[Recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone : Expert recommendation of the working group on acute pain of the German Pain Society, the scientific working group on pain medicine of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the surgical working group on acute pain of the German Society for Surgery with participation of representatives of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association]. / Empfehlungen zur perioperativen Anwendung von Metamizol : Expertenempfehlung des Arbeitskreises Akutschmerz der Deutschen Schmerzgesellschaft, des Wissenschaftlichen Arbeitskreises Schmerzmedizin der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin und der Chirurgischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Akutschmerz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie unter Beteiligung von Vertretern der Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft.

BACKGROUND: Dipyrone (metamizole) is widely used for perioperative pain management in countries where it is marketed; however, uncertainty exists concerning the safe use of this drug, specifically considering the rare adverse event of an agranulocytosis. METHODS: As evidence from published studies was lacking, an expert panel developed recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone. After a formal, structured consensus process, the recommendations were approved by the involved medical societies. RESULTS: The panel agreed that blood cell counts shall not be standard for short-term perioperative use in patients unless they are at risk for neutropenia. The medical staff shall be aware of the symptoms and course of action when agranulocytosis is suspected. Patients shall be informed about the risks and benefits of dipyrone and about potential alternatives. The expert group concluded that dipyrone has a relatively positive risk-benefit ratio compared to other nonopioid analgesics. The group strongly recommended educating patients about the symptoms of agranulocytosis if they have received dipyrone over several days and/or treatment is to be continued after discharge, because agranulocytosis can occur several days after discontinuation of metamizole. Further recommendations refer to the information of the physician taking over the patient's care after discharge and the avoidance of re-exposure in patients having previously suffered from dipyrone-induced agranulocytosis. CONCLUSION: The group's recommendations shall be communicated in order to raise medical staff's and patients' awareness of the appropriate use of dipyrone in the perioperative period.

[Recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone : Expert recommendation of the working group on acute pain of the German Pain Society, the scientific working group on pain medicine of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the surgical working group on acute pain of the German Society for Surgery with participation of representatives of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association]. / Empfehlungen zur perioperativen Anwendung von Metamizol : Expertenempfehlung des Arbeitskreises Akutschmerz der Deutschen Schmerzgesellschaft, des Wissenschaftlichen Arbeitskreises Schmerzmedizin der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin und der Chirurgischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Akutschmerz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie unter Beteiligung von Vertretern der Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft.

BACKGROUND: Dipyrone (metamizole) is widely used for perioperative pain management in countries where it is marketed; however, uncertainty exists concerning the safe use of this drug, specifically considering the rare adverse event of an agranulocytosis. METHODS: As evidence from published studies was lacking, an expert panel developed recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone. After a formal, structured consensus process, the recommendations were approved by the involved medical societies. RESULTS: The panel agreed that blood cell counts shall not be standard for short-term perioperative use in patients unless they are at risk for neutropenia. The medical staff shall be aware of the symptoms and course of action when agranulocytosis is suspected. Patients shall be informed about the risks and benefits of dipyrone and about potential alternatives. The expert group concluded that dipyrone has a relatively positive risk-benefit ratio compared to other nonopioid analgesics. The group strongly recommended educating patients about the symptoms of agranulocytosis if they have received dipyrone over several days and/or treatment is to be continued after discharge, because agranulocytosis can occur several days after discontinuation of metamizole. Further recommendations refer to the information of the physician taking over the patient's care after discharge and the avoidance of re-exposure in patients having previously suffered from dipyrone-induced agranulocytosis. CONCLUSION: The group's recommendations shall be communicated in order to raise medical staff's and patients' awareness of the appropriate use of dipyrone in the perioperative period.

[Recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone : Expert recommendation of the working group on acute pain of the German Pain Society, the scientific working group on pain medicine of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the surgical working group on acute pain of the German Society for Surgery with participation of representatives of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association]. / Empfehlungen zur perioperativen Anwendung von Metamizol : Expertenempfehlung des Arbeitskreises Akutschmerz der Deutschen Schmerzgesellschaft, des Wissenschaftlichen Arbeitskreises Schmerzmedizin der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin und der Chirurgischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Akutschmerz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie unter Beteiligung von Vertretern der Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft.

BACKGROUND: Dipyrone (metamizole) is widely used for perioperative pain management in countries where it is marketed; however, uncertainty exists concerning the safe use of this drug, specifically considering the rare adverse event of an agranulocytosis. METHODS: As evidence from published studies was lacking, an expert panel developed recommendations for the perioperative use of dipyrone. After a formal, structured consensus process, the recommendations were approved by the involved medical societies. RESULTS: The panel agreed that blood cell counts shall not be standard for short-term perioperative use in patients unless they are at risk for neutropenia. The medical staff shall be aware of the symptoms and course of action when agranulocytosis is suspected. Patients shall be informed about the risks and benefits of dipyrone and about potential alternatives. The expert group concluded that dipyrone has a relatively positive risk-benefit ratio compared to other nonopioid analgesics. The group strongly recommended educating patients about the symptoms of agranulocytosis if they have received dipyrone over several days and/or treatment is to be continued after discharge, because agranulocytosis can occur several days after discontinuation of metamizole. Further recommendations refer to the information of the physician taking over the patient's care after discharge and the avoidance of re-exposure in patients having previously suffered from dipyrone-induced agranulocytosis. CONCLUSION: The group's recommendations shall be communicated in order to raise medical staff's and patients' awareness of the appropriate use of dipyrone in the perioperative period.

[Is supplemental ear acupuncture for surgical tooth removal with local anesthesia effective? : A pilot study]. / Ist die Supplementierung der Ohrakupunktur bei operativer Zahnentfernung in Lokalanästhesie effektiv? : Eine Pilotstudie.

BACKGROUND: The application of ear acupuncture can contribute to a reduction of acute pain. Data on the application of ear acupuncture following oral surgery in odontology is insufficient. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effectiveness of ear acupuncture as an auxiliary analgesic treatment in addition to local anesthesia for operative tooth removal. METHODS: In this prospective open non-randomized pilot study (in accordance with the CONSORT publication) 2 cohorts of 50 patients each with the indications for an operative tooth removal either with or without the application of ear acupuncture in addition to local anesthesia with articain were observed. Patients were allocated to the groups according to their preference. Pain intensity while resting and while chewing was recorded as the primary parameter for a period of 10 days. The secondary parameters were the subjective experience of anxiety and symptoms, such as headaches, dizziness and nausea. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to demographic variables or the use of local anesthetics. At the various measurement intervals, pain intensity while resting or chewing differed significantly between the two groups (ANOVA, p = 0.004, p = 0.007, respectively). Furthermore, the experience of anxiety (ANOVA, p = 0.0001), the number of patients taking analgesics (χ2-test, p = 0.017) and the total postoperative consumption of analgesics (t-test, 0.001) revealed significant differences. In both groups the numerical rating scales (NRS) for postoperative headaches, dizziness and nausea were low. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Despite a potential bias and methodological limitations of the study design, the results of this investigation suggest that ear acupuncture influences the experience of pain and anxiety in the postoperative period after tooth removal. As a treatment method with low adverse effects ear acupuncture can contribute to postoperative pain control, especially in patients with preoperative anxiety.

[Pain therapy with metamizole after ambulatory surgery?] / Postoperative Akutschmerztherapie nach ambulanten Operationen mit Metamizol?

