fair interobserver reliability for the first (Mayo R1, Fleiss' κ: 0.278) and second (Mayo R2, Fleiss' κ: 0.292) readings. The mean intraobserver reliability value between the 10 reviewers for the Mayo classification was rated as fair (0.52). DISCUSSION: The classification systems for proximal ulna fractures showed poor reproducibility between the different observers since they had low interobserver agreement values. Nevertheless, their use remained reliable since the measured intraobserver agreement value was deemed substantial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective.

Outcomes of Autologous Fat Graft Injection(s) in Treating Sequelae of Digital Trauma: A Case Series.

Background: Sequelae of digital trauma, such as painful scars adherent to tendons and bones, pain of neural origin, cold intolerance, skin and pulp atrophy, occur frequently. Autologous fat graft injections is an interesting option to treat these sequelae. The aim of this study is to describe the outcomes of autologous fat graft injections to treat sequelae of digital trauma. Methods: This retrospective study included all adult patients with digital trauma who underwent an autologous fat grafting procedure at our hospital between 2015 and 2019. The procedure was done at least 6 months after the initial trauma. Outcomes were assessed at least 9 months after the injection and included 2-point epicritic discrimination by Weber test (2-PD) and pulp circumference of the affected finger compared with the contralateral finger, a satisfaction questionnaire concerning the improvement of symptoms, aesthetic aspects and pain related to the operation, evaluation of pain by visual analogue scale, quality of life by SF-36 score and quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) score. We also assessed whether the patients had reintegrated a previously excluded finger. Results: The study included 14 patients. All patients received one session except for one patient who received two sessions. The average 2-PD of the injured finger was 7 mm compared to 3.57 mm for the contralateral finger. There was no difference in pulp circumference between the treated and contralateral fingers. The mean satisfaction score for symptom improvement and aesthetic improvement was 3.36/5, and the mean score for procedure-related pain was 2.36/5. The mean VAS of the patients was 2.91/10, the mean SF-36 was 60.42/100 and the mean QuickDASH was 40.09/100. Five of the nine patients who had a previously excluded finger were able to reintegrate it. Conclusions: Autologous fat transfer seems to offer some benefit in patients with adherent scars and pulp atrophy. It has little effect on neuropathic pain. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Treatment of scaphoid nonunion by arthroscopic cancellous bone grafting.

INTRODUCTION: In order to avoid Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse (SNAC) type osteoarthritis, which progressively affects the radial and midcarpal joints, several vascularized and non-vascularized grafting techniques have been described. Over the past decade, there has been growing interest in arthroscopic cancellous bone grafts for scaphoid nonunion. The aim of this novel prospective study was to assess the healing rate of scaphoid grafts under arthroscopy, and the prognostic factors for healing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study was carried out across 10 centers between September 2019 and April 2021, in patients aged 16 to 65. Scaphoid nonunion grafting was performed arthroscopically. Union was assessed on CT scans and displacement correction angles were measured preoperatively and then at 3 and 6months. We assessed mobility, Jamar wrist strength, functional results as per the Patient Related Wrist Score (PRWE) and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH) score. Risk factors for nonunion were assessed. RESULTS: We included 77 patients with a mean age of 24years (18 to 55years) with a mean time between trauma and treatment of nonunion of 34.8months (6 to 180months). The population was represented by 46 manual workers and 20 were smokers. In 42 cases, the nonunion was proximal, in Schernberg zone I or II. At the last follow-up of 12.9months on average (Standard Deviation: 8.7months), union was achieved in 72 patients (93.5%). The average duration of union was 3.4months (Standard Deviation 1.6). Among the 5 patients who did not heal, grafting was performed in addition to the fixation. We did not identify any contributory factors for nonunion. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the effectiveness of arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunion with a union rate at least equivalent to pedicled vascularized grafts. Smoking and delayed treatment were no longer considered unfavorable prognostic factors in the context of arthroscopic treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Should the artery be trimmed before anastomosis in every finger replantation/revascularization case? Prospective, single-center, multidisciplinary study over 46 months.

