Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Severe Maternal Morbidity from Pregnancy through 1-year Postpartum.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies examining racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) have mainly focused on intrapartum hospitalization. There is limited information regarding the racial and ethnic distribution of SMM occurring in the antepartum and postpartum periods, including SMM occurring beyond the traditional 6 weeks postpartum period. OBJECTIVE: To examine the racial and ethnic distribution of SMM during antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum hospitalizations through 1-year postpartum, overall and stratified by maternal sociodemographic factors, and to estimate the percent increase in SMM by race and ethnicity and maternal sociodemographic factors within each racial and ethnic group after accounting for both antepartum and postpartum SMM through 1-year postpartum rather than just SMM occurring during the intrapartum hospitalization. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using birth and fetal death certificate data linked to hospital discharge records from Michigan, Oregon, and South Carolina from 2008-2020. We examined the distribution of non-transfusion SMM and total SMM per 10,000 cases during antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum hospitalizations through 365 days postpartum by race and ethnicity and by maternal education and insurance type within each racial and ethnic group. We subsequently examined "SMM cases added" by race and ethnicity and by maternal education and insurance type within each racial and ethnic group. The "SMM cases added" represent cases among unique individuals that are identified by considering the antepartum and postpartum periods but that would be missed if only the intrapartum hospitalization cases were included. RESULTS: Among 2,584,206 birthing individuals, a total of 37,112 (1.4%) individuals experienced non-transfusion SMM and 64,661 (2.5%) experienced any SMM during antepartum, intrapartum, and/or postpartum hospitalization. Black individuals had the highest rate of antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum non-transfusion and total SMM followed by American Indian individuals. Asian individuals had the lowest rate of non-transfusion and total SMM during antepartum and postpartum hospitalizations while White individuals had the lowest rate of non-transfusion and total SMM during the intrapartum hospitalization. Black individuals were 1.9 times more likely to experience non-transfusion SMM during the intrapartum hospitalization than White individuals, which increased to 2.8 times during the antepartum period and to 2.5 times during the postpartum period. Asian and Hispanic individuals were less likely to experience SMM in the postpartum period than White individuals. Including antepartum and postpartum hospitalizations resulted in disproportionately more cases among Black and American Indian individuals than among White, Hispanic, and Asian individuals. The additional cases were also more likely to occur among individuals with lower educational levels and individuals on government insurance. CONCLUSION: Racial disparities in SMM are underreported in estimates that focus on the intrapartum hospitalization. Additionally, individuals with low socio-economic status bear the greatest burden of SMM occurring during the antepartum and postpartum periods. Approaches that focus on mitigating SMM during the intrapartum period only do not address the full spectrum of health disparities.

Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Antenatal Steroid Use among Late Preterm Births.

In 2016, the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroid (ALPS) Trial demonstrated the benefit of antenatal steroids in reducing respiratory morbidity among late preterm singleton births ("LPB," 34-36 weeks of gestation).1 Prior studies have shown that this trial and its dissemination resulted in increased steroid use in the late preterm period; however, adoption was not uniform, with regional variation noted throughout the US.2-4 As the risk of preterm birth is known to vary widely by maternal characteristics and providers are encouraged to engage in shared decision-making around its use,5,6 we aimed to determine if antenatal steroid exposure among LPBs also varied based on sociodemographic characteristics.

Hospital Quality Indicators for Opioid-Exposed Infants: Results From an Expert Consensus Panel.

OBJECTIVE: To elicit expert consensus on quality indicators for the hospital-based care of opioid-exposed infants. METHODS: We used the ExpertLens online platform to conduct a 3-round modified Delphi panel. Expert panelists included health care providers, parents in recovery, quality experts, and public health experts. We identified 49 candidate quality indicators from a literature review and environmental scan. A total of 32 experts rated the importance and feasibility of the indicators using a 9-point Likert scale (Round 1), reviewed and discussed the initial ratings (round 2), and revised their original ratings (Round 3). Numeric scores corresponded with descriptive ratings of "low" (1-3), "uncertain" (4-6), or "high" (7-9). We measured consensus using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. RESULTS: Candidate quality indicators assessed structures, processes, and outcomes in multiple domains of clinical care. After the final round, 36 indicators were rated "high" on importance and feasibility. Experts had strong consensus on the importance of quality indicators to assess universal screening of pregnant people for substance use disorder, hospital staff training, standardized assessment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, nonpharmacologic interventions, and transitions of care. For indicators focused on processes and outcomes, experts saw feasibility as dependent on the information routinely documented in electronic medical records or billing records. To present a more complete picture of hospital quality, experts suggested development of composite measures that summarize quality across multiple indicators. CONCLUSIONS: A panel of experts reached consensus on a range of quality indicators for hospital-based care of opioid-exposed infants, with potential for use in national benchmarking, intervention studies, or hospital performance measurement.

