RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In a gene expression analysis comparing sinus mucosa samples from allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) patients with samples from non-AFRS chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp (CRSwNP) patients, the antimicrobial peptide (AMP) histatin 1 (HTN1) was found to be the most differentially downregulated gene in AFRS. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the molecular etiology of the downregulated expression of HTN1. METHODS: We used RT-PCR to compare the expression of AMPs and a fungistasis assay to evaluate the antifungal activity of sinus secretions. Using flow cytometry, we characterized the presence of TH17/TH22 cells and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling from AFRS patients, non-AFRS CRSwNP patients, and healthy controls. RESULTS: We confirmed decreased expression of AMPs in AFRS sinus mucosa with concordant decrease in antifungal activity in sinus secretions. IL-22 and IL-22-producing T cells were deficient within sinus mucosa of AFRS patients. In vitro studies demonstrated a defect in IL-6/STAT3 signaling critical for TH17/TH22 differentiation. Epithelial cells from AFRS patients could express AMPs when stimulated with exogenous IL-22/IL-17 and circulating TH17 cell abundance was normal. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to other hyper-IgE syndromes, but distinct from CRSwNP, AFRS patients express a defect in STAT3 activation limited to IL-6-dependent STAT3 phosphorylation that is critical for TH17/TH22 differentiation. This defect leads to a local deficiency of IL-17/IL-22 cytokines and deficient AMP expression within diseased sinus mucosa of AFRS patients. Our findings support evaluation of therapeutic approaches that enhance airway AMP production in AFRS.
RESUMEN
The united airway refers to the combined upper and lower airways and their interconnected pathophysiologic relationships. Inflammatory airway diseases (chronic rhinosinusitis, asthma, and so forth) have been linked to fungal species through type 2 immune responses. These type 2 immune responses involve the cytokines interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, and a myriad of other inflammatory processes that lead to a spectrum of diseases from allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis to chronic rhinosinusitis. Historically, these diseases have been managed primarily with corticosteroids but recent revelations in the molecular pathophysiology provide opportunities for more diverse treatment options for patients with uncontrolled disease.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Hipersensibilidad , Sinusitis , Humanos , Sistema Respiratorio , Enfermedad Crónica , HongosRESUMEN
Following the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) treatment algorithm for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), patients suffering from severe uncontrolled CRSwNP are recommended to receive oral corticosteroids, (revision) sinus surgery, systemic biologicals and/or aspirin treatment after desensitization (ATAD). Given the major differences in indications, outcomes, practical considerations, risks and costs of these key pillars of treatment, there is a growing need to define criteria for each treatment option and list the clinically relevant and major considerations for them. This EUFOREA document therefore provides an expert panel overview of the expected outcomes, specific considerations and (contra)indications of the five major treatment arms of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP: oral corticosteroids, primary and revision sinus surgery, biological treatment and ATAD. This overview of treatment considerations is needed to allow physicians and patients to consider the different options in the context of providing optimal and personalized care for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP. In conclusion, the five major treatment options for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP have intrinsic advantages, specific indications and considerations that are of importance to the patient, the physician and the society. This EUFOREA statement supports the unmet need to define criteria for the indication of every treatment pillar of CRSwNP.