INTRODUCTION: Despite optimal arterial anastomosis, some finger replantations fail. Our objective was to evaluate how the mechanism of injury (MOI) affects the artery's microscopic appearance and the success of anastomosis. We hypothesized that the MOI influences arterial histology and microsurgical success. METHODS: This single-center prospective study enrolled patients who had an acute traumatic arterial injury of the hand and/or wrist. The proximal and distal ends of the artery were trimmed before anastomosis in every case. The arterial margins were analyzed in anatomical pathology. Clinical follow-up along with an ultrasound arterial patency check was carried out at 1 month postoperative. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2022, 104 patients were enrolled with a follow-up of 12 months. Macroscopically, 42% of the arterial margins were dilapidated. Histological analysis found damage in 74% of surgical specimens: blast (100%)>laceration by mechanical or power tool (92%; 82%)>amputation by mechanical or power tool (80%; 67%)>laceration by glass (50%)>crush injury (33%). The arterial margins were more likely to be normal based on the histological analysis when the MOI was laceration by glass (p<.05; OR=3.72) and the patient was 65 years or older (p<.01). Risk factors for anastomosis failure were an amputation by power tool (p<.01, OR 8.19) and shorter length of arterial resection (p<.02). The clinical failure rate was 7.8% and the patency failure rate was 10.4%. DISCUSSION: Histological arterial lesions correlate with the MOI. Trimming >2mm from the proximal and distal arterial ends is recommended for all MOI before arterial end-to-end anastomosis. For blast injuries or amputation, we recommend trimming>4mm and using a vein bypass graft. This study's findings could lead to a change in surgical practices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II; well-conducted non-randomized comparative study; recommendation grade B: scientific presumption.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of the hand from biplanar X-rays: Assessment of accuracy and reliability.

BACKGROUND: Functional disorders of the hand are generally investigated first using conventional radiographic imaging. However, X-rays (two-dimensional (2D)) provide limited information and the information may be reduced by overlapping bones and projection bias. This work presents a three-dimensional (3D) hand reconstruction method from biplanar X-rays. METHOD: This approach consists of the deformation of a generic hand model on biplanar X-rays by manual and automatic processes. The reference examination being the manual CT segmentation, the precision of the method was evaluated by a comparison between the reconstructions from biplanar X-rays and the corresponding reconstructions from the CT scan (0.3mm section thickness). To assess the reproducibility of the method, 6 healthy hands (6 subjects, 3 left, 3 men) were considered. Two operators repeated each reconstruction from biplanar X-rays three times to study inter- and intra-operator variability. Three anatomical parameters that could be calculated automatically from the reconstructions were considered from the bone surfaces: the length of the scaphoid, the depth of the distal end of the radius and the height of the trapezius. RESULTS: Double the root mean square error (2 Root Mean Square, 2RMS) at the point/area difference between biplanar X-rays and computed tomography reconstructions ranged from 0.46mm for the distal phalanges to 1.55mm for the bones of the distal carpals. The inter-intra-observer variability showed precision with a 95% confidence interval of less than 1.32mm for the anatomical parameters, and 2.12mm for the bone centroids. DISCUSSION: The current method allows to obtain an accurate 3D reconstruction of the hand and wrist compared to the traditional segmented CT scan. By improving the automation of the method, objective information about the position of the bones in space could be obtained quickly. The value of this method lies in the early diagnosis of certain ligament pathologies (carpal instability) and it also has implications for surgical planning and personalized finite element modeling. LEVEL OF PROOF: Basic sciences.

Acromioclavicular joint separation: Retrospective study of non-operative and surgical treatment in 38 patients with grade III or higher injuries and a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

INTRODUCTION: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation is a common shoulder injury. When the injury is graded as type III or higher in the Rockwood classification, surgical treatment can be proposed. However, an increasing number of practitioners are shifting back to conservative treatment as it is associated with fewer complications and seemingly close functional outcomes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the functional recovery of operated and non-operated patients with grade III or higher AC joint injuries. Secondarily, the reliability and relevance of the Rockwood classification was evaluated within and between raters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We did a retrospective two-center study of 38 patients treated between 2014 and 2020. The clinical evaluation involved various functional outcome scores (Constant, QuickDASH, ASES, UCLA, SSV, STT) and a pain assessment (VAS). Return to sports and to work was also documented. The radiological evaluation consisted of Zanca AP and lateral axillary views immediately after the injury and at each radiographic follow-up visit until the final visit. An intra- and inter-rater analysis was also done for the Rockwood classification. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the functional scores (Constant score surgery group=91, nonoperative group=83; p=0.09) or the pain on VAS at the final assessment. Return to work and to sports was significantly faster in patients treated non-operatively. No complication was found in the non-operated patients, while nine of the operated patients suffered a complication. The inter-rater reliability of the Rockwood classification was found to be poor (kappa=0.08) to fair (kappa=0.35), while the intra-rater reliability was moderate (kappa=0.6) to good (kappa=0.63). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: No matter which treatment is used, the functional outcomes and patient satisfaction level a minimum of 1 year after the injury appear to be identical. Thus, surgery should be only for patients whose AC joint is painful 7 days after the injury (VAS>7) and whose function has not improved. For young and athletic patients or for patients who simply want to regain nearly normal function, it is important to remember that the time to return to work and sports is longer with surgical management and to take into consideration the potential postoperative complications. While none of the patients who received the non-operative treatment required a secondary stabilizing surgery, this is a possible recourse. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The impact of COVID-19 on hand surgery: A French retrospective comparative study in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 hand trauma centers.