Severe maternal morbidity from pregnancy through 1 year postpartum.

BACKGROUND: Few recent studies have examined the rate of severe maternal morbidity occurring during the antenatal and/or postpartum period to 42 days after delivery. However, little is known about the rate of severe maternal morbidity occurring beyond 42 days after delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the distribution of severe maternal morbidity and its indicators during antenatal, delivery, and postpartum hospitalizations to 365 days after delivery and to estimate the increase in severe maternal morbidity rate and its indicators after accounting for antenatal and postpartum severe maternal morbidity to 365 days after delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using birth and fetal death certificate data linked to hospital discharge records from Michigan, Oregon, and South Carolina from 2008 to 2020. This study examined the distribution of severe maternal morbidity, nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity, and severe maternal morbidity indicators during antenatal, delivery, and postpartum hospitalizations to 365 days after delivery. Subsequently, this study examined "severe maternal morbidity cases added," which represent cases among unique individuals that are included by considering the antenatal and postpartum periods but that would be missed if only the delivery hospitalization cases were included. RESULTS: A total of 64,661 (2.5%) individuals experienced severe maternal morbidity, whereas 37,112 (1.4%) individuals experienced nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity during antenatal, delivery, and/or postpartum hospitalization. A total of 31% of severe maternal morbidity cases were added after accounting for severe maternal morbidity occurring during the antenatal or postpartum hospitalization to 365 days after delivery, whereas 49% of nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity cases were added after accounting for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity occurring during the antenatal or postpartum periods. Severe maternal morbidity occurring between 43 and 365 days after delivery contributed to 12% of all severe maternal morbidity cases, whereas nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity occurring between 43 and 365 days after delivery contributed to 19% of all nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity cases. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that a total of 31% of severe maternal morbidity and 49% of nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity cases were added after accounting for severe maternal morbidity occurring during the antenatal or postpartum hospitalization to 365 days after delivery. Our findings highlight the importance of expanding the severe maternal morbidity definition beyond the delivery hospitalization to better capture the full period of increased risk, identify contributing factors, and design strategies to mitigate this risk. Only then can we improve outcomes for mothers and subsequently the quality of life of their infants.

Preterm Birth Risk and Maternal Nativity, Ethnicity, and Race.

Importance: Immigrant birthing people have lower rates of preterm birth compared with their US-born counterparts. This advantage and associated racial and ethnic disparities across the gestational age spectrum have not been examined nationally. Objective: To examine associations of maternal nativity, ethnicity, and race with preterm birth. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used birth certificates from the National Vital Statistics System to analyze in-hospital liveborn singleton births in the US between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018. Data were analyzed from January to June 2023. Exposure: Mutually exclusive nativity, ethnicity, and race subgroups were constructed using nativity (defined as US-born or non-US-born), ethnicity (defined as Hispanic or non-Hispanic), and race (defined as American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, White, or other [individuals who selected other race or more than 1 race]). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of interest was preterm birth. Modified Poisson and multinomial logistic regression models quantified relative risk (RR) of preterm birth overall (<37 weeks' gestation) and by gestational category (late preterm: 34-36 weeks' gestation; moderately preterm: 29-33 weeks' gestation; and extremely preterm: <29 weeks' gestation) for each maternal nativity, ethnicity, and race subgroup compared with the largest group, US-born non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White) birthing people. The RR of preterm birth overall and by category was also measured within each racial and ethnic group by nativity. Models were adjusted for maternal demographic and medical covariates, birth year, and birth state. Results: A total of 34 468 901 singleton live births of birthing people were analyzed, with a mean (SD) age at delivery of 28 (6) years. All nativity, ethnicity, and race subgroups had an increased adjusted risk of preterm birth compared with US-born White birthing people except for non-US-born White (adjusted RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.84-0.86) and Hispanic (adjusted RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.98) birthing people. All racially and ethnically minoritized groups had increased adjusted risks of extremely preterm birth compared with US-born White birthing people. Non-US-born individuals had a decreased risk of preterm birth within each subgroup except non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander individuals, in which immigrants had significantly increased risk of overall (adjusted RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14), moderately (adjusted RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.92-1.30), and late (adjusted RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22) preterm birth than their US-born counterparts. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest heterogeneity of preterm birth across maternal nativity, ethnicity, and race and gestational age categories. Understanding these patterns could aid the design of targeted preterm birth interventions and policies, especially for birthing people typically underrepresented in research.