Asunto(s)
Pólipos Nasales , Rinosinusitis , Humanos , Enfermedad Crónica , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Pólipos Nasales/terapia , Pólipos Nasales/diagnóstico , Rinosinusitis/diagnóstico , Rinosinusitis/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acoustic resonance therapy (ART) is a novel vibrational treatment that delivers patient-specific resonant frequency acoustic energy to the sinonasal cavities. In a pilot study, ART was effective for the acute treatment of nasal congestion. We conducted a sham-controlled randomized trial to validate the efficacy of ART when administered daily for 2 weeks. METHODS: A total of 52 adult patients were enrolled in a multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, interventional study evaluating ART administered by a vibrational headband. Patients received either active treatment or a non-therapeutic sham treatment twice daily over 2 weeks. Clinical endpoints were the average change in nasal congestion sub-score of the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) and the average change in composite TNSS. RESULTS: ART resulted in a significantly greater mean change in the nasal congestion sub-score compared to sham (-0.87 [95% confidence interval [CI] -1.11, -0.62] vs. -0.44 [95% CI -0.64, -0.23], p = 0.008). ART also resulted in a significantly greater reduction in the composite TNSS versus sham, (-2.85 [95% CI -3.85, -1.85], vs. -1.32 [95% CI -2.27, -0.36], p = 0.027). The response rate, determined by a nasal congestion sub-score minimal clinically important difference of 0.23, was 80.8% for ART and 46.2% for sham, with an adjusted risk ratio of 1.95 (95% CI 1.26, 3.02, p = 0.003) in favor of ART. Safety endpoints showed no adverse events. CONCLUSION: ART is a safe and effective non-pharmacologic alternative for the treatment of nasal congestion.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is clear evidence that the prevalence of primary antibody deficiency (PAD) is higher in patients with recurrent and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) than in the general population. The purpose of this multi-institutional and multidisciplinary evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) is to thoroughly review the literature on rhinosinusitis with PAD, summarize the existing evidence, and provide recommendations on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in patients with PAD. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from inception through August 2022. Studies on the evaluation and management of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients were included. An iterative review process was utilized in accordance with EBRR guidelines. Levels of evidence and recommendations on the evaluation and management principles for PAD were generated. RESULTS: A total of 42 studies were included in this evidence-based review. These studies were evaluated on incidence of PAD in rhinosinusitis patients, incidence of rhinosinusitis in PAD patients, and on the different treatment modalities used and their outcome. The aggregate quality of evidence was varied across reviewed domains. CONCLUSION: Based on the currently available evidence, PAD can occur in up to 50% of patients with recalcitrant CRS. Despite the presence of multiple studies addressing rhinosinusitis and PAD, the level of evidence supporting different treatment options continues to be lacking. Optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach through collaboration with clinical immunology. There is need for higher-level studies that compare different treatments in patients with PAD and rhinosinusitis.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria , Rinitis , Sinusitis , Humanos , Adulto , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Rinitis/epidemiología , Rinitis/terapia , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Sinusitis/epidemiología , Sinusitis/terapia , Enfermedad Crónica , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
Objectives: Current evidence suggests a link between idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (sCSF) leak, as well as between IIH and dural venous sinus (DVS) narrowing. However, there are limited data linking DVS narrowing and sCSF leak. This study aims to determine the prevalence of DVS narrowing in patients with sCSF leak. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with sCSF leak that presented to a tertiary academic center from 2008 to 2019. Preoperative imaging was independently reviewed by two neuroradiologists to evaluate for DVS narrowing. Available literature was used to estimate the prevalence of DVS narrowing in the general population to allow for comparison. Data were analyzed using Exact binomial test. Results: Analysis of 25 patients with appropriate imaging revealed the majority were women (21/25, 84%) with a mean age of 51.89 years (SD 13.96). The majority of these patients were found to have narrowing of the DVS (20/25, 80%). In patient with sCSF leaks, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients with DVS narrowing compared with published literature examining this condition in the general population (80% vs. 40%, CI 0.59-0.93, p < .001). Conclusion: The prevalence of DVS narrowing in patients with sCSF leaks is substantial and likely greater than the general population. Moreover, there appears to be narrowing in most patients with sCSF leak. Preoperative radiological evaluation of the DVS using MR venography may be useful in patients with sCSF leaks as DVS stenosis may be an underdiagnosed etiology. Further study is needed to evaluate this. Level of Evidence: IV.
RESUMEN
The unified airway hypothesis proposes that upper and lower airway diseases reflect a single pathological process manifesting in different locations within the airway. Functional, epidemiological, and pathological evidence has supported this well-established hypothesis for some time. However, literature on the pathobiologic roles/therapeutic targeting of eosinophils and IL-5 in upper and lower airway diseases (including asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps [CRSwNP], and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease) has recently emerged. This narrative review revisits the unified airway hypothesis by searching the scientific literature for recent learnings and clinical trial/real-world data that provide a novel perspective on its relevance for clinicians. According to the available literature, eosinophils and IL-5 have important pathophysiological roles in both the upper and lower airways, although the impact of eosinophils and IL-5 may vary in asthma and CRSwNP. Some differential effects of anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5-receptor therapies in CRSwNP have been observed, requiring further investigation. However, pharmaceutical targeting of eosinophils and IL-5 in patients with upper, lower, and comorbid upper and lower airway inflammation has led to clinical benefit, supporting the hypothesis that these are linked conditions manifesting in different locations. Consideration of this approach may improve patient care and aid clinical decision making.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Pólipos Nasales , Rinitis , Sinusitis , Humanos , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pólipos Nasales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pólipos Nasales/patología , Terapia Biológica , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence-based findings and recommendation from the full document. METHODS: ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence-based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work. RESULTS: ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost. CONCLUSION: The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.
Asunto(s)
Complejo Hierro-Dextran , Rinitis Alérgica , Humanos , Rinitis Alérgica/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica/terapia , AlérgenosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is an endotype of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps characterized by eosinophilic mucin laden with fungal hyphae entrapped in expanded sinus cavities with an exaggerated hypersensitivity to fungal elements. The last decade has elucidated fungi-driven inflammatory pathways contributing to the pathophysiology of chronic inflammatory respiratory diseases. In addition, novel therapeutic biologic options have become available for CRS over the last several years. OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature examining AFRS, focusing on recent developments in our understanding of its pathophysiology and implications for treatment options. METHODS: Review article. RESULTS: Fungi-driven respiratory inflammation has been linked to fungal proteinases and toxin activity. In addition, AFRS patients demonstrate a local sinonasal immunodeficiency in antimicrobial peptides and hence limited antifungal activity, along with an exaggerated type 2 inflammatory response, highlighting a possible imbalanced type 1, type 2, and type 3 profile. The elucidation of these dysregulated molecular pathways has highlighted novel potential therapeutic targets. As such, the clinical management of AFRS, which once included surgery and extended courses of oral corticosteroids, is transitioning away from long courses of oral corticosteroids to incorporate novel delivery mechanisms of topical therapeutic targets and biologics for recalcitrant disease. CONCLUSION: AFRS is an endotype of CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) for which the molecular pathways leading to its inflammatory dysfunction are beginning to be illuminated. In addition to affecting treatment options, these understandings may shape necessary changes to diagnostic criteria and the extrapolated effects of environmental changes on AFRS. More critically, a better appreciation of fungi-driven inflammatory pathways may have implications for the understanding of broader CRS inflammation.
Asunto(s)
Sinusitis Fúngica Alérgica , Hipersensibilidad , Pólipos Nasales , Senos Paranasales , Humanos , Pólipos Nasales/tratamiento farmacológico , InflamaciónRESUMEN
Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a unique clinical entity that falls under the broader umbrella of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps with type 2 inflammation. It is characterized by nasal polyposis, production of characteristic thick eosinophilic mucin, and expansile change of involved sinus cavities. The diagnosis is classically made using the Bent and Kuhn criteria. However, recent studies have indicated the lack of specificity of some major criteria. The need to fulfill all 5 criteria before diagnosing AFRS partially mitigates this but renders the criteria cumbersome to use, and highlights the need to develop more specific criteria. Our understanding of AFRS pathophysiology has advanced significantly and has helped elucidate the lack of histatins contributing to the inability to clear fungal spores, consequently leading to fungi-induced disruption of the epithelial barrier and stimulation of sinonasal epithelial cells. These trigger a cascade of type 2 inflammatory cytokines driven by both the adaptive and innate immune system. Although more research is needed, these findings could hypothetically point to a limited type 3 immune response at the sinus mucosa, resulting in a compensatory overstimulation of type 2 inflammatory processes. Treatment for AFRS remains centered on surgery and topical corticosteroids. Short courses of systemic corticosteroids may be used with caution, and fungal-specific immunotherapy and systemic antifungals are options in recalcitrant disease. Biologics show early promise, as we await data from randomized controlled trials under way. Finally, new insights into AFRS pathology provide opportunities for novel therapeutic strategies.
Asunto(s)
Sinusitis Fúngica Alérgica , Pólipos Nasales , Senos Paranasales , Sinusitis , Humanos , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Pólipos Nasales/diagnóstico , Pólipos Nasales/terapia , Senos Paranasales/patología , Sinusitis/terapia , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Unified airway disease describes the shared epidemiologic and pathophysiologic relationship among the chronic inflammatory diseases of the upper and lower airways including allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, asthma, and chronic otitis media. This concept proposes that these diseases are manifestations of a single inflammatory process and require an integrated diagnostic and therapeutic approach to achieve global disease control. Future directions to further establish this entity should focus on pathophysiology, diagnostic markers, flora microbes with particular emphasis on fungi, the role of type 3 inflammation, and targeted therapeutics including biologics, JAK inhibitors, and synthetic peptides.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Rinitis Alérgica , Sinusitis , Humanos , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Sinusitis/terapia , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Sistema Respiratorio , Inflamación , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify differences in inpatient otolaryngology consultations and interventions for patients based on COVID-19. METHODS: Records were reviewed for all patients for whom otolaryngology was consulted at a high-volume tertiary care hospital from April 30, 2020 to October 1, 2020. Demographic information, length of stay, COVID-19 status, indication for consultation, and otolaryngology interventions were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. RESULTS: Bleeding composed a significantly higher proportion of otolaryngology consults in COVID-19 positive patients (28% vs. 8.4%, p<0.0001). Management of bleeding was the most common procedure performed in positive patients (n=37, 35%), and they had a higher median number of interventions performed when compared to bleeding patients who tested negative (1, IQR 1-2 vs. 1, IQR 0-1, p=0.04). COVID-19 positive patients with bleeding were more likely to expire than those with other indications for otolaryngology consultation (50% vs. 7%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Bleeding and associated interventions comprised the predominant discrepancy between COVID-19 positive and negative patients in our cohort. We encourage routine use of simple and cost-effective methods to decrease risk of bleeding.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Otolaringología , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Derivación y Consulta , HemorragiaRESUMEN
These evidence-based guidelines support patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders in decisions about the use of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS), biologics, and aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) for the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). It is important to note that the current evidence on surgery for CRSwNP was not assessed for this guideline nor were management options other than INCS, biologics, and ATAD. The Allergy-Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to include the views of multiple stakeholders and to minimize potential biases. Systematic reviews for each management option informed the guideline. The guideline panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to inform and develop recommendations. The guideline panel reached consensus on the following statements: (1) In people with CRSwNP, the guideline panel suggests INCS rather than no INCS (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence). (2) In people with CRSwNP, the guideline panel suggests biologics rather than no biologics (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence). (3) In people with aspirin (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug)-exacerbated respiratory disease, the guideline panel suggests ATAD rather than no ATAD (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence). The conditions for each recommendation are discussed in the guideline.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Pólipos Nasales , Rinitis , Sinusitis , Humanos , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Administración Intranasal , Pólipos Nasales/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Crónica , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The escalating negative impact of climate change on our environment has the potential to result in significant morbidity of rhinologic diseases. METHODS: Evidence based review of examples of rhinologic diseases including allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and allergic fungal rhinosinusitis was performed. RESULTS: The lower socioeconomic population, including historically oppressed groups, will be disproportionately affected. CONCLUSIONS: We need a systematic approach to improve healthcare database infrastructure and funding to promote diverse scientific collaboration to address these healthcare needs.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad , Rinitis , Sinusitis , Humanos , Cambio Climático , Rinitis/epidemiología , Sinusitis/epidemiología , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a noninvasive subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) that usually develops in immunocompetent atopic individuals and is more common in geographic regions characterized by warm temperatures and high humidity, conducive to higher environmental fungal presence. Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis usually presents with unique computed tomography findings and significant polyp burden, yet patients often report minimal sinus symptoms. Patients with AFRS often have extremely elevated serum total and fungal-specific IgE levels. Treatment almost always requires surgery, in which adjuvant medical therapy is critical to success. However, until recently the choice of adjuvant therapy has consisted primarily of either oral and/or topical steroids. Although oral corticosteroids decrease recurrence after surgery, data for the effectiveness of other adjunctive pharmacologic agents, including topical and oral antifungal agents and immunotherapy, have remained unclear and hence are not recommended in recent guidelines including the International Consensus of Allergy and Rhinology. Three biologics, omalizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab, have recently been approved for treating CRSwNP in general, but clinical trials to date with these biologics did not involve AFRS patients. Recently published case reports and smaller prospective studies have shown good efficacy of these biologics on the AFRS subgroup of patients. This article provides an overview of the understanding of the pathophysiology of AFRS, implications of this understanding on the possible role of biologics, and clinical reports on the use of biologics in treating AFRS. Because biologics are indicated for treating CRSwNP, follow up real-world evidence studies are needed for AFRS.
