Decoding cardiogenic shock: assessing shock index and its variants as prognostic indicators for in-hospital mortality.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high in-hospital mortality. Objective assessment of its severity and prognosis is paramount for timely therapeutic interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the shock index (SI) and its variants as prognostic indicators for in-hospital mortality. METHODS: A retrospective study involving 1282 CS patients were evaluated. Baseline patient characteristics, clinical trajectory, hospital outcomes, and shock indices were collected and analysed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to determine the predictive accuracy of shock indices in predicting in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of those evaluated, 866 (67.6%) survived until discharge. Non-survivors were older (66.0 ± 13.7 vs. 57.4 ± 16.2, P < 0.001), had a higher incidence of cardiac risk factors, and were more likely to present with acute coronary syndrome (33.4% vs. 16.1%, P < 0.001) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (11.3% vs. 5.3%, P < 0.001). All mean shock indices were significantly higher in non-survivors compared with survivors. ROC curves demonstrated that adjusted shock index (ASI), age-modified shock index (AMSI), and shock index-C (SIC) had the highest predictive accuracy for in-hospital mortality, with AUC values of 0.654, 0.667, and 0.659, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that SIC had good predictive ability in patients with STEMI (AUC: 0.714) and ACS (AUC: 0.696) while AMSI and ASI were notably predictive in the OHCA group (AUC: 0.707 and 0.701, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Shock index and its variants, especially ASI, AMSI, and SIC, may be helpful in predicting in-hospital mortality in CS patients. Their application could guide clinicians in upfront risk stratification. SIC, ASI, and AMSI show potential in predicting in-hospital mortality in specific CS subsets (STEMI and OHCA). This is the first study to evaluate SI and its variants in CS patients.

Interhospital Variation in Admissions Managed With Critical Care Therapies or Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Tertiary Cardiac Intensive Care Units: An Analysis From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry.

BACKGROUND: Wide interhospital variations exist in cardiovascular intensive care unit (CICU) admission practices and the use of critical care restricted therapies (CCRx), but little is known about the differences in patient acuity, CCRx utilization, and the associated outcomes within tertiary centers. METHODS: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter registry of tertiary and academic CICUs in the United States and Canada that captured consecutive admissions in 2-month periods between 2017 and 2022. This analysis included 17 843 admissions across 34 sites and compared interhospital tertiles of CCRx (eg, mechanical ventilation, mechanical circulatory support, continuous renal replacement therapy) utilization and its adjusted association with in-hospital survival using logistic regression. The Pratt index was used to quantify patient-related and institutional factors associated with CCRx variability. RESULTS: The median age of the study population was 66 (56-77) years and 37% were female. CCRx was provided to 62.2% (interhospital range of 21.3%-87.1%) of CICU patients. Admissions to CICUs with the highest tertile of CCRx utilization had a greater burden of comorbidities, had more diagnoses of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, or cardiogenic shock, and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality (median, 12.7%) was 9.6%, 11.1%, and 18.7% in low, intermediate, and high CCRx tertiles, respectively. No clinically meaningful differences in adjusted mortality were observed across tertiles when admissions were stratified by the provision of CCRx. Baseline patient-level variables and institutional differences accounted for 80% and 5.3% of the observed CCRx variability, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a large registry of tertiary and academic CICUs, there was a >4-fold interhospital variation in the provision of CCRx that was primarily driven by differences in patient acuity compared with institutional differences. No differences were observed in adjusted mortality between low, intermediate, and high CCRx utilization sites.

Patient Outcomes and Characteristics in a Contemporary Quaternary Canadian Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

Background: The modern-day cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) has evolved to care for patients with acute critical cardiac illness. We describe the current population of cardiac patients in a quaternary CICU. Methods: Consecutive CICU patients admitted to the CICU at the Toronto General Hospital from 2014 to 2020 were studied. Patient demographics, admission diagnosis, critical care resources, complications, in-hospital mortality, and CICU and hospital length of stay were recorded. Results: A total of 8865 consecutive admissions occurred, with a median age of 64.9 years. The most common primary cardiac diagnoses were acute decompensated heart failure (17.8%), non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (16.8%), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (15.5%), and arrhythmias (14.7%). Cardiogenic shock was seen in 13.2%, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in 4.1%. A noncardiovascular admission diagnosis accounted for 13.9% of the cases. Over the period studied, rates of admission were higher for cardiogenic shock (P < 0.001 for trend), with a higher use of critical care resources. Additionally, rates of admission were higher in female patients and those who had chronic kidney disease and diabetes. The in-hospital mortality rate of all CICU admissions was 13.2%, and it was highest in those with noncardiac conditions, compared to the rate in those with cardiac diagnoses (29.4% vs 10.6%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Given the trends of higher acuity of patients with cardiac critical illness, with higher use of critical care resources, education streams for critical care within cardiology, and alternative pathways of care for patients who have lower-acuity cardiac disease remain imperative to manage this evolving population.