INTRODUCTION: In 2020, the pandemic divided France into two zones: COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. The main objective of our study was to compare the variability of surgical and emergency consultation activity amongst two hand trauma centers, between the pandemic period and outside the pandemic period. The secondary objective was to identify at-risk patients in order to develop preventative strategies in hand trauma. METHODS: This bi-centric retrospective study considered the epidemiology of admissions to trauma centers during the first French lockdown. The data were compared to the same period in 2019 (control group). Two thousand and fifty-five patients underwent consultations for hand or wrist trauma. RESULTS: The first French lockdown was associated with a 35% decrease in hand and wrist injuries in the COVID-19 zone versus 24% in the non-COVID-19 zone, compared to the same period in 2019 (p<0.0001, 95% CI: 6.5-15.6). Comparing 2019 and 2020, the incidence of wounds significantly increased in the COVID-19 zone (58% vs. 78%, p<0.0001) and significantly decreased in the non-COVID-19 zone (55% vs. 50%, p<0.0001). Complex wounds (16% vs. 35%, p<0.0001 and 15% vs. 17%, p<0.0001) and open fractures (8% vs. 14%, p=0.019 and 4.5% vs. 5.3%, p<0.0001) significantly increased in both zones during the pandemic. The rate of male, non-manual workers injured in domestic accidents (76% vs. 36%, p<0.0001) was significantly increased in all areas. CONCLUSION: Hand and wrist trauma was less frequent but more severe during the pandemic compared to the same period in 2019. By encouraging the public to be aware of the risks and the means to avoid trauma, such as better information and compliance with safety instructions, we could minimize these risks. This data can be useful in planning preventative strategies for future lockdowns. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case-control study.

Has the COVID lockdown altered the incidence and management of fragility fractures in older adults? Case-control study at a French University Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: In France, a national lockdown related to the COVID-19 pandemic was imposed from March 17 to May 11, 2020, drastically changing our professional and organizational practices. We were interested on the impact of the lockdown on fragility fractures in older adults (65 years and older). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of peripheral and pelvic fragility fractures during the lockdown. The secondary objectives were to carry out an epidemiological analysis of the fractures, treatments and hospitalization data. HYPOTHESIS: The main hypothesis was that the number of peripheral and pelvic fragility fractures was lower during the lockdown in 2020 than in the same (non-lockdown) period in 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected epidemiological (age, sex), clinical (type of fracture, treatment) and hospitalization data from patients 65 years and older who came to the emergency room because of a peripheral and/or pelvic fracture between March 17 and May 11 of the years 2019 and 2020. RESULTS: We included 192 patients in 2019 and 157 patients in 2020. The mean age and sex ratio were not statistically different. The number of peripheral and/or pelvic fragility fractures decreased by 16%. The share of patients treated surgically was similar in both years (46% in 2019; 51% in 2020 (p=0.47)). The number of proximal femur fractures dropped by 21%. The mean time to surgery for these fractures was shorter in 2020 (p=0.02) although the mean length of hospital stay was unchanged (p=0.72) The mortality rate of patients hospitalized for fragility fractures did not increase significantly (p=0.51). DISCUSSION: We observed a reduction in the number of peripheral and pelvic fragility fractures in patients 65 years and older during the lockdown. To ensure that we met our goals of optimal care for proximal femur fractures, a general reorganization of the operating room was necessary. The continued availability of fully functional technical facilities despite this health crisis was crucial to being able to treat these fractures and to prevent increased mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case-control study.