One third of operations are performed on an outpatient basis in Germany, but methods of postoperative pain therapy are less studied. We observed 126 patients with ambulatory and planned surgery in the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery. They were treated with the analgesic metamizole intra- and postoperatively and completed the patients' questionnaire QUIPS on the first postoperative day. In all, 79 patients (61.7%) reported current pain ≥4 on the numerical rating scale (NRS); 84 (66.6%) had restrictions in mobility, 48 (38.1%) described sleep disorders, and 26 (20.6%) wished for more or stronger analgesics. However, 91 (72.2%) of our patients were satisfied with the their pain therapy. Chances are that the treatment of nociceptive pain during movement with NSAID or COX-2-inhibitors is more successful. Further investigations should follow.

[Palliative approach in outpatient care in Westphalia-Lippe--Follow-up study five years after inception of a structured home-based palliative care system]. / Ambulante Palliativversorgung in Westfalen-Lippe--Eine Follow-up-Erhebung fünf Jahre nach Einführung einer strukturierten Versorgung im häuslichen Umfeld.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2009, based on an agreement to implement palliative care for terminally ill patients at home in Westfalia-Lippe, family doctors and palliative doctors cooperate, supported by coordinators. METHOD: Since 2009, this cooperation is evaluated, concerning supply structure, number of patients and their places of death. RESULTS: In Westfalia-Lippe, yearly approx. 91.000 patients die, approx. 19 % of them, 17.699 patients, were included in palliative care structures, compared to some 6 % in 2009/2010. Whereas in the first years about 70 % of the palliative patients died at home, 2014 this number increased to 75 %. Only 9 % of our patients 2014 died in a hospital (normal ward) - compared to about 13 % in 2009/2010. This applies both for urban and rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: The idea of home based, family doctor supported palliative care led to a significant strengthening of the general out-patient palliative care. The number of patients, integrated in our structures of palliative care in 2014 tripled compare to those of 2009/2010. Well trained and experienced coordinators are the essential guarantee of multidisciplinary and multiprofessional team-work. The results of the regional palliative care structures are different also after the agreement came in effect. Data for quality assurance should be periodically collected and evaluated in the future to develop the palliative care structures for outpatients.

[QUIPSambulant. An instrument for quality assurance in acute pain therapy after outpatient operations]. / QUIPSambulant. Ein Tool zur Qualitätssicherung in der Akutschmerztherapie nach ambulanten Operationen.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Up until recently no tool for quality assurance (QA) of outpatient pain therapy after outpatient surgery, which currently constitutes one third of all operations, was available with benchmarking capacity. The QUIPS (German abbreviation for quality assurance in postoperative pain therapy) questionnaire, that had primarily been developed and established for inpatient postoperative pain therapy, was to be optimized to not only incorporate the issues with regard to outpatient operations but also a revision for use in the clinical routine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An interdisciplinary task force reviewed and optimized the QUIPS questionnaire. The optimized questionnaire was then used within the scope of outpatient surgery in their clinics. A total of 121 patients and 12 surgeons received a questionnaire on the first postoperative day containing questions on acceptance and understandability of the QUIPS patient outcome questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the patients 12 (9.9 %) did not understand the original question on special pain therapy procedures stated during the preoperative counseling. For 15 patients (12.4 %) the original questions on chronic or pre-existing pain were misleading and 4 out of the 12 surgeons (33 %) did not conclusively understand these questions. The optimized questionnaire modified the questions in the preoperative counseling in the segment of postoperative pain as follows: question E1 was changed to a yes/no answer. Question E13 was modified to "how content were you with respect to your post-operative pain therapy?" Question E14 was modified to "did you suffer from other pain prior to the operation, hence pain that continued in addition to the postoperative pain?" These changes improved the understandability of the QUIPS patient outcome questionnaire. Surgeons required on average 9.7 min (SD ±3.2 min) to complete the QUIPS documentation sheets and 83 % of the surgeons rated the optimized QUIPS module as usable in the daily routine. The new module QUIPSambulant will soon be available for download on the QUIPS internet website. DISCUSSION: By reducing items on the QUIPS documentation sheets with respect to items relevant for outpatient surgery and redesigning three questions in the patient outcome questionnaire, a new QUIPS module for the QA of postoperative pain in an ambulatory setting is now available for both patients and surgeons. The necessity for quality management (QM) with regard to postoperative pain therapy after outpatient surgery can be considered assured. To what extent the newly adapted QM tool QUIPSambulant will be deemed suitable in a routine hospital setting remains to be seen and requires ongoing investigation.