Introduction: L'unité de soins intensifs de cardiologie (USIC) d'aujourd'hui a évolué vers des soins aux patients atteints d'une maladie cardiaque aiguë en phase critique. Nous décrivons la population actuelle de patients cardiaques d'une USIC quaternaires. Méthodes: Les patients consécutifs d'USIC admis à l'USIC de l'Hôpital général de Toronto de 2014 à 2020 ont fait l'objet de l'étude. Les données démographiques des patients, le diagnostic à l'admission, les ressources en soins aux patients en phase critique, les complications, la mortalité intrahospitalière, et la durée de séjour à l'hôpital et à l'USIC ont été enregistrés. Résultats: Il y a eu un total de 8 865 admissions consécutives dont les patients avaient un âge médian de 64,9 ans. Les diagnostics principaux les plus fréquents de maladies cardiaques étaient l'insuffisance cardiaque aiguë décompensée (17,8 %), l'infarctus du myocarde sans élévation du segment ST (16,8 %), l'infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST (15,5 %) et les arythmies (14,7 %). Le choc cardiogénique a été observé chez 13,2 %, et l'arrêt cardiaque hors de l'hôpital, chez 4,1 %. Un diagnostic d'admission de maladie non cardiovasculaire représente 13,9 % des cas. Durant la période étudiée, les taux d'admission en raison d'un choc cardiogénique étaient plus élevés (P < 0,001 pour la tendance), et entraînaient une utilisation plus élevée de ressources en soins aux patients en phase critique. De plus, les taux d'admission étaient plus élevés chez les patientes, et chez ceux qui avaient une insuffisance rénale chronique et un diabète. Le taux de mortalité intrahospitalière de toutes les admissions à l'USIC était de 13,2 %, et il constituait le taux le plus élevé chez ceux qui avaient des maladies non cardiaques comparativement au taux chez ceux qui avaient des diagnostics de maladies cardiaques (29,4 % vs 10,6 %, P < 0,001). Conclusions: Compte tenu des tendances d'accroissement de la gravité de l'état des patients atteints d'une maladie cardiaque en phase critique et de la plus grande utilisation des ressources en soins aux patients en phase critique, des volets de formation en soins aux patients en phase critique en cardiologie et d'autres protocoles de soins des patients qui ont une maladie cardiaque de plus faible gravité demeurent essentiels à la prise en charge de cette population grandissante.

Clonal hematopoiesis confers an increased mortality risk in orthotopic heart transplant recipients.

Novel risk stratification and non-invasive surveillance methods are needed in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) to reduce morbidity and mortality post-transplant. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) refers to the acquisition of specific gene mutations in hematopoietic stem cells linked to enhanced inflammation and worse cardiovascular outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between CH and OHT. Blood samples were collected from 127 OHT recipients. Error-corrected sequencing was used to detect CH-associated mutations. We evaluated the association between CH and acute cellular rejection, CMV infection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), malignancies, and survival. CH mutations were detected in 26 (20.5%) patients, mostly in DNMT3A, ASXL1, and TET2. Patients with CH showed a higher frequency of CAV grade 2 or 3 (0% vs. 18%, p < .001). Moreover, a higher mortality rate was observed in patients with CH (11 [42%] vs. 15 [15%], p = .008) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.9 (95% CI, 1.4-6.3; p = .003). CH was not associated with acute cellular rejection, CMV infection or malignancies. The prevalence of CH in OHT recipients is higher than previously reported for the general population of the same age group, with an associated higher prevalence of CAV and mortality.

Clonal haematopoiesis is associated with higher mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock.

AIMS: Cardiogenic shock (CS) with variable systemic inflammation may be responsible for patient heterogeneity and the exceedingly high mortality rate. Cardiovascular events have been associated with clonal haematopoiesis (CH) where specific gene mutations in haematopoietic stem cells lead to clonal expansion and the development of inflammation. This study aims to assess the prevalence of CH and its association with survival in a population of CS patients in a quaternary centre. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the frequency of CH mutations among 341 CS patients and 345 ambulatory heart failure (HF) patients matched for age, sex, ejection fraction, and HF aetiology. The association of CH with survival and levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines was analysed. We detected 266 CH mutations in 149 of 686 (22%) patients. CS patients had a higher prevalence of CH-related mutations than HF patients (odds ratio 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-2.1, p = 0.02) and was associated with decreased survival (30 days: hazard ratio [HR] 2.7; 95% CI 1.3-5.7, p = 0.006; 90 days: HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.3-3.9, p = 0.003; and 3 years: HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.8, p = 0.01). TET2 or ASXL1 mutations were associated with lower survival in CS patients at all time-points (p ≤ 0.03). CS patients with TET2 mutations had higher circulating levels of SCD40L, interferon-γ, interleukin-4, and tumour necrosis factor-α (p ≤ 0.04), while those with ASXL1 mutations had decreased levels of CCL7 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiogenic shock patients have high frequency of CH, notably mutations in TET2 and ASXL1. This was associated with reduced survival and dysregulation of circulating inflammatory cytokines in those CS patients with CH.

Liberation From Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Review.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be used for circulatory support in cardiogenic shock as a bridge to recovery, a bridge to a ventricular assist device (VAD), or a bridge to transplant. While the determination of potential exit strategies is essential before cannulation, the final determination of a patient's options may change, in part, through their in-hospital clinical course. We propose that liberation from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be conceptualized as a process of discovery in the assessment of a patient's underlying clinical status and a key driver of further clinical decision-making. A trial of liberation from support should be considered when the goals of the weaning trial are well-defined and, ideally, in the absence of potentially confounding clinical factors. In this review, we will discuss readiness to wean criteria from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, as well as specific clinical, biochemical, and echocardiographic parameters that may prove useful in determining weaning timing and revealing the patient's underlying hemodynamic status and prognosis. The role of various cannula configurations, support devices, and pharmacological adjuncts will also be discussed. Finally, we highlight current gaps in evidence and suggest areas of future research.