Addition of epinephrine to epidural bupivacaine infusions following initiation of labor analgesia with epidural fentanyl.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analgesic effects of the addition of epinephrine to a bupivacaine epidural infusion in early labor after a fentanyl bolus, following a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded study. SETTING: Labor suite of a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: 60 ASA physical status 1 and 2, laboring, nulliparous women. INTERVENTIONS: All laboring women received a 3 mL epidural test dose of 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, followed by a fentanyl 100 µg bolus in 10 mL of diluent volume. Patients were randomized to receive one of two continuous epidural infusions: bupivacaine 0.625 mg/mL at 10 mL/hr (control group) or bupivacaine 0.625 mg/mL with epinephrine 5 µg/mL at 10 mL/hr (epinephrine group). MEASUREMENTS: Time to re-dose, pain scores, and side effects were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: The mean duration of satisfactory analgesia prior to re-dose was 159 ± 62 min for the control group and 221 ± 111 min for the epinephrine group (P < 0.02). Pain scores were significantly higher in the control group than the epinephrine group at two time periods: 2.5 hours and 4.5 hours (P < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of 0.625 mg/mL bupivacaine with epinephrine 5 µg/mL at 10 mL/hr, compared with plain 0.625 mg/mL bupivacaine at 10 mL/hr, provided a longer time to re-dose, decreased pain scores at two time intervals, and had no significant difference in duration of labor or side effects.

Epidural clonidine added to a bupivacaine infusion increases analgesic duration in labor without adverse maternal or fetal effects.

PURPOSE: Many obstetric patients receiving epidural analgesia are encouraged to ambulate. This current study was designed to determine the potential for maximizing the time to first epidural supplement when adding clonidine to a 0.625 mg.ml(-1) bupivacaine continuous epidural infusion following epidural fentanyl bolus in early labor for patients allowed to ambulate. Maternal and fetal effects secondary to clonidine were also evaluated. METHODS: Sixty-eight laboring primigravid women received a 3-ml epidural test dose of lidocaine with epinephrine, followed by a fentanyl 100-microg bolus (in a 10 ml-volume). The patients then received a 0.625 mg.ml(-1) bupivacaine continuous epidural infusion, either with or without clonidine (5 microg.ml(-1)), at a rate of 10 ml.h(-1). Pain scores and side effects were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: The overall quality of analgesia was similar in both groups. The mean duration prior to request for additional analgesia was significantly longer in the clonidine group (269 +/- 160 min), compared to the control group (164 +/- 64 min). No patient in either group experienced any detectable motor block; one patient (clonidine group) complained of mild thigh numbness and was not allowed to ambulate. While mean blood pressure was approximately 6 mmHg lower in the clonidine group at 1, 1.5, and 3.5 h, this was not clinically significant. No adverse effects on maternal heart rate or fetal heart rate were noted. CONCLUSION: In early laboring patients, addition of clonidine prolongs the analgesia duration of a 0.625 mg.ml(-1) bupivacaine continuous epidural infusion following 100 microg epidural fentanyl (after a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose) without a clinically significant increase in side effects.

Diluent volume for epidural fentanyl and its effect on analgesia in early labor.

UNLABELLED: Epidural fentanyl after a lidocaine and epinephrine test dose provides adequate analgesia and allows for ambulation during early labor. We designed the current study to determine the influence of the diluent volume of the epidural fentanyl bolus (e.g., whether it has an effect on the onset and duration of analgesia). Sixty laboring primigravid women received a 3-mL epidural test dose of lidocaine with epinephrine and then received a fentanyl 100- micro g bolus in either a 2-mL, 10-mL, or 20-mL volume. Pain scores and side effects were recorded for each patient. The onset of analgesia was similar in all three groups. The mean duration before re-dose was not significantly different in the 2-mL group (108 +/- 40 min), the 10-mL group (126 +/- 57 min), or the 20-mL group (126 +/- 41 min). No patient in any group experienced any detectable motor block; one patient (2-mL group) complained of mild knee weakness and was not allowed to ambulate. In early laboring patients, the volume in which 100 micro g of epidural fentanyl (after a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose) is administered does not affect the onset or duration of analgesia, nor does it affect the ability to ambulate. IMPLICATIONS: In early laboring patients, the volume in which 100 micro g of epidural fentanyl (after a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose) is administered does not affect the onset or duration of ambulatory analgesia.

The addition of hydromorphone to epidural fentanyl does not affect analgesia in early labour.

PURPOSE: Epidural fentanyl after a lidocaine and epinephrine test dose, provides adequate analgesia and allows for ambulation during early labour. The current study was designed to determine the influence of hydromorphone added to an epidural fentanyl bolus (e.g., whether there is an increase in duration of analgesia). METHODS: Forty-four labouring primigravid women, at less than 5 cm cervical dilation, who requested epidural analgesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind study. After a 3 mL test dose of lidocaine with epinephrine, patients received fentanyl 100 microgram (in 10 mL volume). They randomly received the fentanyl with either saline or hydromorphone (300 microgram). After administration of the initial analgesic, pain scores and side effects were recorded for each patient at ten, 20, and 30 min, and every 30 min thereafter, by an observer blinded to the technique used. RESULTS: The patients were taller in the hydromorphone group (P < 0.04). There were no other demographic differences between the two groups. The mean duration prior to re-dose was not significantly different in the group that received hydromorphone (135 +/- 52 min) compared to the control group (145 +/- 46 min). Side effects were similar between the two groups. No patient in either group experienced any detectable motor block. CONCLUSION: In early labouring patients, the addition of hydromorphone (300 microgram) to epidural fentanyl (100 microgram after a lidocaine and epinephrine test dose) neither prolongs the duration of analgesia nor affects the ability to ambulate, and cannot be recommended according to the current study.