Long term recovery of right ventricular function after treatment of intermediate and high risk pulmonary emboli.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and significant source of mortality and morbidity worldwide. A subset of patients with PE, particularly those who have intermediate and high risk events, are at increased risk for long-term right ventricular (RV) dysfunction; however, the impact of novel advanced therapies used for acute PE, including catheter-directed intervention, on long-term RV function remains uncertain. We sought to determine whether use of advanced therapies (catheter-directed intervention or systemic thrombolysis) is associated with improved long-term RV function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, single-center cohort study of adult (≥18 year old) patients admitted and discharged alive with a diagnosis of acute PE, who fell under the category of intermediate or high risk, with available follow-up echocardiograms at least 6 months after the index, seen at a single quaternary referral center in Los Angeles, CA between 2012 and 2021. RESULTS: There were 113 patients in this study (58 (51.3 %) treated with anticoagulation alone, 12 (10.6 %) treated with systemic thrombolysis, and 43 (38.1 %) treated with catheter-directed intervention), with approximately equal gender and racial distribution. Patients treated with advanced therapies were significantly more likely to have moderate-severe RV dysfunction (100 % for those treated with thrombolysis, 88.3 % for those treated with catheter-directed intervention, vs 55.2 % for those treated with anticoagulation alone; p < 0.001). At a follow-up of about 1.5 years, patients treated with advanced therapy (systemic thrombolysis or catheter-directed intervention) were more likely to have normalization of RV function (93-100 % vs 81 % for anticoagulation alone, p = 0.04). The subgroup of patients with intermediate-risk PE was significantly more likely to have normalization of RV function (95.6 % vs 80.4 % for anticoagulation alone, p = 0.03). Use of advanced therapy was not associated with substantial short-term adverse events among patients who survived to hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Patients with intermediate and high risk PE were more likely to have recovery in RV function long-term if treated with catheter-directed intervention or systemic thrombolysis, as compared to anticoagulation alone, without substantial safety issues, despite having worse RV function at baseline. Further data is needed to verify this observation.

Total parenteral nutrition pleural effusion after peripherally inserted central venous catheter insertion despite fluoroscopic confirmation.

Peripherally inserted central catheters are frequently used for durable central venous access for nutrition. Depending on the medical and surgical history, there are times when a person's vasculature has become scarred or stenotic due to multiple previous vascular devices, catheters, or pacemaker/defibrillator leads, that causes placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter challenging. Choosing the correct catheter and approach must be weighed against invasiveness of the procedure as unforeseen complications can arise. When pleural effusions quickly accumulate after placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter despite using confirmatory image guidance, delayed complications must be thought of, and offending medications and catheter should be removed in a timely fashion to avoid further morbidity and mortality.

Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to hypoxemic respiratory failure resulting in prolonged mechanical ventilation. Typically, tracheostomy is considered in patients who remain ventilator dependent beyond 2 weeks. However, in the setting of this novel respiratory virus, the safety and benefits of tracheostomy are not well-defined. Our aim is to describe our experience with percutaneous tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single center retrospective descriptive study. We reviewed comorbidities and outcomes in patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19 who underwent percutaneous tracheostomy at our institution from April 2020 to September 2020. In addition, we provide details of our attempt to minimize aerosolization by using a modified protocol with brief periods of planned apnea. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients underwent percutaneous tracheostomy during the study. The average body mass index was 33.0±10.0. At 30 days posttracheostomy 17 (71%) patients still had the tracheostomy tube and 14 (58%) remained ventilator dependent. There were 3 (13%) who died within 30 days. At the time of data analysis in November 2020, 9 (38%) patients had died and 7 (29%) had been decannulated. None of the providers who participated in the procedure experienced signs or symptoms of COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous tracheostomy in prolonged respiratory failure due to COVID-19 appears to be safe to perform at the bedside for both the patient and health care providers in the appropriate clinical context. Morbid obesity did not limit the ability to perform percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients.

Ventilatory Support in Patients with COVID-19.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which spread throughout the world. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is the most dangerous complication of COVID-19 pneumonia. To date, no specific therapeutic drugs or vaccines have been proven efficacious. Ventilatory support is still a significant challenge for physicians facing COVID-19. The mechanisms underlying hypoxemia in those patients are not fully understood, but a new physiopathology model has been proposed. Oxygen therapy should be delivered to patients with mild to moderate hypoxemia. More severe patients could benefit from other treatments (high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation or intubation, and invasive ventilation). Given the rapid evolution of COVID-19, there has been a paucity of the high-quality data that typically inform clinical practice guidelines from professional societies, and a worldwide consensus is still lacking. This chapter aims to illustrate the potentials of ventilatory support as therapeutic options for adult and pediatric patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia.