Molecular classification improves preoperative risk assessment of endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the performance of endometrial cancer (EC) molecular classification in predicting extrauterine disease after primary surgery alone and in combination with other clinical data available in preoperative setting. METHODS: Retrospective single-center observational study including patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma treated with primary surgery between December 1994 and May 2022. Molecular profiling was performed using immunohistochemistry of p53, MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6; and KASP genotyping of the 6 most common mutations of POLE gene. Clinical, pathological and imaging information was reviewed. Logistic regression, regression trees and random forest classification techniques (CART) were performed. RESULTS: We enrolled 658 patients, 47 with POLEmut (7.1%), 234 with MMRd (35.6%), 95 with p53abn (14.4%) and 282 with NSMP (42.8%) tumors. Advanced stage after primary surgery (III-IV FIGO 2009) was diagnosed in 11.7% of patients, p53abn tumors showed increased extrauterine spread (34.1%) and nodal involvement (30.1%) (p < .001). In multivariate analysis, only p53abn subgroup (aOR = 16.0, CI95% = 1.5-165.1) and radiological suspicion of extrauterine disease (aOR = 24.2, CI95% = 12.2-48.2) independently predicted the finding of extrauterine disease after primary surgery. In patients with preoperative uterine-confined disease, deep myometrial and cervical involvement in radiological assessment and p53abn molecular subtype were the best variables to identify patients at-risk of occult extrauterine disease after the staging surgery. CONCLUSION: EC molecular classification is more accurate than histotype or grade in preoperative biopsy to predict advanced disease, and together with imaging tests are the most reliable preoperative information. This work provides an initial framework for using molecular information preoperatively to tailor surgical treatment.

Molecular profile in endometrial carcinoma: can we predict the lymph node status? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Molecular classification of endometrial cancer (EC) has become a promising information to tailor preoperatively the surgical treatment. We aimed to evaluate the rate of lymph node metastases (LNM) in patients with EC according to molecular profile. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines by searching in two major electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus), including original articles reporting lymph node metastases according to the molecular classification of EC as categorized in the ESGO-ESMO-ESP guidelines. RESULTS: Fifteen studies enrolling 3056 patients were included. Pooled prevalence LNM when considering only patients undergoing lymph node assessment was 4% for POLE-mutated (95%CI: 0-12%), 22% for no specific molecular profile (95% CI: 9-39%), 23% for Mismatch repair-deficiency (95%CI: 10-40%) and 31% for p53-abnormal (95%CI: 24-39%). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of LNM seems to be influenced by molecular classification. P53-abnormal group presents the highest rate of nodal involvement, and POLE-mutated the lowest.

Molecular profile is a strong predictor of the pattern of recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the pattern of first recurrence of disease in patients with endometrial cancer according to molecular classification, and to assess the independent role of molecular profiling in each type of failure. METHODS: Retrospective single-center study including patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer stage I-IVB (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009) between December 1994 and May 2022, who underwent primary surgical treatment and had a complete molecular profile. First recurrence was classified as isolated or multiple, and as vaginal, pelvic, peritoneal, nodal, and distant according to its location. The log-rank test and univariate and multivariate adjusted Cox regression models were used for comparison between groups. RESULTS: A total of 658 patients were included. Recurrence was observed in 122 patients (18.5%) with a recurrence rate of 12.4% among mismatch-repair deficient tumors, 14.5% among non-specific molecular profile, 2.1% among POLE-mutated, and 53.7% among p53-abnormal tumors. Recurrences were found to be isolated in 80 (65.6%) and multiple in 42 (34.4%) patients, with no differences in molecular subtype (p=0.92). Patients with p53-abnormal tumors had a recurrence mainly as distant (28.4%) and peritoneal (21.1%) disease, while patients with non-specific molecular profile tumors presented predominantly with distant failures (10.3%), and mismatch-repair deficient tumors with locoregional recurrences (9.4%).On multivariate analysis, p53-abnormal molecular profile was the only independent risk factor for peritoneal failure (OR=8.54, 95% CI 2.0 to 36.3). Vaginal recurrence was independently associated with p53-abnormal molecular profile (OR=6.51, 95% CI 1.1 to 37.4) and lymphovascular space invasion. p53-abnormal and non-specific molecular profiles were independent predictors for distant recurrence (OR=3.13, 95% CI 1.1 to 8.7 and OR=2.35, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.0, respectively), along with lymphovascular space invasion and high-grade tumors. Molecular profile was not independently associated with pelvic and nodal recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial cancer featured different patterns of recurrence depending on the molecular profile. p53-abnormal molecular profiling was the only independent risk factor for peritoneal relapse, while non-specific molecular profile showed a strong association with distant failures.