[Palliative home care in Westfalia-Lippe--baseline study 12 and 36 months after coming into effect of the "agreement to the implementation of ambulant home palliative careforterminally ill patients"]. / Ambulante Palliativversorgung in Westfalen-Lippe--Strukturierte Bestandsaufnahme 12 und 36 Monate nach Inkrafttreten der "Vereinbarung zur Umsetzung der ambulanten palliativmedizinischen Versorgung von unheilbar Kranken im häuslichen Umfeld".

BACKGROUND: On 2009-04-01 the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians Westfalia-Lippe and health insurance organizations made an agreement to implement palliative home care for terminally ill patients. Based on this agreement, family doctors and palliativecardoctorscooperate,supported by coordinators. METHOD: 12 and 36 months after coming into effect of the agreement a questionnaire was sent to the regional palliative care networks to collect data about supply structure, number of patients and their place of death. RESULTS: In the year 2011 85,410 people died in Westfalia-Lippe, 9.0% of them were included in palliative care structures. 69.5% of the included patients died at home, 9.9% in hospital (in 2010: 68.7% at home, 14.7% in hospital). A correlation between the population density or the number of included patients per palliative networkcould not be detected. CONCLUSION: Low-threshold access to palliative care networks(bothfamilydoctorand patientcancontact the palliative care team at any time) improves ambulant palliative care. Non-bureaucratic change from general home palliative care (German abbreviation: AAPV) to specialized home palliative care (SAPV) has proven successful in Westfalia-Lippe. Well-trained and experienced coordinators guarantee multidisciplinary and multiprofessional working of palliative care teams. In order to enhance palliative care in Westfalia-Lippe, data for quality assurance should be defined, periodically collected and evaluated in the future.

[Home care treatment of cancer pain patients with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)]. / Häusliche Behandlung von Tumorschmerzpatienten mit patientenkontrollierter Analgesie (PCA).

BACKGROUND: Only limited data and experience with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in outpatients for palliative home care, related to organization, effectiveness and costs are available. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our retrospective study we analyzed the effectiveness, care intensity and pain reduction of 108 palliative cancer pain patients with PCA, included in a palliative home care system. RESULTS: After equivalent conversion of the opioid doses from oral/transcutaneus to parenteral administration a dose increase was necessary in 12.9% of the patients. The pain therapy was effective until death for an average of 38.9 days (median 21 days). During 3,889 days of PCA therapy there were 76 unscheduled visits based on technical problems. CONCLUSION: In cases of cancer pain patients with failed oral or transcutaneous opioid medication, sufficient pain reduction can be achieved with parenteral drug administration by PCA. Domestic PCA requires a lot of human and financial resources, with trained nursing services and regular house visits by physicians experienced in palliative medicine but this method is sufficient and safe to use.

[Experience in treatment of patients with neuropathic facial pain using ziconotide]. / Erfahrungen mit intrathekaler First-line-Therapie mit Ziconotide bei Patienten mit Neuropathischen Gesichtsschmerzen.

We report on the intrathecal use of ziconotide in three patients with idiopathic facial pain after surgery of the mouth, jaw or face and one patient with neuropathic pain after damage of the lingual nerve. The therapy was successful in three patients but one patient with idiopathic facial pain had pain relief only during the test phase of ziconotide with an external pump and not after implanting the Synchromed® pump. With intrathecal morphine therapy this patient achieved good pain relief. We recommend that patients with neuropathic facial pain should be treated with ziconotide after implementation of guideline-based therapy. In the test phase the ziconotide dose should be increased by 0.6 µg/day per week after an initial dose of 0.6-1.2 µg/day to avoid side-effects.

