Mathematical and Pharmacokinetic Approaches for the Design of New 3D Printing Inks Using Ricobendazole.

PURPOSE: 3D printing (3DP) makes it possible to obtain systems that are not achievable with current conventional methods, one of them, sustained release floating systems. Floating systems using ricobendazole (RBZ) as a model drug and a combination of polymers were designed and obtained by melt solidification printing technique (MESO-PP). METHODS: Four different MESO-PP inks were formulated based on combinations of the polymers Gelucire 43/01 and Gelucire 50/13 in different ratios. For each of the formulated inks, physicochemical characterization was performed by thermal analysis (thermogravimetric analysis [TGA] and differential scanning calorimetry [DSC]), fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Pharmaceutical characterization was performed by in vitro assays to determine pharmaceutically relevant parameters. These parameters were calculated by applying mathematical models developed to evaluate in vitro drug release profiles. On the other hand, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to predict the in vivo performance of RBZ loaded in the different inks by determining the Cmax, and the AUC0-∞. RESULTS: By increasing the proportion of Gelucire 50/13 co-surfactant in the mixtures (the proportion in Ink 1 was 33%, while the proportion in Ink 4 was 80%), the dissolution capacity of RBZ increases substantially, decreasing flotation times. CONCLUSION: MESO-PP produced ink 1 (50% Gelucire 43/01, 25% Gelucire 50/13 and 25% RBZ), which has a zero-order release (RR = 0.180%/min) and the longest flotation time (545 ± 23 min), and in turn would produce a significant increase in oral absorption of the drug, with an AUC0-∞ 2.16-fold higher than that obtained in animals treated with RBZ loaded in conventional tablets.

Integration of in vitro biorelevant dissolution and in silico PBPK model of carvedilol to predict bioequivalence of oral drug products.

Bioequivalence implementation in developing countries where a high proportion of similar drug products are being marketed has found several obstacles, impeding regulatory agencies to move forward with this policy. Biopharmaceutical quality of these products, several of which are massively prescribed, remains unknown. In this context, an in vitro-in silico-in vivo approach is proposed as a mean to screen product performance and target specific formulations for bioequivalence assessment. By coupling in vitro biorelevant dissolution testing in USP-4 Apparatus (flow-through cell) with physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling in PK-Sim® software (Bayer, Germany), the performance of seven similar products of carvedilol tablets containing 25 mg available in the Uruguayan market were compared with the brand-name drug Dilatrend®. In silico simulations for Dilatrend® were compared with published results of bioequivalence studies performed in fasting conditions allowing model development through a learning and confirming process. Single-dose pharmacokinetic profiles were then simulated for the brand-name drug and two similar drug products selected according to in vitro observations, in a virtual Caucasian population of 1000 subjects (50% male, aged between 18 and 50 years with standard body-weights). Population bioequivalence ratios were estimated revealing that in vitro differences in drug release would have a major impact in carvedilol maximum plasma concentration, leading to a non-bioequivalence outcome. Predictions support the need to perform in vivo bioequivalence for these products of extensive use. Application of the in vitro-in silico-in vivo approach stands as an interesting alternative to tackle and reduce drug product variability in biopharmaceutical quality.

Sex and Food Influence on Intestinal Absorption of Ketoprofen Gastroresistant Formulation.

Sixteen healthy volunteers (8 women and 8 men) participated in a 2-period, 2-treatment crossover study. A delayed-release gastroresistant formulation of ketoprofen was administered under fasting and fed conditions. Cmax , AUC, Cmax /AUC, and kel obtained after food coadministration did not differ from those calculated under fasting administration. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for fed/fasting geometric mean ratio of Cmax /AUC and AUC were 0.80-1.14 and 0.80-1.23, respectively. A significant difference (P < .01) was found between lag-time medians (T0 ), with a longer T0 after food intake (5.5 vs 2.5 hours). Also, a significant difference between the medians of Tmax was found (P < .01), being 7.0 hours after food coadministration and 4.0 hours under fasting administration, but this difference disappeared once T0 was subtracted from Tmax . Cmax /AUC, which is related to drug absorption rate, showed significant differences between sexes. Men showed higher (P =.006) Cmax /AUC means (0.468 ± 0.094 vs 0.361 ± 0.087 h(-1) . Tmax was also significantly different (P < .05), being 4.0 (3.0-5.0) hours for men and 8.0 (5.0-10.0) hours for women. In conclusion, men showed a faster intestinal absorption rate with earlier time-to-peak plasma concentration of ketoprofen. Food coadministration extended the gastric residence time of formulation but exerted no effect on its intestinal absorption pattern.

Complete dataset for 2-treatment, 2-sequence, 2-period efavirenz bioequivalence study conducted with nightly dosing.