The impact of volume and neonatal level of care on outcomes of moderate and late preterm infants.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the relationship of neonatal unit level of care (LOC) and volume with mortality or morbidity in moderate-late preterm (MLP) (32-36 weeks' gestation) infants. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 650,865 inborn MLP infants in 4976 hospitals-years using 2003-2015 linked administrative data from 4 states. Exposure was combined neonatal LOC and MLP annual volume. The primary outcome was death or morbidity (respiratory distress syndrome, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, infection, pneumothorax, extreme length of stay) with components as secondary outcomes. Poisson regression models adjusted for patient characteristics with a random effect for unit were used. RESULTS: In adjusted models, high-volume level 2 units had a lower risk of the primary outcome compared to low-volume level 3 units (aIRR 0.90 [95% CI 0.83-0.98] vs. aIRR 1.13 [95% CI 1.03-1.24], p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: MLP infants had improved outcomes in high-volume level 2 units compared to low-volume level 3 units in adjusted analysis.

Validity of Birth Certificate Data Compared With Hospital Discharge Data in Reporting Maternal Morbidity and Disparities.

A growing number of studies are using birth certificate data, despite data-quality concerns, to study maternal morbidity and associated disparities. We examined whether conclusions about the incidence of maternal morbidity, including Black-White disparities, differ between birth certificate data and hospitalization data. Using linked birth certificate and hospitalization data from California and Michigan for 2018 (N=543,469), we found that maternal morbidity measures using birth certificate data alone are substantially underreported and have poor validity. Furthermore, the degree of underreporting in birth certificate data differs between Black and White individuals and results in erroneous inferences about disparities. Overall, Black-White disparities were more modest in the birth certificate data compared with the hospitalization data. Birth certificate data alone are inadequate for studies of maternal morbidity and associated racial disparities.

Communication and Birth Experiences Among Black Birthing People Who Experienced Preterm Birth.

PURPOSE: Physically or psychologically distressing birth experiences can influence postpartum health, parenting efficacy, and future pregnancy plans. Communication deficits contribute to negative birth experiences. This qualitative analysis explored themes related to communication and negative birth experiences among Black birthing people who experienced preterm birth. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with non-Hispanic Black, English language-proficient birthing people with Medicaid-insured preterm infants. Interviews were designed to explore experiences with health care access and well-being after birth. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded following an integrated approach where we applied a priori codes and captured emergent themes from the data. RESULTS: We interviewed 30 participants from October 2018 to July 2021. Median gestational age at birth was 30 weeks (range 22-36 weeks). Interviews occurred a median of 7 months postpartum (range 2-34 months). Themes emerged related to negative birth experiences and communication: (1) communication gaps during urgent or emergent intrapartum procedures contributed to negative birth experiences; (2) postpartum opportunities to share birth experiences, particularly with peers, sometimes mitigated the psychological consequences of negative birth experiences; (3) participants did not consistently discuss concerns about future pregnancy risk related to negative birth experiences with clinical teams. CONCLUSIONS: Themes from this sample of Black birthing people who experienced preterm birth suggest 3 ways health systems might intervene to improve communication to mitigate the consequences of negative birth experiences. Improvement efforts in these areas may improve postpartum health, future pregnancy outcomes, and long-term health.

Regional Variation in Antenatal Late Preterm Steroid Use Following the ALPS Trial.

