Laparoscopic Roux-Y-gastric bypass versus laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass for obesity: clinical & metabolic results of a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has been proposed as an effective alternative to the current standard procedure in Switzerland, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Prospective data comparing both procedures are scarce. Therefore, we performed a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness and safety of these 2 operative techniques. METHOD: Eighty patients were randomized 1:1. OAGB consisted of a very long gastric pouch with a 200 cm biliopancreatic limb, RYGB of a 150 cm ante-colic alimentary and a 60 cm biliopancreatic limb, respectively. Primary endpoint was the percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Mean %EWL at 12 months was 87.9% (SD24.4) in the RYGB group and 104.1% (SD24.6) in the OAGB group (p = 0.006). There was no mortality. The rate of marginal ulcers was higher in patients with OAGB compared to those with RYGB (p = 0.011), while the total number of late complications did not statistically differ between the two groups. Except for the remission of GERD, which was higher in the RYGB group compared to OAGB, there was no difference between the groups regarding the remission of comorbidities. OAGB showed improved glucose control compared to the RYGB after 1 year (p = 0.001). Furthermore, glucagon-like peptide-1 increase was significantly higher in OAGB at 6 weeks (p = 0.041) and 1 year after surgery (p = 0.029). Quality of life improved after both surgeries, without differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: %EWL 1 year after surgery was higher in OAGB than in RYGB. A better glycemic control with a higher increase in GLP-1 was observed after OAGB compared to RYGB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT02601092.

Incretin therapy in feline diabetes mellitus - A review of the current state of research.

Incretin hormones potentiate the glucose-induced insulin secretion following enteral nutrient intake. The best characterised incretin hormones are glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) which are produced in and secreted from the gut in response to nutrient ingestion. The property of incretins to enhance endogenous insulin secretion only at elevated blood glucose levels makes them interesting therapeutics for type 2 diabetes mellitus with a better safety profile than exogenous insulin. While incretin therapeutics (especially GLP-1 agonists, and more recently also GLP-1 / GIP dual agonists and other drugs that influence the incretin metabolism (e.g., dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors)) are already widely used treatment options for human type 2 diabetes, these drugs are not yet approved for the therapy of feline diabetes mellitus. This review provides an introduction to incretins and feline diabetes mellitus in general and summarises the current study situation on incretins as therapeutics for feline diabetes mellitus to assess their possible future potential in feline medicine. Studies to date on the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) in healthy cats largely confirm their insulinotropic effect known from other species. In diabetic cats, GLP-1RAs appear to significantly reduce glycaemic variability (GV, an indicator for the quality of glycaemic control), which is important for the management of the disease and prevention of long-term complications. However, for widespread use in feline diabetes mellitus, further studies are required that include larger numbers of diabetic cats, and that consider and test a possible need for dose adjustments to overweight and diabetic cats. Also evaluation of the outcome of GLP-1RA monotherapy will be neceessary.

Weight loss in adult male Wistar rats by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is primarily explained by caloric intake reduction and presurgery body weight.

Diets varying in macronutrient composition, energy density, and/or palatability may cause differences in outcome of bariatric surgery. In the present study, rats feeding a healthy low-fat (LF) diet or an obesogenic high-fat/sucrose diet (HF/S) were either subjected to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) or sham surgery, and weight loss trajectories and various energy balance parameters were assessed. Before RYGB, rats eating an HF/S (n = 14) diet increased body weight relative to rats eating an LF diet (n = 20; P < 0.01). After RYGB, absolute weight loss was larger in HF/S (n = 6) relative to LF feeding (n = 6) rats, and this was associated with reduced cumulative energy intake (EI; P < 0.05) and increased locomotor activity (LA; P < 0.05-0.001), finally leading to similar levels of reduced body fat content in HF/S and LF rats 3 wk after surgery. Regression analysis revealed that variation in RYGB-induced body weight loss was best explained by models including 1) postoperative cumulative EI and preoperative body weight (R2 = 0.87) and 2) postoperative cumulative EI and diet (R2 = 0.79), each without significant contribution of LA. Particularly rats on the LF diet became transiently more hypothermic and circadianally arrhythmic following RYGB (i.e., indicators of surgery-associated malaise) than HF/S feeding rats. Our data suggest that relative to feeding an LF diet, continued feeding an HF/S diet does not negatively impact recovery from RYGB surgery, yet it promotes RYGB-induced weight loss. The RYGB-induced weight loss is primarily explained by reduced cumulative EI and higher preoperative body weight, leading to comparably low levels of body fat content in HF/S and LF feeding rats.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Relative to feeding an LF diet, continued feeding an HF/S diet does not negatively impact recovery from RYGB surgery in rats. Relative to feeding an LF diet, continued feeding an HF/S diet promotes RYGB-induced weight loss. The RYGB-induced weight loss is primarily explained by reduced cumulative EI and higher preoperative body weight, leading to comparably low levels of body fat content in HF/S and LF feeding rats.

The processing intermediate of human amylin, pro-amylin(1-48), has in vivo and in vitro bioactivity.

Amylin is released by pancreatic beta-cells in response to a meal and its major soluble mature form (37 amino acid-peptide) produces its biological effects by activating amylin receptors. Amylin is derived from larger propeptides that are processed within the synthesizing beta-cell. There are suggestions that a partially processed form, pro-amylin(1-48) is also secreted. We tested the hypothesis that pro-amylin(1-48) has biological activity and that human pro-amylin(1-48) may also form toxic pre-amyloid species. Amyloid formation, the ability to cross-seed and in vitro toxicity were similar between human pro-amylin(1-48) and amylin. Human pro-amylin(1-48) was active at amylin-responsive receptors, though its potency was reduced at rat, but not human amylin receptors. Pro-amylin(1-48) was able to promote anorexia by activating neurons of the area postrema, amylin's primary site of action, indicating that amylin can tolerate significant additions at the N-terminus without losing bioactivity. Our studies help to shed light on the possible roles of pro-amylin(1-48) which may be relevant for the development of future amylin-based drugs.