Intra- and Inter-rater Reliability of Postoperative Radiographic Analysis of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in 49 Shoulders After Proximal Humerus Fracture.

Introduction: The lateralization shoulder angle (LSA), the distalization shoulder angle (DSA) and the new "pentagon" concept are tools used in scheduled shoulder surgery to evaluate the positioning of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) implants. There is no information on the intra- and inter-rater reliability of these tools in the context of RSA for a proximal humerus fracture. The first hypothesis was the high reliability of the intra- and inter-rater analysis of the LSA and DSA angles. The second hypothesis was the reproductibility of the pentagon based on LSA and DSA analysis. Methods: Forty-nine patients were evaluated retrospectively with a minimum of 2 years radiological follow-up after RSA surgery. Tuberosity healing was evaluated using an AP radiograph of the shoulder and their location analyzed within the said "pentagon" defined by the LSA/DSA angles and the maximum lengthening recommended. Results: The intra-rater analysis found strong to an almost perfect agreement for the LSA and DSA. The agreement was moderate to strong for the pentagon. The inter-rater analysis found a fair agreement for the LSA and moderate agreement for the DSA and pentagon. Conclusion: The LSA/DSA is used in patients undergoing RSA for glenohumeral OA. In this context, the tuberosities were intact and certain complications inherent to RSA for humeral fracture were not present. The population studied here (RSA after fracture) creates an interpretation bias due to the difficulty in analyzing tuberosity position. Level of Evidence: 4, retrospective study.

Assessment of intraoperative bleeding in reverse shoulder arthroplasty - with or without a stem.

INTRODUCTION: The functional results of stemless reverse shoulder prostheses are similar to those with stems. However, the operative time and the bleeding appear less significant because of the absence of humeral reaming. To date, the data amongst the literature regarding this subject is limited. Thus, we report a retrospective evaluation on these 2 types of prostheses by assessing their respective intraoperative blood loss. HYPOTHESIS: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty without a stem leads to less blood loss, compared to arthroplasty with a stem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients underwent an operation for a stemless prosthesis, while 37 patients had a prosthesis with a stem. The hemoglobin was measured preoperatively, as well as postoperatively. Drainage of the operative site was maintained for two to three days. In the stem group, the preoperative hemoglobin was 14g/dL (11.7-16.6), while it was 13.1g/dL (11-15.8) in the stemless group. RESULTS: The intraoperative bleeding reached 223cm3 (80-530), with an operative duration of 81minutes (40-110) in the stemless group, compared to 260cm3 (50-1000) and 92minutes (33-110) in the stem group. On the first day postoperatively, 333cm3 (20-570) of blood had been collected by drainage for the stemless group, compared to 279cm3 (40-550) in the stem group. The amount decreased the second day, with 139cm3 (20-510) and 129cm3 (0-750) respectively. There was no difference between the two groups regarding the postoperative hemoglobin level (11g/dL). DISCUSSION: There is no significant difference concerning the blood loss between reverse shoulder replacements with and without stems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Retrospective case control study.

The Dorsal Ligament Complex: A Cadaveric, Histology, and Imaging Study.

PURPOSE: The distinction between the dorsal intercarpal (DIC) and dorsal scaphotriquetral (DST) ligaments is imprecise and unclear in the literature. The purpose of our cadaveric study was to define the origins, insertions, and anatomic relationships of the dorsal wrist ligaments and relate these anatomic findings to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and histology. METHODS: The study included 17 unmatched fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens (7 male and 10 female), with a mean age of 67.1 years (range, 48-86 years). Wrists with arthritis or carpal malalignment were excluded. Ligaments were dissected and insertion sites were recorded in the radioulnar (width) and proximodistal (length) dimensions, centered at the midpoints of the insertion. Three cadaveric specimens underwent a histologic analysis to demonstrate ligament composition and insertion sites. Three additional cadavers underwent MRI, from which 3-dimensional models were built to model ligament topography. RESULTS: The conjoined triquetral insertion of the DIC, DST, and dorsal radiocarpal (DRC) measured 88.5 ± 6.4 mm2. In each specimen, there were 2 distinct deep and superficial components of intercarpal fibers. The deep component inserted on the lunate with an area of 59.0 ± 5.0 mm2. The deep and superficial components diverged as they coursed radially. The superficial component proceeded to the scaphoid ridge, trapezium, and trapezoid, whereas the deep component inserted on the proximal row. The deep fibers blended distally from their lunate insertion with the DST, forming a robust, 2.9 ± 0.8-mm wide extension over the dorsal capitate. The DRC inserted on the lunate, proximal to the DIC and DST insertions, with an area of 23.9 ± 5.4 mm2. CONCLUSIONS: The dorsal ligament complex forms a firm link across the proximal carpal row and the DST provides extension of the proximal row over the capitate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This information can guide surgeons while performing a dorsal approach to the wrist and repairing traumatic ligament disruption.