Importance: The publication of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids (ALPS) trial in February 2016 demonstrated that antenatal administration of betamethasone in the late preterm period (between 34 to 36 weeks of gestation) for individuals with a high risk of delivery decreased neonatal respiratory morbidity. National estimates have suggested the trial did change obstetric practice, but little is known if the evidence was adopted uniformly or equitably. Objective: To assess regional variation in the use of late preterm steroids after the publication of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids (ALPS) Trial and to understand factors associated with a region's pace of adoption. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used US natality data from February 2015 to October 2017 from hospital referral regions (HRRs) within the US. Inclusion criteria included live-born, nonanomalous, singleton, late preterm (34 to 36 completed weeks of gestation) neonates born to individuals without pregestational diabetes. This study was conducted from November 15, 2022, to January 13, 2023. Main Outcome and Measures: HRRs were categorized as either a slower adopter or faster adopter of antenatal late preterm steroids based on the observed vs expected pace of antenatal steroid adoption in a 1-year period after the trial's dissemination. Patient and regional factors hypothesized a priori to be associated with the uptake of late preterm steroids were compared between faster and slower adopters. Comparisons were made using Student t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate. A multivariable logistic regression was constructed to identify factors associated with faster adopter status in the postperiod. Results: There were 666 097 late preterm births in 282 HRRs. The mean (SD) maternal age in HRRs was 27.9 (1.2) years. The median (IQR) percentage of births by race categories in HRRs for patients identifying as American Indian or Alaskan Native was 0.5% (0.2%-1.3%); Asian or Pacific Islander, 3.0% (1.7%-5.3%); Black, 12.9% (5.1%-29.1%); and White, 78.6% (66.6%-87.0%). The median percentage of births in HRRs to patients of Hispanic ethnicity was 11.2% (6.3%-27.4%). In this study, 136 HRRs (48.2%) were classified as faster adopters and 146 (51.8%) were classified as slower adopters. Faster adopters increased their steroid use by 12.1 percentage points (from 5.9% to 18.0%) compared with a 5.5 percentage point increase (from 3.7% to 9.2%) among slower adopters (P < .001). Most examined patient and regional factors were not associated with a region's pace of adoption, with the exception of the regional prevalence of prior preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.48-2.82]) and the percentage of deliveries at 34 to 35 weeks of gestation (aOR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.47-0.99]) compared with 36 weeks. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, there was widespread geographic variation in the adoption of antenatal steroid administration for late preterm births that largely remained unexplained by population factors. These findings should prompt further investigations to barriers to timely or equitable access to new evidence-based practices and guide future dissemination strategies with the goal of more uniform adoption.

The association of maternal country/region of origin and nativity with infant mortality rate among Hispanic preterm infants.

OBJECTIVES: Among US-born preterm infants of Hispanic mothers, we analyzed the unadjusted and adjusted infant mortality rate (IMR) by country/region of origin and maternal nativity status. STUDY DESIGN: Using linked national US birth and death certificate data (2005-2014), we examined preterm infants of Hispanic mothers by subgroup and nativity. Clinical and sociodemographic covariates were included and the main outcome was death in the first year of life. RESULTS: In our cohort of 891,216 preterm Hispanic infants, we demonstrated different rates of infant mortality by country and region of origin, but no difference between infants of Hispanic mothers who were US vs. foreign-born. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the need to disaggregate the heterogenous Hispanic birthing population into regional and national origin groups to better understand unique factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in order to develop more targeted interventions for these subgroups.

Transfer Patterns Among Infants Born at 28 to 34 Weeks' Gestation.

BACKGROUND: Although postnatal transfer patterns among high-risk (eg, extremely preterm or surgical) infants have been described, transfer patterns among lower-risk populations are unknown. The objective was to examine transfer frequency, indication, timing, and trajectory among very and moderate preterm infants. METHODS: Observational study of the US Vermont Oxford Network all NICU admissions database from 2016 to 2021 of inborn infants 280/7 to 346/7 weeks. Infants' first transfer was assessed by gestational age, age at transfer, reason for transfer, and transfer trajectory. RESULTS: Across 467 hospitals, 294 229 infants were eligible, of whom 12 552 (4.3%) had an initial disposition of transfer. The proportion of infants transferred decreased with increasing gestational age (9.6% [n = 1415] at 28 weeks vs 2.4% [n = 2646] at 34 weeks) as did the median age at time of transfer (47 days [interquartile range 30-73] at 28 weeks vs 8 days [interquartile range 3-16] at 34 weeks). The median post menstrual age at transfer was 34 or 35 weeks across all gestational ages. The most common reason for transfer was growth or discharge planning (45.0%) followed by medical and diagnostic services (30.2%), though this varied by gestation. In this cohort, 42.7% of transfers were to a higher-level unit, 10.2% to a same-level unit, and 46.7% to a lower-level unit, with indication reflecting access to specific services. CONCLUSIONS: Over 4% of very and moderate preterm infants are transferred. In this population, the median age of transfer is later and does not reflect immediate care needs after birth, but rather the provision of risk-appropriate care.