[Postoperative pain management after ambulatory surgery. A survey of anaesthesiologists]. / Postoperative Schmerztherapie nach ambulanten Operationen. Eine Befragung der behandelnden Anästhesisten.

BACKGROUND: Data on practice and quality of postoperative pain treatment by anaesthesiologists after ambulatory surgery are sparse. The current survey enrolled anaesthesiologists in private practice who were responsible for pain therapy after ambulatory surgery. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the implementation of the German S3 guidelines for acute and postoperative pain therapy in the outpatient setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2,156 anaesthesiologists in private practice received a postal questionnaire which was limited to those anaesthesiologists who were responsible for postoperative pain therapy. The questionnaire included items such as types of surgery, techniques of anaesthesia and analgesic drugs used for pain management during the immediate postoperative phase and for the treatment at home as well as details of pain measurement. RESULTS: Out of 116 responses 108 could be analyzed covering a total of 86,616 patients receiving postoperative pain therapy, 80% of the operations were performed using general anaesthesia and local anaesthesia was additionally used in 9% of the institutions. In the perioperative period 66% of the respondents administered non-steroidal-antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 62% metamizol (dipyrone), 41% paracetamol (acetaminophen) and 73% opioids. After discharge 81% of the responding anaesthesiologists prescribed NSAIDs, 55% metamizol and 47% opioids for pain relief at home. Only 40% of the respondents measured and documented pain intensity. Nearly all respondents (93%) were satisfied with their pain management after outpatient surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Pain therapy after ambulatory surgery significantly varied with respect to the methods, drugs and measures of quality assurance used by anaesthesiologists in private praxis. This survey demonstrated that the national guidelines of acute pain therapy have only been partially implemented.

[Teaching pain management. An innovative curriculum model at the University of Witten/Herdecke (UWH)]. / Schmerztherapie in der Lehre. Ein innovatives Curriculumsmodell an der Universität Witten/Herdecke (UWH).

BACKGROUND: The subject of pain and pain therapy is not mandatory in medical curricula in Germany. Therefore, the German Society for the Study of Pain (DGSS) has developed a core-curriculum for pain and suggested its implementation for all medical faculties. METHOD: At the University of Witten/Herdecke this DGSS core curriculum was extended in terms of a "pain week", which comprised 22 h of seminars and clinical teaching and started in 2009. The knowledge gained by the students regarding the intended learning issues was measured by a pre-post self-assessment questionnaire. RESULTS: In almost every category the students reported significant knowledge gain. The learning issues were rated as relevant for the professional career. CONCLUSION: The "pain week" is intended to be a constant part of the medical curriculum at the University of Witten/Herdecke in the future. It will be integrated into the new cross-sectional subject of palliative care and be assessed by examinations.

[Ketamine racemate and fast track anaesthesia. Influence on recovery times and postoperative opioid needs]. / Ketaminrazemat bei "Fast-track"-Anästhesie. Einfluss auf Aufwachzeiten und postoperativen Opioidbedarf.

INTRODUCTION: In this study the impact of 25 mg of ketamine racemate given just before surgery on recovery times and postoperative analgesic needs in patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy and receiving propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia was investigated. METHODS: With ethics committee approval 70 female patients aged 25-65 years were enrolled. All patients received a total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol with the propofol infusion being controlled to a Narcotrend index of 40. Patients in the ketamine group (n=35) received additionally a bolus dose of 25 mg ketamine racemate intravenously 3 min before skin incision. In addition to monitoring haemodynamics and circulation parameters, recovery times, postoperative pain and opioid needs were also recorded. Patients were also questioned on their satisfaction with the pain therapy. RESULTS: All 70 patients completed the study and the groups were similar with respect to demographic data. The haemodynamics of the patients were stable in both groups and the postoperative pain measured over a 24-h period as well as the opioid needs were also comparable. However, recovery times were significantly prolonged in the ketamine group, e.g. the times to extubation were 8.3+/-4.0 min with ketamine compared to 6.1+/-2.1 min in the control group (p<0.01). Undesired side effects were overall rare but occurred to the same extent in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that 25 mg ketamine racemate given just before surgery significantly prolongs recovery times without reducing post-operative analgesic needs when applied to patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy and receiving propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. A bolus dose of 25 mg ketamine racemate cannot therefore be recommended for preemptive analgesia under these conditions.