Traumatic Nondissociative Carpal Instability: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: We report 8 cases of acute or subacute unilateral nondissociative carpal instability (CIND) in the context of nondisplaced scaphoid fractures. METHODS: Eight patients from 3 centers developed abnormal volar intercalated segment instability (VISI) or dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI) following the diagnosis of a nondisplaced scaphoid fracture. An operative inspection in each patient confirmed intact scapholunate and lunotriquetral interosseous ligaments. We outline the demographic characteristics of our patient cohort, radiologic and operative findings of CIND-DISI and CIND-VISI, and the outcomes of acute and delayed treatment. RESULTS: Two patients were diagnosed with CIND-DISI and 6 with CIND-VISI associated with ipsilateral nondisplaced scaphoid fractures. The average time from injury to diagnosis of CIND was 11 weeks, and the mean clinical and radiographic follow-up was 18 months. Rapid healing of the scaphoid fractures was achieved in all patients (4 open reduction internal fixation, 4 cast). All patients underwent surgery to improve proximal carpal row alignment: in 3 of the 4 patients who were diagnosed and treated surgically within 12 weeks of injury, the radiolunate angle (RLA) was successfully restored. A contracture release and ligament repair or reconstruction with tendon graft 12 or more weeks following injury was unsuccessful in restoring proximal row alignment in all 4 patients. Two patients in the delayed treatment group required secondary surgery for partial fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the arthroscopic, imaging, and operative findings, we propose that the ligamentous restraints to CIND-VISI are dorsal at the radiocarpal joint and volar at the midcarpal joint. Conversely, the ligamentous restraints to CIND-DISI are dorsal at the midcarpal joint and volar at both the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints. In our series, a delayed diagnosis and late reconstructive surgery were associated with no improvement in RLA. We recommend early recognition of traumatic CIND and prompt treatment of injured ligaments prior to the development of a fixed deformity. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Is the Dorsal Fiber-Splitting Approach to the Wrist Safe? A Kinematic Analysis and Introduction of the "Window" Approach.

PURPOSE: To compare the kinematic effects of the dorsal fiber-splitting approach for scapholunate ligament repair to a dorsal "window" approach that spares all ligaments. METHODS: We randomized 24 fresh-frozen paired cadaveric forearms to either the dorsal fiber-splitting capsulotomy approach (FSC) or the dorsal window approach (window) following scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) division. Loaded fluoroscopic radiographs were obtained after each of the 4 testing conditions following cyclic loading (200 cycles; 71 N): (1) intact SLIL, (2) SLIL-division, (3) surgical approach, and (4) closure. FSC specimens were randomly allocated to 2 subgroups for closure with either a suture anchor (n = 6) or a simple running suture closure (n = 6). Radiographic parameter measurements included the scapholunate gap, radiolunate angle, scapholunate angle, and dorsal scaphoid translation. RESULTS: Following the FSC, there were significant alterations in all radiographic parameters when compared with the intact and SLIL-division conditions. The window approach did not result in significant changes in any radiographic parameter. When compared to the window approach, all radiographic parameters of the FSC approach were significantly altered. Following closure with suture anchors in the FSC group, radiographic parameters improved, whereas with standard closure they failed to do so. Despite anchor closure, dorsal scaphoid translation, radiolunate angle, and scapholunate angle all remained elevated compared with scapholunate-divided wrists. CONCLUSIONS: The FSC produced significant changes in carpal posture under load, including scapholunate diastasis, dorsal intercalated segment instability, and dorsal scaphoid translation in SLIL-deficient wrists. The window approach preserved the critical dorsal ligament stabilizers and did not produce changes in carpal posture. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The FSC may create iatrogenic changes in carpal posture that cannot be fully corrected with standard or anchor closure. The window approach does not alter carpal posture and should be considered when performing surgical procedures on the scaphoid or lunate.