Association between stillbirth and severe maternal morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Severe maternal morbidity has been increasing in the past few decades. Few studies have examined the risk of severe maternal morbidity among individuals with stillbirths vs individuals with live-birth deliveries. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the prevalence and risk of severe maternal morbidity among individuals with stillbirths vs individuals with live-birth deliveries during delivery hospitalization as a primary outcome and during the postpartum period as a secondary outcome. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using birth and fetal death certificate data linked to hospital discharge records from California (2008-2018), Michigan (2008-2020), Missouri (2008-2014), Pennsylvania (2008-2014), and South Carolina (2008-2020). Relative risk regression analysis was used to examine the crude and adjusted relative risks of severe maternal morbidity along with 95% confidence intervals among individuals with stillbirths vs individuals with live-birth deliveries, adjusting for birth year, state of residence, maternal sociodemographic characteristics, and the obstetric comorbidity index. RESULTS: Of the 8,694,912 deliveries, 35,012 (0.40%) were stillbirths. Compared with individuals with live-birth deliveries, those with stillbirths were more likely to be non-Hispanic Black (10.8% vs 20.5%); have Medicaid (46.5% vs 52.0%); have pregnancy complications, including preexisting diabetes mellitus (1.1% vs 4.3%), preexisting hypertension (2.3% vs 6.2%), and preeclampsia (4.4% vs 8.4%); have multiple pregnancies (1.6% vs 6.2%); and reside in South Carolina (7.4% vs 11.6%). During delivery hospitalization, the prevalence rates of severe maternal morbidity were 791 cases per 10,000 deliveries for stillbirths and 154 cases per 10,000 deliveries for live-birth deliveries, whereas the prevalence rates for nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity were 502 cases per 10,000 deliveries for stillbirths and 68 cases per 10,000 deliveries for live-birth deliveries. The crude relative risk for severe maternal morbidity was 5.1 (95% confidence interval, 4.9-5.3), whereas the adjusted relative risk was 1.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.5-1.8). For nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity among stillbirths vs live-birth deliveries, the crude relative risk was 7.4 (95% confidence interval, 7.0-7.7), whereas the adjusted relative risk was 2.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.3). This risk was not only elevated among individuals with stillbirth during the delivery hospitalization but also through 1 year after delivery (severe maternal morbidity adjusted relative risk, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.4; nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity adjusted relative risk, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.3). CONCLUSION: Stillbirth was found to be an important contributor to severe maternal morbidity.

Acceptability of Dyad Care Management After Preterm Birth: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVES: Care management programs for medically complex infants interact with parents after complicated pregnancies, when gaps in maternal health care are well documented. These care managers may have the relationships and skills to promote postpartum and interconception health and health care access. It is unknown whether expanding these care management models to address maternal needs would be acceptable. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with women with a history of preterm birth and clinicians. For women with a history of preterm birth, additional inclusion criteria were Medicaid-insured infant in one health system and English proficiency. We purposively oversampled women whose infants received care management. Clinicians worked in two geographically adjacent health systems. Interviews explored priorities after preterm birth and perceived acceptability of mother-infant dyad care management. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded following an integrated approach in which we applied a priori codes and captured emergent themes. RESULTS: We interviewed 33 women (10/2018-7/2021) and 24 clinicians (3/2021-8/2021). Women were predominantly non-Hispanic Black, and 15 had infants receiving care management. Clinicians included physicians, nurses, and social workers from Pediatrics, Obstetrics, and Family Medicine. Subgroups converged thematically, finding care management acceptable. Tailoring programs to address stress and sleep, emphasizing care managers with strong interpersonal skills and shared experiences with care management users, and program flexibility would contribute to acceptability. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Dyad care management after preterm birth is acceptable to potential program end-users and clinicians. Dyad health promotion may contribute to improved birth outcomes, infant, and parent health.