Endometrial adenocarcinoma recurring in the lung: impact of molecular profile and role of local therapies on prognosis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study was to describe the characteristics of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed with a first recurrence involving the lung, and to describe the prognostic role of the molecular profile. We also aimed to describe the prognostic outcomes after local treatment of recurrence (resection of lung metastases or stereotactic body radiation therapy) in a group of patients with isolated lung recurrence. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study between June 1995 and July 2021. The study included patients diagnosed with a first recurrence of endometrial cancer involving the lung. We defined two groups of patients: patients with isolated lung recurrence (confined to the lung) and patients with multisystemic recurrence (in the lung and other locations). RESULTS: Among 1413 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer in stage IA to IVA of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009, 64 (4.5%) patients had a first recurrence involving the lung. Of these, 15 (39.1%) were of a non-specific molecular profile, 16 (25%) were p53-abnormal, 15 (23.4%) were mismatch-repair deficient, and 0% POLE-mutated. P53-abnormal patients had the shortest 3 year progression-free survival after recurrence and those with mismatch-repair deficient had the longest 3 year progression-free survival (14.3% (range; 1.6-40.3) and 47.6% (range; 9.1-79.5) respectively, p=0.001). We found no differences on overall survival after recurrence by molecular profile. Thirty-one of 64 (48.4%) patients had an isolated recurrence in the lung, and 16 (25%) patients received local treatment. When comparing patients with isolated lung recurrence, locally treated patients had a longer median progression-free survival than patients treated systemically (41.9 (range, 15.4-NA) vs 7.8 (range, 7.2-10.6) months respectively, p=0.029), a complete response rate of 80% for stereotactic body radiation therapy and a complete resection of 90.9% for surgery. CONCLUSION: Although few patients will benefit from local treatment (stereotactic body radiation therapy or resection) after a recurrence involving the lung, local therapies might be considered as an option in oligometastatic lung recurrences as they achieve high local control rates and better oncological outcomes than systemic treatment alone.

Surgical treatment in older patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Older patients (OP) diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC) are less likely to receive an optimal surgical treatment compared with non-older patients (NOP). This undertreatment along with the presence of more aggressive tumours at diagnosis can explain the worse prognosis of EC in OP. There is limited evidence comparing perioperative outcomes between OP and NOP, and the benefit of applying complex procedures to OP is still controversial. The primary objective of the study was to compare intraoperative and postoperative complications between NOP and OP with EC that underwent primary surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare surgical management and survival rates. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre observational study including women undergoing surgery for EC between 2010 and 2019. Patients were classified according to age as NOP (younger than 75 years) or OP (75 years or older). Basal characteristics and surgical outcomes of groups were compared using Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests, student T-tests or Mann Whitney tests. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival. RESULTS: In total 281 patients underwent primary surgery for EC between 2010 and 2019 in our centre. At diagnosis, 184 patients were younger than 75 years while 97 were 75 and older. No differences were found in disease characteristics. Most of our patients (83,3%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Pelvic (58,2% vs. 37,1%, p = 0,001) and para-aortic (46,7% vs. 23,7%, p < 0,001) lymphadenectomies were performed more frequently in NOP compared with OP. Rates of intra-operative (6,5% vs. 12,4%, p = 0,116) and post-operative (13,0% vs. 20,6%, p = 0,120) complications were not statistically different between NOP and OP, and neither was the rate of severe complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification (5,4% vs. 8,2% of complications grade III-V respectively, p = 0,387). The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate tended to be lower in the OP than in the NOP (74,8% vs. 82,5%, p = 0,071). Considering only patients in whom complete surgical staging was performed, OP presented similar DSS to NOP, with comparable complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: OP do not present a significantly higher rate of perioperative complications compared to NOP. However, they underwent fewer lymphadenectomies and tended to present poorer DSS. Further studies are needed to standardize the surgical management of these patients.