Unnecessary use of additional animals for determination of sexual maturation in the EOGRTS.

The Extended-One-Generation Study [EOGRTS, OECD 443] is a study in which the toxic effects of test substances on reproduction (Cohort 1), neurodevelopment (Cohort 2), and development of the immune system (Cohort 3) in rats are evaluated. The latter two Cohorts are not always required according to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) based on data from previously performed toxicity studies. Although the Cohorts for developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) and developmental immunotoxicity (DIT) are often omitted, the F1-animals normally required for these Cohorts are still maintained for evaluation of sexual maturation since three F1-animals/sex/litter/group are required according to OECD Guidance Document (GD) No. 151. This review investigates whether two F1-animals/sex/litter/group would suffice for this endpoint by investigating the rationale provided by the GD and by comparing results of eighteen EOGRTSs in which three versus two F1-animals/sex/litter/group were evaluated. After a comprehensive literature research, we concluded that the rationale in the GD does not substantiate the decision to use three F1-animals/sex/litter/group. The scientific papers provided as rationale focused on male observations and the observations discussed do not match the observations for sexual maturation mentioned by the guidelines. The investigation using data from eighteen EOGRTSs showed that the toxicological conclusions, whether the test substance affected sexual maturation or not, matched when comparing data of two F1-animals/sex/litter/group to three F1-animals/sex/litter/group. To conclude, two F1-animals/sex/litter/group would suffice for the evaluation of sexual maturation, which negates the requirement for a so called "Cohort 1 C" (i.e. 160 animals (80 males and 80 females)) per EOGRTS, as well as the number of regulated procedures that need to be performed.

Bioaccessibility as a determining factor in the bioavailability and toxicokinetics of cadmium compounds.

Cadmium toxicity occurs where there is absorption and accumulation of cadmium ions (Cd2+) in tissues beyond tolerable levels. Significant differences in the release of Cd2+ from cadmium compounds in biological fluids, like gastric fluid, may indicate differences in bioavailability and absorption. This means that direct read-across from high solubility cadmium compounds to lower solubility compounds may not accurately reflect potential hazards. Here, the relative bioaccessibility in gastric fluid of cadmium telluride and cadmium chloride was evaluated using in vitro bioelution tests whilst the toxicokinetic behavior of these two compounds were compared after dietary administration for 90 days in male and female Wistar Han rats following OECD TG 408. Cadmium chloride was highly bioaccessible, whilst cadmium telluride showed low solubility in simulated gastric fluid (90 % and 1.5 % bioaccessibility, respectively). This difference in bioaccessibility was also reflected by a difference in bioavailability as shown by the difference in the liver and kidney concentrations of cadmium after repeat oral exposure. Feeding at doses of 750 and 1500 ppm of cadmium telluride did not result in tissue cadmium levels above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). In contrast, feeding with a lower test substance concentration yet higher concentration of bioaccessible cadmium (30 ppm cadmium chloride) resulted in tissue accumulation of cadmium. Only slight, non-adverse changes in hematology and clinical chemistry parameters were seen at these doses, indicating an absence of significant cadmium mediated toxicity towards target organs (kidney and liver), reflected in minimal cadmium accumulation in these organs. This study demonstrates that bioelution tests can help determine the bioaccessibility of cadmium, which can be used to estimate the potential for target tissue toxicity based on known toxicokinetic profiles and threshold levels for cadmium toxicity, while reducing and refining animal testing.