Diuretic Tolerance to Repeated-Dose Furosemide in Infants Born Very Preterm with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the presence and timing of furosemide diuretic tolerance in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and to determine if tolerance is modified by thiazide co-administration. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study among infants born very preterm with BPD exposed to repeated-dose furosemide for 72 hours, measuring net fluid balance (total intake minus total output) as a surrogate of diuresis in the 3 days before and after exposure. The primary comparison was the difference in fluid balance between the first and third 24 hours of furosemide exposure. We fit a general linear model for within-subject repeated measures of fluid balance over time, with thiazide co-administration as an interaction variable. Secondary analyses included an evaluation of weight trajectories over time. RESULTS: In 83 infants, median fluid balance ranged between + 43.6 and + 52.7 ml/kg/d in the 3 days prior to furosemide exposure. Fluid balance decreased to a median of + 29.1 ml/kg/d in the first 24 hours after furosemide, but then increased to +47.5 ml/kg/d by the third 24-hour interval, consistent with tolerance (P < .001). Thiazides did not modify the change in fluid balance during furosemide exposure for any time-period. Weight decreased significantly in the first 24 hours after furosemide and increased thereafter (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The net fluid balance response to furosemide decreases rapidly during repeated-dose exposures in infants with BPD, consistent with diuretic tolerance. Clinicians should consider this finding in the context of an infant's therapeutic goals. Further research efforts to identify safe and effective furosemide dosage strategies are needed.

Integrating Care for Mother-Infant Dyads After Preterm Birth: A Qualitative Study of Clinician Perspectives on Feasibility.

Objective: There are gaps in receipt of maternal preventive services in the interconception period. Yet mother-infant dyads have frequent health care visits. Health systems have opportunities to better capitalize on existing visits to address dyad needs, but this possibility has not been fully explored. Methods: In this qualitative study we conducted semistructured interviews with clinical team members involved with birthing parents or infants after preterm birth. We conducted snowball sampling from teams in pediatrics, obstetrics, and family medicine at two geographically adjacent health systems. Interviews explored perspectives on existing barriers and facilitators to integrating dyad care across adult and infant teams. Interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and coded using an integrated approach. Results: We interviewed 24 physicians, nurses, midwives, and social workers (March-November 2021). Participants identified barriers to integrated care including infrequent communication between clinical teams, which was generalizable to care of the birthing parent or infant as individuals, and additional barriers related to privacy, credentialing, and visit design that were specific to dyad care. To improve integration of dyad care, clinicians proposed adapting a variety tools and procedures currently used in their practices, including electronic health record tools for communication, dedicated roles to support communication or navigation, centralized information on resources for dyad care, referral protocols, identifying dyads for proactive outreach, and opportunities for clinicians to connect face-to-face about shared patients or families. Conclusions: Clinicians believe existing health care structures and processes can be adapted to address current substantial barriers to integrated dyad care.

Medicaid Expansion And Outpatient Cardiovascular Care Use Among Low-Income Nonelderly Adults, 2012-15.

Adults with lower socioeconomic status have a disproportionately higher burden of cardiovascular disease. Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, which went into effect January 1, 2014, in adopting states, led to an expansion of health insurance coverage for low-income adults. To understand whether Medicaid expansion was associated with increased access to outpatient cardiovascular care in expansion states, we examined Medicaid Analytic eXtract administrative claims data for nonelderly adult beneficiaries from the period 2012-15 for two states that expanded Medicaid eligibility (New Jersey and Minnesota) and two states that did not (Georgia and Tennessee) and calculated population-level rates of cardiovascular care use. There was a 38.1 percent greater increase in expansion states in the rate of beneficiaries with outpatient visits for cardiovascular disease management associated with Medicaid expansion relative to nonexpansion states. This was accompanied by a 42.9 percent greater increase in the prescription rate for cardiovascular disease management agents. These results suggest that expansion of Medicaid eligibility was associated with an increase in cardiovascular care use among low-income nonelderly adults in expansion states.

Perinatal Care Measures Are Incomplete If They Do Not Assess The Birth Parent-Infant Dyad As A Whole.

Measures of perinatal care quality and outcomes often focus on either the birth parent or the infant. We used linked vital statistics and hospital discharge data to describe a dyadic measure (including both the birth parent and the infant) for perinatal care during the birth hospitalization. In this five-state cohort of 2010-18 births, 21.6 percent of birth parent-infant dyads experienced at least one complication, and 9.6 percent experienced a severe complication. Severe infant complications were eight times more prevalent than severe birth parent complications. Among birth parents with a severe complication, the co-occurrence of a severe infant complication ranged from 2 percent to 51 percent, whereas among infants with a severe complication, the co-occurrence of a severe birth parent complication was rare, ranging from 0.04 percent to 5 percent. These data suggest that measures, clinical interventions, public reporting, and policies focused on either the birth parent or the infant are incomplete in their assessment of a healthy dyad. Thus, clinicians, administrators, and policy makers should evaluate dyadic measures, incentivize positive outcomes for both patients (parent and infant), and create policies that support the health of the dyad.