Asunto(s)
Sinusitis Fúngica Alérgica , Productos Biológicos , Pólipos Nasales , Rinitis , Sinusitis , Humanos , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Pólipos Nasales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pólipos Nasales/cirugía , Enfermedad Crónica , Rinitis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is associated with a significant disease burden. The optimal use of and administration route for intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) when managing CRSwNP are unclear. OBJECTIVE: We systematically synthesized the evidence addressing INCS for CRSwNP. METHODS: We searched studies archived in Medline, Embase, and Central from database inception until September 1, 2021, for randomized controlled trials comparing INCS using any delivery method to placebo or other INCS administration types. Paired reviewers screened records, abstracted data, and rated risk of bias (CLARITY revision of Cochrane Risk of Bias version 1 tool) independently and in duplicate. We synthesized the evidence for each outcome using random effects network meta-analyses. We critically appraised the evidence following the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: We analyzed 61 randomized controlled trials (7176 participants, 8 interventions). Sinusitis-related quality of life might improve with INCS rinse (mean difference [MD] -6.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] -11.94 to -1.71) and exhalation delivery system (EDS) (MD -7.86, 95% CI -14.64 to -1.08) compared to placebo (both low certainty evidence). Nasal obstruction symptoms are likely improved when receiving INCS via stent/dressing (MD -0.31, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.08), spray (MD -0.51, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.41), and EDS (MD -0.35, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.18) (all moderate to high certainty) compared to placebo. We found no important differences in adverse effects among interventions (moderate certainty for INCS spray, very low to low certainty for others). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple delivery forms of INCS are viable therapeutic options for CRSwNP, resulting in improvement of patient-important outcomes. INCS via stent, spray, and EDS appear to be beneficial across the widest range of considered outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Metaanálisis en RedRESUMEN
Background: Endoscopic sinus surgery presents significant visuospatial challenges to surgical trainees. We tested the utility of novel 3D printed models to simulate sinus surgery tasks to improve endoscopic skillsets in resident trainees. Methods: This was a prospective quality improvement study of 10 ENT residents (PGY1-5). Participants rotated through 4 stations with different 3D simulation training modules designed to enhance endoscopic skillsets in the axial, sagittal and coronal planes (e.g., straight forceps to grasp a bead from a ledge, angled instruments to cannulate openings). Participants completed a self-assessment survey on the subjective sinus surgical skills using a visual analog scale before and after tasks. Two- tailed paired T-tests were used to analyze the data. Results: All residents rated their post-intervention "overall sinus surgery skills" higher than pre-intervention. They rated simulations to provide more significant utility as an adjunct to surgical education after the intervention. All but one participant reported improved spatial awareness working with the endoscopes and surgical instruments. There was subjectively improved proficiency in using 0-degree and angled endoscopes as well as cutting, grasping, and curved instruments after the intervention. The simulations led to subjective improvements in spatial awareness, bimanual dexterity, and increased confidence in selecting correct surgical instruments. Conclusion: Our set of novel 3D printed models to improve sinus surgery skillset was well accepted by the resident cohort. The 3D models can serve as an adjunct tool to traditional residency education.
RESUMEN
Absorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants provide targeted corticosteroid release over a sustained period and are designed to prevent both undesirable adhesion formation and sinus ostia restenosis. Here, we highlight the key evidence of these implants to date and query a group of experts via a Delphi process on the indications and optimal timing for intraoperative or in-office placement of these implants. Six of a total of 12 statements reached consensus and were accepted. Overall, experts largely agree that intraoperative or in-office use of steroid-eluting stents could be considered for patients: (1) who are diabetic or intolerant of oral steroids, (2) undergoing extended frontal sinus surgery, and (3) with recurrent stenosis. Given the lack of expert consensus on other key statements, clinicians should carefully consider these treatment options on a case-by-case basis after shared decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Rinitis , Sinusitis , Implantes Absorbibles , Corticoesteroides , Enfermedad Crónica , Técnica Delphi , Endoscopía , Humanos , Rinitis/cirugía , Sinusitis/cirugía , Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Unified airway disease, including concurrent asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), is a common, but poorly understood disorder with no curative treatment options. To establish a murine model of chronic unified eosinophilic airway inflammation, mice were challenged with Aspergillus niger, and sinonasal mucosa and lung tissue were evaluated by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and gene expression. Inhalation of A niger conidia resulted in a Th2-biased lung and sinus inflammation that typifies allergic asthma and CRS. Gene network and pathway analysis correlated with human disease with upregulation of not only the JAK-STAT and helper T-cell pathways, but also less expected pathways governing the spliceosome, osteoclast differentiation, and coagulation pathways. Utilizing a specific inhibitor and gene-deficient mice, we demonstrate that STAT6 is required for mycosis-induced sinus inflammation. These findings confirm the relevance of this new model and portend future studies that further extend our understanding of the immunopathologic basis of airway mycosis and unified airway disease.