[Successful treatment of treatment-resistant opioid-induced constipation in a patient with incomplete paraplegia with methylnaltrexone]. / Behandlung einer therapieresistenten, opioidbedingten Obstipation bei inkomplettem Querschnittssyndrom mit Methylnaltrexon.

We observed a patient with incomplete, cervical paraplegia and opioid-induced constipation who developed a resistance to laxatives after 15 years of treatment. The constipation-induced reduction in the patient's quality of life was improved using 12 mg methylnaltrexone, a peripheral mu-opioid receptor antagonist, administered subcutaneously twice a week.

[Postoperative pain after ambulatory surgery]. / Postoperative Schmerztherapie nach ambulanten Operationen.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient surgeons were surveyed about the quality of postoperative pain therapy after outpatient interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 2,317 outpatient surgeons who received a questionnaire by mail, 419 responded. The return rate was 18.1%. The questionnaire collected data on the operative procedures and methods of anesthesia from 2004 and the analgesics, which were applied in the immediate postoperative period and at home. Methods and contents of quality control were registered. RESULTS: The respondents indicated that the person responsible for the pain therapy was the surgeon in 74% of the practices, the anesthesiologist in 16%, and both in 10%. The drugs used in the practice were: novaminsulfone (34%), NSAIDs (28%), and opioids (36%). The drugs used for at-home care were: NSAIDs (58%), opioids (43%), novaminsulfone (32%), and mixed analgesics (28%). No analgesics were given by 6%, and 21% prescribed a supplementary antiemetic. Routine pain measurement was performed with pain scales in only 11% of the practices; among the certified practices, 48% performed pain measurement for quality control. Ninety-five percent of the surgeons were satisfied with the pain therapy. CONCLUSION: This survey shows that the guidelines for acute pain therapy (http://www.awmf.de ) are only partially implemented.

[Puncture catheterization of central veins--experiences from a primary care clinic]. / Der Punktionskatheterismus zentraler Venen--Erfahrungen aus einer Klinik der Grundversorgung.

BACKGROUND: We introduced in the years 1984-1989 317 central venous catheters. Our results and conclusions for using those catheters in smaller hospitals are described. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 4 physicians inserted under standardized conditions 317 central venous catheters in the intensive care unit using the transmuscular way for puncturing the V. jugularis interna and the infraclavicular way for puncturing the V. subclavia. RESULTS: Puncturing the V. basilica complications were not registered. By the V. subclavia route a Pneumothorax rate of 1.7% and an arterial puncture rate of 4.1% were found compared with a 4% arterial puncture rate using the V. jugularis interna. We couldn't find the V. subclavia in 3.4% and the V. jugularis interna in 8%. The complication rate decreased with increasing experience of the physicians. The positions of the catheters in the venous system were not appropriate in 46.9% of the cases after puncture of the V. basilica and in 1.3% after puncture of V. subclavia. Wrong catheter positions were not found after puncturing the V. jugularis interna. Complications as thrombophlebitis were observed in 6.5% after puncturing the V. basilica and 1.1% of the cases after V. subclavia puncture. CONCLUSIONS: Central venous catheters can be safely used also in smaller hospitals if applied by a standardized method. A limited team of physicians can get enough experiences also in a slight number of patients, so that complication rates as low as in international statistics were found.