Inter-hospital Variation in COVID-19 Era Pediatric Hospitalizations by Age Group and Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Mitigation strategies and public responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) varied geographically and may have differentially affected burden of pediatric disease and hospitalization practices. We aimed to quantify hospital-specific variation in hospitalizations during the COVID-19 era. METHODS: Using Pediatric Health Information Systems data from 44 Children's Hospitals, this retrospective multicenter analysis compared hospitalizations of children (1 day-17 years) from the COVID-19 era (March 1, 2020-June 30, 2021) to prepandemic (January 1, 2017-December 31, 2019). Variation in the magnitude of hospital-specific decline between eras was determined using coefficients of variation (CV). Spearman's test was used to assess correlation of variation with community and hospital factors. RESULTS: The COVID-19 era decline in hospitalizations varied between hospitals (CV 0.41) and was moderately correlated with declines in respiratory infection hospitalizations (r = 0.69, P < .001). There was no correlation with community or hospital factors. COVID-19 era changes in hospitalizations for mental health conditions varied widely between centers (CV 2.58). Overall, 22.7% of hospitals saw increased admissions for adolescents, and 29.5% saw increases for newborns 1 to 14 days, representing significant center-specific variation (CV 2.30 for adolescents and 1.98 for newborns). CONCLUSIONS: Pandemic-era change in hospitalizations varied across institutions, partially because of hospital-specific changes in respiratory infections. Residual variation exists for mental health conditions and in groups least likely to be admitted for respiratory infections, suggesting that noninfectious conditions may be differentially and uniquely affected by local policies and hospital-specific practices enacted during the COVID-19 era.

Associations of neighborhood social vulnerability with emergency department visits and readmissions among infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize associations of the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) with medically attended acute respiratory illness among infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort of 378 preterm infants with BPD from a single center. Multivariable logistic regression quantified associations of SVI with medically attended acute respiratory illness, defined as emergency department (ED) visits or hospital readmissions within a year after first hospital discharge. Mediation analysis quantified the extent to which differences in SVI may explain known Black-White disparities in medically attended acute respiratory illness. RESULTS: SVI was associated with medically attended respiratory illness (per SVI standard deviation increment, aOR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.17-1.78). Adjustment for race and ethnicity attenuated the association (aOR 1.27, 95% CI: 0.97-1.64). SVI significantly mediated 31% of the Black-White disparity in ED visits (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: SVI was associated with, and may partially explain racial disparities in, medically attended acute respiratory illness among infants with BPD.

Exploration of Gross Motor Function in Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome.

Background: Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by a spectrum of motor abilities. While the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome severity score favors severely impacted individuals, there is an unmet need to define tools measuring function across the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome spectrum as potential outcome assessments for future clinical trials. Methods: Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) and AGS Severity Scale were administered in individuals affected by Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (n = 71). We characterized the performance variability by genotype. Derived versions of the GMFM-88, including the GMFM-66, GMFM-66 item set (GMFM-66IS), and GMFM-66 Basal&Ceiling (GMFM-66BC) were calculated. The Aicardi-Goutières syndrome cohort was divided into severe (AGS Severity Scale score <4) or attenuated (≥4). Performance on the AGS Severity Scale highly correlated with total GMFM-88 scores (Spearman Correlation: R = 0.91). To assess variability of the GMFM-88 within genotypic subcohorts, interquartile ranges (IQRs) were compared. Results: GMFM-88 performance in the TREX1 cohort had least variability while the SAMHD1 cohort had the largest IQR (4.23 vs 81.8). Floor effect was prominent, with most evaluations scoring below 20% (n = 46, 64.79%), particularly in TREX1- and RNASEH2-cohorts. Performance by the GMFM-66, GMFM-66IS, and GMFM-66BC highly correlated with the full GMFM-88. The Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population represents a broad range of gross motor skills. Conclusions: This work identified the GMFM-88 as a potential clinical outcome assessment in subsets of the Aicardi-Goutières syndrome population but underscores the need for additional validation of outcome measures reflective of the diverse gross motor function observed in this population, including low motor function. When time is limited by resources or patient endurance, shorter versions of the GMFM-88 may be a reasonable alternative.