The efavirenz pharmacokinetic raw data presented in this article was obtained in an average bioequivalence study between a local brand and Stocrin (Merck Sharp & Dohme, purchased from Australia, batch H009175, expiration date November 2013). Dose was administered at night (9:00 p.m.) two hours after food intake. Fourteen healthy subjects, 8 women and 6 men, completed the study. For each subject, 15 data points until 96 h post-administration are included. Subject demographic characteristics and sequences of administration are provided along with individual pharmacokinetic profiles of efavirenz obtained for both formulations after a single oral dose of 600 mg. This data provides information in support of the research article "Sex-by-formulation interaction assessed through a bioequivalence study of efavirenz tablets" [1].

Sex-by-formulation interaction assessed through a bioequivalence study of efavirenz tablets.

Although sex-related differences in gastrointestinal physiology have been vastly reported, its impact on drug oral bioavailability and bioequivalence (product discrimination) is often ignored. On this work results from an average bioequivalence study between tablets containing 600mg of the antiretroviral efavirenz (EFV), carried out with 14 healthy subjects (8 female and 6 men) in a randomized 2-period, 2-treatment crossover design, are analyzed from a sex-based approach. Sequences were balanced within each sex group. Considering all subjects, no differences were observed on EFV absorbed amount, as shown by the estimated 90CI of the AUC96 Test/Reference bioequivalence ratio (T/R): 0.950-1.05. However, results were not conclusive due to the 90CI for CMAX T/R was 0.743-1.07. Over this parameter, a significant sex-by-formulation interaction was detected: 90CI CMAX T/R was 0.838-1.36 in women and 0.540-0.920 in men; with a 52% relative difference between point estimates. Formulation differences were therefore evidenced only by male subjects. In vitro dissolution and disintegration tests for both products were carried out in two aqueous media: A) SLS 0.25% and B) HCl/KCl pH1.2. T/R results for dissolution efficiency and tablet disintegration times of formulations in both A and B media were highly correlated with CMAX T/R bioequivalence results observed in women and men respectively, showing that a dissimilar gastrointestinal environment between sexes affected EFV oral absorption. This work shows how sex-by-formulation interaction can affect bioequivalence conclusions. Sex effect on product discrimination should be specially disclosed in bioequivalence studies, mainly for drugs aimed to be given to both sexes.

Stereoselective Pharmacokinetics of Ketoprofen After Oral Administration of Modified-Release Formulations in Caucasian Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ketoprofen, a potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is clinically administered as a racemic mixture. One of the possible metabolism routes of ketoprofen is the inversion of the R- to S-enantiomer in the gastrointestinal tract. Ketoprofen, as a weak acid drug, might undergo recirculation through pancreatic/intestinal juices. The aim of the work was to investigate if a plasma-gastrointestinal tract recirculation of ketoprofen could explain its R-to-S chiral inversion after the oral administration of two modified-release formulations: a gastro-resistant delayed-release tablet (Reference) and an extended-release-plus-immediate-release bilayer tablet (Test). METHODS: Sixteen healthy Caucasian volunteers (eight women and eight men) participated in a ketoprofen bioequivalence study. Both formulations were administered with and without food. In both cases, standard meals were given throughout the experiment. R- and S-enantiomers were measured separately using a validated HPLC-UV chiral method. Mean concentration-time profiles of ketoprofen enantiomers in plasma were obtained for men and women. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve, maximum ketoprofen plasma concentration, and time-to-peak were also computed for both isomers, both modes of administration, and both sexes. S/R concentration ratio was assessed as an indicator of enantiomer chiral inversion rate. RESULTS: Differences in the pharmacokinetics of S- and R-ketoprofen enantiomers were found after the Test administration. S-Ketoprofen presented a lower plasma exposure compared to R-enantiomer. However, the S/R concentration ratio increased 1 h (in men) and 2 h (in women) after meal intakes. This was related to pancreatic and/or intestinal and/or biliary secretions of the drug, followed by reabsorption and conversion of the R- to the S-isomer. The lower intestinal pH reported for men would lead to a higher oral bioavailability of the Test formulation and a higher reabsorption of both ketoprofen isomers in this sex. Hence, a higher rise of the S/R concentration ratio could be observed in men. No significant differences between isomers exposure were detected in both sexes after the Reference administration. Different lag times were observed after fed and fasting administration of this formulation; however, drug absorption coincided with food ingestion. Then, drug recirculation affected the S/R ratio from the beginning of drug exposure, minimizing the difference between isomers disposition. CONCLUSIONS: R-to-S conversion rate could be mainly associated with several passages of the drug through the intestinal mucosa. The concentration-time profiles of ketoprofen in plasma after the administration of both formulations evidenced R-to-S conversion of recirculating drug following meal intakes.